The APOE ε4 variant and hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy body dementia: a systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging studies and therapeutic relevance

Author(s):  
Usman Saeed ◽  
Philippe Desmarais ◽  
Mario Masellis
Author(s):  
U Saeed ◽  
P Desmarais ◽  
M Masellis

Background: The ɛ4-allele of apolipoprotein E (APOE-ɛ4) increases the risk not only for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but also for Parkinson’s disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies (collectively, Lewy body dementia [LBD]). Hippocampal volume is an important neuroimaging biomarker for AD and LBD, although its association with APOE-ɛ4 is inconsistently reported. We investigated the association of APOE-ε4 with hippocampal atrophy quantified using magnetic resonance imaging in AD and LBD. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science) were systematically searched for studies published up until December 31st, 2020. Results: Thirty-nine studies (25 cross-sectional, 14 longitudinal) were included. We observed that: (1) APOE-ε4 was associated with greater rate of hippocampal atrophy in AD and those who progressed from mild cognitive impairment to AD, (2) APOE-ε4 carriers showed greater involvement of cornu ammonis-1 hippocampal subfield versus non-carriers in AD, (3) APOE-ɛ4 may influence hippocampal atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies, although longitudinal investigations are required, and (4) APOE-ε4 associated with earlier rather than very late expression of mediotemporal degeneration and memory-related neurocognitive impairment. Conclusions: The role of APOE-ɛ4 in modulating hippocampal phenotypes may be further clarified through more homogenous, well-powered, pathology-proven studies. Understanding the underlying mechanisms will facilitate development of prevention strategies targeting APOE-ɛ4.


Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 3010
Author(s):  
Andy Wai Kan Yeung ◽  
Natalie Sui Miu Wong

This systematic review aimed to reveal the differential brain processing of sugars and sweeteners in humans. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies published up to 2019 were retrieved from two databases and were included into the review if they evaluated the effects of both sugars and sweeteners on the subjects’ brain responses, during tasting and right after ingestion. Twenty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The number of participants per study ranged from 5 to 42, with a total number of study participants at 396. Seven studies recruited both males and females, 7 were all-female and 6 were all-male. There was no consistent pattern showing that sugar or sweeteners elicited larger brain responses. Commonly involved brain regions were insula/operculum, cingulate and striatum, brainstem, hypothalamus and the ventral tegmental area. Future studies, therefore, should recruit a larger sample size, adopt a standardized fasting duration (preferably 12 h overnight, which is the most common practice and brain responses are larger in the state of hunger), and reported results with familywise-error rate (FWE)-corrected statistics. Every study should report the differential brain activation between sugar and non-nutritive sweetener conditions regardless of the complexity of their experiment design. These measures would enable a meta-analysis, pooling data across studies in a meaningful manner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document