scholarly journals 1607 Seeing White: Management of TIVA During Autologous Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Vigneswaran ◽  
R Clancy ◽  
S Choo ◽  
S Love-Jones ◽  
P Jackson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Standard Operating Procedure ◽  
Venous Drainage ◽  
Cephalic Vein ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Anaesthetic Agents ◽  
Free Flap Surgery ◽  
Ensure Patient Safety ◽  
Effective Delivery

Abstract Background Free flap surgery has inherent risks, and the venous drainage of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap is particularly vulnerable to congestion. In these cases, an algorithm for flap salvage should be followed and one of the final steps in this process is a cephalic vein transposition. Case Report We describe two patients undergoing mastectomy and immediate bilateral DIEP breast reconstruction, where cephalic vein transposition was required. As part of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway, patients are anaesthetised with a continuous propofol infusion (Total Intravenous Anaesthesia; TIVA). When the cephalic vein was identified, the propofol infusion was visible within the vein, which would have interrupted TIVA if harvested. To maintain continuous TIVA infusion, the cannula was resited prior to harvest of the cephalic vein. The cephalic vein was anastomosed to the superficial inferior epigastric vein and resolution of the venous congestion was noted. Conclusions These cases although rare highlight the importance of robust preoperative planning and communication between the team and preparation for all eventualities to ensure patient safety and successful outcomes. These cases highlight the potential effects vein harvesting or transposition may have on the safe and effective delivery of anaesthetic agents and other medication. We hope these cases prompt a discussion in the preoperative stage for alternate strategies for monitoring and intravenous access in response to diversions from the standard operating procedure.

Observations from Implementation of the ERAS Protocol after DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas T. Haddock ◽  
Ricardo Garza ◽  
Carolyn E. Boyle ◽  
Sumeet S. Teotia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Fluid Management ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Background The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multivariate intervention requiring the help of several departments, including anesthesia, nursing, and surgery. This study seeks to observe ERAS compliance rates and obstacles for its implementation at a single academic institution. Methods This is a retrospective study looking at patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction from January 2016 to September 2019. The ERAS protocol was implemented on select patients early 2017, with patients from 2016 acting as a control. Thirteen points from the protocol were identified and gathered from the patient's electronic medical record (EMR) to evaluate compliance. Results Two hundred and six patients were eligible for the study, with 67 on the control group. An average of 6.97 components were met in the pre-ERAS group. This number rose to 8.33 by the end of 2017. Compliance peaked with 10.53 components met at the beginning of 2019. The interventions most responsible for this increase were administration of preoperative medications, goal-oriented intraoperative fluid management, and administration of scheduled gabapentin postoperatively. The least met criterion was intraoperative ketamine goal of >0.2 mg/kg/h, with a maximum compliance rate of 8.69% of the time. Conclusion The introduction of new protocols can take over a year for full implementation. This is especially true for protocols as complex as an ERAS pathway. Even after years of consistent use, compliance gaps remain. Staff-, patient-, or resource-related issues are responsible for these discrepancies. It is important to identify these issues to address them and optimize patient outcomes.

How Does Autologous Breast Reconstruction Impact Downtime?

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (07) ◽  
pp. 530-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Rais ◽  
Jian Farhadi ◽  
Giovanni Zoccali
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Autologous Reconstruction ◽  
Autologous Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Superior Gluteal Artery ◽  
Free Flap Surgery ◽  
Recovery Times ◽  
Time Required ◽  
The Impact

Background Although autologous breast reconstruction is technically quite demanding, it offers the best outcomes in terms of durable results, patient perceptions, and postoperative pain. Many studies have focused on clinical outcomes and technical aspects of such procedures, but few have addressed the impact of various flaps on patient recovery times. This particular investigation entailed an assessment of commonly used flaps, examining the periods of time required to resume daily activities. Methods Multiple choice questionnaires were administered to 121 patients after recovery from autologous reconstruction to determine the times required in returning to specific physical activities. To analyze results, the analysis of variance F-test was applied, and odds ratios (ORs) were determined. Results Among the activities surveyed, recovery time was not always a function of free-flap surgery. Additional treatments and psychological effects also contributed. Adjuvant chemotherapy increased average downtime by 2 weeks, and postoperative irradiation prolonged recovery as much as 4 weeks. Patient downtime was unrelated to flap type, ranging from 2.9 to 21.3 weeks for various activities in question. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps yielded the highest OR and transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps the lowest. Conclusion Compared with superior gluteal artery perforator and TUG flaps, the DIEP flap was confirmed as the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction, conferring the shortest recovery times. All adjuvant therapies served to prolong patient recovery as well. Surgical issues, patient lifestyles, and donor-site availability are other important aspects of flap selection.

Do Patient Expectations of Discharge Affect Length of Stay after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravinder Bamba ◽  
Jordan E. Wiebe ◽  
Christopher A. Ingersol ◽  
Steven Dawson ◽  
Mithun Sinha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Patient Expectations ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Introduction Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a common method of breast reconstruction. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) postoperative protocols have been used to optimize patient outcomes and facilitate shorter hospital stays. The effect of patient expectations on length of stay (LOS) after DIEP has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patient expectations affect LOS. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction from 2017 to 2020. All patients were managed with the same ERAS protocol. Patients were divided in Group I (early expectations) and Group II (standard expectations). Group I patients had expectations set for discharge postoperative day (POD) 2 for unilateral DIEP and POD 3 for bilateral DIEP. Group II patients were given expectations for POD 3 to 4 for unilateral DIEP and POD 4 to 5 for bilateral. The primary outcome variable was LOS. Results The study included 215 DIEP flaps (45 unilateral and 85 bilateral). The average age was 49.8 years old, and the average body mass index (BMI) was 31.4. Group I (early expectations) included 56 patients (24 unilateral DIEPs, 32 bilateral). Group II (standard expectations) had 74 patients (21 unilateral, 53 bilateral). LOS for unilateral DIEP was 2.9 days for Group I compared with 3.7 days for Group II (p = 0.004). Group I bilateral DIEP patients had LOS of 3.5 days compared with 3.9 days for Group II (p = 0.02). Immediate timing of DIEP (Group I 42.9 vs. Group II 52.7%) and BMI (Group I 32.1 vs. Group II 30.8) were similar (p = 0.25). Conclusion Our study found significantly shorter hospital stay after DIEP flap for patients who expected an earlier discharge date despite similar patient characteristics and uniform ERAS protocol. Patient expectations should be considered during patient counseling and as a confounding variable when analyzing ERAS protocols.

Defining Enhanced Recovery Pathway with or without Liposomal Bupivacaine in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (5) ◽  
pp. 948-957
Author(s):  
Nicholas T. Haddock ◽  
Ricardo Garza ◽  
Carolyn E. Boyle ◽  
Yulun Liu ◽  
Sumeet S. Teotia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Enhanced Recovery Pathway ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine

scholarly journals Different Hydraulic Constructs to Optimize the Venous Drainage of DIEP Flaps in Breast Reconstruction: Decisional Algorithm and Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Pignatti ◽  
Valentina Pinto ◽  
Federico A. Giorgini ◽  
Maria Elisa Lozano Miralles ◽  
Salvatore D'Arpa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Venous Drainage ◽  
Venous Congestion ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Related Complication ◽  
Venous Anastomosis ◽  
Epigastric Artery ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery

Abstract Background Venous congestion is the most common perfusion-related complication of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. Several hydraulic constructs can be created for venous superdrainage in case of flap venous engorgement or as a preventive measure. These can be classified based on the choice of the draining vein of the flap, either a second deep inferior epigastric vein (DIEV) or a superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV), and of the recipient vein, either a vein of the chest or the DIEV. Methods We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review in Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to find publications that reported on venous congestion in DIEP flap. The keywords used were DIEP Flap, breast reconstruction, venous congestion, supercharging, superdrainage, SIEV, and DIEV. Results Based on the studies found in the literature, we developed an algorithm to guide the surgeon's decision when choosing the veins for the superdrainage anastomosis. Conclusion Several alternatives for venous anastomosis in superdrainage are available. We propose an algorithm to simplify the choice. The use of the ipsilateral SIEV to be connected to a vein of the chest appears to be advantageous. The anatomical position that allows the easiest anastomosis dictates which chest vein to favor.

Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Stacked Diep Flap

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Suñé ◽  
David Carrillo ◽  
Cristian Lopez ◽  
Marco Serena Signes ◽  
Alejandra Sainz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Immediate Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Diep Flap

Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction on One Single Internal Mammary Pedicle

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koenraad Landuyt ◽  
Moustapha Hamdi ◽  
Phillip Blondeel ◽  
Nathalie Roche ◽  
Stanislas Monstrey
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Internal Mammary

scholarly journals Exploring personalized postoperative non-invasive tissue oximetry in DIEP flap breast reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouk A. M. A. Lindelauf ◽  
Nousjka P. A. Vranken ◽  
Rutger M. Schols ◽  
Esther A. C. Bouman ◽  
Patrick W. Weerwind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Detection ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Baseline Measurement ◽  
Flap Surgery ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Vascular Compromise ◽  
Tissue Oximetry

Abstract Early detection of vascular compromise after autologous breast reconstruction is crucial to enable timely re-exploration for flap salvage. Several studies proposed non-invasive tissue oximetry for early identification of ischemia of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. The present study aimed to explore the utility of non-invasive tissue oximetry following DIEP flap surgery using a personalized oxygenation threshold. Methods Patients undergoing immediate/delayed DIEP flap surgery were included in this prospective observational study. DIEP flap tissue oxygenation (StO2) was monitored continuously using near-infrared spectroscopy. A baseline measurement was performed by positioning one sensor at the marked position of the major inferior epigastric perforator on the abdomen. A new sensor was positioned postoperatively on the transplanted tissue. In unilateral procedures, postoperative StO2 values of the native breast were also obtained. Measurements were continued for 24 h. Results Thirty patients (42 flaps) were included. Fourteen patients (46.7%) had an uncomplicated postoperative course. A minor complication was observed in thirteen patients; in five patients, at least one major complication occurred, requiring re-exploration. Median StO2 readings were significantly lower in patients with major complications compared to uncomplicated cases. In fourteen unilateral DIEP flap procedures, StO2 values of the native breast were similar to the preoperative baseline measurement (92%; p = 0.452). Conclusions Non-invasive tissue oximetry following DIEP flap surgery could aid in early detection of vascular compromise. StO2 values of the native breast and abdominal wall preoperatively can be used interchangeably and can serve as personalized reference value. Level of evidence: Level IV, diagnostic / prognostic study.

scholarly journals Breast softness in patients randomised to postmastectomy breast reconstruction with an expander prosthesis or DIEP flap

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Tallroth ◽  
Håkan Brorson ◽  
Nathalie Mobargha ◽  
Patrik Velander ◽  
Stina Klasson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Subjective Evaluation ◽  
Objective Evaluation ◽  
Applanation Tonometry ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Delayed Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Level I ◽  
Therapeutic Study

Abstract Background Objectively measured breast softness in reconstructed breasts and its relation to patients’ subjective satisfaction with breast softness has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate breast softness in patients 1 year following delayed breast reconstruction with an expander prosthesis (EP) or deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, using objective and subjective methods. Methods Seventy-three patients were randomised to breast reconstruction with an EP or DIEP flap between 2012 and 2018. Of these, 69 completed objective evaluation at a mean of 25 (standard deviation, SD 9.4) months following breast reconstruction. Objective evaluation included measurements of breast volume, jugulum-nipple distance, clavicular-submammary fold distance, ptosis and Baker scale grading. Breast softness was assessed with applanation tonometry. Subjective evaluation was performed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Results Objectively, DIEP flaps were significantly softer than EP breast reconstructions. Non-operated contralateral breasts were significantly softer compared with reconstructed breasts. In the subjective evaluation, the median score on the question (labelled 1.h) “How satisfied or dissatisfied have you been with the softness of your reconstructed breast (s)?” was higher in the DIEP flap group corresponding to greater satisfaction in this group. A fair correlation was found between the applanation tonometry and the patient-reported satisfaction with the reconstructed breast’s softness (rs = 0.37). Conclusions In terms of breast softness, breast reconstructions with DIEP flaps result in more satisfied patients. Concerning applanation tonometry as an objective tool for softness assessment, future studies on interobserver agreement are warranted. Level of evidence: Level I, therapeutic study

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document