Is There a ‘Right to Try’ Experimental Therapies? Ethical Criteria for Selecting Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy to Receive Nusinersen in an Expanded Access Program

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 70-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy S. Jecker
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
S. B. Artemieva ◽  
L. M. Kuzenkova ◽  
E. S. Ilyina ◽  
Yu. A. Kursakova ◽  
L. M. Kolpakchi ◽  
...  

Introduction. Spinal muscular atrophy is a severe neuromuscular disease characterized by rapid progression of muscle weakness and early death. Pathogenetic therapy with nusinersen can significantly change the course of the disease and enable the patient to acquire new skills. The study of the efficacy and safety of nusinersen therapy in patients with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy should be continued. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of nusinersen therapy in patients with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy for 6 months as part of an expanded access program at federal and regional healthcare facilities. Materials and methods. Patients with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy received nusinersen therapy under the expanded access program (NCT02865109). Patients were evaluated before starting treatment and 6 months after starting treatment. Overall motor development and motor function was assessed using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Status Scale Part 2 and the Philadelphia Pediatric Hospital Neonatal Motor Scale. Results. 41 children aged 6 to 38 months received nusinersen therapy between July 2019 and March 2020. At the time of analysis, all patients were alive and continued treatment. The average improvement on the Hammersmith Hospital Neurological Status Scale was 3.7 points after 6 months of therapy compared to baseline (n = 39, p <0.001). The mean improvement on the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Scale for the Diagnosis of Motor Function in Newborns was 9.8 after 6 months of therapy from baseline (n = 30, p <0.001). Conclusion. The efficacy and safety of nusinersen have been demonstrated in real clinical practice in Russia in the treatment of early-onset spinal muscular atrophy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Elena Gargaun

Une révolution est actuellement en cours dans le domaine des maladies neuromusculaires avec l’arrivée de nouvelles thérapies. L’amyotrophie spinale (SMA ou spinal muscular atrophy) est parmi les maladies pionnières de ce bouleversement thérapeutique. Le premier traitement approuvé et mis sur le marché en Europe et aux États-Unis est un oligonucléotide antisens dénommé nusinersen et commercialisé par le laboratoire Biogen sous le nom de Spinraza®. Il a comme indication les SMA de types 1, 2 et 3. La première injection de Spinraza® dans le cadre d’une ATU/EAP (Autorisation Temporaire d’Utilisation/Expanded Access Program ou programmes d’accès étendu) a été réalisée en France par le centre d’essais l-Motion. Les résultats des essais cliniques et des données de la littérature sur l’utilisation du nusinersen dans la SMA infantile sont discutés dans cette revue. Ces études rapportent une amélioration de la fonction motrice chez les patients SMA tous types confondus y compris les patients de type 3 [1, 2]. Une administration précoce du traitement s’accompagne d’une meilleure réponse clinique. Une meilleure compréhension de l’hétérogénéité génétique et clinique devient indispensable dans le monitoring et le suivi à long terme de ces patients.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1214-1214
Author(s):  
Yves Bertrand ◽  
Nicolas Boissel ◽  
Claudine Schmitt ◽  
Alban Villate ◽  
Emmanuel Gyan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Asparaginase is an important part of the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Hypersensitivity is found in 16.8% of patients treated with pegylated asparaginase (PEG-asp). Hypersensitivity is the most common cause of truncated asparaginase therapy which has been associated with decreased event free survival. Asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in erythrocytes (eryaspase) is an alternative formulation of ASNase aiming to prolong the half-life of ASNase and to reduce toxicity e.g. hypersensitivity, since the erythrocyte membrane protects asparaginase against elimination and prevents activation of the immune system. In the NOR-GRASPALL 2016 trial eryaspase consistently demonstrated prolonged ASNase activity in patients who developed hypersensitivity reactions to PEG-asp. Treatment with eryaspase was well tolerated when combined with multiagent chemotherapy. The objective of this expanded access program was to explore the tolerability of eryaspase (150 U/Kg) combined with polychemotherapy in patients under 55 years of age with ALL, unable or at risk to receive any other available ASNase formulation. Patients in this study had developed hypersensitivities to prior E-Coli- and Erwinia-derived asparaginase therapies. Methods This was a non-randomized, multicentre, open label, Phase 1 study to assess the limiting toxicities, global safety and biological efficacy of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy regimens. Patients were under 55 years of age with ALL de novo or in relapse or refractory; eligible for a chemotherapy treatment including ASNase; known contraindication and/or at risk of toxicity from other ASNase formulations. Eryaspase (150 U/Kg) was given as a replacement therapy for the remaining intended courses of asparaginase therapy. The number of courses was not defined and depended on therapeutic treatment chosen by the Investigator and the patient's response and tolerance. The primary endpoint was the exploration of the toxicity of eryaspase defined as the number and percent of patients presenting at least one limiting toxicity (LT) of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy. Major secondary endpoints included: adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and complete remission (CR) status at end of induction and survival status up to 12 months after inclusion. Results Eighteen patients enrolled of which seven (38.8%) patients experienced a total of 24 AE limiting toxicities, which were primarily bone marrow failure, and were indicative of the underlying ALL disease process and of the concomitant chemotherapy-related myelosuppression. All patients experienced at least one AE and Treatment Emergent (TEAE) and most (11 [61.1%] patients) experienced at least one SAE. A total of 17 (94.4%) patients experienced a TEAE of Grade 3 or above. No TEAEs led to withdrawal or dose reduction of eryaspase. Sparse whole blood ASNase concentrations following 150 U/Kg were within the range of concentrations expected for this dose level. At 14 days following the first infusion, the range of whole blood ASNase was 111 to 1160 U/Kg, which would be equivalent to the trough (nadir) for infusions every 2 weeks. Mean and median plasma asparagine (ASN) concentrations over time demonstrated a reduction by approximately 50% at 3 days post eryaspase infusion, followed by a slow return toward baseline before the next infusion of eryaspase. Seventeen (94.4%) patients achieved CR at least once overall. Fourteen (77.8%) patients were alive at the end of the study. Survival rate was 88.9% at 6 months and 77.8% at 12 and 18 months. Conclusion The AE profile of eryaspase was consistent with other studies and was as expected for this cohort of patients. Serious AEs were generally consistent with those that would be expected in this study population. A total of 17 patients in the study achieved a CR at least once overall and 14 were still alive at the end of the study. This study evaluated additional asparaginase therapy in double (and even triple) allergic patient population, who have received prior E-Coli- or Erwinia-derived asparaginase therapy. All patients achieved target asparaginase activity. Therefore, eryaspase provides an additional option for patients for whom further ASNase treatment is contraindicated due to toxicity and/or immunization. Disclosures Boissel: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria. Recher: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MaatPharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. El-Hariry: Erytech: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-393
Author(s):  
Yekaterina Anokhina ◽  
V. Rubinchik ◽  
Yekaterina Yaremenko ◽  
Gulfiya Teletaeva ◽  
Dilorom Latipova ◽  
...  

Ipilimumab (IPI) provides a ten-year overall survival in almost 20 % of selected patients participated in several phase II-III trials. However, the expanded access program (EAP) looks more like routine practice than like clinical trials& This is why the results of such application could be different. Here we present the long-term follow-up data of single center EAP. Ninety-six patients with disseminated melanoma progressing after at least one lines of drug therapy were included at the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology. Sixty-seven (70 %) patients had stage IV M1c, 35 patients (36 %) had elevated LDH before initiating IPI therapy. All patients received IPI 3 mg / kg IV every 3 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. Totally, 320 cycles (mean - 3.3 per patient) were conducted. Grade 3-4 immuno-mediated adverse events (imAE) observed in 18 (19 %) patients. Three patients died of adverse events, possibly associated with ongoing therapy. The median time to progression was 3 (95 % CI, 2.4 to 3.5) mo., the median overall survival was 13 (95 % CI, 8.3 to17.6) mo. Previous immunotherapy with dendritic cell vaccines decreased the risk of death by 48 % (Log-rank p = 0.049). The wild type BRAF status increased three-year overall survival from 29 to 68 % (p = 0.042). Our data confirms long-term safety and efficacy of IPI in patients with pretreated disseminated melanoma in the close to real practice setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document