scholarly journals Model of a prototype vehicle powered by a hybrid hydrogen system

2021 ◽  
Vol 2130 (1) ◽  
pp. 012002
Author(s):  
M Gilewski ◽  
J Czarnigowski ◽  
J Hunicz ◽  
K Dubeński ◽  
M Szafran ◽  
...  

Abstract The paper presents a physical mathematical model of the movement of a prototype vehicle equipped with an electric drive system powered by two sources of hydrogen fuel cell and supercapacitors. The model is based on the analysis of the forces acting on the vehicle during motion, taking into account both resistance to motion and propulsion. The model also considers the flow of electrical energy from two sources: a hydrogen fuel cell and supercapacitors, taking into account energy buffering. The aim of the model was to develop a tool to analyse fuel consumption at different control strategies of energy flow in a vehicle. The paper also presents the results of model identification for the Hydros prototype vehicle developed at Lublin University of Technology for the Shell Eco Marathon competition. Model validation was performed for a selected run during the 2019 London competition. High agreement of the model with the results of the actual vehicle was obtained.

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 4791-4804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo García ◽  
Juan P. Torreglosa ◽  
Luis M. Fernández ◽  
Francisco Jurado

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 5018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Szałek ◽  
Ireneusz Pielecha ◽  
Wojciech Cieslik

The search for fossil fuels substitutes forces the use of new propulsion technologies applied to means of transportation. Already widespread, hybrid vehicles are beginning to share the market with hydrogen-powered propulsion systems. These systems are fuel cells or internal combustion engines powered by hydrogen fuel. In this context, road tests of a hydrogen fuel cell drive were conducted under typical traffic conditions according to the requirements of the RDE test. As a result of the carried-out work, energy flow conditions were presented for three driving phases (urban, rural and motorway). The different contributions to the vehicle propulsion of the hydrogen system and the electric system in each phase of the driving route are indicated. The characteristic interaction of power train components during varying driving conditions was presented. A wide variation in the contribution of the fuel cell and the battery to the vehicle’s propulsion was identified. In urban conditions, the share of the fuel cell in the vehicle’s propulsion is more than three times that contributed by the battery, suburban—7 times, highway—28 times. In the entire test, the ratio of FC/BATT use was more than seven, while the energy consumption was more than 22 kWh/100 km. The amounts of battery energy used and recovered were found to be very close to each other under RDE test conditions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 489 ◽  
pp. 229450
Author(s):  
Sahar Foorginezhad ◽  
Masoud Mohseni-Dargah ◽  
Zahra Falahati ◽  
Rouzbeh Abbassi ◽  
Amir Razmjou ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 4384
Author(s):  
Hanhee Kim ◽  
Niklas Hartmann ◽  
Maxime Zeller ◽  
Renato Luise ◽  
Tamer Soylu

This paper shows the results of an in-depth techno-economic analysis of the public transport sector in a small to midsize city and its surrounding area. Public battery-electric and hydrogen fuel cell buses are comparatively evaluated by means of a total cost of ownership (TCO) model building on historical data and a projection of market prices. Additionally, a structural analysis of the public transport system of a specific city is performed, assessing best fitting bus lines for the use of electric or hydrogen busses, which is supported by a brief acceptance evaluation of the local citizens. The TCO results for electric buses show a strong cost decrease until the year 2030, reaching 23.5% lower TCOs compared to the conventional diesel bus. The optimal electric bus charging system will be the opportunity (pantograph) charging infrastructure. However, the opportunity charging method is applicable under the assumption that several buses share the same station and there is a “hotspot” where as many as possible bus lines converge. In the case of electric buses for the year 2020, the parameter which influenced the most on the TCO was the battery cost, opposite to the year 2030 in where the bus body cost and fuel cost parameters are the ones that dominate the TCO, due to the learning rate of the batteries. For H2 buses, finding a hotspot is not crucial because they have a similar range to the diesel ones as well as a similar refueling time. H2 buses until 2030 still have 15.4% higher TCO than the diesel bus system. Considering the benefits of a hypothetical scaling-up effect of hydrogen infrastructures in the region, the hydrogen cost could drop to 5 €/kg. In this case, the overall TCO of the hydrogen solution would drop to a slightly lower TCO than the diesel solution in 2030. Therefore, hydrogen buses can be competitive in small to midsize cities, even with limited routes. For hydrogen buses, the bus body and fuel cost make up a large part of the TCO. Reducing the fuel cost will be an important aspect to reduce the total TCO of the hydrogen bus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document