Validation of Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) fractional vegetation cover product from MODIS data in an agricultural region

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 847-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Jia ◽  
Shunlin Liang ◽  
Xiangqin Wei ◽  
Yunjun Yao ◽  
Linqing Yang ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 2324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao ◽  
Jia ◽  
Zhao ◽  
Wei ◽  
Xie ◽  
...  

As an important indicator to characterize the surface vegetation, fractional vegetation cover (FVC) with high spatio-temporal resolution is essential for earth surface process simulation. However, due to technical limitations and the influence of weather, it is difficult to generate temporally continuous FVC with high spatio-temporal resolution based on a single remote-sensing data source. Therefore, the objective of this study is to explore the feasibility of generating high spatio-temporal resolution FVC based on the fusion of GaoFen-1 Wide Field View (GF-1 WFV) data and Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. Two fusion strategies were employed to identify a suitable fusion method: (i) fusing reflectance data from GF-1 WFV and MODIS firstly and then estimating FVC from the reflectance fusion result (strategy FC, Fusion_then_FVC). (ii) fusing the FVC estimated from GF-1 WFV and MODIS reflectance data directly (strategy CF, FVC_then_Fusion). The FVC generated using strategies FC and CF were evaluated based on FVC estimated from the real GF-1 WFV data and the field survey FVC, respectively. The results indicated that strategy CF achieved higher accuracies with less computational cost than those of strategy FC both in the comparisons with FVC estimated from the real GF-1 WFV (CF:R2 = 0.9580, RMSE = 0.0576; FC: R2 = 0.9345, RMSE = 0.0719) and the field survey FVC data (CF: R2 = 0.8138, RMSE = 0.0985; FC: R2 = 0.7173, RMSE = 0.1214). Strategy CF preserved spatial details more accurately than strategy FC and had a lower probability of generating abnormal values. It could be concluded that fusing GF-1 WFV and MODIS data for generating high spatio-temporal resolution FVC with good quality was feasible, and strategy CF was more suitable for generating FVC given its advantages in estimation accuracy and computational efficiency.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 2524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duanyang Liu ◽  
Kun Jia ◽  
Xiangqin Wei ◽  
Mu Xia ◽  
Xiwang Zhang ◽  
...  

Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is an important parameter for many environmental and ecological models. Large-scale and long-term FVC products are critical for various applications. Currently, several global-scale FVC products have been generated with remote sensing data, such as VGT bioGEOphysical product Version 2 (GEOV2), PROBA-V bioGEOphysical product Version 3 (GEOV3) and Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) FVC products. However, studies comparing and validating these global-scale FVC products are rare. Therefore, in this study, the performances of three global-scale time series FVC products, including the GEOV2, GEOV3, and GLASS FVC products, are investigated to assess their spatial and temporal consistencies. Furthermore, reference FVC data generated from high-spatial-resolution data are used to directly evaluate the accuracy of these FVC products. The results show that these three FVC products achieve general agreements in terms of spatiotemporal consistencies over most regions. In addition, the GLASS and GEOV2 FVC products have reliable spatial and temporal completeness, whereas the GEOV3 FVC product contains much missing data over high-latitude regions, especially during wintertime. Furthermore, the GEOV3 FVC product presents higher FVC values than GEOV2 and GLASS FVC products over the equator. The main differences between the GEOV2 and GLASS FVC products occur over deciduous forests, for which the GLASS product presents slightly higher FVC values than the GEOV2 product during wintertime. Finally, temporal profiles of the GEOV2 and GLASS FVC products show better consistency than the GEOV3 FVC product, and the GLASS FVC product presents more reliable accuracy (R2 = 0.7878, RMSE = 0.1212) compared with the GEOV2 (R2 = 0.5798, RMSE = 0.1921) and GEOV3 (R2 = 0.7744, RMSE = 0.2224) FVC products over these reference FVC data.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingwen Li ◽  
Song Zhou ◽  
Zhezhen Wang ◽  
Nan Lv ◽  
Jianwu Jiang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document