Evaluations of pretensioner activation in rear impacts

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Chantal S. Parenteau ◽  
David C. Viano ◽  
Roger A. Burnett
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
J Latchford ◽  
E C Chirwa ◽  
T Chen ◽  
M Mao

Car-rear-impact-induced cervical spine injuries present a serious burden on society and, in response, seats offering enhanced protection have been introduced. Seats are evaluated for neck protection performance but only at one specific backrest angle, whereas in the real world this varies greatly owing to the variation in occupant physique. Changing the backrest angle modifies the seat geometry and thereby the nature of its interaction with the occupant. Low-velocity rear-impact tests on a BioRID II anthropomorphic test dummy (ATD) have shown that changes in backrest angle have a significant proportionate effect on dummy kinematics. A close correlation was found between changes in backrest angle and the responses of neck injury predictors such as lower neck loading and lower neck shear but not for the neck injury criterion NICmax. Torso ramping was evident, however, with negligible effect in low-velocity impacts. The backrest angle ranged from 20° to 30° whereas the BioRID II spine was adapted to a range from 20° to 26.5°. Nevertheless, in general, instrumentation outputs correlated well, indicating that this ATD could be used for evaluating seats over a 20–30° range rather than solely at 25° as required by current approval test specifications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel White ◽  
Chantal Parenteau ◽  
Roger Burnett

Author(s):  
Ovidiu Andrei Condrea ◽  
Anghel Chiru ◽  
George Radu Togănel ◽  
Daniel Dragos Trusca

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Declan A. Patton ◽  
Aditya N. Belwadi ◽  
Jalaj Maheshwari ◽  
Kristy B. Arbogast
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Saczalski ◽  
Anthony Sances ◽  
Srirangam Kumaresan ◽  
Steve Meyer ◽  
Joseph Lawson Burton ◽  
...  

Government recommendations have been made to place children into the rear seating areas of motor vehicles in order to alleviate airbag hazards in frontal impact. In most moderate to severe rear impacts, however, the adult occupied front seats will “yield” or “collapse” into the rear seat area and thus pose another potential head and chest injury hazard to the rear seated children. Numerous factors or variables, each with a wide parameter range, influence whether or not an occupied collapsing front seat will result in engagement with the rear occupant, and whether that engagement is likely to cause injury to the rear-seated occupant. A combined experimental and analytical method, employing instrumented surrogates in a sled-buck test set-up, has been utilized to study the multivariable potential injury problem of the rear-seated child in rear impact. A 3 year-old H-III surrogate, seated in the built-in booster seat of a minivan, was used as the rear seat passenger in this study. Five tests were utilized. The experimental surrogate data from the test method is combined into a “polynomial response function” that expresses “injury levels” (i.e. HIC and chest G) as a function of the many variables, and allows for analytical “interpolation and extrapolation” at variable combinations and ranges not tested. Actual accident cases were compared with the biomechanical injury measures. The present study presents a methodology to delineate the biomechanics of injuries using multivariate analysis.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1105-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrawan Kumar ◽  
Robert Ferrari ◽  
Yogesh Narayan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document