Self-reported health problems due to prescription drug use and non-medical use of prescription drugs – a population-based study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Karoliina Karjalainen ◽  
Solja Niemelä ◽  
Sanna Rönkä ◽  
Tomi Lintonen
2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-778-S-779
Author(s):  
Zoann Nugent ◽  
Laura E. Targownik ◽  
Charles N. Bernstein

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-249.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie R. Daw ◽  
Barbara Mintzes ◽  
Michael R. Law ◽  
Gillian E. Hanley ◽  
Steven G. Morgan

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Shun Weng ◽  
Yi-Hua Chen ◽  
Ching-Chun Lin ◽  
Joseph J. Keller ◽  
I-Te Wang ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. 1125-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua J. Gagne ◽  
Vittorio Maio ◽  
Vincenzo Berghella ◽  
Daniel Z. Louis ◽  
Joseph S. Gonnella

NASPA Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan A Kolek

The purpose of this study was to explore recreational prescription drug use among undergraduate students. Although anecdotal accounts on this subject abound, empirical research is extremely limited. Data from a survey of a random sample of 734 students at a large public research university in the Northeast were examined. Results indicate that a substantial proportion of students reported having used prescription drugs for recreational purposes in the year prior to survey administration. Recreational prescription drug use was positively associated with the use of other substances including alcohol. Recreational prescription drug users were also more likely than other drug users to report negative consequences as a result of their drug use. Implications for future research and for student affairs are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinikka L. Kvamme ◽  
Michael M. Pedersen ◽  
Kristine Rømer Thomsen ◽  
Birgitte Thylstrup

Abstract Background The use of cannabis as medicine (CaM) both prescribed and non-prescribed has increased markedly in the last decade, mirrored in a global shift in cannabis policy towards a more permissive stance. There is some evidence that cannabis functions as a substitute for prescription drugs, particularly opioids; however, more knowledge is needed on the motives of substitution users, their patterns of use, and perceived effects of substitution use. Aims To explore who substitutes prescription drugs with cannabis, the type of prescription drugs substituted and the type of cannabis used, and the impact that substitution with cannabis has on prescription drug use as well as the motives for substitution in terms of experienced effects and side effects. Methods A self-selected convenience sample was recruited through social media, public media, and patient organizations to take part in an anonymous online survey. Inclusion criteria were 18 years or older and use of cannabis (prescribed or non-prescribed) with a medical purpose. Results The final sample included 2.841 respondents of which the majority (91%) used non-prescribed cannabis, and more than half (54.6%) had used CaM with the purpose of replacing a prescribed drug. Compared to non-substitution users, substitution users were more likely to be women and to use CaM in the treatment of chronic pain and other somatic conditions. Pain medication (67.2%), antidepressants (24.5%), and arthritis medication (20.7%) were the most common types of drugs replaced with CaM. Among substitution users, 38.1% reported termination of prescription drug use, and 45.9% a substantial decrease in prescription drug use. The most frequent type of cannabis used as a substitute was CBD-oil (65.2%), followed by ‘hash, pot or skunk’ (36.6%). More than half (65.8%) found CaM much more effective compared to prescription drugs, and 85.5% that the side effects associated with prescription drug use were much worse compared to use of CaM. Conclusion CaM is frequently used as a substitute for prescription drugs, particularly opioids. More research is needed on the long-term consequences of use of CaM, including the impact from low and high THC cannabis products on specific somatic and mental health conditions.


1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 566-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Al Bingefors ◽  
Dag Gl Isacson ◽  
Lars Von Knorring ◽  
Björn Smedby

Objective: To analyze healthcare and prescription drug use among patients taking and those not taking antidepressant drugs in a Swedish community. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: General population of the rural Swedish municipality Tierp of approximately 20 000 inhabitants. Participants: All residents of Tierp aged 25 years or older during 1988. Main Outcome Measures: Mean number of ambulatory care visits, hospital bed days, and prescriptions per person; proportion of those taking prescription drugs in different pharmacologic classes. Results: Patients treated with antidepressant drugs had a significantly (p < 0.05) greater use of ambulatory care, hospital care, and prescription drugs than those who did not take antidepressants in the study population. They also had an increased frequency of use of prescription drugs from virtually all pharmacologic classes. Furthermore, the risk for polypharmacy was high in patients treated with antidepressant medications. Conclusions: Those who took antidepressant drugs consumed more health services and prescription drugs than did those not taking an antidepressant. Patients receiving antidepressant treatment may be at serious risk for iatrogenic disease and should be evaluated carefully with respect to concomitant drug use.


2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 653-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Engeland ◽  
Jørgen G. Bramness ◽  
Anne Kjersti Daltveit ◽  
Marit Rønning ◽  
Svetlana Skurtveit ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1120-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tove M. Jörgensen ◽  
Dag G.L. Isacson ◽  
Mats Thorslund

OBJECTIVE: To analyze prescription drug use among the elderly in a Swedish municipality. METHODS: The municipality of Tierp, located in mideastern Sweden, is a well-defined geographic area that includes both rural areas and a few small, industrial towns. All people aged 65 years and older (n=4769) as of 1986 in a total population of 21000 inhabitants were included in the study. Their drug use was studied by registering all prescriptions filled by the pharmacies in the area. RESULTS: Most of the elderly (>70 percent) obtained at least one prescription during the year studied. Drug use was more common among women than men. However, the difference between men and women was much smaller among those aged 85 years or more. The drugs most commonly prescribed were cardiovascular, psychotropic, and analgesic agents. Furthermore, the study showed that simultaneous use of several drugs was quite common. One-fourth of all people aged 65 years and older used drugs from at least four different pharmacologic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed widespread use of prescription drugs among the elderly. An important finding was extensive drug use among men aged 85 years or more. This age group is increasing and there is need for further studies of its medication use.


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Bingefors

<strong><span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;"><font face="TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT"><p align="left"> </p></font></span><p align="left"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;">ABSTRACT</span></span></p></strong><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><p align="left">Much of our knowledge of drugs originates from clinical trials of drug efficacy performed on stringently</p><p align="left">selected patient groups, often without multiple concurrent diseases. However, the effectiveness of treatment</p><p align="left">under conditions of use in ordinary clinical practice may be very different to conditions in the</p><p align="left">randomised clinical trial. Use of large computerised data bases and record linkage has thus become</p><p align="left">increasingly common in pharmacoepidemiologic research. The greatest advantages of using routinely</p><p align="left">collected data are the minimisation of study costs and time required to complete a study, considerations</p><p align="left">that are particularly relevant for longitudinal studies. The advantages of using data bases also include the</p><p align="left">possibility of obtaining large sample sizes and to retrospectively study long-term outcomes. The risk for</p><p align="left">recall bias, a significant problem in interviews and questionnaires, is also reduced. However, computerised</p><p align="left">data bases also have some potentially serious disadvantages, primarily in the areas of data validity</p><p align="left">and data availability. The Tierp study, including individually based data bases of prescription drug use,</p><p align="left">will be used here as an example of research. In this paper an example of a comprehensive data base study</p><p align="left">concerning health care and drug utilisation in depressed patients is presented. Methodological considerations</p><p align="left">in data base research are discussed in relation to experiences from the antidepressant study. A well</p><p align="left">planned and research oriented computerised data base on prescription drugs represents an important tool</p><p>in the study of the outcome of drug treatment in real world clinical practice.</p></span></span>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document