Let Your Students “Speak the Speech”: The Academic and Social Benefits of a Performance-Based Approach to Teaching Shakespeare’s Plays to Middle School and High School Students

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Rachel D. Smith
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Dianne S. Goldsby

AS NCTM'S Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000) points out, students should work directly with data to understand the fundamentals of statistical ideas. Teachers should also introduce statistics in a way that will capture the attention of students of varying abilities and interests. The constructivist approach to teaching emphasizes the idea that students work better when presented with tasks that are meaningful and relevant; in other words, they expend energy on topics that interest them (Brahier 2000). One way to harness that energy in the classroom is to teach with music, an area of interest for most middle school and high school students. This article describes the use of the 1950s hit “Lollipop” (Ross and Dixon 1986), heard in the movie Stand by Me, as a launching point to introduce ideas of counting, working with frequency tables, and graphing data.


2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (11) ◽  
pp. 1989-1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanmin Chen ◽  
Gary A. Smith ◽  
Shusong Deng ◽  
Sarah Grim Hostetler ◽  
Huiyun Xiang

Author(s):  
Adriana Berenice Valencia Álvarez ◽  
Jaime Ricardo Valenzuela González

Financial literacy is a combination of financial knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, key for making informed decisions and for solving financial problems. This descriptive study explored the applied, conceptual and procedural financial knowledge of 243 Mexican students via three financial knowledge tests. In addition, these students were surveyed about their financial behavior, their attitudes towards money, and their experience with money using a self-report questionnaire. The study aims to identify financial-education needs and gaps between school levels and systems. Therefore, the analysis focuses on the differences and similarities between two subgroups: (1) students in public and in private education, and between (2) middle school (ages 12 to 15) and high school students (ages 15 to 18). Middle school and high school students differed significantly only in their conceptual knowledge and in their financial experience, while public and private students showed statistical significant differences on their financial knowledge, behavior, attitudes and experience.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-398
Author(s):  
Carl James

Studies of Black students’ schooling experiences and educational outcomes have consistently shown that compared to their peers, they – especially males – tend to underperform academically, be more athletically engaged, and be streamed into non-academic educational programs. These studies tend to focus on high school students, but what of middle school students: is the situation any different? Using a combination of critical race theory and positioning theory, this article presents the results of a 2018 focus group of middle school male students residing in an outer suburb of the Greater Toronto Area. The findings reveal how the nine participants positioned themselves, and were positioned by their teachers, for an education that would enable them to enter high school and become academically successful. Some participants felt that teachers had constructs of them as underperformers, athletes, and troublemakers; others believed teachers saw them as ‘regular students’ and treated them accordingly by supporting their academic and extracurricular activities. How these students read educators’ perceptions of them informed their positioning responses: some adjusted and others resisted. Our findings highlight the urgent need to support Black students in culturally relevant ways during the transition schooling years so that they enter high school ready to meet the social, academic, and pedagogical challenges they will face, graduate, and realize their post high school ambitions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. LoPresti ◽  
Theodore W. Manikas ◽  
Jeff G. Kohlbeck

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document