scholarly journals Resting heart rate and cardiovascular events: risk factor or risk marker?

2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
JA Ker
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Sobieraj ◽  
J Lewandowski ◽  
M Sinski

Abstract Background Available evidence does not indicate whether resting heart rate (RHR) is an independent risk factor or just marker of elevated risk. None of the studies assessed impact of RHR on cardiovascular events, when RHR was measured using automated blood pressure measurements (AOBPM). Purpose To assess the relationship between RHR (measured using AOBPM) and cardiovascular events risk in subjects with hypertension. Methods The data of SPRINT trial obtained via NHLBI were used to perform the analysis. SPRINT trial assessed intensive lowering of systolic BP to a target <120 mm Hg in comparison to standard goal (<140 mm Hg). RHR was measured using AOBPM device and calculated as an average of 3 measurements during the baseline visit of the study. Clinical composite endpoint (CE) of the study was defined as: myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, decompensation of heart failure, stroke or cardiovascular death. The relationship between RHR and CE was assessed according to presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in past medical history. The statistical methods included t-test and chi-square test, Cox proportional risk models. The Cox models were adjusted for adjusted for age, sex, current smoking status and mean SBP during the trial. Restricted cubic splines were used to describe the relationship between RHR and hazard ratio. Results Data of 1877 participants with CVD and 7484 participants without CVD were analyzed. Subjects with cardiovascular disease were older (69.7±9.5 vs 67.5 years ± 9.4, p<0.001), more often were men (72.8% vs 62.3%, p<0.001) and had prior chronic kidney disease (34.3% vs 26.8%, p<0.001) than subjects without CVD. CE was more than twice often when CVD was present (10.9% vs 4.8%, p<0.001). RHR was lower in subjects with CVD disease than in subjects without CVD (63.6±11 vs 66.9±11.6 bpm, p=0<00.1). Elevated RHR was associated with increased risk both in subjects with and without CVD (Figure 1). The multivariable Cox proportional hazard risk model revealed that RHR>80 bpm is an independent risk factor for CE in subjects without CVD (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.01–1.85, p=0.043) while not in subjects with CVD (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.57–1.71, p=0.98). Conclusion Elevated RHR (>80 bpm) measured using AOBPM is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in subjects with hypertension and without CVD. Figure 1. Heart ratio vs hazard ratio. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Author(s):  
Ester Puig ◽  
Albert Clará ◽  
Silvia Pérez ◽  
Irene R Degano ◽  
Isaac Subirana ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Martyna Waliczek ◽  
Piotr Rozentryt

Higher resting heart rate was shown to correlate with worse prognosis both in general population and in various disease groups. Scientific societies dealing with patients with hypertension propose assessment of resting heart rate as a standard risk factor. In patients with uncomplicated hypertension and elevated resting heart rate they propose use of cardioselective β1-adrenolytics. This decision should be preceded by careful examination of potential modified reasons. In the paper we express several concerns regarding standard provision of heart rate lowering drugs in particular clinical situations. The algorithm showing proposed steps in assessment of elevated heart rate is provided.


2016 ◽  
Vol 248 ◽  
pp. 44-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja L. van Ockenburg ◽  
Judith G.M. Rosmalen ◽  
Stephan J.L. Bakker ◽  
Peter de Jonge ◽  
Reinold O.B. Gans

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 311
Author(s):  
Xavier X. Jouven ◽  
Mahmoud Zureik ◽  
Laurent Sabbah ◽  
Dominique Courbon ◽  
Michel Desnos ◽  
...  

Open Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-jing Chen ◽  
Salim Bary Barywani ◽  
Per-Olof Hansson ◽  
Erik Östgärd Thunström ◽  
Annika Rosengren ◽  
...  

BackgroundResting heart rate (RHR), a known cardiovascular risk factor, changes with age. However, little is known about the association between changes in RHR and the risk of cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess the impact of RHR at baseline, and the change in RHR over time, on the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events.DesignA random population sample of men born in 1943 who were living in Gothenburg, Sweden was prospectively followed for a 21-year period.MethodsParticipants were examined three times: first in 1993 and then re-examined in 2003 and 2014. At each visit, a clinical examination, an ECG and laboratory analyses were performed. Change in RHR between 1993 and 2003 was defined as a decrease if RHR decreased by 5 beats per minute (bpm), an increase if RHR increased by 5 bpm or stable if the RHR change was <4bpm).ResultsParticipants with a baseline RHR of >75 bpm in 1993 had about a twofold higher risk of all-cause death (HR 2.3, CI 1.2 to 4.7, p=0.018), cardiovascular disease (CVD) (HR 1.8, CI 1.1 to 3.0, p=0.014) and coronary heart disease (CHD) (HR 2.2, CI 1.1 to 4.5, p=0.025) compared with those with <55 bpm in 1993. Participants with a stable RHR between 1993 and 2003 had a 44% decreased risk of CVD (HR 0.56, CI 0.35 to 0.87, p=0.011) compared with participants with an increasing RHR. Furthermore, every beat increase in heart rate from 1993 was associated with a 3% higher risk for all-cause death, 1% higher risk for CVD and 2% higher risk for CHD.ConclusionHigh RHR was associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular events in men from the general population. Moreover, individuals with an increase in RHR between 50 and 60 years of age had worse outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document