Introduction: social policies and social inequalities in contemporary Turkey

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-114
Author(s):  
Volkan Yılmaz
Sociology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mara Yerkes

Social policy exists as an academic discipline but also refers to the practice of policymaking and administration (including service delivery). As an academic discipline, social policy is distinct in its empirical focus on welfare provision but overlaps with other social science fields such as sociology, political science, and public administration. From a narrow standpoint, social policy refers to policies and practices created to address the needs of individuals, i.e., to provide welfare. From a broader standpoint, social policy can be used to motivate individual behavior; is inherently related to the creation of social inequalities across class, gender, race, and sexualities; and is closely tied to capital. Social policy encompasses a wide range of policies, including activation, care, education, families, health care, pensions/aging, poverty/social assistance, and unemployment. Social policy practice refers to the administration of social policies and service delivery. Welfare provision is not limited to government—markets, employers, nongovernmental organizations, churches, and informal networks all play a role in welfare provision, although this varies across countries. The focus, however, particularly in social policy research, is often on government policies and the provision of services. In particular, social policy is often discussed in relation to the welfare state because social policies represent the public or collective management of social risks, an essential function of welfare states. In recent years, social policy research has become increasingly comparative, with a focus on cross-national analyses of systems, policies, and service provision. I would like to thank Hannelore van Hoffen, my research assistant, for all her efforts in helping to compile a list of social policy references to be considered for this article.


The article examines transformations of labor relationships under the influence of globalization in the context of tasks which consequently emerge in social policies. The introduction of new technologies into the production process and incorporation of countries into the unified economic space predetermine significant changes in the structure of the labor market, as well as in the basic principles of interaction between employers and employees. This results in transformations of labor and social biographies of the latter. General social effects of these transformations are analyzed, as well as their possible negative consequences that require regulation, such as job insecurity, increase in number of cases of forced labor mobility, intensification of social inequalities and alienation. The questions of welfare of wage workers in the following aspects are raised: professional (qualification, career growth, way of organizing the labor process), economic (ensuring a stable and adequate income), social (professional prestige, position in the system of inequalities and life chances), psychological (feeling of security, adaptation to the group of co-workers). Special attention is paid to the questions of formation of the sense of community in the context of labor relationships, as well as of transformation of the role of labor communities in person's social integration. The research results on the manifestations of the described transformations in the Ukrainian society are presented. Based on the estimates regarding further development of these changes, there were identified the key aspects of the efficient social policies, aimed at their compensation, such as ensuring equal access to professional education, possibilities of improvement or switching of professional skills, transformations of values and norms regarding labor relationships, as well as the questions of formation of trust and sense of community, of positive personal and group identification.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 341-356
Author(s):  
Cristina Gomes

This article aims to analyze the fragmented mix of social policies in Latin America, guided by minimalist principles and instruments of liberal thinking on individual meritocracy and contributory insurance, in order to discuss the challenges to and possibilities of developing universal policies. The article describes the historically social, economic and political contexts and pressures that frame the process of building fragmented social policies in the region; the contradictions, disadvantages, and limited achievements of these fragmented systems in terms of coverage, generosity and quality of health and pensions. Results show that expansive and fragmented welfare policies reproduce differences in quality and scope and increase social inequalities and conflicts; the challenges of building universal rights, citizenship and equality in Latin America, considering current public-private agreements, political coalitions, and interclass alliances, and the need to reorient social policies in order to overcome conflicts of interest, discrimination and market resistance, and to promote equality.


2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 311-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Brambilla ◽  
David A. Butz

Two studies examined the impact of macrolevel symbolic threat on intergroup attitudes. In Study 1 (N = 71), participants exposed to a macrosymbolic threat (vs. nonsymbolic threat and neutral topic) reported less support toward social policies concerning gay men, an outgroup whose stereotypes implies a threat to values, but not toward welfare recipients, a social group whose stereotypes do not imply a threat to values. Study 2 (N = 78) showed that, whereas macrolevel symbolic threat led to less favorable attitudes toward gay men, macroeconomic threat led to less favorable attitudes toward Asians, an outgroup whose stereotypes imply an economic threat. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding the role of a general climate of threat in shaping intergroup attitudes.


2017 ◽  
pp. 45-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Osmakov ◽  
A. Kalinin

The article considers the problems of industrial policy and, accordingly, the industrial development strategy from the standpoint of the challenges facing the industry, the conditions for the adoption of strategic decisions and possible answers - the key directions of state activities. The main principles and directions are analyzed: investment, foreign trade, technological policies, certain aspects of territorial planning, state corporate and social policies. Proposals on the prospective goal-setting and possible results of industrial policy have been formulated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document