scholarly journals Study about Ecological Security Assessment of Beijing Valley Region Based on PSR Model——A Case study of Puwa Valley Region in Fangshan District

Author(s):  
Cui-hong Jiang ◽  
Guang-yong Li
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 7222
Author(s):  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Liyuan Zhang ◽  
Kanhua Yu ◽  
Yifan Zou

The development pattern of agriculture and energy exploitation in the southern marginal area of the Loess Plateau is widespread in the northern part of China. As a typical example, the fragile ecological area in the Weibei region is greatly affected by human factors, which makes the local ecological environment and social sustainability disturbed to varying degrees. Taking the Weibei region as the study area, through the comprehensive analysis of social, economic, and climate data, an index system suitable for the ecological security assessment of the Weibei region was constructed. The ecological security of this region was quantitatively evaluated by spatial principal component analysis (SPCA), and its ecological security partition was divided and analyzed. There were five zones at different levels, and I to V represented the development of ecological security from a low level to a high level. The results showed that from 1997 to 2017, the ecological security of different districts and counties in the Weibei region showed different trends. For example, the ecological security index of Tongguan County, Chengcheng County, and Pucheng County continued to decrease, but the overall index value was still high, and the ecological security index of Dali County, Fuping County, and Hancheng County increased. During this period, the ecological security of regions I and II continued to increase, while regions IV and V first decreased and then increased. At the same time, the area of the ecological security buffer region increased year by year. This study can provide a feasible method for assessing ecological security of the current regional model of mixed agriculture and energy extraction industry.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasi Tian ◽  
Lei Wang

In developing countries like China, urbanization is still occurring at a rapid pace. During urbanization, the urban land expands drastically, which makes suburbs the most affected area facing urban expansion. The land transition has proven to threaten the function and security of ecosystems, and therefore the topics of suburban land transition and ecological security have raised much attention. However, the urban-suburban interaction, which is one of the basic characteristics of suburbs, has been insufficiently considered. The urban-suburban interaction is developed based on the flows of people, materials, and information between urban and suburban areas, and it essentially reveals the relationship between human activities and land-use optimization. To fill the research gap, this study adopts a case study of Wuhan city, and first quantifies the urban-suburban interactions from a symbiotic perspective, and investigates rural residents and public buses to verify the estimated interactions. The results show that there is obvious heterogeneity in urban-suburban interactions in different suburban towns. Correlation analysis and geographic weight regression are then applied to demonstrate the relationship between the urban-suburban interaction and urbanization in the suburbs. Additionally, urbanization potential in the suburbs is estimated. Then, a suburban ecological security assessment is conducted by a “pressure-status-response” (PSR) model, and the urbanization potential that is estimated based on urban-suburban interaction is integrated as a “pressure” indicator. The comparison between the suburban ecological security assessment results based on considering and not considering urban-suburban interaction demonstrates the importance of considering urban-suburban interaction. This study contributes to the understanding of the complicated relationships of urban-suburban socio-economic, spatial, and ecological environments, and offers suggestions for suburban planning and ecological protection.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0131732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Jingqing Zhou ◽  
Hugo Loaiciga ◽  
Huaicheng Guo ◽  
Song Hong

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
吴未 WU Wei ◽  
陈明 CHEN Ming ◽  
范诗薇 FAN Shiwei ◽  
欧名豪 OU Minghao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document