Revering Individual Autonomy During Goals of Care Family Meetings

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-288
Author(s):  
Ricardo Diaz Milian
Author(s):  
Gina M. Piscitello ◽  
Corinna M. Fukushima ◽  
Anna K. Saulitis ◽  
Katherine T. Tian ◽  
Jennifer Hwang ◽  
...  

Purpose: Visitor restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic limit in-person family meetings for hospitalized patients. We aimed to evaluate the quantity of family meetings by telephone, video and in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic by manual chart review. Secondary outcomes included rate of change in patient goals of care between video and in-person meetings, the timing of family meetings, and variability in meetings by race and ethnicity. Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluated patients admitted to the intensive care unit at an urban academic hospital between March and June 2020. Patients lacking decision-making capacity and receiving a referral for a video meeting were included in this study. Results: Most patients meeting inclusion criteria (N = 61/481, 13%) had COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 57/61, 93%). A total of 650 documented family meetings occurred. Few occurred in-person (n = 70/650, 11%) or discussed goals of care (n = 233/650, 36%). For meetings discussing goals of care, changes in patient goals of care occurred more often for in-person meetings rather than by video (36% vs. 11%, p = 0.0006). The average time to the first goals of care family meeting was 11.4 days from admission. More documented telephone meetings per admission were observed for White (10.5, SD 9.5) and Black/African-American (7.1, SD 6.6) patients compared to Hispanic or Latino patients (4.9, SD 4.9) (p = 0.02). Conclusions: During this period of strict visitor restrictions, few family meetings occurred in-person. Statistically significant fewer changes in patient goals of care occurred following video meetings compared to in-person meetings, providing support limiting in-person meetings may affect patient care.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippa J Cahill ◽  
Elizabeth A Lobb ◽  
Christine Sanderson ◽  
Jane L Phillips

Background: Structured family meeting procedures and guidelines suggest that these forums enhance family–patient–team communication in the palliative care inpatient setting. However, the vulnerability of palliative patients and the resources required to implement family meetings in accordance with recommended guidelines make better understanding about the effectiveness of this type of intervention an important priority. Aim and design: This systematic review examines the evidence supporting family meetings as a strategy to address the needs of palliative patients and their families. The review conforms to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. Data sources: Six medical and psychosocial databases and “CareSearch,” a palliative care–specific database, were used to identify studies reporting empirical data, published in English in peer-reviewed journals from 1980 to March 2015. Book chapters, expert opinion, and gray literature were excluded. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool assessed risk of bias. Results: Of the 5051 articles identified, 13 met the inclusion criteria: 10 quantitative and 3 qualitative studies. There was low-level evidence to support family meetings. Only two quantitative pre- and post-studies used a validated palliative care family outcome measure with both studies reporting significant results post-family meetings. Four other quantitative studies reported significant results using non-validated measures. Conclusion: Despite the existence of consensus-based family meeting guidelines, there is a paucity of evidence to support family meetings in the inpatient palliative care setting. Further research using more robust designs, validated outcome measures, and an economic analysis are required to build the family meeting evidence before they are routinely adopted into clinical practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1915-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn S. Sinow ◽  
Irene Corso ◽  
Javier Lorenzo ◽  
Kiley A. Lawrence ◽  
David C. Magnus ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 81-81
Author(s):  
Ramy Sedhom ◽  
Jasmet Bajaj ◽  
Vadim Finklestein ◽  
Mindy Tanpiengco ◽  
David Barile

81 Background: Death in the ICU is an extraordinarily stressful event. Qualitative and quantitative studies have identified effective communication between caregivers and families to be important throughout the decision making process. In many ICUs, the end-of-life family conference is an opportunity to ask questions, express concerns, and confront painful emotions with the help of compassionate professionals. Methods: A prospective study in a single ICU center. The ICU physician, palliative care team, and research nurse interviewed surrogate decision makers. The only criterion for inclusion in the study was anticipated death in one year. Patients younger than 18 were excluded from the study, as were those unable to speak English. Prior to the family meeting, families were offered an opportunity to watch a video on EOL decision-making made by the research team. The meeting itself followed a script, guided by four steps:establish diagnosis, share prognosis, elicit goals of care, recommend treatment. The investigators recorded ICU and patient characteristics on standardized forms. Results: 22 families were included. A decision to forego life-sustaining treatment and transition to comfort care or hospice was pursued by 77% of families. There were few non-beneficial interventions, such as CRRT or use of artificial nutrition; withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and vasopressors was common. Qualitative commentary suggested that time spent by providers were sufficient and the video support tool was clear and easy to understand. Conclusions: EOL family conferences improve communication between ICU staff and family members and assist families in decision making, especially for cancer syndromes. The structured family meetings offered opportunities to discuss patient’s wishes, alleviate feelings of guilt, and understand the goals of care. Patients received few non-beneficial treatments and families were likely to accept realistic goals of care. This highlights the potential role for video-support tools in advance care planning. Future studies reporting overall LOS and bereavement data are important quality markers and pending in a future report.


2021 ◽  
pp. 114471
Author(s):  
Emma Kirby ◽  
Alex Broom ◽  
John MacArtney ◽  
Sophie Lewis ◽  
Phillip Good

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mieko Fukui ◽  
Satoru Iwase ◽  
Naoko Sakata ◽  
Yujiro Kuroda ◽  
Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1356-1362
Author(s):  
Laurence Tan Lean Chin ◽  
Yu Jun Lim ◽  
Wan Ling Choo

Purpose Palliative care is a philosophy of care that encompasses holistic, patient-centric care involving patients and their family members and loved ones. Palliative care patients often have complex needs. A common challenge in managing patients near their end of life is the complexity of navigating clinical decisions and finding achievable and realistic goals of care that are in line with the values and wishes of patients. This often results in differing opinions and conflicts within the multidisciplinary team. Conclusion This article describes a tool derived from the biopsychosocial model and the 4-quadrant ethical model. The authors describe the use of this tool in managing a patient who wishes to have fried chicken despite aspiration risk and how this tool was used to encourage discussions and reduce conflict and distress within the multidisciplinary team.


Author(s):  
Julia Huemer ◽  
Maria Haidvogl ◽  
Fritz Mattejat ◽  
Gudrun Wagner ◽  
Gerald Nobis ◽  
...  

Objective: This study examines retrospective correlates of nonshared family environment prior to onset of disease, by means of multiple familial informants, among anorexia and bulimia nervosa patients. Methods: A total of 332 participants was included (anorexia nervosa, restrictive type (AN-R): n = 41 plus families); bulimic patients (anorexia nervosa, binge-purging type; bulimia nervosa: n = 59 plus families). The EATAET Lifetime Diagnostic Interview was used to establish the diagnosis; the Subjective Family Image Test was used to derive emotional connectedness (EC) and individual autonomy (IA). Results: Bulimic and AN-R patients perceived significantly lower EC prior to onset of disease compared to their healthy sisters. Bulimic patients perceived significantly lower EC prior to onset of disease compared to AN-R patients and compared to their mothers and fathers. A low family sum – sister pairs sum comparison – of EC had a significant influence on the risk of developing bulimia nervosa. Contrary to expectations, AN-R patients did not perceive significantly lower levels of IA compared to their sisters, prior to onset of disease. Findings of low IA in currently ill AN-R patients may represent a disease consequence, not a risk factor. Conclusions: Developmental child psychiatrists should direct their attention to disturbances of EC, which may be present prior to the onset of the disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document