The World Health Organization (WHO) hearing impairment guidelines and a speech recognition in noise (SRN) disorder

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Vermiglio ◽  
Xiangming Fang
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
World Health Organization ◽  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
World Health ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Speech Recognition In Noise

An Evaluation of the World Health Organization and American Medical Association Ratings of Hearing Impairment and Simulated Single-Sided Deafness

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (07) ◽  
pp. 634-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Vermiglio ◽  
Stephanie Griffin ◽  
Courtney Post ◽  
Xiangming Fang
Keyword(s):  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
World Health ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Single Sided Deafness ◽  
Speech Recognition In Noise ◽  
Pure Tone Threshold

AbstractAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), a pure-tone threshold average (PTA) ≤25 dB HL for the better ear represents “no impairment.” This implies that patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) would have “no or very slight hearing problems.” According to the American Medical Association (AMA), a patient with SSD would receive a binaural hearing impairment rating of 16.7%. The premise of the WHO and AMA methods is that PTA is related to the ability to perceive speech in everyday environments.The overall goal of the study was to evaluate the WHO and AMA criteria for the rating of hearing impairment. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of simulated SSD on the ability to recognize speech in the presence of background noise in terms of binaural and spatial advantage measures.Study participants were tested using the standard protocol for the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) in both binaural and monaural conditions using a simulated soundfield environment under headphones. The target sentences were presented at 0°. Binaural thresholds were obtained for the Noise Front (0°), Noise Left (270°), and Noise Right (90°) listening conditions. Monaural thresholds were collected for each ear for the Noise Front condition and for the unshadowed ear for the Noise Left and Noise Right conditions. Binaural advantage was determined by subtracting the binaural from the monaural thresholds. Spatial advantage was determined by subtracting the Noise Side from the Noise Front thresholds.Twenty-five young native speakers of English with normal pure-tone thresholds (≤25 dB HL, 250–8000 Hz) participated in the study.Pure-tone threshold data were collected using the modified Hughson–Westlake procedure. Speech recognition in noise data were collected using a Windows-based HINT software system. The binaural and spatial advantage measures were calculated from the HINT thresholds. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, correlation coefficients, and matched-pairs t-tests.The average binaural advantage for the Noise Front conditions was 1.21 dB (p < 0.01) or a maximum estimated intelligibility improvement of 12.01% when the speech and noise were presented at 0°. The average binaural advantage across the Noise Side conditions was 11.25 dB (p < 0.01) or a maximum estimated intelligibility improvement of 84.09% when the noise was spatially separated from the speech. The average spatial advantage for the binaural conditions was 6.72 dB (p < 0.01) or a maximum estimated intelligibility improvement of 60.03%. The average spatial advantage for the monaural conditions was −3.32 dB or a maximum estimated decrease in intelligibility of 32.27%.The results do not support the WHO or AMA hearing impairment ratings for SSD. The WHO and AMA criteria for the determination of hearing impairment should be updated to include speech recognition in noise testing with and without the spatial separation of the speech and noise stimuli. In this way actual, as opposed to inferred perceptions of speech in noisy environments, may be determined. This will provide a much-needed improvement in the ratings of hearing impairment.

Erstes Instrument zur standardisierten Erfassung der Teilhabe Behinderter

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (07) ◽  
pp. 526-527
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
World Health ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Menschen Mit Behinderung

Coenen M et al. [Recommendation for the collection and analysis of data on participation and disability from the perspective of the World Health Organization]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2016; 59: 1060–1067 Um eine gleichberechtigte Teilhabe an der Gesellschaft von Menschen mit Behinderung zu ermöglichen, werden zunächst Daten zu vorhandenen Einschränkungen gebraucht. Erst wenn diese detailliert erhoben wurden, können Konzepte zur Beseitigung von Problemen entwickelt werden. Ein standardisiertes Erhebungsinstrument für alle Aspekte der Funktionsfähigkeit fehlte jedoch bisher.

Recomendações de equipamentos de proteção individual no combate ao COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (31) ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
Nicole Maria Miyamoto Bettini ◽  
Fabiana Tomé Ramos ◽  
Priscila Masquetto Vieira de Almeida
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Health Personnel ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
World Health ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Effective Strategy ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization

A Organização Mundial da Saúde - OMS confirmou a circulação internacional do novo Coronavírus em janeiro de 2020, nomeando-o como COVID-19 e, declarando uma pandemia. É de extrema importância que durante a pandemia, os profissionais de saúde tenham acesso e conhecimento sobre o uso correto dos Equipamentos de Proteção Individual (EPIs) e suas indicações, tomando assim, as devidas precauções na prevenção de infecções. O presente estudo buscou identificar a padronização mundial quanto ao uso dos EPIs utilizados no atendimento a pacientes suspeitos e/ou confirmados de COVID-19 no Brasil, EUA, China, Espanha, Itália e demais países europeus. Os guidelines apresentam a padronização quanto ao uso dos EPIs utilizados no atendimento a suspeitos e/ou confirmados de COVID-19, indo ao encontro das recomendações fornecidas pela OMS. Até o momento, o uso de EPIs é sem dúvida a estratégia mais importante e eficaz para proteger os profissionais de saúde durante a assistência ao paciente com COVID-19.Descritores: Infecções por Coronavírus, Equipamento de Proteção Individual, Pessoal de Saúde, Enfermagem. Recommendations for personal protective equipment to combat COVID-19Abstract: The World Health Organization - WHO confirmed the international circulation of the new Coronavirus in January 2020, naming it as COVID-19 and declaring a pandemic. It is extremely important that during the pandemic, health professionals have access and knowledge about the correct use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and its indications, thus taking appropriate precautions to prevent infections. The present study sought to identify the worldwide standardization regarding the use of PPE utilized to take care of suspected and confirmed patients with COVID-19 in Brazil, USA, China, Spain, Italy and other European countries. The guidelines present a standardization regarding the use of PPE utilized to take care of suspected and confirmed with COVID-19, in line with the recommendations provided by WHO. To date, the use of PPE is undoubtedly the most important and effective strategy to protect healthcare professionals during care for patients with COVID-19.Descriptors: Coronavirus Infections, Personal Protective Equipment, Health Personnel, Nursing. Recomendaciones para el equipo de protección personal para combatir COVID-19Resumen: La Organización Mundial de la Salud - La OMS confirmó la circulación internacional del nuevo Coronavirus en enero de 2020, nombrándolo COVID-19 y declarando una pandemia. Es extremadamente importante que durante la pandemia, los profesionales de la salud tengan acceso y conocimiento sobre el uso correcto del Equipo de Protección Personal (EPP) y sus indicaciones, tomando así las precauciones adecuadas para prevenir infecciones. El presente estudio buscó identificar la estandarización mundial con respecto al uso de EPP utilizado para atender a pacientes sospechosos y/o confirmados con COVID-19 en Brasil, Estados Unidos, China, España, Italia y otros países europeos. Las pautas presentan la estandarización con respecto al uso de EPP utilizado para cuidar COVID-19 sospechoso y/o confirmado, de acuerdo con las recomendaciones proporcionadas por la OMS. Hasta la fecha, el uso de EPP es, sin duda, la estrategia más importante y efectiva para proteger a los profesionales de la salud durante la atención de pacientes con COVID-19.Descriptores: Infecciones por Coronavirus, Equipo de Protección Personal, Personal de Salud, Enfermería.

Current updates on COVID-19 - A review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ghotekar D S ◽  
Vishal N Kushare ◽  
Sagar V Ghotekar
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
Common Cold ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Gastrointestinal Diseases ◽  
Hubei Province ◽  
World Health ◽  
The World ◽  
The Common ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Health Organization

Coronaviruses are a family of viruses that cause illness such as respiratory diseases or gastrointestinal diseases. Respiratory diseases can range from the common cold to more severe diseases. A novel coronavirus outbreak was first documented in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in December 2019. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. A global coordinated effort is needed to stop the further spread of the virus. A novel coronavirus (nCoV) is a new strain that has not been identified in humans previously. Once scientists determine exactly what coronavirus it is, they give it a name (as in the case of COVID-19, the virus causing it is SARS-CoV-2).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document