Put two (and two) together to make the most of physical activity and healthy nutrition – A longitudinal online study examining cross-behavioural mechanisms in multiple health behaviour change

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliane Paech ◽  
Sonia Lippke
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edurne Zabaleta-del-Olmo ◽  
Marc Casajuana-Closas ◽  
Tomàs López-Jiménez ◽  
Haizea Pombo ◽  
Mariona Pons-Vigués ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of: a) a Multiple Health Behaviour Change (MHBC) intervention on reducing smoking, increasing physical activity and adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern in people aged 45-75 years compared to usual care; and b) an implementation strategy. Methods A cluster randomised effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial type 2 with two parallel groups was conducted in 25 Primary Health Care centres (3062 participants): 12 centres (1481 participants) were randomised to the intervention and 13 (1581 participants) to the control group (usual care). The intervention focused on all target behaviours and used individual, group and community approaches. The implementation strategy was based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and a set of discrete implementation strategies which included planning, educating, financing, restructuring and managing quality. Data were analysed using generalised linear mixed models, accounting for clustering. A mixed methods data analysis was used to evaluate implementation outcomes (adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and fidelity) and determinants of implementation success. Results MHBC was greater in the intervention (14.5%) than in the usual care group (8.9%). The overall adoption rate by professionals was 48.7. Early and final appropriateness were perceived by professionals as moderate. Early acceptability was high, whereas final acceptability was only moderate. Initial and final acceptability as perceived by the participants was high, and appropriateness moderate, with a lower initial than final appropriateness perception. Consent and recruitment rates were 82.0% and 65.5%, respectively, intervention uptake was 89.5% and completion rate 74.7%. The global value of percentage of approaches with fidelity ≥ 50% was 16.7%. Eight CFIR constructs distinguished between high and low implementation, five of them corresponding to the Inner Setting domain. Conclusions Compared to usual care, the EIRA intervention was more effective in promoting MHBC. Implementation outcomes were satisfactory except for the fidelity to the planned intervention which was low. The organisational and structural contexts of the centres proved to be significant determinants of implementation effectiveness. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03136211. Registered 2 May 2017, “retrospectively registered”: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03136211


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma S. Everson-Hock ◽  
Adrian H. Taylor ◽  
Michael Ussher ◽  
Guy Faulkner

AbstractThere are mixed views on whether smoking cessation advisors should focus only on quitting smoking or also promote simultaneous health behaviour changes (e.g., diet, physical activity), but no studies have qualitatively examined the views and vicarious experiences of such health professionals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 trained smoking cessation advisors who promote physical activity to their clients. The data were categorised into themes using thematic analysis supported by qualitative data analysis software. We report themes that were related to why advisors promote multiple health behaviour change and issues in timing. Physical activity could be promoted as a cessation aid and also as part of a holistic lifestyle change consistent with a nonsmoker identity, thereby increasing feelings of control and addressing fear of weight gain. Multiple changes were promoted pre-quit, simultaneously and post-quit, and advisors asserted that it is important to focus on the needs and capabilities of individual clients when deciding how to time multiple changes. Also, suggesting that PA was a useful and easily performed cessation aid rather than a new behaviour (i.e., structured exercise that may seem irrelevant) may help some clients to avoid a sense of overload.


Author(s):  
Amanda Baker ◽  
Sarah Hiles ◽  
Louise Thornton ◽  
Amanda Searl ◽  
Peter Kelly ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan L. Hammersley ◽  
Veronica R. Cann ◽  
Anne-Maree Parrish ◽  
Rachel A. Jones ◽  
David J. Holloway

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Angel Marie Chater ◽  
Lindsey Smith ◽  
Louise Ferrandino ◽  
Kev Wyld ◽  
Daniel P Bailey

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e039909
Author(s):  
Nickola D Pallin ◽  
Rebecca J Beeken ◽  
Kathy Pritchard-Jones ◽  
Laura Charlesworth ◽  
Nick Woznitza ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTherapeutic radiographers (TRs) are well placed to deliver health behaviour change advice to those living with and beyond cancer (LWBC). However, there is limited research on the opinions of TRs around delivering such advice to those LWBC. This study aimed to explore TRs’ practices and facilitators in delivering advice on physical activity, healthy eating, alcohol intake, smoking and weight management.Setting and participantsFifteen UK-based TRs took part in a telephone interview using a semi‐structured interview guide. Data was analysed using the framework analysis method.ResultsEmergent themes highlighted that TRs are mainly aware of the benefits of healthy behaviours in managing radiotherapy treatment related side effects, with advice provision lowest for healthy eating and physical activity. Participants identified themselves as well placed to deliver advice on improving behaviours to those LWBC, however reported a lack of knowledge as a limiting factor to doing so. The TRs reported training and knowledge as key facilitators to the delivery of advice, with a preference for online training.ConclusionsThere is a need for education resources, clear referral pathways and in particular training for TRs on delivering physical activity and healthy eating advice to those LWBC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document