scholarly journals Geoid Modelling of Kalimantan Island using Airborne Gravity Data and Global Geoid Model (EGM2008)

2021 ◽  
Vol 936 (1) ◽  
pp. 012029
Author(s):  
Zahroh Arsy Udama ◽  
Ira Mutiara Anjasmara ◽  
Arisauna Maulidyan Pahlevi ◽  
Anas Sharafeldin Mohamed Osman
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Gravity Anomaly ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Wave Component ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Free Air Gravity ◽  
Local Geoid

Abstract The availability of geoids, especially in survey and mapping activities, is useful for transforming the geometric heights obtained from observations of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) into orthometric heights that have real physical meanings such as those obtained from waterpass measurements. If a geoid is available, the orthometric heights of points on earth can be determined using the GNSS heighting method. The use of modern survey and mapping instruments based on satellite observations such as GNSS is more efficient in terms of time, effort, and cost compared to the accurate waterpass method. According to the Indonesian Geospatial Information Agency (BIG) it is stated that the application of geoid as a national Vertical Geospatial Reference System has an adequate and ideal category if the accuracy is higher than 15 cm. Recent studies have shown that it is possible to generate local geoid models with centimetre accuracy by utilizing airborne gravity data. We calculate free-air gravity anomaly data is calculated by processing airborne gravity and GNSS data using the Stokes Integral method on AGR software. Next a geoid model is created by calculating the contribution of three components, namely the long wave component represented by the EGM2008 global geoid data model, the shortwave component represented by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data and the medium wave component represented by the free-air gravity anomaly data. The geoid model validation was carried out using the geoid fitting method for geoid accuracy by calculating the difference between the gravimetric geoid and the geometric geoid and comparing it with the global geoid model EGM2008 degrees 2190. As a result, the total geoid model accuracy value was determined to be 49.4 cm on gravimetric geoid undulations with a standard deviation of 7.1 cm. Meanwhile, the results of the EGM2008 geoid undulation accuracy test at 2190 degrees resulted in an accuracy of 51.9 cm with a standard deviation of 9.9 cm. These results indicate that the local geoid model from airborne gravity measurement data produces a geoid model with a higher accuracy than the global geoid model EGM2008 degrees 2190. However, the accuracy of the resulting data is still below the BIG standard of 15 cm, so further research is needed to produce a geoid model which conforms to the standard.

scholarly journals GRAVIMETRIC GEOID MODELLING OVER PENINSULAR MALAYSIA USING TWO DIFFERENT GRIDDING APPROACHES FOR COMBINING FREE AIR ANOMALY

2019 ◽  
Vol XLII-4/W16 ◽  
pp. 515-522
Author(s):  
M. F. Pa’suya ◽  
A. H. M. Din ◽  
J. C. McCubbine ◽  
A. H. Omar ◽  
Z. M. Amin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
Reference Signal ◽  
Digital Terrain Model ◽  
Peninsular Malaysia ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Free Air Anomaly

Abstract. We investigate the use of the KTH Method to compute gravimetric geoid models of Malaysian Peninsular and the effect of two differing strategies to combine and interpolate terrestrial, marine DTU17 free air gravity anomaly data at regular grid nodes. Gravimetric geoid models were produced for both free air anomaly grids using the GOCE-only geopotential model GGM GO_CONS_GCF_2_SPW_R4 as the long wavelength reference signal and high-resolution TanDEM-X global digital terrain model. The geoid models were analyzed to assess how the different gridding strategies impact the gravimetric geoid over Malaysian Peninsular by comparing themto 172 GNSS-levelling derived geoid undulations. The RMSE of the two sets of gravimetric geoid model / GNSS-levelling residuals differed by approx. 26.2 mm. When a 4-parameter fit is used, the difference between the RMSE of the residuals reduced to 8 mm. The geoid models shown here do not include the latest airborne gravity data used in the computation of the official gravimetric geoid for the Malaysian Peninsular, for this reason they are not as precise.

scholarly journals Gravimetric Geoid Modeling from the Combination of Satellite Gravity Model, Terrestrial and Airborne Gravity Data: A Case Study in the Mountainous Area, Colorado

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Jiang ◽  
Yamin Dang ◽  
Chuanyin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Gravity Model ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Combination Method ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Mountainous Area ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Satellite Gravity ◽  
Terrestrial Gravity

Abstract Constructing a high precision and high resolution gravimetric geoid model in the mountainous area is a quite challenging task because of the high, rough nature of topography and the geological complexity. One way out is to use as many gravity observations from different sources as possible such as satellite, terrestrial and airborne gravity data, thus the proper combination of heterogeneous gravity datasets is critical. In a rough topographic area in Colorado, we computed a set of gravimetric geoid models based on different combination modes of satellite gravity models, terrestrial and airborne gravity data using the spectral combination method. The gravimetric geoid model obtained from the combination of satellite gravity model GOCO06S and terrestrial gravity data agrees with the GPS leveling measured geoid heights at 194 benchmarks in 5.8 cm in terms of the standard deviation of discrepancies, and the standard deviation reduces to 5.3 cm after including the GRAV-D airborne gravity data collected at ~6.2 km altitude into the data combination. The contributions of airborne gravity data to the signal and accuracy improvements of the geoid models were quantified for different spatial distribution and density of terrestrial gravity data. The results demonstrate that, although the airborne gravity survey was flown at a high altitude, the additions of airborne gravity data improved the accuracies of geoid models by 13.4% - 19.8% in the mountainous area (elevations > 2000 m) and 12.7% - 21% (elevations < 2000 m) in the moderate area in the cases of terrestrial gravity data spacings are larger than 15 km.

scholarly journals Gravimetric geoid modeling from the combination of satellite gravity model, terrestrial and airborne gravity data: a case study in the mountainous area, Colorado

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Jiang ◽  
Yamin Dang ◽  
Chuanyin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Gravity Model ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Combination Method ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Mountainous Area ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Satellite Gravity ◽  
Terrestrial Gravity

Abstract Constructing a high precision and high resolution gravimetric geoid model in the mountainous area is a quite challenging task because of the the lack of terrestrial gravity observations, rough high, rough nature of topography and the geological complexity. One way out is to use as hight quality and well distributed satellite and airborne gravity data to fill the gravity data gapsmany gravity observations from different sources as possible such as satellite, terrestrial and airborne gravity data, thus the proper combination of heterogeneous gravity datasets is critical. In a rough topographic area in Colorado, we computed a set of gravimetric geoid models based on different combination modes of satellite gravity models, terrestrial and airborne gravity data using the spectral combination method. The gravimetric geoid model obtained from the combination of satellite gravity model GOCO06S and terrestrial gravity data agrees with the GPS leveling measured geoid heights at 194 benchmarks in 5.8 cm in terms of the standard deviation of discrepancies, and the standard deviation reduces to 5.3 cm after including the GRAV-D airborne gravity data collected at ~6.2 km altitude into the data combination. The contributions of airborne gravity data to the signal and accuracy improvements of the geoid models were quantified for different spatial distribution and density of terrestrial gravity data. The results demonstrate that, although the airborne gravity survey was flown at a high altitude, the additions of airborne gravity data improved the accuracies of geoid models by 13.4% - 19.8% in the mountainous area (elevations > 2000 m) and 12.7% - 21% (elevations < 2000 m) in the moderate area in the cases of terrestrial gravity data spacings are larger than 15 km.

scholarly journals Gravimetric geoid modeling from the combination of satellite gravity model, terrestrial and airborne gravity data: a case study in the mountainous area, Colorado

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Jiang ◽  
Yamin Dang ◽  
Chuanyin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Gravity Model ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Combination Method ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Mountainous Area ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Satellite Gravity ◽  
Terrestrial Gravity

Abstract Constructing a high precision and high resolution gravimetric geoid model in the mountainous area is a quite challenging task because of the lack of terrestrial gravity observations, rough topography and the geological complexity. One way out is to use high quality and well distributed satellite and airborne gravity data to fill the gravity data gaps, thus the proper combination of heterogeneous gravity datasets is critical. In a rough topographic area in Colorado, we computed a set of gravimetric geoid models based on different combination modes of satellite gravity models, terrestrial and airborne gravity data using the spectral combination method. The gravimetric geoid model obtained from the combination of satellite gravity model GOCO06S and terrestrial gravity data agrees with the GPS leveling measured geoid heights at 194 benchmarks in 5.8 cm in terms of the standard deviation of discrepancies, and the standard deviation reduces to 5.3 cm after including the GRAV-D airborne gravity data collected at ~6.2 km altitude into the data combination. The contributions of airborne gravity data to the signal and accuracy improvements of the geoid models were quantified for different spatial distribution and density of terrestrial gravity data. The results demonstrate that, although the airborne gravity survey was flown at a high altitude, the additions of airborne gravity data improved the accuracies of geoid models by 13.4% - 19.8% in the mountainous area (elevations > 2000 m) and 12.7% - 21% (elevations < 2000 m) in the moderate area in the cases of terrestrial gravity data spacings are larger than 15 km.

scholarly journals Gravimetric geoid modeling from the combination of satellite gravity model, terrestrial and airborne gravity data: a case study in the mountainous area, Colorado

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Jiang ◽  
Yamin Dang ◽  
Chuanyin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Gravity Model ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Combination Method ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Mountainous Area ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Satellite Gravity ◽  
Terrestrial Gravity

AbstractConstructing a high-precision and high-resolution gravimetric geoid model in the mountainous area is a quite challenging task because of the lack of terrestrial gravity observations, rough topography and the geological complexity. One way out is to use high-quality and well-distributed satellite and airborne gravity data to fill the gravity data gaps; thus, the proper combination of heterogeneous gravity datasets is critical. In a rough topographic area in Colorado, we computed a set of gravimetric geoid models based on different combination modes of satellite gravity models, terrestrial and airborne gravity data using the spectral combination method. The gravimetric geoid model obtained from the combination of satellite gravity model GOCO06S and terrestrial gravity data agrees with the GPS leveling measured geoid heights at 194 benchmarks in 5.8 cm in terms of the standard deviation of discrepancies, and the standard deviation reduces to 5.3 cm after including the GRAV-D airborne gravity data collected at ~ 6.2 km altitude into the data combination. The contributions of airborne gravity data to the signal and accuracy improvements of the geoid models were quantified for different spatial distribution and density of terrestrial gravity data. The results demonstrate that, although the airborne gravity survey was flown at a high altitude, the additions of airborne gravity data improved the accuracies of geoid models by 13.4%–19.8% in the mountainous area (elevations > 2000 m) and 12.7%–21% (elevations < 2000 m) in the moderate area in the cases of terrestrial gravity data spacings are larger than 15 km.

scholarly journals Contribution of GRAV-D airborne gravity to improvement of regional gravimetric geoid modelling in Colorado, USA

2021 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matej Varga ◽  
Martin Pitoňák ◽  
Pavel Novák ◽  
Tomislav Bašić
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Anomaly ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Mountainous Area ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Terrestrial Gravity ◽  
The Third ◽  
Regional Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Computation

AbstractThis paper studies the contribution of airborne gravity data to improvement of gravimetric geoid modelling across the mountainous area in Colorado, USA. First, airborne gravity data was processed, filtered, and downward-continued. Then, three gravity anomaly grids were prepared; the first grid only from the terrestrial gravity data, the second grid only from the downward-continued airborne gravity data, and the third grid from combined downward-continued airborne and terrestrial gravity data. Gravimetric geoid models with the three gravity anomaly grids were determined using the least-squares modification of Stokes’ formula with additive corrections (LSMSA) method. The absolute and relative accuracy of the computed gravimetric geoid models was estimated on GNSS/levelling points. Results exhibit the accuracy improved by 1.1 cm or 20% in terms of standard deviation when airborne and terrestrial gravity data was used for geoid computation, compared to the geoid model computed only from terrestrial gravity data. Finally, the spectral analysis of surface gravity anomaly grids and geoid models was performed, which provided insights into specific wavelength bands in which airborne gravity data contributed and improved the power spectrum.

The Wilkes Land Anomaly revisited

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Weihaupt ◽  
Frans G. Van Der Hoeven ◽  
Frederick B. Chambers ◽  
Claude Lorius ◽  
John W. Wyckoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Anomaly ◽  
Ross Sea ◽  
Original Description ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Gravity Survey ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Magnetic Survey ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Wilkes Land ◽  
Free Air Gravity

AbstractThe Wilkes Land Gravity Anomaly, first reported in 1959–60, is located in northern Victoria Land in the Pacific Ocean sector of East Antarctica, 1400 km west of the Ross Sea and centred at 70°00'S-140°00'E. Initially described on the basis of ground-based seismic and gravity survey, and estimated at the time to have a diameter of 243 km, the original data are now supplemented by data from airborne radiosound survey, airborne gravity survey, airborne magnetic survey and satellite remote sensing. These new data enable us to expand upon the original data, and reveal that the structure has a diameter of some 510 km, is accompanied by ice streams and a chaotically disturbed region of the continental ice sheet, has a subglacial topographical relief of ≥1500 m, and exhibits a negative free air gravity anomaly associated with a larger central positive free air gravity anomaly. The feature has been described as a volcanic structure, an igneous intrusion, an ancient igneous diapir, a subglacial sedimentary basin, a glacially eroded subglacial valley, a tectonic feature and a meteorite impact crater. We re-examine the feature on the basis of these collective data, with emphasis on the free air gravity anomaly signs, magnitudes and patterns, magnetic signature magnitudes and patterns, and the size, shape, dimensions and morphology of the structure. This enhanced view adds substantially to the original description provided at the time of discovery, and suggests several explanations for the origin of the Wilkes Land Anomaly. However, the importance of this feature lies not only in determining its origin but by the fact that this part of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin is one of the most prominent regional negative geoid and associated gravity anomalies of the Antarctic continent.

On Downward Continuing Airborne Gravity Data for Local Geoid Modeling

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaopeng Li ◽  
Jianliang Huang ◽  
Cornelis Slobbe ◽  
Roland Klees ◽  
Martin Willberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Downward Continuation ◽  
Continuation Methods ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Spherical Harmonic Analysis ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Numerical Comparison ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Local Geoid

&lt;p&gt;The topic of downward continuation (DWC) has been studied for many decades without very conclusive answers on how different methods compare with each other. On the other hand, there are vast amounts of airborne gravity data collected by the GRAV-D project at NGS NOAA of the United States and by many other groups around the world. These airborne gravity data are collected on flight lines where the height of the aircraft actually varies significantly, and this causes challenges for users of the data. A downward continued gravity grid either on the topography or on the geoid is still needed for many applications such as improving the resolution of a local geoid model. Four downward continuation methods, i.e., Residual Least Squares Collocation (RLSC), the Inverse Poisson Integral, Truncated Spherical Harmonic Analysis, and Radial Basis Functions (RBF), are tested on both simulated data sets and real GRAV-D airborne gravity data in a previous joint study between NGS NOAA and CGS NRCan. The study group is further expanded by adding the TU Delft group on RBF and the TUM group on RLSC to incorporate more updated knowledge in the theoretical background and more in-depth discussion on the numerical results. A formal study group will be established inside IAG for providing the best answers for downward continuing airborne gravity data for local gravity field improvement. In this presentation, we review and compare the four methods theoretically and numerically. Simulated and real airborne and terrestrial data are used for the numerical comparison over block MS05 of the GRAV-D project in Colorado, USA, where the 1cm geoid experiment was performed by 15 international teams. The conclusion drawn from this study will advance the use of GRAV-D data for the new North American-Pacific Geopotential Datum of 2022 (NAPGD2022).&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Usporedba različitih pristupa Bouguer-ove redukcije na temelju satelitskih gravimetrijskih podataka

Geofizika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-261
Author(s):  
Fan Luo ◽  
Xin Tao ◽  
Guangming Fu ◽  
Chong Zhang ◽  
Kun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Anomaly ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Gravitational Effect ◽  
Seismic Profile ◽  
Bouguer Gravity ◽  
Seismic Profiles ◽  
Satellite Gravity ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Free Air Gravity

Satellite gravity data are widely used in the field of geophysics to study deep structures at the regional and global scales. These data comprise free-air gravity anomaly data, which usually need to be corrected to a Bouguer gravity anomaly for practical application. Bouguer reduction approaches can be divided into two methods based on the coordinate system: the spherical coordinates method (SBG) and the Cartesian coordinates method; the latter is further divided into the CEBG and CBG methods, which do and do not include the Earth’s curvature correction. In this paper, free-air gravity anomaly data from the eastern Tibetan Plateau and its adjacent areas were used as the basic data to compare the CBG, CEBG, and SBG Bouguer gravity correction methods. The comparison of these three Bouguer gravity correction methods shows that the effect of the Earth’s curvature on the gravitational effect increases with increasing elevation in the study area. We want to understand the inversion accuracy for the data obtained by different Bouguer gravity reduction approaches. The depth distributions of the Moho were obtained by the interface inversion of the Bouguer gravity anomalies obtained by the CBG, CEBG, and SBG, and active seismic profiles were used as references for comparison and evaluation. The results show that the depths of the Moho obtained by the SBG inversion are more consistent with the measured seismic profile depths. Therefore, the SBG method is recommended as the most realistic approach in the process of global or regional research employing gravity data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document