scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Her2, Egfr, and C-Met Status on Overall Survival of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Standard Chemotherapy Without Trastuzumab in a First-Line Treatment: a Japanese Multicenter Collaborative Retrospective Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv214
Author(s):  
E. Shinozaki ◽  
N. Fuse ◽  
Y. Kuboki ◽  
T. Kuwata ◽  
T. Nishina ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Hayano ◽  
Hiroki Watanabe ◽  
Takahiro Ryuzaki ◽  
Naoto Sawada ◽  
Gaku Ohira ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since the ToGA trial, trastuzumab-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for HER2 positive stage IV gastric cancer. However, it is not yet clear whether surgical resection after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy (conversion surgery) can improve survival of HER2 positive stage IV gastric cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic benefit of conversion surgery in HER2 positive stage IV gastric cancer patients. Case presentation We retrospectively investigated the medical records of the patients with HER2 positive (IHC3(+) or IHC2(+)/FISH(+)) stage IV gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy as the first line treatment. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with conversion surgery and without. Eleven HER2 positive stage IV gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy as the first line treatment were evaluated. Response rate was 63.6%, and 6 of 11 patients could receive conversion surgery. R0 resection was achieved in four patients. In Kaplan–Meier analysis, patients who received conversion surgery showed significantly better OS than those without surgery (3-year survival rate, 66.7% vs. 20%, P = 0.03). The median OS of patients who achieved R0 resection is 51.8 months. Conclusions Conversion surgery might have a survival benefit for HER2 positive stage IV gastric cancer patients. If curative surgery is technically possible, conversion surgery could be a treatment option for HER2 positive stage IV gastric cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nozomu Fuse ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
Takeshi Kuwata ◽  
Tomohiro Nishina ◽  
Shigenori Kadowaki ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 315-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. McDermott ◽  
P. Calvert ◽  
M. Parker ◽  
G. Webb ◽  
B. Moulton ◽  
...  

315 Background: The combination of capecitabine plus erlotinib in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer patients has proved beneficial in terms of median survival duration, objective radiological response rate and decrease in tumour marker levels from baseline. In the phase I study of capecitabine and lapatinib carried out in advanced solid tumors, the optimal tolerated regimen was determined to be lapatinib 1,250 mg plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day. At these dose levels, the combination was well tolerated with few grade 3 toxicities and no grade 4 toxicity. Our preclinical work suggested synergistic activity of capecitabine and lapatinib in pancreatic cancer. We initiated a study of this combination in the first-line therapy of metastatic pancreas cancer. Methods: This was a single-arm multicenter study in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic pancreatic cancer. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The study was designed as a Simons two-stage optimal design and was divided into two stages. The first stage was to recruit up to 12 patients. If at least seven of these patients survived for at least six months, then a further 20 patients would be enrolled into the study. If six or fewer of the initial 12 patients met the specified study survival criteria, the study would be halted. Treatment was to be administered until disease progression or until withdrawal from the study due to unacceptable toxicity or other reasons. Clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed to evaluate disease response and toxicity of therapy. The study patients received lapatinib 1,250 mg/day, plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day on days 1-14 every 21 days. Results: Nine patients were enrolled. Seven of these patients did not achieve the interim protocol response requirement of survival for at least 6 months, to allow for the study to continue to the second cohort of patients. Median overall survival from first dose was 4 months. Median time on treatment was 2 months. There were no objective responses. There were no unexpected toxicities. Conclusions: The addition of lapatinib to capecitabine does not improve overall survival in the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer patients. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document