Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy choices for patients with atrial fibrillation one year after coronary stenting or acute coronary syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph B. Olivier ◽  
Mintu P. Turakhia ◽  
Kenneth W. Mahaffey
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Nunez Martinez ◽  
N V-Ibarra ◽  
F Marin Ortuno ◽  
V Pernias Escrig ◽  
M Sandin Rollan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher atherothrombotic risk and higher rates of recurrent ischemic events compared with the non-diabetic population. Although current antiplatelet therapy strategies have been shown to be successful in improving outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), patients with DM continue to experience high rates of adverse cardiovascular events. Today, it is known that diabetic patients are characterized by a deregulation in different intracellular signaling pathways, which leads to an inadequate or suboptimal response to antiplatelets agents. The purpose of this study is to analyze the different therapeutic strategies, the use of new antiplatelet drugs and medium-term prognosis in diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic patients who have suffered an ACS. Methods It is an observational, prospective and multicenter registry of patients with ACS. The objective is to analyze the differences in the management of DM patients vs non-DM patients in the acute phase and their evolution during the first year after coronary event. Antiplatelet therapy administered will be evaluated, type of coronary injury and treatment performed, major adverse events as well as cardiovascular complications and mortality at one year of follow-up. Results Of a total of 1717 patients, 38% were diabetic. The diabetic population was older, with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and higher rate of previous cardiovascular events (cerebrovascular, peripheral arterial disease and coronary disease). Patients with DM received less new antiplatelets drugs at admission (15.5% DM vs 26.5% non DM, p<0.001) and less in-hospital switch to new antiplatelet agents was performed. They were subjected to a lower number of catheterizations and at the time of revascularization, the drug-eluting stent was of choice. During admission, they developed more complications, both ischemic (refractory angina, reinfarction or CVA) and hemorrhagic. Following one year, DM had higher major cardiovascular events (MACE) and higher mortality (7.72% vs 5.14%, p=0.0039). Non-coronary revascularization, renal failure, and reduced ejection fraction were predictive variables of death in diabetic population. Treatment with new antiplatelet drugs was associated with a statistically significant decrease in total mortality an MACE without differences in major bleeding. Conclusion More than a third of patients with ACS are diabetic. These patients present with more severe coronary disease associating a greater number of cardiovascular events and a higher mortality rate after one year of ACS. However, despite this, they undergo less invasive tests and they were undertreated with the new antiplatelets therapies. Acknowledgement/Funding SEC


Hematology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 547-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Mega ◽  
Edward T. Carreras

Abstract Antithrombotic therapy plays an essential role in the management of some of the most common and morbid medical conditions. Triple oral antithrombotic therapy (TOAT) is defined as the administration of both therapeutic oral anticoagulation (OAC) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to patients with indications for both treatments. The current societal guidelines regarding TOAT are derived from observational studies and some trials of the use of warfarin in addition to antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. The general apprehension to administer TOAT is due to the heightened concern for bleeding, rendering warfarin's pharmacokinetic properties concerning. Newer anticoagulant agents may serve as appealing alternatives, and further investigations are warranted. The results of the recent trials that have studied the use of these agents in atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome offer some useful applications to TOAT. Ultimately, selecting the most favorable antithrombotic strategy is going to involve weighing the risks and benefits for each patient.


2009 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Bagur ◽  
Olivier F. Bertrand ◽  
Josep Rodés-Cabau ◽  
Stéphane Rinfret ◽  
Éric Larose ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e0186961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Patti ◽  
Ilaria Cavallari ◽  
Emilia Antonucci ◽  
Paolo Calabrò ◽  
Plinio Cirillo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R. Sinnaeve ◽  
Walter Desmet ◽  
Olivier Descamps ◽  
Sofie Gevaert ◽  
Guy De Backer ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e041044
Author(s):  
Leonardo De Luca ◽  
Andrea Rubboli ◽  
Leonardo Bolognese ◽  
Lucio Gonzini ◽  
Stefano Urbinati ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to assess current management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing coronary stenting.DesignNon-interventional, prospective, nationwide study.Setting76 private or public cardiology centres in Italy.ParticipantsPatients with ACS with concomitant AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Primary and secondary outcome measuresTo obtain accurate and up-to-date information on pharmacological management of patients with AF admitted for an ACS and undergoing PCI with stent implantation.ResultsOver a 12-month period, 598 consecutive patients were enrolled: 48.8% with AF at hospital admission and 51.2% developing AF during hospitalisation. At discharge, a triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) was prescribed in 64.8%, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in 25.7% and dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) in 8.8% of patients. Among patients with AF at admission, TAT and DAT were more frequently prescribed compared with patients with new-onset AF (76.3% vs 53.8% and 12.5% vs 5.3%, respectively; both p<0.0001), while a DAPT was less often used (11.2% vs 39.5%; p<0.0001). At multivariable analysis, a major bleeding event (OR: 5.40; 95% CI: 2.42 to 12.05; p<0.0001) and malignancy (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 1.77 to 14.78; p=0.003) resulted the most important independent predictors of DAT prescription.ConclusionsIn this contemporary registry of patients with ACS with AF treated with coronary stents, TAT still resulted as the antithrombotic strategy of choice, DAT was reserved for high bleeding risk and DAPT was mainly prescribed in those developing AF during hospitalisation.Trial registration numberNCT03656523.


2019 ◽  
pp. 20-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Kashtalap ◽  
O. L. Barbarash

Based on the recommendations of the European Heart Society and the results of clinical and register studies, the article highlights the complex issues that arise when prescribing antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome, including with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF); the promising strategies for managing the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic events are described. Also a clinical case of a patient with acute coronary syndrome and AF is presented, illustrating the objective complexity of correct selection of antiplatelet therapy in such patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document