scholarly journals Mitotic exit kinase Dbf2 directly phosphorylates chitin synthase Chs2 to regulate cytokinesis in budding yeast

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
pp. 2445-2456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Younghoon Oh ◽  
Kuang-Jung Chang ◽  
Peter Orlean ◽  
Carsten Wloka ◽  
Raymond Deshaies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Chitin Synthase ◽  
Chitin Synthesis ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Ecm Remodeling ◽  
Division Site ◽  
Primary Septum

How cell cycle machinery regulates extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling during cytokinesis remains poorly understood. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the primary septum (PS), a functional equivalent of animal ECM, is synthesized during cytokinesis by the chitin synthase Chs2. Here, we report that Dbf2, a conserved mitotic exit kinase, localizes to the division site after Chs2 and directly phosphorylates Chs2 on several residues, including Ser-217. Both phosphodeficient (chs2‑S217A) and phosphomimic (chs2‑S217D) mutations cause defects in cytokinesis, suggesting that dynamic phosphorylation–dephosphorylation of Ser-217 is critical for Chs2 function. It is striking that Chs2‑S217A constricts asymmetrically with the actomyosin ring (AMR), whereas Chs2-S217D displays little or no constriction and remains highly mobile at the division site. These data suggest that Chs2 phosphorylation by Dbf2 triggers its dissociation from the AMR during the late stage of cytokinesis. Of interest, both chs2‑S217A and chs2‑S217D mutants are robustly suppressed by increased dosage of Cyk3, a cytokinesis protein that displays Dbf2‑dependent localization and also stimulates Chs2‑mediated chitin synthesis. Thus Dbf2 regulates PS formation through at least two independent pathways: direct phosphorylation and Cyk3‑mediated activation of Chs2. Our study establishes a mechanism for direct cell cycle control of ECM remodeling during cytokinesis.

scholarly journals Role of Inn1 and its interactions with Hof1 and Cyk3 in promoting cleavage furrow and septum formation in S. cerevisiae

2009 ◽  
Vol 185 (6) ◽  
pp. 995-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichi Nishihama ◽  
Jennifer H. Schreiter ◽  
Masayuki Onishi ◽  
Elizabeth A. Vallen ◽  
Julia Hanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Chitin Synthase ◽  
Cleavage Furrow ◽  
Sh3 Domains ◽  
C2 Domains ◽  
Division Site ◽  
Primary Septum ◽  
N Terminus

Cytokinesis requires coordination of actomyosin ring (AMR) contraction with rearrangements of the plasma membrane and extracellular matrix. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, new membrane, the chitin synthase Chs2 (which forms the primary septum [PS]), and the protein Inn1 are all delivered to the division site upon mitotic exit even when the AMR is absent. Inn1 is essential for PS formation but not for Chs2 localization. The Inn1 C-terminal region is necessary for localization, and distinct PXXP motifs in this region mediate functionally important interactions with SH3 domains in the cytokinesis proteins Hof1 (an F-BAR protein) and Cyk3 (whose overexpression can restore PS formation in inn1Δ cells). The Inn1 N terminus resembles C2 domains but does not appear to bind phospholipids; nonetheless, when overexpressed or fused to Hof1, it can provide Inn1 function even in the absence of the AMR. Thus, Inn1 and Cyk3 appear to cooperate in activating Chs2 for PS formation, which allows coordination of AMR contraction with ingression of the cleavage furrow.

scholarly journals Inhibition of Cdc42 during mitotic exit is required for cytokinesis

2013 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Atkins ◽  
Satoshi Yoshida ◽  
Koji Saito ◽  
Chi-Fang Wu ◽  
Daniel J. Lew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
General Feature ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Division Site ◽  
Polo Kinase ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulator ◽  
P21 Activated Kinase

The role of Cdc42 and its regulation during cytokinesis is not well understood. Using biochemical and imaging approaches in budding yeast, we demonstrate that Cdc42 activation peaks during the G1/S transition and during anaphase but drops during mitotic exit and cytokinesis. Cdc5/Polo kinase is an important upstream cell cycle regulator that suppresses Cdc42 activity. Failure to down-regulate Cdc42 during mitotic exit impairs the normal localization of key cytokinesis regulators—Iqg1 and Inn1—at the division site, and results in an abnormal septum. The effects of Cdc42 hyperactivation are largely mediated by the Cdc42 effector p21-activated kinase Ste20. Inhibition of Cdc42 and related Rho guanosine triphosphatases may be a general feature of cytokinesis in eukaryotes.

scholarly journals Targeting and functional mechanisms of the cytokinesis‑related F‑BAR protein Hof1 during the cell cycle

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1305-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Younghoon Oh ◽  
Jennifer Schreiter ◽  
Ryuichi Nishihama ◽  
Carsten Wloka ◽  
Erfei Bi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Polarized Growth ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Septum Formation ◽  
Primary Septum ◽  
Bud Neck ◽  
Ring Constriction

F-BAR proteins are membrane‑associated proteins believed to link the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton in cellular processes such as cytokinesis and endocytosis. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the F‑BAR protein Hof1 localizes to the division site in a complex pattern during the cell cycle and plays an important role in cytokinesis. However, the mechanisms underlying its localization and function are poorly understood. Here we show that Hof1 contains three distinct targeting domains that contribute to cytokinesis differentially. The N‑terminal half of Hof1 localizes to the bud neck and the sites of polarized growth during the cell cycle. The neck localization is mediated mainly by an interaction between the second coiled‑coil region in the N‑terminus and the septin Cdc10, whereas the localization to the sites of polarized growth is mediated entirely by the F‑BAR domain. In contrast, the C‑terminal half of Hof1 interacts with Myo1, the sole myosin‑II heavy chain in budding yeast, and localizes to the bud neck in a Myo1‑dependent manner from the onset to the completion of cytokinesis. We also show that the SH3 domain in the C‑terminus plays an important role in maintaining the symmetry of Myo1 ring constriction during cytokinesis and that Hof1 interacts with Chs2, a chitin synthase that is required for primary septum formation. Together these data define a mechanism that accounts for the localization of Hof1 during the cell cycle and suggest that Hof1 may function in cytokinesis by coupling actomyosin ring constriction to primary septum formation through interactions with Myo1 and Chs2.

scholarly journals IBD2 Encodes a Novel Component of the Bub2p-Dependent Spindle Checkpoint in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-609
Author(s):  
Hyung-Seo Hwang ◽  
Kiwon Song
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Essential Gene ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Arrest ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway

Abstract During mitosis, genomic integrity is maintained by the proper coordination of mitotic events through the spindle checkpoint. The bifurcated spindle checkpoint blocks cell cycle progression at metaphase by monitoring unattached kinetochores and inhibits mitotic exit in response to the incorrect orientation of the mitotic spindle. Bfa1p is a spindle checkpoint regulator of budding yeast in the Bub2p checkpoint pathway for proper mitotic exit. We have isolated a novel Bfa1p interacting protein named Ibd2p in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that IBD2 (Inhibition of Bud Division 2) is not an essential gene but its deletion mutant proceeded through the cell cycle in the presence of microtubule-destabilizing drugs, thereby inducing a sharp decrease in viability. In addition, overexpression of Mps1p caused partial mitotic arrest in ibd2Δ as well as in bub2Δ, suggesting that IBD2 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint downstream of MPS1. Overexpression of Ibd2p induced mitotic arrest with increased levels of Clb2p in wild type and mad2Δ, but not in deletion mutants of BUB2 and BFA1. Pds1p was also stabilized by the overexpression of Ibd2p in wild-type cells. The mitotic arrest defects observed in ibd2Δ in the presence of nocodazole were restored by additional copies of BUB2, BFA1, and CDC5, whereas an extra copy of IBD2 could not rescue the mitotic arrest defects of bub2Δ and bfa1Δ. The mitotic arrest defects of ibd2Δ were not recovered by MAD2, or vice versa. Analysis of the double mutant combinations ibd2Δmad2Δ, ibd2Δbub2Δ, and ibd2Δdyn1Δ showed that IBD2 belongs to the BUB2 epistasis group. Taken together, these data demonstrate that IBD2 encodes a novel component of the BUB2-dependent spindle checkpoint pathway that functions upstream of BUB2 and BFA1.

scholarly journals Kinetic Analysis of a Molecular Model of the Budding Yeast Cell Cycle

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 369-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine C. Chen ◽  
Attila Csikasz-Nagy ◽  
Bela Gyorffy ◽  
John Val ◽  
Bela Novak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Molecular Model ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Molecular Events ◽  
Eukaryotic Organism ◽  
Molecular Machinery ◽  
Time Courses

The molecular machinery of cell cycle control is known in more detail for budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, than for any other eukaryotic organism. In recent years, many elegant experiments on budding yeast have dissected the roles of cyclin molecules (Cln1–3 and Clb1–6) in coordinating the events of DNA synthesis, bud emergence, spindle formation, nuclear division, and cell separation. These experimental clues suggest a mechanism for the principal molecular interactions controlling cyclin synthesis and degradation. Using standard techniques of biochemical kinetics, we convert the mechanism into a set of differential equations, which describe the time courses of three major classes of cyclin-dependent kinase activities. Model in hand, we examine the molecular events controlling “Start” (the commitment step to a new round of chromosome replication, bud formation, and mitosis) and “Finish” (the transition from metaphase to anaphase, when sister chromatids are pulled apart and the bud separates from the mother cell) in wild-type cells and 50 mutants. The model accounts for many details of the physiology, biochemistry, and genetics of cell cycle control in budding yeast.

scholarly journals Systems Level Modeling of the Cell Cycle Using Budding Yeast

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 117693510700300 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.P. Ingalls ◽  
B.P. Duncker ◽  
D.R. Kim ◽  
B.J. McConkey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Cell Cycle Gene ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Gene Transcript ◽  
Proteomics Data ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Levels

Proteins involved in the regulation of the cell cycle are highly conserved across all eukaryotes, and so a relatively simple eukaryote such as yeast can provide insight into a variety of cell cycle perturbations including those that occur in human cancer. To date, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has provided the largest amount of experimental and modeling data on the progression of the cell cycle, making it a logical choice for in-depth studies of this process. Moreover, the advent of methods for collection of high-throughput genome, transcriptome, and proteome data has provided a means to collect and precisely quantify simultaneous cell cycle gene transcript and protein levels, permitting modeling of the cell cycle on the systems level. With the appropriate mathematical framework and sufficient and accurate data on cell cycle components, it should be possible to create a model of the cell cycle that not only effectively describes its operation, but can also predict responses to perturbations such as variation in protein levels and responses to external stimuli including targeted inhibition by drugs. In this review, we summarize existing data on the yeast cell cycle, proteomics technologies for quantifying cell cycle proteins, and the mathematical frameworks that can integrate this data into representative and effective models. Systems level modeling of the cell cycle will require the integration of high-quality data with the appropriate mathematical framework, which can currently be attained through the combination of dynamic modeling based on proteomics data and using yeast as a model organism.

scholarly journals Far3 and Five Interacting Proteins Prevent Premature Recovery from Pheromone Arrest in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1750-1763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary A. Kemp ◽  
George F. Sprague,
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Open Reading Frames ◽  
Velocity Sedimentation ◽  
Interacting Proteins ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Mutant Cells ◽  
Two Hybrid ◽  
Reading Frames

ABSTRACT In budding yeast, diffusible mating pheromones initiate a signaling pathway that culminates in several responses, including cell cycle arrest. Only a handful of genes required for the interface between pheromone response and the cell cycle have been identified, among them FAR1 and FAR3; of these, only FAR1 has been extensively characterized. In an effort to learn about the mechanism by which Far3 acts, we used the two-hybrid method to identify interacting proteins. We identified five previously uncharacterized open reading frames, dubbed FAR7, FAR8, FAR9, FAR10, and FAR11, that cause a far3-like pheromone arrest defect when disrupted. Using two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation analysis, we found that all six Far proteins interact with each other. Moreover, velocity sedimentation experiments suggest that Far3 and Far7 to Far11 form a complex. The phenotype of a sextuple far3far7-far11 mutant is no more severe than any single mutant. Thus, FAR3 and FAR7 to FAR11 all participate in the same pathway leading to G1 arrest. These mutants initially arrest in response to pheromone but resume budding after 10 h. Under these conditions, wild-type cells fail to resume budding even after several days whereas far1 mutant cells resume budding within 1 h. We conclude that the FAR3-dependent arrest pathway is functionally distinct from that which employs FAR1.

scholarly journals Chs1p and Chs3p, two proteins involved in chitin synthesis, populate a compartment of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae endocytic pathway.

1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1909-1919 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ziman ◽  
J S Chuang ◽  
R W Schekman
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Endocytic Pathway ◽  
Chitin Synthase ◽  
Cell Fractionation ◽  
Cell Wall Polysaccharide ◽  
Chitin Synthesis ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Steady State Levels ◽  
Membrane Bound

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the synthesis of chitin, a cell-wall polysaccharide, is temporally and spatially regulated with respect to the cell cycle and morphogenesis. Using immunological reagents, we found that steady-state levels of Chs1p and Chs3p, two chitin synthase enzymes, did not fluctuate during the cell cycle, indicating that they are not simply regulated by synthesis and degradation. Previous cell fractionation studies demonstrated that chitin synthase I activity (CSI) exists in a plasma membrane form and in intracellular membrane-bound particles called chitosomes. Chitosomes were proposed to act as a reservoir for regulated transport of chitin synthase enzymes to the division septum. We found that Chs1p and Chs3p resided partly in chitosomes and that this distribution was not cell cycle regulated. Pulse-chase cell fractionation experiments showed that chitosome production was blocked in an endocytosis mutant (end4-1), indicating that endocytosis is required for the formation or maintenance of chitosomes. Additionally, Ste2p, internalized by ligand-induced endocytosis, cofractionated with chitosomes, suggesting that these membrane proteins populate the same endosomal compartment. However, in contrast to Ste2p, Chs1p and Chs3p were not rapidly degraded, thus raising the possibility that the temporal and spatial regulation of chitin synthesis is mediated by the mobilization of an endosomal pool of chitin synthase enzymes.

scholarly journals Computational modelling of mitotic exit in budding yeast: the role of separase and Cdc14 endocycles

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (61) ◽  
pp. 1128-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Vinod ◽  
Paula Freire ◽  
Ahmed Rattani ◽  
Andrea Ciliberto ◽  
Frank Uhlmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Computational Modelling ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Intuitive Reasoning ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Systems View

The operating principles of complex regulatory networks are best understood with the help of mathematical modelling rather than by intuitive reasoning. Hereby, we study the dynamics of the mitotic exit (ME) control system in budding yeast by further developing the Queralt's model. A comprehensive systems view of the network regulating ME is provided based on classical experiments in the literature. In this picture, Cdc20–APC is a critical node controlling both cyclin (Clb2 and Clb5) and phosphatase (Cdc14) branches of the regulatory network. On the basis of experimental situations ranging from single to quintuple mutants, the kinetic parameters of the network are estimated. Numerical analysis of the model quantifies the dependence of ME control on the proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions of separase. We show that the requirement of the non-proteolytic function of separase for ME depends on cyclin-dependent kinase activity. The model is also used for the systematic analysis of the recently discovered Cdc14 endocycles. The significance of Cdc14 endocycles in eukaryotic cell cycle control is discussed as well.

scholarly journals Quantitative Characterization of a Mitotic Cyclin Threshold Regulating Exit from Mitosis

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2129-2138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick R. Cross ◽  
Lea Schroeder ◽  
Martin Kruse ◽  
Katherine C. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Model Predictions ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin ◽  
Constitutive Overexpression

Regulation of cyclin abundance is central to eukaryotic cell cycle control. Strong overexpression of mitotic cyclins is known to lock the system in mitosis, but the quantitative behavior of the control system as this threshold is approached has only been characterized in the in vitro Xenopus extract system. Here, we quantitate the threshold for mitotic block in budding yeast caused by constitutive overexpression of the mitotic cyclin Clb2. Near this threshold, the system displays marked loss of robustness, in that loss or even heterozygosity for some regulators becomes deleterious or lethal, even though complete loss of these regulators is tolerated at normal cyclin expression levels. Recently, we presented a quantitative kinetic model of the budding yeast cell cycle. Here, we use this model to generate biochemical predictions for Clb2 levels, asynchronous as well as through the cell cycle, as the Clb2 overexpression threshold is approached. The model predictions compare well with biochemical data, even though no data of this type were available during model generation. The loss of robustness of the Clb2 overexpressing system is also predicted by the model. These results provide strong confirmation of the model's predictive ability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document