The Contextual Nature of Teaching: Mathematics and Reading Instruction in One Second-Grade Classroom

1990 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 497-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry Wood ◽  
Paul Cobb ◽  
Erna Yackel
1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 476-479
Author(s):  
Cheryl Ann Lubinski ◽  
Nancy Nesbitt Vacc

Seth was sitting in his second-grade classroom on the third day of school. He'd just finished writing on his paper after his teacher, Ms. Kates, had given the class a problem to solve.


2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Flanagan Knapp

Based on interviews and observations collected during a year in a second-grade classroom, this article presents case studies of two at-risk readers, Tom and Joshua. It describes their perceptions of in-school and out-of-school reading-related activities; their conceptions of reading, learning to read, and themselves as readers; and their responses to their teacher's learner-centered, meaning-based reading instruction. Both boys were enabled to participate in the classroom literacy community and both made progress in reading, but each brought different experiences and conceptions to the class, and so responded differently to the opportunities the class offered. Their stories illustrate the instructional significance of children's conceptions about reading; reaffirm the importance of flexible, meaning-based reading instruction; and demonstrate the power of looking past the “at-risk” label to understand the thoughts, beliefs, resources, and concerns of children who struggle with learning to read.


2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Stahl ◽  
Kathleen M. Heubach

This paper reports the results of a two-year project designed to reorganize basal reading instruction to stress fluent reading and automatic word recognition. The reorganized reading program had three components: a redesigned basal reading lesson that included repeated reading and partner reading, a choice reading period during the day, and a home reading program. Over two years of program implementation, students made significantly greater than expected growth in reading achievement in all 14 classes. All but two children who entered second grade reading at a primer level or higher (and half of those who did not) were reading at grade level or higher by the end of the year. Growth in fluency and accuracy appeared to be consistent over the whole year. Students' and teachers' attitudes toward the program were positive. In evaluating individual components, we found that self-selected partnerings seemed to work best and that children chose partners primarily out of friendship. Children tended to choose books that were at or slightly below their instructional level. In addition, children seemed to benefit instructionally from more difficult materials than generally assumed, with the greater amount of scaffolding provided in this program.


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 354-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Wenrick ◽  
Jean L. Behrend ◽  
Laura C. Mohs

See how the NCTM Process Standards in action integrate Common Core State Standards in a second-grade classroom.


1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doreen M. Blischak

A case study is presented to describe the development of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and literacy skills by a 9-year-old child, Thomas, who has quadriplegic cerebral palsy and a central vision impairment. Thomas’s development and progress from birth to second grade is chronicled. Development and use of his AAC system also is described, along with activities for language and literacy development and his inclusion in a second grade classroom.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Dokter ◽  
R. Aarts ◽  
J. Kurvers ◽  
A. Ros ◽  
S. Kroon

Abstract Students who are proficient academic language (AL) users, achieve better in school. To develop students’ AL register teachers’ AL input is necessary. The goal of this study was to investigate the extent of AL features in the language input first and second grade teachers give their students in whole class mathematics instruction. Five key features could be distinguished: lexical diversity, lexical complexity, lexical specificity, syntactic complexity and textual complexity. Teachers used all features, but the amount in which they used them varied. While all teachers used lexical specific language when teaching mathematics, they did not use very complex language input. The academicness of teachers’ input was significantly higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 with respect to lexical diversity and lexical specificity. The input during explanation and discussion only differed with regard to textual complexity, which was higher during explanation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document