Adoption of sustainable agricultural technologies for vegetable production in rural Tanzania: trade-offs, complementarities and diffusion

Author(s):  
Justus Ochieng ◽  
Victor Afari-Sefa ◽  
Francis Muthoni ◽  
Monica Kansiime ◽  
Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 2537-2551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben D’Exelle ◽  
Els Lecoutere ◽  
Bjorn Van Campenhout

Author(s):  
Francesco Lissoni

This chapter summarizes the results of the project titled Academic Patenting in Europe (APE-INV). The key aims of the project are the creation and diffusion of a harmonized database on academic patenting in Europe. The database allows for the investigation of the economic returns of academic patenting at the scientist, university, and industry level. It also helps to investigate the extent of synergies and trade-offs between patenting and other technology transfer means such as consultancy, mobility of personnel, as well as teaching, conferencing, and publishing. Finally, it provides the basis for the creation of a larger database on inventors in Europe, to be used in studies on knowledge diffusion and labour mobility. The basic evidence from the database is opposed to the view that the European universities are lagging behind the US in terms of universities’ contribution to patenting. The bulk of academic patents remained in the hands of the companies having strong ties with academic scientists. The European policies mainly addressed the narrow issue of technology transfer and patent ownership, and were not strong enough to change the fundamentals of the research systems.


1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-150
Author(s):  
Reuben Ausher

The introduction of microcomputer (MC)-supported technologies to agricultural production, protection, marketing, environment protection and R&D management is an opportunity which could lead to improvements in both production and resource management. In agricultural extension and research, more specifically, MC-support could contribute to more professionalism among staff and revitalize the efficiency of these systems in generating and formulating powerful messages and carrying them to the farming clientele and the agricultural knowledge system at large, with new and improved communication, training and education tools.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-156
Author(s):  
MAU Alam ◽  
M Hossain ◽  
MI Mia ◽  
MAAH Talukder ◽  
MMU Haque ◽  
...  

A field experiment was conducted in the farmer’s field at Salaipur, Mithapukur, On Farm Research Division, Rangpur during 2015-2016to control cucurbit fruit fly effectively through the use of sex pheromone trap. The trial was conducted among six farmers. Three treatments viz., T1 (Sex pheromone + Poison bait + Sanitation (9 spot)), T2 (Sex pheromone + Poison bait + Sanitation (16 spot)) and T3 (Farmers practice) were compared.  The total land area was 7200m2. The higher fruit yield (63.99t/ha) was obtained from T2 (Sex pheromone + Poison bait + Sanitation (16 spot). The lower fruit yield (27.99 t/ha) was obtained from T3. The gross margin (Tk. 294706/ha) and gross return was also higher with the use of T2 (Sex pheromone + Poison bait + Sanitation (16 spot).The highest gross margin and gross return was found in T2 (Sex pheromone + Poison bait + Sanitation (16 spot) treatment. Use of insect lures can improve safe vegetable production as well as yield. Innovative agricultural technologies have the potential to increase yield and income of smallholder vegetable farmers in the northern region of Bangladesh. Progressive Agriculture 30 (2): 150-156, 2019


Author(s):  
Sushan Chowhan

Agriculture is being highly technologized today; to sustain production and gain higher yields, farmers have to be updated regarding available technologies. As the land area is decreasing, there’s always a challenge to increase production and earn profit. Therefore, technological innovations also change farmers’ socio-economic conditions. Considering this, an interview on three categories (landless, marginal, small) of 15 farmers was conducted at the Jagannathpur union of Kumarkhali upazilla under the Kushtia district to investigate the socio-economic status, problems in crop production, potentials, limitations of rural development and adoption extent of modern agricultural technologies. Outcomes expressed that, a major source of annual income (1,20,800 Tk) of landless farmers were from non-agricultural works; contrary, marginal (2,89,000 Tk) and small (3,89,200 Tk) farmers’ prime source of income was from agricultural origins. It was a positive sign that all categories of farm families spent a good sum of money for educating children immediately after food expenditure. All the farmers had drinking water, electricity and hygienic toilet facilities at their dwelling house. The problem confrontation index (PCI) of rural development was highest in lack of capital (36). Physical and social PCI was identified as limited natural resources (32) and reduction of croplands (28), respectively. Concerning technology adoption, 14% used biofertilizer, 12% followed a modern model of vegetable production, 12% collected quality seeds, 10% exercised mulching, 10% used perching and 10% imitated seed preservation techniques. Top PCI for crop production was high input cost (36) followed by lack of technical knowledge (34). Most of the respondents agreed that agricultural production directly contributes to food security (34), increased nutrition (32) and financial safety (30).


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-62
Author(s):  
Murari Suvedi ◽  
Ramjee P. Ghimire

Agricultural extension services in Nepal are in serious need of revival. An extension approach that brings agricultural stakeholders together and fosters co-learning among them is paramount for agricultural development. This study, conducted in 2013 in Hamsapur, Nepal, aims to assess the current agricultural extension services and search for an alternative extension strategy for speedy agricultural development. Specifically, the study seeks to examine the current agricultural production patterns; assess farmers’ perceptions of the participatory action research (PAR) approach; and identify barriers for adoption of new agricultural technologies by farmers. Personal interviews and observations were employed for collecting qualitative and quantitative data. Ninety-two farmers participated in the study. Farmers, including women and youths, found off-season tomato production beneficial to them. Marketing of vegetables and lack of irrigation, education and knowledge are problems facing farmers. Farmers are optimistic about increasing farm productivity by adopting new and improved technologies. The PAR approach appears to be effective in helping smallholders when non-governmental organizations, farmers and educational institutions work together. Agricultural programs would likely succeed if there were provision of input such as seeds, fertilizers and farmer-to-farmer extension, and if technologies were market-driven and compatible with target communities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 160 ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barnabas K. Kurgat ◽  
Silke Stöber ◽  
Samuel Mwonga ◽  
Hermann Lotze-Campen ◽  
Todd S. Rosenstock

Author(s):  
Saikou E. Sanyang

Agricultural technology development and transfer is a driving force for national development. The perspective is to reduce poverty and hunger facing people by adopting new measures to raise income and attain household food security. This is attainable through the establishment of research institutions, extension services, farmer organizations, and public private participation. The primary function of extension service is to deliver efficient and effective transfer of agricultural technologies to farmers as a factor for rural development. The importance of technology development and transfer approaches in developing countries has been recognized as a tool for economic development. Technology development and transfer economics create employment opportunities, reduce poverty, and enhance economic growth. Therefore, better agricultural technologies and better policies can serve as catalysts for economic return. This chapter examines the components of agricultural technology development and transfer and offers implied lessons for emerging technologies like nanotechnology and microelectronics transfer and diffusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document