Effective Co-Teaching Practices Within the Inclusive Classroom

Author(s):  
Kathleen Magiera

Co-teaching can be defined with a multitude of formats in a variety of educational settings. Its underlying concept is that at least two professionals collaborate during their instruction and strengthen their delivery, resulting in improved student outcomes. Partnerships that can be deemed as co-teaching could include pairing various combinations of university instructors, teachers of English-language learners, special education service providers, and student teachers but the following review of co-teaching targets the special education service model. In the preschool through high school setting, the continuing trend toward greater inclusion of students with disabilities means that all teachers are faced with teaching their content to increasingly diverse students. A popular service used to accomplish inclusive practices from preschool to high school is co-teaching. Co-teaching is a service by which students with disabilities and their teachers collaborate together for the purpose of providing students with and without disabilities access to the general education curriculum with specially designed instruction. Co-teaching usually occurs for a designated portion of the instructional day. By carefully planning together, co-teaching pairs provide more intense instruction to the entire class based on the general education content and the learning goals for students with disabilities. While instructing together, both teachers often form smaller instructional groups for more individualized lessons. The co-teachers use their assessment data to inform future instruction within the inclusive classroom. By implementing the effective co-teaching practices of shared planning, instructing, and assessing, teachers become equal partners for the benefit of all students.

2020 ◽  
pp. 104420732093481
Author(s):  
Leanna Stiefel ◽  
Michael Gottfried ◽  
Menbere Shiferaw ◽  
Amy Schwartz

In this study, we assess changes in the education of students with disabilities (SWDs) in the nation’s largest school district, New York City (NYC), over the decade 2005–2015. Specifically, we examine progress toward the twin legislative goals of both the federal Individuals with Disability Education Act (IDEA) and NYC district goals of (a) including SWDs in general education settings and (b) improving their academic performance. We find that the inclusion of SWDs with their general education peers (GENs) has increased in elementary and middle schools, but decreased in high school. Furthermore, although more SWDs are completing high school, their graduation rate remains considerably below that of GENs (50% vs. 80%). In assessing these patterns, we provide empirical evidence of the changing context of education in NYC before, during, and after policy changes that affected special education.


Author(s):  
Pankaj Khazanchi ◽  
Rashmi Khazanchi

Today's inclusive education settings consist of a diverse student population that needs a different pedagogical approach. Both general education and special education teachers may face difficulties to engage students in meaningful tasks and to promote learning. Teachers may struggle to effectively reach all students with different abilities in an inclusive education setting. Teachers implement several strategies to keep students engage in inclusive education settings. Teachers do multiple tasks, such as teaching students, developing engaging lessons, assessing and tracking students' learning, collaborating with teachers and rehabilitation professionals, implementing evidence-based strategies, and delivering instructions in various formats. Inclusive education needs administrators, related service providers, general education teachers, and special education teachers to optimize students' learning. This chapter aims to highlight pedagogical practices in teaching students with disabilities in inclusive education settings.


1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen Butera ◽  
Gia Deasy ◽  
Kevin Miller ◽  
Laura Reissner ◽  
Carl Stein ◽  
...  

Observational data were collected to compare classroom academic and social behaviors of 71 students with mild-moderate disabilities to those of their normative peers in 48 elementary inclusive classrooms. Fifteen categories of observed behaviors were recorded in six-second intervals that alternated with the recording of observed behaviors of normative peers in each classroom using the Classroom Behavior Record (CBR). Analyses indicated students with disabilities did not differ from their normative peers on fourteen measures of social and academic classroom behaviors. Students with disabilities were observed as significantly less attentive than their normative peers and they were even less attentive if more than one adult was in the classroom. Implications for rural inclusive special education service delivery are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-26
Author(s):  
Adrienne D. Woods

It is important to understand how longitudinal patterns of special education placement differ from cross-sectional incidence estimates in order to improve measurement precision and better target assistance to students with disabilities. This study used latent class growth analysis in a national-level data set to classify four trajectories of special education service receipt from kindergarten to eighth grade (Never, Persistent, Delayed, and Discontinued) and to predict which kindergarteners follow these trajectories of service receipt ( N = 3,970). This study is among the first to identify which kindergarteners with disabilities may experience persistent special education services, which may exit special education, and what patterns of sociodemographic, achievement, and behavior covariates distinguish these groups. Results both align with prior work and offer a fresh perspective for researchers and policymakers as to how placement changes across schooling and for whom.


2020 ◽  
pp. 002246692092503
Author(s):  
Sandi M. Cole ◽  
Hardy R. Murphy ◽  
Michael B. Frisby ◽  
Teresa A. Grossi ◽  
Hannah R. Bolte

This study investigates the academic outcomes of a special education student cohort in the state of Indiana placed in high and low inclusion settings. Student scores in these two settings from the Indiana State Test of Educational Progress (ISTEP+ English/Language Arts and math) were compared from fourth grade in 2014 through the eighth grade in 2018. Results of this study show that students with disabilities who spent 80% or more of their time in a general education inclusive classroom did significantly better in both reading and math assessment than their peers who spent more time in separate special education classrooms.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia D. Santistevan Matthews ◽  
Leanne S. Hawken ◽  
Jason J. Burrow-Sánchez ◽  
Patricia J. Peterson ◽  
Matthew K. Fields

Author(s):  
Jennifer York ◽  
Madelin Tundidor

Forty-five focus group discussions involving 335 general and special educators, administrators, support staff, parents, and students from a midwestern urban community were held to discuss the education initiative referred to as inclusive education. This study was conducted to develop a district-wide profile of the issues raised when considering systems change to more inclusive educational practices for students with special education labels. Specifically, information was sought about the preliminary issues and concerns that might need to be addressed in future inclusion efforts. Participants represented a diverse array of constituents and individuals with the vast majority having little to no knowledge of or experience with including special education students in general education. Findings, therefore, largely represent opinions about inclusion given little knowledge or experience. Results indicated that for the past decade, there has been an increase in the percentage of students with disabilities who attend regular schools, but that special education services remain largely separate from general education within those schools. Perceived facilitators of inclusion centered around the attitudes and skills of service providers in schools and the allocation of collaboration time for general and special educators. Perceived barriers included rigid general education curricular expectations, insufficient resources for staffing and materials, lack of collaboration time, and negative attitudes with particular concern that “regular” students would lose out. The appropriateness of inclusion was questioned for students with the most severe disabilities (e.g., severe behavior challenges, health and medical needs). Although much of the information obtained was similar across constituencies, there were a number of differences—especially between the adult groups and the student groups.


2021 ◽  
pp. 104837132110344
Author(s):  
Ellary A. Draper

Within special education, transition is a required part of a student’s Individualized Education Program, specifically the transition from school to postsecondary life. Recently, special educators have begun to investigate best practices of transition at all levels—early intervention into school, elementary to middle school, and middle to high school. Yet in music education transition is not widely discussed for students with and without disabilities. This article includes an overview of best practices of transition in special education and provides ideas on how to implement these practices in music education to better facilitate transition between schools to postsecondary life for students with disabilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document