Optimum Design of Passive Control Devices for Reducing the Seismic Response of Twin-Tower-Connected Structures

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 826-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiaoyun Wu ◽  
Jianzhou Dai ◽  
Hongping Zhu
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Hiramoto ◽  
Taichi Matsuoka ◽  
Katsuaki Sunakoda ◽  
Akira Fukukita ◽  
Issei Yamazaki

We propose a semi-active control of civil structures based on a one-step-ahead prediction of the seismic response. The vibration control device (VCD), which has been developed by authors, generates two types of resistance forces, i.e., a damping force proportional to the relative velocity and an inertial force proportional to the relative acceleration between two stories. The damping coefficient of the VCD can be changed with a command signal to an electric circuit connected to the VCD. In the present paper the command signal for changing the damping coefficient of each VCD is assumed to take two values, i.e., the command to take the maximum or minimum damping coefficient. The optimal command signal is selected from all candidates of command signals so that the Euclidean norm of the one-step-ahead predicted seismic response is minimized. As an example a semi-active control of a fifteen-story building with three VCDs is considered. The simulation results show that the proposed semi-active control achieves superior performance on vibration suppression compared with a passive control case where the damping coefficient of each VCD is fixed at its maximum value.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 065004 ◽  
Author(s):  
O E Ozbulut ◽  
P N Roschke ◽  
P Y Lin ◽  
C H Loh

2014 ◽  
Vol 1010-1012 ◽  
pp. 250-253
Author(s):  
Ji Yang Li ◽  
Wen Fang Zhang

Seismic can be divided into passive seismic and active seismic. Seismic isolation technology belong to the second type. Base isolation structure is defined by setting the isolation layer between the superstructure and foundation building, to extend the natural period architecture, increasing the damping to reduce structural seismic response. It is a passive control system. Compared with the traditional seismic structure, it mainly through the isolation layer to absorb and dissipate energy, reducing the response to the earthquake.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waseem Sarwar ◽  
Rehan Sarwar

Abstract Retrofit and structural design with vibration control devices have been proven repeatedly to be feasible seismic hazard mitigation approach. To control the structural response; supplemental energy dissipation devices have been most commonly used for energy absorption. The passive control system has been successfully incorporated in mid to high rise buildings as an appropriate energy absorbing system to suppress seismic and wind-induced excitation. The considerable theses that are highlighted include vibration control devices, the dynamic behavior of devices; energy dissipation mechanism, devices installation approach and building guidelines for structural analysis and design employing vibration control devices also, design concern that is specific to building with vibration control devices. The following four types of supplemental damping devices have been investigated in this review: metallic devices, friction devices, viscous fluid devices, and viscoelastic devices. Although numerous devices installation techniques available, more precisely, devices installation approaches have been reviewed in this paper, including Analysis and Redesign approach (Lavan A/R), standard placement approach, simplified sequential search algorithm, and Takewaki approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document