scholarly journals Structural Design and Analysis of Flat LOFT Apartment with Large Aspect Ratio

Author(s):  
Junjie Chen ◽  
Mufeng Chen ◽  
Zhixiong Lu
1958 ◽  
Vol 62 (575) ◽  
pp. 787-795
Author(s):  
N. E. Rowe

During my five years from July 1929 at Weybridge the amount that was done was amazing, although the technical and design staffs were microscopic by present-day standards. The types included Vimy, Virginia, Victoria, B.19/27 Night Bomber—all of these were twin-engined—Type 163, 4-engined Night Bomber, a P.V. with tandem engines; Vespa, Vildebeeste Torpedo Bomber and other roles, C.O.W. Gun Fighter, G.4/31 Reconnaissance Bomber (2 versions)—all of these were single engined military machines; Viastra, passenger carrier, Vellore and Vellox Freighters—twin-engined civil aircraft, although Viastra first flew with three engines. All were biplanes with the exception of the C.O.W. Gun Fighter, the Viastra and the second prototype G.4/31 which were monoplanes. Incidentally, the G.4/31 was the first example of geodetic construction, the fuselage being so constructed. My recollection is that Mr. Wallis was responsible for the structural design of this aircraft which had an unusually large aspect ratio. It became the Wellesley, had a most honourable career in the R.A.F. and of course held the world's long distance record for many years.


Author(s):  
Alexandrina Untaroiu ◽  
Costin D. Untaroiu ◽  
Houston G. Wood ◽  
Paul E. Allaire

Traditional annular seal models are based on bulk flow theory. While these methods are computationally efficient and can predict dynamic properties fairly well for short seals, they lack accuracy in cases of seals with complex geometry or with large aspect ratios (above 1.0). In this paper, the linearized rotordynamic coefficients for a seal with large aspect ratio are calculated by means of a three dimensional CFD analysis performed to predict the fluid-induced forces acting on the rotor. For comparison, the dynamic coefficients were also calculated using two other codes: one developed on the bulk flow method and one based on finite difference method. These two sets of dynamic coefficients were compared with those obtained from CFD. Results show a reasonable correlation for the direct stiffness estimates, with largest value predicted by CFD. In terms of cross-coupled stiffness, which is known to be directly related to cross-coupled forces that contribute to rotor instability, the CFD predicts also the highest value; however a much larger discrepancy can be observed for this term (73% higher than value predicted by finite difference method and 79% higher than bulk flow code prediction). Similar large differences in predictions one can see in the estimates for damping and direct mass coefficients, where highest values are predicted by the bulk flow method. These large variations in damping and mass coefficients, and most importantly the large difference in the cross-coupled stiffness predictions, may be attributed to the large difference in seal geometry (i.e. the large aspect ratio AR>1.0 of this seal model vs. the short seal configuration the bulk flow code is usually calibrated for, using an empirical friction factor).


2005 ◽  
Vol 430 (3) ◽  
pp. L57-L60 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Rincon ◽  
F. Lignières ◽  
M. Rieutord

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document