178 Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome in a District General Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Ellerton ◽  
H Benjamin-Laing ◽  
W J Harrison

Abstract Introduction Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is rare but when the diagnosis is delayed patient morbidity is significant. Recently, NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries have updated their red flags on CES to be more explicit enabling earlier referral and diagnosis. A joint project between Orthopaedics and Radiology departments aimed to assess the current pathway of Cauda Equina Investigation at a District General Hospital. Method Data was collected from the local Radiology database for requests between July 2017 and August 2018. This included both direct requests to assess for CES and implied. Raw data revealed a potential of 600 patients, of which we have analysed 332 patients met the eligibility criteria. Results Only 58 patients had a documented complete bladder function assessment, of those 33% had incomplete or partial bladder emptying. Time to MRI scan ranged from 50mins – 23 hours & 52 mins. 47% had negative scans with CES or Cord compromise on MRI scan was demonstrated on 9%. 23 patients were transferred urgently to the receiving tertiary centre. Conclusions We found that nearly 90% of patients were being incompletely assessed and time to scan ranged significantly. We are producing a trust wide suspected CES pathway to improve patient assessment.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Richardson ◽  
F Greenway ◽  
A Mostofi ◽  
E Pereira

Abstract Introduction Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a spinal emergency that cannot be reliably detected through clinical examination alone and as a result requires prompt MR imaging to provide a diagnosis. This audit examined compliance to standard of care following service improvements in line with the updated SBNS/BASS national guidelines for CES. Method A retrospective analysis of 200 patients referred to neurosurgery for suspected CES: 100 pre- and 100 post-service improvement SBNS guideline implementation. The online neurosurgical database was reviewed, cases assessed for completeness of referral information (including appropriate exam and pre-referral MRI) with patient demographics, referring hospital and outcome also recorded. Results Prior to the SBNS guidelines only 19 patients received MRI prior to referral, 70% of all referrals were incomplete or contained erroneous clinical information. Post-service improvements there was a 68% increase of pre-referral MRI (32 cases), and an improvement in quality of clinical information with only 19% of referrals providing insufficient or unreliable information. Conclusions Through relatively simple changes to local policy, patient care flow and education of emergency department clinicians we have significantly improved pre-referral MRI rates as well as overall referral quality across the whole DGH network.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. E271-E271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dillon Vyas ◽  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a spinal emergency with clinical symptoms and signs that have low diagnostic accuracy. National guidelines in the United Kingdom (UK) state that all patients should undergo an MRI prior to referral to specialist spinal units and surgery, if required, should be performed at the earliest opportunity. We aimed to evaluate the current practice of investigating and treating suspected CES in the UK. METHODS A retrospective, multicentre observational study of the investigation and management of patients with suspected CES was conducted across the UK, including all patients referred to a spinal unit over 6 mo between 1st October 2016 and 31st March 2017. RESULTS A total of 28 UK spinal units submitted data on 4441 referrals. Over half of the referrals were made without any previous imaging (n = 2572, 57.9%). The majority of referrals were made out-of-hours (n = 2229/3517, 63.4%), of which 2.9% (n = 45/1529) underwent surgical decompression. Patient location and prereferral imaging were not significantly associated with time intervals from symptom onset or presentation to decompression. Patients investigated outside of the spinal unit experienced significantly longer time intervals from presentation and from referral to undergoing the MRI scan. CONCLUSION This is the largest known study of the investigation and management of suspected CES. We found that the majority of referrals were made without adequate investigations. Most patients were referred out-of-hours and many were transferred for an MRI without subsequently requiring surgery. Cases not transferred experienced delays if undergoing an MRI scan outside of the spinal unit.


BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Amy Porter ◽  
Victoria Porter

Abstract Introduction Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES), is a neurological emergency with many urological features. Delayed decompressive surgery can cause urinary retention, overflow incontinence, long term catherization and loss of sexual function. This article focusses on the accuracy of the initial diagnosis and the time taken before treatment is commenced. Methods In this systematic literature review, OneSearch and PubMed have been searched for articles which identify the main symptoms of CES, evaluate the effectiveness of several diagnostic methods and compare the postoperative results of bladder function following timely and delayed treatment. Results A total of 20 articles have been referenced, of which 9 studies have been reviewed. While no individual symptom is 100% indicative of CES, urinary retention (diagnostic accuracy 0.9), is the most consistent clinical finding. Therefore, MRI is necessary for an accurate diagnosis. Further 4 out of 5 studies state that treatment within 24-hours improves patient outcomes compared to 48-hours, one study showed no significant difference between 24 and 48 hours. All articles indicate beyond 48-hours, surgical intervention has little impact on the relief of symptoms. Conclusion The studies concluded that any patient presenting in the emergency department with lower back pain should be screened for CES. A thorough history and neurological examination should be performed; however, the evidence base for rectal examination to assess anal tone is poor. Decompressive surgery carried out within the first 24-hour period from the onset of symptoms is favourable. Overall, early accurate diagnosis and treatment is invaluable to preventing urological complications and improving prognosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayan George ◽  
Alok Mathew ◽  
Edward Robinson ◽  
Edward Botsford ◽  
Rohan Ardley ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims 1. Understand the confidence levels in caring for general surgical patients of current foundation year one (FY1) doctors in who have had foundation interim year one (FiY1) post in a tertiary centre (TC) and a district general hospital (DGH). 2. Determine whether there is a difference in the experience of the FiY1 post in a TC or DGH. Methods FY1s doctors were surveyed throughout August – December 2020. Nine questions used Likert scales (1 to 5: not at all confident to very confident) over some common general surgical themes. Data was initially inputted using Google Docs and analysed in Microsoft Excel. Results 20% (6/30) from a DGH and 80% (24/30) from a TC Confidence levels were higher for FY1s who had a FiY1 post in a TC as opposed to a DGH in dealing with acute general surgical patients, appendicitis and scrubbing in theatre. Confidence levels were the same in both a TC and DGH for FY1s in managing those with hepatobiliary disease, prescribing fluids for resuscitation and maintenance as well as speaking to a family when a patient is dying and speaking to a patient when their diagnosis is unknown. Conclusions FY1s who had a FiY1 post in a TC had better confidence levels in more areas as opposed to a DGH. The experience of the FiY1 post should be more standardised to ensure the growth of confidence across all areas identified in the survey.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Rajesh Pratap Shah ◽  
Bishnu Babu Thapa ◽  
Sushil Rana Magar ◽  
Ritesh Sinha ◽  
Pankaj Chand ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare clinical entity caused by compression of lumbar and sacral nerve roots resulting in various neurological dysfunctions. Early diagnosis of the syndrome and timely intervention is required to prevent permanent disability. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted from January 2013 to December 2017 in a tertiary care centre in Kathmandu, Nepal. All the cases meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients were operated using posterior open discectomy and the outcome was evaluated at  two weeks , one month, three months, six months and one year. Result: Total number of patients meeting the inclusion criteria was 10, two females and eight males with a mean age of 40.30 + 6.58 years. The mean time for onset of symptom to timing of surgery was 142 hrs. VAS for leg improved from 5.90 + 0 .738 to 0.70 + 0.483 and VAS for back pain improved from 3.20 + 1.476 to 0.5 + 0.572 post operatively. There was improvement in sensory and motor function in all the cases. Bowel and bladder function improved in all the cases postoperatively at the time of final follow up. Sexual function was impaired in six patients preoperatively but postoperatively four had improved and two patients had poor result at the time of final follow up. Conclusions: Timing of surgery may not be the most important determining factor for the outcome of the CES. Surgical decompression in delayed presentation have good clinical outcome in CES.


2021 ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Natalie Hamer ◽  
Ashley Brown ◽  
Trisha Jha ◽  
Oladiran Olatunbode ◽  
Madan Jha

Intro: Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has had a dramatic impact on the global landscape. One of the biggest challenges has been the additional strain that the virus has put on healthcare systems. Although there has been much data on the direct affects of COVID-19 on intensive care beds and ventilator availability, there has been little exploration into the wider impacts that the restrictions brought about by COVID-19 have had on the provision of other healthcare services. We designed this study to explore how Aim: COVID-19 has impacted surgical service provision at a tertiary centre. We Methods: compared the number and types of general surgeries carried out at a single hospital in the six months prior to the initial UK COVID-19 outbreak (September 2019 - February 2020) and the six months after (March 2020 - August 2020). We found that since March 2020 there has been a 70% decrease i Results: n the number of operations being carried out, with numbers dropping from a pre-COVID surgery number of 1761 to a post-COVID number of 529. This mainly affected elective procedures however, with emergency surgeries remaining relatively constant (48 pre-COVID vs 44 post-COVID). COVID-19 has Conclusion: caused a signicant decrease in the number of surgeries being undertaken. This is due to a combination of factors including stafng issues, reduced investigation, and national mandates requesting the cessation of non-urgent procedures. Although this has mainly affected elective operations, it is likely to have a larger impact in the future as surgical waiting lists continue to grow


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1432.1-1433
Author(s):  
A. Francioni ◽  
J. Gnanapragasam ◽  
N. Ramsundar ◽  
V. Joshi ◽  
M. K. Nisar

Background:Interstitial lung disease is a well described extra-articular manifestation in a range of rheumatic diseases. It carries significant morbidity and mortality. Management of rheumatic diseases associated ILD (r-ILD) requires expertise as the needs of such patients are complex and treatment options limited. Historically, such complex ILD has been managed in tertiary referral centres. We set up a combined service incorporating both rheumatology and respiratory domains in a district general hospital (DGH) to help patients avoid long journeys and improve their experience whilst focusing on an integrated care pathway.Objectives:We evaluated the outcomes of all patients managed over three years in this pilot service model.Methods:Referrals were accepted from any hospital specialist involved in the management r-ILD. They were triaged by lead ILD pulmonologist to monthly ILD MDT comprising a rheumatologist, respiratory physician, a radiologist and ILD specialist nurse. Appropriate patients were booked into combined clinic, run by the respective rheumatology and chest specialists with ILD interest, attracting a multi-speciality tariff. All the data was recorded electronically with full access to demographics, disease parameters, investigations and drug management.Results:111 consecutive patients were included in this evaluation. Mean age was 66.4 yrs (19-92 yrs) and 36% (n=40) were male. 34 (30%) had RA, 31 (28%) had CTD, 20 (18%) had IPAF and 26 others. Most predominant HRCT pattern was NSIP (n=40,36%) followed by UIP (n=31, 28%). Mean FVC was 2.59 L/min (1.93-4.13) with DLCOc of 52.7% (28.9-90.1%) predicted. Only two patients had all antibodies negative whilst 109 had at least one antibody positive with ANA being the most common (n=38).Most (83%) patients were treated with immunomodulators including 11 with rituximab. 49 (44.1%) patients had significant improvement in clinical, imaging and pulmonary parameters with DLCOc improving to 56.57% and FVC to 2.70 L/min. There were similar improvements in six minute walk test. 21 patients died and 23 patients required long term oxygen therapy.Conclusion:This pilot real world study confirms the utility of a combined specialist service in a district general hospital. Nearly half of this complex and resource intensive patient cohort had good clinical outcomes and derived benefit from the expertise in one room. Feedback from both patients and referrers was unanimously positive. No patient required tertiary centre referral and all could be managed adequately in the clinical setting.Our report confirms that r-ILD can be managed in a DGH setting with a stream-lined service offering clear benefits to patients. We would argue that r-ILD service, congruent to satellite pulmonary hypertension clinics in secondary care with hub-and-spoke model liaison with tertiary centre, can be established on similar principles and could help over-stretched tertiary care with repatriation of services whilst helping develop local expertise in the management of chronic ILD.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1881.1-1881
Author(s):  
K. Salama ◽  
N. Ramsundar ◽  
V. Joshi ◽  
M. K. Nisar

Background:Interstitial lung disease is a well described extra-articular manifestation in a range of rheumatic diseases. It carries significant morbidity and mortality. Management of rheumatic diseases associated ILD (r-ILD) requires expertise as the needs of such patients are complex and treatment options limited. Historically, such complex ILD has been managed in tertiary referral centres.Objectives:We set up a combined service incorporating both rheumatology and respiratory domains in a district general hospital (DGH) to help patients avoid long journeys and improve their experience whilst focusing on an integrated care pathway. We evaluated the outcomes of the first set of patients managed in this proof-of-concept service model.Methods:Referrals were accepted from any hospital specialist involved in the management r-ILD. They were triaged by lead ILD pulmonologist to monthly ILD MDT comprising a rheumatologist, respiratory physician, a radiologist and ILD specialist nurse. Appropriate patients were booked into combined clinic, run by the respective rheumatology and chest specialists with ILD interest, attracting a multi-speciality tariff. All the data was recorded electronically with full access to demographics, disease parameters, investigations and drug management.Results:89 patients were included in this proof-of-concept. Mean age was 66.1 yrs (19-90 yrs) and 44% (n=39) were male. 35 (40%) had RA, 34 (39%) had CTD, eight (10%) had sarcoidosis, five had IPAF and seven others. Most predominant HRCT pattern was NSIP (n=53,60%) followed by UIP (n=23, 21%), sarcoid (n=10, 12%) and miscellaneous (LIP and mixed). Mean FVC was 2.64 L/min (1.93-4.13) with DLCOc of 52.7% (28.9-90.1%) predicted. Only two patients had all antibodies negative whilst 87 had at least one antibody positive with ANA being the most common (n=28).Most (83%) patients were treated with immunomodulators including nine with rituximab. 39 (44.3%) patients had significant improvement in clinical, imaging and pulmonary parameters with DLCOc improving to 56.57% and FVC to 2.70 L/min. There were similar improvements in six minute walk test. 17 patients died and 20 patients required long term oxygen therapy.Conclusion:This proof-of-concept real world study confirms the utility of a combined specialist service in a district general hospital. Nearly half of this complex and resource intensive patient cohort had good clinical outcomes and derived benefit from the expertise in one room. Feedback from both patients and referrers was unanimously positive. No patient required tertiary centre referral and all could be managed adequately in the clinical setting.Our report confirms that r-ILD can be managed in a DGH setting with a stream-lined service offering clear benefits to patients. We would argue that r-ILD service, congruent to satellite pulmonary hypertension clinics in secondary care with hub-and-spoke model liaison with tertiary centre, can be established on similar principles and could help over-stretched tertiary care with repatriation of services whilst helping develop local expertise in the management of chronic ILD.Disclosure of Interests:Karim Salama: None declared, Natasha Ramsundar: None declared, Vijay Joshi: None declared, Muhammad Khurram Nisar Grant/research support from: Muhammad Nisar undertakes clinical trials and received support (including attendance at conferences, speaker fees and honoraria) from Roche, Chugai, MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, Novartis and UCB, Consultant of: Muhammad Nisar undertakes clinical trials and received support (including attendance at conferences, speaker fees and honoraria) from Roche, Chugai, MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, Novartis and UCB, Speakers bureau: Muhammad Nisar undertakes clinical trials and received support (including attendance at conferences, speaker fees and honoraria) from Roche, Chugai, MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, Novartis and UCB


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document