An Exploratory Investigation of the Relations Among Annual School Absences, Reading Curriculum-Based Measurement, and a High-Stakes State Reading Assessment

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ara Schmitt ◽  
John Balles ◽  
Lindsey Venesky
2020 ◽  
pp. 073428292095014
Author(s):  
Giancarlo A. Anselmo ◽  
Jamie L. Yarbrough ◽  
Van Vi N. Tran

This study analyzed the relationship between benchmark scores from the newly published Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Math (i.e., Acadience™) math probes and student performance on math and reading sections of a state-mandated high-stakes test. Participants were 420 students enrolled in third, fourth, and fifth grades in a rural southeastern school district. Specific to this study was the calculation of the predictive validity of benchmark scores obtained in the spring from curriculum-based measurement probes measuring math computation, math application skills, and reading ability. Results of the study suggest that math application probes have strong predictive validity. The study also provides evidence that even at early grades the skill of reading is associated with performance on a high-stakes math test. The study provides some evidence that calculation skills are needed, but do not account for as much of the variance as reading ability does in grades as low as third grade. Implications for practice are discussed as it relates to multiple gating screening procedures at the elementary level.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-410
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A Lam ◽  
Kristen L McMaster ◽  
Susan Rose

Abstract This review systematically identified and compared the technical adequacy (reliability and validity evidence) of reading curriculum-based measurement (CBM) tasks administered to students who are deaf and hard of hearing (DHH). This review included all available literature written in English. The nine studies identified used four CBM tasks: signed reading fluency, silent reading fluency, cloze (write in missing words given blank lines within a passage), and maze (circle the target word given multiple choice options within a passage). Data obtained from these measures were generally found to be internally consistent and stable with validity evidence varying across measures. Emerging evidence supports the utility of CBM for students who are DHH. Further empirical evidence is needed to continue to explore technical properties, identify if student scores are sensitive to growth over short periods of time, and examine whether CBM data can be used to inform instructional decision-making to improve student outcomes.


2007 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Silberglitt ◽  
John M. Hintze

This study examined the reading growth rates of 7,544 students in Grades 2–6, measured over 1 year using Reading—Curriculum-Based Measurement (R—CBM) benchmark assessments administered in the fall, winter, and spring. The authors used hierarchical linear modeling to establish and compare student rates of growth within each grade level based on initial level of performance. Results suggest that growth rates vary significantly, conditional on initial level of performance, with much lower rates of growth for students at the bottom and top of the distribution. Implications for using R—CBM in a response-to-intervention model are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita M. Payan ◽  
Milena Keller-Margulis ◽  
Andrea B. Burridge ◽  
Samuel D. McQuillin ◽  
Kristen S. Hassett

National test data indicate that some students do not perform well in writing, suggesting a need to identify students at risk for poor performance. Research supports Written Expression Curriculum-Based Measurement (WE-CBM) as an indicator of writing proficiency, but it is less commonly used in practice. This study examined the usability of WE-CBM compared with Reading Curriculum-Based Measurement (R-CBM). Participants included 162 teachers who were given examples of WE-CBM and R-CBM and then completed a usability measure for both curriculum-based measurement (CBM) types. Teachers not only rated WE-CBM as usable but also rated R-CBM significantly higher in usability, with no significant differences in acceptability. Practical implications that may inform modifications to WE-CBM are discussed.


1991 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn S. Fuchs ◽  
Stanley L. Deno

This study assessed the effects of curriculum on technical features within curriculum-based measurement in reading. Curriculum was defined as the difficulty of material and the basal series from which students read. Technical features were the criterion validity and developmental growth rates associated with the measurement. Ninety-one students took a commercial, widely used test of reading comprehension and read orally for 1 minute from each of 19 passages, one from each grade level within two reading series. Correlations between the oral reading samples and the test of reading comprehension were similar across difficulty levels and across series. Developmental growth rates also remained strong regardless of difficulty level and series.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-132
Author(s):  
Bryan D. Miller

Data collection procedures using adapted Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) and Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) were developed for deaf and hard of hearing students. Results from statistical analyses through linear regression indicated that reading fluency scores using CBA and CBM materials adapted for deaf and hard of hearing students significantly predicted total reading standard scores from the Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation or GRADE across a 10-year (2005–2008 and 2012–2014) time span. The purpose of the present article is to review these procedures and significant results, which help to provide a foundation to demonstrate the utility of curriculum-based approaches with deaf and hard of hearing students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document