scholarly journals Dynamic Phosphorylation of RGS Provides Spatial Regulation of G-alpha And Promotes Completion of Cytokinesis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C Simke ◽  
Andrew J Hart ◽  
Cory P Johnson ◽  
Sari Mayhue ◽  
P Lucas Craig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Pheromone Response ◽  
Mating Partner ◽  
Downstream Signaling ◽  
Spatial Regulation ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Yeast use a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway to detect mating pheromone, arrest in G1, and direct polarized growth towards the potential mating partner. The primary negative regulator of this pathway is the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS), Sst2, which induces Gα GTPase activity and subsequent inactivation of all downstream signaling. MAPK phosphorylates the RGS in response to pheromone, but the role of this modification is unknown. We set out to examine the role of RGS phosphorylation during the pheromone response. We found that phosphorylation of the RGS peaks early in the pheromone response and diminishes RGS localization to the polarization site and focuses Gα/MAPK complexes there. At later time points, RGS is predominantly unphosphorylated, which promotes RGS localization to the polar cap and broadens the distribution of Gα/MAPK complexes relative to the Cdc42 polarity machinery. Surprisingly, we found that phosphorylation of the RGS is required for the completion of cytokinesis prior to pheromone induced growth. The completion of cytokinesis in the presence of pheromone is promoted by the formin Bnr1 and the kelch-repeat protein, Kel1, both proteins previously found to interact with the RGS.

scholarly journals GPR158/179 regulate G protein signaling by controlling localization and activity of the RGS7 complexes

2012 ◽  
Vol 197 (6) ◽  
pp. 711-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Orlandi ◽  
Ekaterina Posokhova ◽  
Ikuo Masuho ◽  
Thomas A. Ray ◽  
Nazarul Hasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Night Vision ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Gpcr Signaling ◽  
Signaling Specificity ◽  
Orphan Gpcrs ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The extent and temporal characteristics of G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling are shaped by the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which promote G protein deactivation. With hundreds of GPCRs and dozens of RGS proteins, compartmentalization plays a key role in establishing signaling specificity. However, the molecular details and mechanisms of this process are poorly understood. In this paper, we report that the R7 group of RGS regulators is controlled by interaction with two previously uncharacterized orphan GPCRs: GPR158 and GPR179. We show that GPR158/179 recruited RGS complexes to the plasma membrane and augmented their ability to regulate GPCR signaling. The loss of GPR179 in a mouse model of night blindness prevented targeting of RGS to the postsynaptic compartment of bipolar neurons in the retina, illuminating the role of GPR179 in night vision. We propose that the interaction of RGS proteins with orphan GPCRs promotes signaling selectivity in G protein pathways.

scholarly journals Regulation of G-Protein Signaling by RKTG via Sequestration of the Gβγ Subunit to the Golgi Apparatus

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhui Jiang ◽  
Xiaoduo Xie ◽  
Yixuan Zhang ◽  
Xiaolin Luo ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Golgi Apparatus ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Akt Phosphorylation ◽  
Downstream Signaling ◽  
Spatial Regulation ◽  
Β2 Adrenergic Receptor ◽  
Subcellular Compartmentation ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Gpcr Desensitization

ABSTRACT Upon ligand binding, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) impart the signal to heterotrimeric G proteins composed of α, β, and γ subunits, leading to dissociation of the Gα subunit from the Gβγ subunit. While the Gα subunit is imperative for downstream signaling, the Gβγ subunit, in its own right, mediates a variety of cellular responses such as GPCR desensitization via recruiting GRK to the plasma membrane and AKT stimulation. Here we report a mode of spatial regulation of the Gβγ subunit through alteration in subcellular compartmentation. RKTG (Raf kinase trapping to Golgi apparatus) is a newly characterized membrane protein specifically localized at the Golgi apparatus. The N terminus of RKTG interacts with Gβ and tethers Gβγ to the Golgi apparatus. Overexpression of RKTG impedes the interaction of Gβγ with GRK2, abrogates the ligand-induced change of subcellular distribution of GRK2, reduces isoproterenol-stimulated phosphorylation of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), and alters β2AR desensitization. In addition, RKTG inhibits Gβγ- and ligand-mediated AKT phosphorylation that is enhanced in cells with downregulation of RKTG. Silencing of RKTG also alters GRK2 internalization and compromises ligand-induced Gβ translocation to the Golgi apparatus. Taken together, our results reveal that RKTG can modulate GPCR signaling through sequestering Gβγ to the Golgi apparatus and thereby attenuating the functions of Gβγ.

scholarly journals Regulation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel by the RH Domain of G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase, GRK2, and Gαq/11

2011 ◽  
Vol 286 (22) ◽  
pp. 19259-19269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Il-Ha Lee ◽  
Sung-Hee Song ◽  
Craig R. Campbell ◽  
Sharad Kumar ◽  
David I. Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Na Channel ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Receptor Kinase ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Α Subunits

The G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK2) belongs to a family of protein kinases that phosphorylates agonist-activated G protein-coupled receptors, leading to G protein-receptor uncoupling and termination of G protein signaling. GRK2 also contains a regulator of G protein signaling homology (RH) domain, which selectively interacts with α-subunits of the Gq/11 family that are released during G protein-coupled receptor activation. We have previously reported that kinase activity of GRK2 up-regulates activity of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in a Na+ absorptive epithelium by blocking Nedd4-2-dependent inhibition of ENaC. In the present study, we report that GRK2 also regulates ENaC by a mechanism that does not depend on its kinase activity. We show that a wild-type GRK2 (wtGRK2) and a kinase-dead GRK2 mutant (K220RGRK2), but not a GRK2 mutant that lacks the C-terminal RH domain (ΔRH-GRK2) or a GRK2 mutant that cannot interact with Gαq/11/14 (D110AGRK2), increase activity of ENaC. GRK2 up-regulates the basal activity of the channel as a consequence of its RH domain binding the α-subunits of Gq/11. We further found that expression of constitutively active Gαq/11 mutants significantly inhibits activity of ENaC. Conversely, co-expression of siRNA against Gαq/11 increases ENaC activity. The effect of Gαq on ENaC activity is not due to change in ENaC membrane expression and is independent of Nedd4-2. These findings reveal a novel mechanism by which GRK2 and Gq/11 α-subunits regulate the activity ENaC.

scholarly journals Endogenous modification of the chemoattractant CXCL5 alters receptor usage and enhances its activity toward neutrophils and monocytes

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (673) ◽  
pp. eaax3053
Author(s):  
Mieke Metzemaekers ◽  
Anneleen Mortier ◽  
Alessandro Vacchini ◽  
Daiane Boff ◽  
Karen Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Chemotactic Activity ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Agonist Activity ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The inflammatory human chemokine CXCL5 interacts with the G protein–coupled receptor CXCR2 to induce chemotaxis and activation of neutrophils. CXCL5 also has weak agonist activity toward CXCR1. The N-terminus of CXCL5 can be modified by proteolytic cleavage or deimination of Arg9 to citrulline (Cit), and these modifications can occur separately or together. Here, we chemically synthesized native CXCL5(1–78), truncated CXCL5 [CXCL5(9–78)], and the citrullinated (Cit9) versions and characterized their functions in vitro and in vivo. Compared with full-length CXCL5, N-terminal truncation resulted in enhanced potency to induce G protein signaling and β-arrestin recruitment through CXCR2, increased CXCL5-initiated internalization of CXCR2, and greater Ca2+ signaling downstream of not only CXCR2 but also CXCR1. Citrullination did not affect the capacity of CXCL5 to activate classical or alternative signaling pathways. Administering the various CXCL5 forms to mice revealed that in addition to neutrophils, CXCL5 exerted chemotactic activity toward monocytes and that this activity was increased by N-terminal truncation. These findings were confirmed by in vitro chemotaxis and Ca2+ signaling assays with primary human CD14+ monocytes and human THP-1 monocytes. In vitro and in vivo analyses suggested that CXCL5 targeted monocytes through CXCR1 and CXCR2. Thus, truncation of the N-terminus makes CXCL5 a more potent chemoattractant for both neutrophils and monocytes that acts through CXCR1 and CXCR2.

scholarly journals Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins (version 2020.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelin E. Ahlers-Dannen ◽  
Mohammed Alqinyah ◽  
Christopher Bodle ◽  
Josephine Bou Dagher ◽  
Bandana Chakravarti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Signaling Cascades ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Rgs Domain ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [160, 377, 411, 415, 416, 512, 519, 312, 6].

scholarly journals Role of the RGS (regulator of G protein signaling) domain of Axin in vertebrate axis formation

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Schneider ◽  
Diane Slusarski ◽  
Douglas Houston
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Axis Formation ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Signaling Domain

scholarly journals The role of regulator of G protein signaling 4 in delta-opioid receptor-mediated behaviors

2016 ◽  
Vol 234 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac J. Dripps ◽  
Qin Wang ◽  
Richard R. Neubig ◽  
Kenner C. Rice ◽  
John R. Traynor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Opioid Receptor ◽  
Delta Opioid Receptor ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Signaling

Toward understanding the role of G-protein signaling

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
Ryoji Kise ◽  
Yuki Ono ◽  
Kouki Kawakami ◽  
Asuka Inoue
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Signaling
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document