scholarly journals Aloe Vera: A multifaceted ayurvedic herb used in palliative care of oral cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. ix110
Author(s):  
J.K. Acharya ◽  
S. Beniwal ◽  
S. Jakhar ◽  
N. Mohta
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Aloe Vera ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients ◽  
Ayurvedic Herb

scholarly journals Early Referral to Palliative Care for Advanced Oral Cancer Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Oncology Center at All India Institute of Medical Sciences

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 230-234
Author(s):  
Aanchal Satija ◽  
Karl Lorenz ◽  
Michelle DeNatale ◽  
Jake Mickelsen ◽  
SV Suryanarayana Deo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Palliative Medicine ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Early Referral ◽  
Medicine Clinic ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Clinic

Objectives: Oral cancers have high epidemiologic burden in India, and most oral cancer patients at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences present in advanced stages. Their symptomatic needs are often not adequately addressed and the referrals to palliative medicine clinic are for severe pain or terminal stages. Using quality improvement methods, we aimed to provide early referral to palliative care for advanced oral cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Duration (number of days) between registration at the head-and-neck cancer clinic and referral to palliative medicine clinic at baseline and postinterventions. Interventions: Understanding current perceptions of oncologists for referral to palliative medicine clinic, educating them through departmental meetings, fostering clinician and patient-family awareness through pamphlets, defining process and screening guidelines for referral, including symptom burden charts in head-and-neck cancer clinic notes, soliciting regular feedback from oncologists at review meetings. Results: The number of days for the referral to the palliative medicine clinic decreased from an average of 48 days to 13 days in 6 months. Conclusion: A multicomponent intervention included oncologists and patients and families, education, workflow modification, standardized assessment, documentation, and clinician feedback, and succeeded in improving the timeliness of palliative care referrals of advanced oral cancer patients.

Palliative Care in Oral Cancer Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 3137
Author(s):  
E. Rajesh ◽  
N. Anitha ◽  
K. M. K. Masthan ◽  
Hariharan ◽  
N. Aravindha Babu
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients

scholarly journals High Expression of KLF10 Is Associated with Favorable Survival in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Chung-Min Yeh ◽  
Yi-Ju Lee ◽  
Po-Yun Ko ◽  
Yueh-Min Lin ◽  
Wen-Wei Sung
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
Independent Prognostic Marker ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background and objectives: Krüppel-like transcription factor 10 (KLF10) plays a vital role in regulating cell proliferation, including the anti-proliferative process, activation of apoptosis, and differentiation control. KLF10 may also act as a protective factor against oral cancer. We studied the impact of KLF10 expression on the clinical outcomes of oral cancer patients to identify its role as a prognostic factor in oral cancer. Materials and Methods: KLF10 immunoreactivity was analyzed by immunohistochemical (IHC) stain analysis in 286 cancer specimens from primary oral cancer patients. The prognostic value of KLF10 on overall survival was determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: High KLF10 expression was significantly associated with male gender and betel quid chewing. The 5-year survival rate was greater for patients with high KLF10 expression than for those with low KLF10 expression (62.5% vs. 51.3%, respectively; p = 0.005), and multivariate analyses showed that high KLF10 expression was the only independent factor correlated with greater overall patient survival. The significant correlation between high KLF10 expression and a higher 5-year survival rate was observed in certain subgroups of clinical parameters, including female gender, non-smokers, cancer stage T1, and cancer stage N0. Conclusions: KLF10 expression, detected by IHC staining, could be an independent prognostic marker for oral cancer patients.

scholarly journals Genetic Variants of lncRNA GAS5 Are Associated with the Clinicopathologic Development of Oral Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Ming-Hong Hsieh ◽  
Hsueh-Ju Lu ◽  
Chiao-Wen Lin ◽  
Chia-Yi Lee ◽  
Shang-Jung Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Alcohol Drinking ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Advanced Tumor Stage ◽  
Advanced Tumor ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients

The long noncoding RNA, Growth arrest-specific 5 (GAS5) plays a crucial role in the development of oral cancer. However, potential genetic variants in GAS5 that affect the susceptibility and progression of oral cancer have rarely been explored. In this study, two loci of GAS5 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs145204276 and rs55829688) were genotyped by using the TaqMan allelic discrimination in 1125 oral cancer patients and 1195 non-oral-cancer individuals. After statistical analyses, the distribution of both the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 and GAS5 SNP rs55829688 frequencies were similar between the study and control groups. However, the patients with GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variants (Ins/Del or Del/Del) showed a higher tendency of moderate to poor cell differentiation of oral cancer (OR: 1.454, 95% CI: 1.041–2.031, p = 0.028). Moreover, the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variants (Ins/Del or Del/Del) in the non-alcohol-drinking population were associated with significantly advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.500, 95% CI: 1.081–2.081, p = 0.015) and larger tumor size (OR: 1.494, 95% CI: 1.076–2.074, p = 0.016). Furthermore, individuals with the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variant were associated with a higher expression of GAS5 in the GTEx database (p = 0.002), and the higher GAS5 level was associated with poor cell differentiation, advanced tumor stage and larger tumor size in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from the TCGA database (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variant is related to poor-differentiation cell status in oral cancer. Besides, the presence of the GAS5 SNP rs145204276 variant is associated with a worse tumor stage and tumor size in oral cancer patients without alcohol drinking.

scholarly journals Adjuvant Radiotherapy Significantly Increases Neck Control and Survival in Early Oral Cancer Patients with Solitary Nodal Involvement: A National Cancer Registry Database Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3742
Author(s):  
Chia-Jen Tsai ◽  
Yu-Hsuan Kuo ◽  
Hung-Chang Wu ◽  
Chung-Han Ho ◽  
Yi-Chen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Nodal Involvement ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Control ◽  
Registry Database

We assessed the role of adjuvant radiotherapy on neck control and survival in patients with early oral cancer with solitary nodal involvement. We identified pT1-2N1 oral cancer patients with or without adjuvant radiotherapy from the 2007–2015 Taiwan Cancer Registry database. The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on 5-year neck control, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank tests, and Cox regression analysis. Of 701 patients identified, 505 (72.0%) received adjuvant radiotherapy and 196 (28.0%) had surgery alone. Patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy were more likely to be aged <65 years, pT2 stage, poorly graded and without comorbid conditions (all, p < 0.05). The 5-year OS and DFS differed significantly by receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy. Multivariable analysis showed adjuvant radiotherapy significantly associated with better 5-year OS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54–0.97; p = 0.0288) and DFS (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48–0.84; p = 0.0016). Stratified analysis indicated the greatest survival advantage for both 5-year OS and DFS in those with pT2 classification (p = 0.0097; 0.0009), and non-tongue disease (p = 0.0195; 0.0158). Moreover, adjuvant radiotherapy significantly protected against neck recurrence (aHR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18–0.51; p < 0.0001). Thus, adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with improved neck control and survival in these early oral cancer patients.

scholarly journals Clinical long-term and patient-reported outcomes of dental implants in oral cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eik Schiegnitz ◽  
Lena Katharina Müller ◽  
Keyvan Sagheb ◽  
Lisa Theis ◽  
Vahide Cagiran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients

Abstract Background and purpose The aim of this clinical study was to investigate the clinical long-term and patient-reported outcome of dental implants in patients with oral cancer. In addition, analysis of the influence of radiation therapy, timing of implant insertion, and augmentation procedures on implant survival was performed. Material and methods This retrospective study investigated the clinical outcome of 711 dental implants in 164 oral cancer patients, inserted by experienced surgeons of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was evaluated. Results Cumulative 5-year and 10-year implant survival rates for all included implants were 87.3% and 80.0%. Implants placed straight after ablative surgery (primary implant placement) and implants placed after completing the oncologic treatment (secondary implant placement) showed a comparable implant survival (92.5% vs. 89.5%; p = 0.635). Irradiation therapy had no significant influence on implant survival of secondary placed implants (p = 0.929). However, regarding implant site (native bone vs. augmented bone) and radiation therapy (non-irradiated bone vs. irradiated bone), implants inserted in irradiated bone that received augmentation procedures showed a statistically significant lower implant survival (p < 0.001). Patients reported a distinct improvement in OHRQoL. Conclusions Promising long-term survival rates of dental implants in patients after treatment of oral cancer were seen. In addition, patients benefit in form of an improved OHRQoL. However, bone augmentation procedures in irradiated bone may result in an impaired implants’ prognosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document