scholarly journals The differences between beginning and advanced student teachers’ teacher identities based on their practical theories

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katariina Stenberg ◽  
Katriina Maaranen
Author(s):  
William Fraser ◽  
Ronel Ferreira ◽  
Mia Abrie ◽  
Judy van Heerden ◽  
Marie Botha ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katariina Stenberg ◽  
Liisa Karlsson ◽  
Harri Pitkaniemi ◽  
Katriina Maaranen

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 608-621
Author(s):  
Liz Keiner ◽  
Nicole Graulich ◽  
Richard Göttlich ◽  
Verena Pietzner

Creativity has become an increasingly important competence in today's rapidly changing times. It is a central aspect of social development, but it is hardly discussed in schools and often neglected in the natural sciences. In order to promote creativity in science teaching in a targeted way, it is important to understand the perspectives and views of prospective teachers on this topic. For this purpose, a qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted with 83 German chemistry student teachers at the beginning and at the end of their study programme. We used concept maps and questionnaires to characterize changes in students’ perspective on creativity in the chemistry classroom during their course of study. The quantitative analysis of the concept maps and the content analysis of student's proposition revealed similarities and differences in students’ perspective on creativity between beginners and advanced student. All student teachers showed a diverse range of conceptions and views on creativity in general and in the context of chemistry education. Furthermore, almost all of the students had a positive attitude towards creativity and its integration in chemistry lessons. Although, there are no large differences in the perspective on creativity from beginner to advanced student teachers, subtle differences in students’ perspectives revealed that advanced students had a more sophisticated perspective on fostering creativity in students in their prospective classrooms.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiina Anspal ◽  
Eve Eisenschmidt ◽  
Erika Löfström

1989 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Johnson Glaser ◽  
Carole Donnelly

The clinical dimensions of the supervisory process have at times been neglected. In this article, we explain the various stages of Goldhammer's clinical supervision model and then describe specific procedures for supervisors in the public schools to use with student teachers. This easily applied methodology lends clarity to the task and helps the student assimilate concrete data which may have previously been relegated to subjective impressions of the supervisor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document