Understanding the factor structure of the public stigma of substance use disorder

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Nieweglowski ◽  
Rachel Dubke ◽  
Nadine Mulfinger ◽  
Lindsay Sheehan ◽  
Patrick W. Corrigan
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Nieweglowski ◽  
Patrick W. Corrigan ◽  
Tri Tyas ◽  
Anastasia Tooley ◽  
Rachel Dubke ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 698-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa K. Czyz ◽  
Amy S. B. Bohnert ◽  
Cheryl A. King ◽  
Amanda M. Price ◽  
Felicia Kleinberg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Corrigan ◽  
Sang Qin ◽  
Larry Davidson ◽  
Georg Schomerus ◽  
Valery Shuman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dagny Adriaenssen Johannessen ◽  
Amy Østertun Geirdal ◽  
Trond Nordfjærn

Abstract Background Recovery has been outlined as a process of change through which involvement and empowerment enables individuals to reach their goals and aspirations. Recovery self-assessment (RSA) is an instrument that has been acknowledged as an applicable measure of recovery-orientation in services for people with mental health problems or substance use disorder (SUD). This study aimed to translate RSA from US English to Norwegian and to investigate the factor structure of the translated version (RSA-N). Methods A translate/back-translate procedure was used. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to investigate the factor structure of RSA-N in a sample of clinicians (n = 407) working in inpatient SUD treatment facilities. Results The results suggested that the hypothesised five-factor structure originally obtained by the developers showed an inadequate fit with the current data sample. RSA-N was modified and restructured by removing twelve misfitting items and combining factors with high covariance using data from one subsample. The alternative three-factor structure yielded an acceptable fit for the data from a second subsample. Acceptable alpha coefficients, suggesting good internal consistency, supported the adequacy of the three-factor structure. Conclusions Results from the present study are in line with previous findings, which have failed to replicate the hypothesised five-factor structure without modifications. Knowledge about the degree to which SUD services are recovery-oriented may contribute to SUD services’ pursuit of establishing an inpatient treatment environment that fosters change and development of inpatients. The present study’s findings imply RSA-N’s potential as an instrument to assess recovery-orientation in inpatient SUD treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document