scholarly journals GPR158/179 regulate G protein signaling by controlling localization and activity of the RGS7 complexes

2012 ◽  
Vol 197 (6) ◽  
pp. 711-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Orlandi ◽  
Ekaterina Posokhova ◽  
Ikuo Masuho ◽  
Thomas A. Ray ◽  
Nazarul Hasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Night Vision ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Gpcr Signaling ◽  
Signaling Specificity ◽  
Orphan Gpcrs ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The extent and temporal characteristics of G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling are shaped by the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which promote G protein deactivation. With hundreds of GPCRs and dozens of RGS proteins, compartmentalization plays a key role in establishing signaling specificity. However, the molecular details and mechanisms of this process are poorly understood. In this paper, we report that the R7 group of RGS regulators is controlled by interaction with two previously uncharacterized orphan GPCRs: GPR158 and GPR179. We show that GPR158/179 recruited RGS complexes to the plasma membrane and augmented their ability to regulate GPCR signaling. The loss of GPR179 in a mouse model of night blindness prevented targeting of RGS to the postsynaptic compartment of bipolar neurons in the retina, illuminating the role of GPR179 in night vision. We propose that the interaction of RGS proteins with orphan GPCRs promotes signaling selectivity in G protein pathways.

scholarly journals A Physiologically Required G Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR)-Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) Interaction That Compartmentalizes RGS Activity

2013 ◽  
Vol 288 (38) ◽  
pp. 27327-27342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne Croft ◽  
Claire Hill ◽  
Eilish McCann ◽  
Michael Bond ◽  
Manuel Esparza-Franco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Gpcr Signaling ◽  
Additional Layer ◽  
Physiological Relevance ◽  
Gtpase Cycle ◽  
G Protein Coupled

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can interact with regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. However, the effects of such interactions on signal transduction and their physiological relevance have been largely undetermined. Ligand-bound GPCRs initiate by promoting exchange of GDP for GTP on the Gα subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins. Signaling is terminated by hydrolysis of GTP to GDP through intrinsic GTPase activity of the Gα subunit, a reaction catalyzed by RGS proteins. Using yeast as a tool to study GPCR signaling in isolation, we define an interaction between the cognate GPCR (Mam2) and RGS (Rgs1), mapping the interaction domains. This reaction tethers Rgs1 at the plasma membrane and is essential for physiological signaling response. In vivo quantitative data inform the development of a kinetic model of the GTPase cycle, which extends previous attempts by including GPCR-RGS interactions. In vivo and in silico data confirm that GPCR-RGS interactions can impose an additional layer of regulation through mediating RGS subcellular localization to compartmentalize RGS activity within a cell, thus highlighting their importance as potential targets to modulate GPCR signaling pathways.

scholarly journals Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins (version 2020.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelin E. Ahlers-Dannen ◽  
Mohammed Alqinyah ◽  
Christopher Bodle ◽  
Josephine Bou Dagher ◽  
Bandana Chakravarti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Signaling Cascades ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Rgs Domain ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [160, 377, 411, 415, 416, 512, 519, 312, 6].

scholarly journals Probing the mutational landscape of regulators of G protein signaling proteins in cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (617) ◽  
pp. eaax8620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent DiGiacomo ◽  
Marcin Maziarz ◽  
Alex Luebbers ◽  
Jillian M. Norris ◽  
Pandu Laksono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Gpcr Signaling ◽  
Mutational Landscape ◽  
Binding Interface

The advent of deep-sequencing techniques has revealed that mutations in G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathways in cancer are more prominent than was previously appreciated. An emergent theme is that cancer-associated mutations tend to cause enhanced GPCR pathway activation to favor oncogenicity. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are critical modulators of GPCR signaling that dampen the activity of heterotrimeric G proteins through their GTPase-accelerating protein (GAP) activity, which is conferred by a conserved domain dubbed the “RGS-box.” Here, we developed an experimental pipeline to systematically assess the mutational landscape of RGS GAPs in cancer. A pan-cancer bioinformatics analysis of the 20 RGS domains with GAP activity revealed hundreds of low-frequency mutations spread throughout the conserved RGS domain structure with a slight enrichment at positions that interface with G proteins. We empirically tested multiple mutations representing all RGS GAP subfamilies and sampling both G protein interface and noninterface positions with a scalable, yeast-based assay. Last, a subset of mutants was validated using G protein activity biosensors in mammalian cells. Our findings reveal that a sizable fraction of RGS protein mutations leads to a loss of function through various mechanisms, including disruption of the G protein–binding interface, loss of protein stability, or allosteric effects on G protein coupling. Moreover, our results also validate a scalable pipeline for the rapid characterization of cancer-associated mutations in RGS proteins.

scholarly journals Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins (version 2020.5) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelin E. Ahlers-Dannen ◽  
Mohammed Alqinyah ◽  
Christopher Bodle ◽  
Josephine Bou Dagher ◽  
Bandana Chakravarti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Signaling Cascades ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Rgs Domain ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [183, 411, 446, 450, 451, 558, 566, 345, 9].

scholarly journals Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins in GtoPdb v.2021.2

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelin E. Ahlers-Dannen ◽  
Mohammed Alqinyah ◽  
Christopher Bodle ◽  
Josephine Bou Dagher ◽  
Bandana Chakravarti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Signaling Cascades ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Rgs Domain ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [225, 529, 578, 583, 584, 742, 753, 444, 10].

scholarly journals Dynamic Phosphorylation of RGS Provides Spatial Regulation of G-alpha And Promotes Completion of Cytokinesis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C Simke ◽  
Andrew J Hart ◽  
Cory P Johnson ◽  
Sari Mayhue ◽  
P Lucas Craig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Pheromone Response ◽  
Mating Partner ◽  
Downstream Signaling ◽  
Spatial Regulation ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Yeast use a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway to detect mating pheromone, arrest in G1, and direct polarized growth towards the potential mating partner. The primary negative regulator of this pathway is the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS), Sst2, which induces Gα GTPase activity and subsequent inactivation of all downstream signaling. MAPK phosphorylates the RGS in response to pheromone, but the role of this modification is unknown. We set out to examine the role of RGS phosphorylation during the pheromone response. We found that phosphorylation of the RGS peaks early in the pheromone response and diminishes RGS localization to the polarization site and focuses Gα/MAPK complexes there. At later time points, RGS is predominantly unphosphorylated, which promotes RGS localization to the polar cap and broadens the distribution of Gα/MAPK complexes relative to the Cdc42 polarity machinery. Surprisingly, we found that phosphorylation of the RGS is required for the completion of cytokinesis prior to pheromone induced growth. The completion of cytokinesis in the presence of pheromone is promoted by the formin Bnr1 and the kelch-repeat protein, Kel1, both proteins previously found to interact with the RGS.

scholarly journals PDGF-dependent regulation of regulator of G protein signaling-5 expression and vascular smooth muscle cell functionality

2011 ◽  
Vol 301 (2) ◽  
pp. C478-C489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagadambika J. Gunaje ◽  
Arya J. Bahrami ◽  
Stephen M. Schwartz ◽  
Guenter Daum ◽  
William M. Mahoney
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Vascular Smooth Muscle ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Arterial Tree ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Cell Functionality

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, and notably members of the RGS-R4 subfamily, control vasocontractility by accelerating the inactivation of Gα-dependent signaling. RGS5 is the most highly and differently expressed RGS-R4 subfamily member in arterial smooth muscle. Expression of RGS5 first appears in pericytes during development of the afferent vascular tree, suggesting that RGS5 is a good candidate for a regulator of arterial contractility and, perhaps, for determining the mass of the smooth muscle coats required to regulate blood flow in the branches of the arterial tree. Consistent with this hypothesis, using cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), we demonstrate RGS5 overexpression inhibits G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated hypertrophic responses. The next objective was to determine which physiological agonists directly control RGS5 expression in VSMCs. GPCR agonists failed to directly regulate RGS5 mRNA expression; however, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) acutely represses expression. Downregulation of RGS5 results in the induction of migration and the activation of the GPCR-mediated signaling pathways. This stimulation leads to the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases directly downstream of receptor stimulation, and ultimately VSMC hypertrophy. These results demonstrate that RGS5 expression is a critical mediator of both VSMC contraction and potentially, arterial remodeling.

scholarly journals Up-regulation of Endogenous RGS2 Mediates Cross-desensitization between Gs and Gq Signaling in Osteoblasts

2006 ◽  
Vol 281 (43) ◽  
pp. 32684-32693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anju Anne Roy ◽  
Caroline Nunn ◽  
Hong Ming ◽  
Min-Xu Zou ◽  
Josef Penninger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Calcium Release ◽  
Inositol Phosphates ◽  
Primary Cultures ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Camp Accumulation ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Wild Type

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins limit G protein signals. In this study, we investigated the role of RGS2 in the control of G protein signaling cascades in osteoblasts, the cells responsible for bone formation. Expression of RGS2 was up-regulated in primary cultures of mouse calvarial osteoblasts by parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP)-(1-34), which stimulates Gs signaling. RGS2 was also up-regulated by extracellular ATP, which selectively activates Gq, as well as by forskolin and phorbol myristate acetate, which activate targets downstream of Gs and Gq, respectively. To assess the role of endogenous RGS2, we characterized Gs and Gq signaling in osteoblasts derived from wild type and rgs2-/- mice. Under control conditions, nucleotide-stimulated calcium release, endothelin-stimulated accumulation of inositol phosphates, and PTHrP-stimulated cAMP accumulation were equivalent in osteoblasts isolated from wild type and rgs2-/- mice. Thus, basal levels of endogenous RGS2 do not appear to regulate Gs or Gq signaling in osteoblasts. Interestingly, forskolin treatment of wild type but not rgs2-/- osteoblasts suppressed both endothelin-stimulated accumulation of inositol phosphates and nucleotide-stimulated calcium release, indicating that up-regulation of RGS2 by Gs signaling desensitizes Gq signals. Furthermore, pretreatment with ATP suppressed PTHrP-dependent cAMP accumulation in wild type but not rgs2-/- osteoblasts, implying that up-regulation of RGS2 by Gq signaling desensitizes Gs signals. Our findings demonstrate that endogenously expressed RGS2 can limit Gs signaling. Moreover, up-regulation of RGS2 contributes to cross-desensitization of Gs- and Gq-coupled signals.

scholarly journals Distinct G protein–coupled receptor recycling pathways allow spatial control of downstream G protein signaling

2016 ◽  
Vol 214 (7) ◽  
pp. 797-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanna Lynn Bowman ◽  
Daniel John Shiwarski ◽  
Manojkumar A. Puthenveedu
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Gpcr Signaling ◽  
Sorting Nexin ◽  
Sequence Dependent ◽  
Physiological Relevance ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Dependent Pathway

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are recycled via a sequence-dependent pathway that is spatially and biochemically distinct from bulk recycling. Why there are two distinct recycling pathways from the endosome is a fundamental question in cell biology. In this study, we show that the separation of these two pathways is essential for normal spatial encoding of GPCR signaling. The prototypical β-2 adrenergic receptor (B2AR) activates Gα stimulatory protein (Gαs) on the endosome exclusively in sequence-dependent recycling tubules marked by actin/sorting nexin/retromer tubular (ASRT) microdomains. B2AR was detected in an active conformation in bulk recycling tubules, but was unable to activate Gαs. Protein kinase A phosphorylation of B2AR increases the fraction of receptors localized to ASRT domains and biases the downstream transcriptional effects of B2AR to genes controlled by endosomal signals. Our results identify the physiological relevance of separating GPCR recycling from bulk recycling and suggest a mechanism to tune downstream responses of GPCR signaling by manipulating the spatial origin of G protein signaling.

scholarly journals Regulators of G-Protein Signaling (RGS) Proteins Promote Receptor Coupling to G-Protein-Coupled Inwardly Rectifying Potassium (GIRK) Channels

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (41) ◽  
pp. 8737-8744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kylie B. McPherson ◽  
Emily R. Leff ◽  
Ming-hua Li ◽  
Claire Meurice ◽  
Sherrica Tai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Girk Channels ◽  
Receptor Coupling ◽  
Inwardly Rectifying ◽  
G Protein Coupled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document