Perioperative Homologous Blood Transfusion and Survival in Patients with Surgically Treated Renal Cell Carcinoma

UroOncology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilmosh Mermershtain ◽  
Igor Eidelberg ◽  
Igor Yusim ◽  
Shmuel Ariad ◽  
Jacob Kaneti
2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 775-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Mühlbauer ◽  
Johannes de Gilde ◽  
Michael Mueller-Steinhardt ◽  
Stefan Porubsky ◽  
Margarete Walach ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 632-632
Author(s):  
Dimitar V. Zlatev ◽  
Manuel Ozambela ◽  
Keyan Salari ◽  
Ye Wang ◽  
Matthew Mossanen ◽  
...  

632 Background: Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) prior to systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is recommended in patients with a surgically resectable primary tumor. Traditionally performed as open surgery, the advent of laparoscopic and robotic surgery provides a minimally invasive alternative to CN with a potential for accelerated recovery and earlier initiation of systemic therapy. We sought to compare the trends and morbidity of laparoscopic, robotic, and open CN for patients with metastatic RCC. Methods: Using the Premier Hospital Database (Premier, Inc., Charlotte, NC), we identified 24,145 patients who underwent elective radical nephrectomy for metastatic RCC in the United States between 2003 and 2015. Comparative analysis between laparoscopic, robotic, and open CN was performed with propensity weighting on rates of 90-day complications, blood transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonged length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, 90-day readmission, operative time, and direct hospital costs. Results: Over the course of the study period, the rates of open CN decreased from 76.7% to 66.4%, laparoscopic CN decreased from 22.3% to 11.4%, and robotic CN increased from 0.6% to 22.1%. Compared to open CN, the laparoscopic approach was associated with a 30% decreased odds of 90-day major complications (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 - 0.97, p < 0.05). Compared to open CN, both laparoscopic and robotic approaches were associated with significantly decreased odds of blood transfusion (OR 0.46 and 0.38, respectively), ICU admission (OR 0.57 and 0.48, respectively), and LOS (OR 0.50 and 0.35, respectively). Direct costs were lowest for laparoscopic CN. Conclusions: Compared to open CN, minimally invasive CN is associated with decreased rates of blood transfusion, ICU admission, and LOS. Laparoscopic CN is additionally associated with decreased major complications and direct costs compared to open CN. When technically feasible, the utilization of minimally invasive CN, especially laparoscopic, may be associated with improved outcomes, decreased costs, and accelerated recovery prior to systemic therapy in patients with metastatic RCC.


2014 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Linder ◽  
R. Houston Thompson ◽  
Bradley C. Leibovich ◽  
John C. Cheville ◽  
Christine M. Lohse ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document