scholarly journals 580 Vascular Distal Bypass Early Surveillance Audit

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Soliman ◽  
M Halawa ◽  
R Awad ◽  
J Tan

Abstract Introduction Due to inconsistency in Duplex surveillance following distal bypass for peripheral arterial disease at our district general hospital. We planned an audit aiming to assess our current early surveillance of distal vascular bypass. Method The latest twenty patients who underwent distal bypass were collected retrospectively from the theatre’s records. Their clinical and imaging records were analysed to ascertain the timing of 1st duplex after the procedure. We also examined the discharge medications. We chose the standard advised by Society for Vascular Surgery that every patient following the procedure ideally should have (Clinical examination + ABPI + Duplex) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months then annually. Results 8 patients (40%) had a Duplex within 1 month, while 10% did not have a scan at all. Time range between the procedure and first Duplex was 1-11 months with a mean of 4 months. All patients were discharged on at least a single antiplatelet agent while only 70% were prescribed statins. Six patients needed an intervention for blocked graft but eventually failed, only one patient had a Duplex in a timely fashion, the stenosed graft was salvaged by angioplasty. Conclusions There was no clear standardized surveillance protocol for vascular team juniors to follow. In addition, discharge of distal bypass patients sometimes is carried by general surgery team during weekends and unlikely that a Duplex is booked. We suggested booking the Duplex in theaters soon after performing the procedure to ensure inclusion in the surveillance protocol, education of junior doctors and re-auditing in 1 year.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Daketsey ◽  
M Elkawafi ◽  
A Khallaf ◽  
R Makar

Abstract Introduction According to NICE Guidelines, the Best medical therapy (BMT) for secondary prevention of peripheral arterial disease includes antiplatelet and statin therapy unless contraindicated. Junior Doctors are usually allocated the job of prescribing patients’ medications. Due to discrepancies in their exposure to vascular surgery in earlier training, we implemented an introductory teaching session for them regarding this BMT and audited the efficacy of this intervention. Method A retrospective review of admission and discharge medications of all vascular ward patients from August 12th to 30th September 2019 was done, and the data was analysed via Excel. Results Out of 127 patients (median age 70), 67% and 64% had antiplatelet and statin medications respectively,while on admission. 1 in each patient cohort was found discharged without either medication. The GP of the patient discharged without antiplatelets was contacted to ensure this was rectified. The other patient had refused statin therapy and thus a discharge note to their GP was conducted to reflect this. Conclusions A teaching session as part of a vascular departmental induction emphasising the evidence base for antiplatelet and statin therapy can contribute to improving prescription practices of junior doctors starting in the department.


2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Požar ◽  
Matjaž Špan

Femoropopliteal bypass is a surgical procedure used in the advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease on lower limb arteries. The most common cause of arterial peripheral disease is the atherosclerotic plaque, which significantly narrows the vascular lumen. This kind of lesion is treated with vascular interventions. Those are divided into endovascular percutaneous interventions and into classic surgical interventions. In addition there is emerging a new endoscopic method in vascular bypass operations as an alternative to the already existing classic surgical intervention. Endoscopic vein harvesting is a minimally invasive surgical technique that enables vein dissection and its usage for vascular bypass with the help of videoscopic equipment. The case report presents a 68-years old male with diagnosed peripheral arterial disease. He was a suitable candidate for surgical treatment, therefore a femoropopliteal bypass was done in his right lower extremity. The distinctive note of this operation was the usage of anewer technique, that is, endoscopic vein harvesting of the greater saphenous vein.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
WILLIAM E. GOLDEN ◽  
ROBERT H. HOPKINS

VASA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouk Grandjean ◽  
Katia Iglesias ◽  
Céline Dubuis ◽  
Sébastien Déglise ◽  
Jean-Marc Corpataux ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Multilevel peripheral arterial disease is frequently observed in patients with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia. This report evaluates the efficacy of one-stage hybrid revascularization in patients with multilevel arterial peripheral disease. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database included all consecutive patients treated by a hybrid approach for a multilevel arterial peripheral disease. The primary outcome was the patency rate at 6 months and 1 year. Secondary outcomes were early and midterm complication rate, limb salvage and mortality rate. Statistical analysis, including a Kaplan-Meier estimate and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out with the primary, primary assisted and secondary patency, comparing the impact of various risk factors in pre- and post-operative treatments. Results: 64 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up time of 428 days (range: 4 − 1140). The technical success rate was 100 %. The primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates at 1 year were 39 %, 66 % and 81 %, respectively. The limb-salvage rate was 94 %. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. Early and midterm complication rates were 15.4 % and 6.4 %, respectively. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. Conclusions: The hybrid approach is a major alternative in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease in multilevel disease and comorbid patients, with low complication and mortality rates and a high limb-salvage rate.


VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 341-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Husmann ◽  
Vincenzo Jacomella ◽  
Christoph Thalhammer ◽  
Beatrice R. Amann-Vesti

Abstract. Increased arterial stiffness results from reduced elasticity of the arterial wall and is an independent predictor for cardiovascular risk. The gold standard for assessment of arterial stiffness is the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Other parameters such as central aortic pulse pressure and aortic augmentation index are indirect, surrogate markers of arterial stiffness, but provide additional information on the characteristics of wave reflection. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is characterised by its association with systolic hypertension, increased arterial stiffness, disturbed wave reflexion and prognosis depending on ankle-brachial pressure index. This review summarises the physiology of pulse wave propagation and reflection and its changes due to aging and atherosclerosis. We discuss different non-invasive assessment techniques and highlight the importance of the understanding of arterial pulse wave analysis for each vascular specialist and primary care physician alike in the context of PAD.


VASA ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klein-Weigel ◽  
Gutsche-Petrak ◽  
Wolbergs ◽  
Köning ◽  
Flessenkamper

Background: We compared medical secondary prevention in patients with peripheral arterial disease stage II (Fontaine) located in the femoro-popliteal artery managed by vascular surgeons and medical doctors / angiologists in our multidisciplinary vascular center. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed demission protocols of in-hospital treatments between 01.01.2007 and 20.06.2008. Results: We surveyed 264 patients (54.2 % women; mean age 67.52 ± 8.98 yrs), 179 (67.8 %) primarily treated by medical doctors / angiologists and 85 (32.2 %) primarily managed by vascular surgeons. Medical doctors / angiologists treated more women (n = 109) than men (n = 34), (p = 0.002) and documented smoking and diabetes mellitus more often (p < 0.001) than vascular surgeons. Besides, patients had similar cardiovascular risk profiles and concomitant diseases, vascular surgeons prescribed 5.47 ± 2.26 drugs, medical doctors / angiologists 6.37 ± 2.67 (p = 0.005). Overall, 239 (90.5 %) patients were on aspirin, 180 (68.2 %) on clopidogrel, and 18 (6.9 %) on oral anticoagulants. Significantly more patients treated by medical doctors / angiologists received clopidogrel (169 versus 11; p < 0.001), significantly more surgical patients received oral anticoagulants (11 versus 7; p = 0.016). The number of patients without prescriptions for any antithrombotic therapy was 6 (6.9 %) in patients treated by vascular surgeons and 0 (0 %) in patients managed by medical doctors / angiologists (p = 0.001). Prescription-rates of β-blockers, ACE-inhibitors, Angiotensin II-antangonists, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics were statistically not different between the two disciplines, but statins were prescribed significantly more often by medical doctors / angiologists (139 versus 49; p < 0001). With the exceptions of Clopidogrel (women > men) and diuretics (men > women) we observed no gender-specific prescriptions. Conclusions: We observed high prescriptions rates of secondary medical prevention in patients primarily treated by medical doctors / angiologists and vascular surgeons. We believe that this result is highly influenced by our multidisciplinary approach. Nevertheless, efforts have to be made to raise vascular surgeon’s awareness of statin use and complete prescription of antithrombotic and antiplatelet drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document