scholarly journals 483 A Quality Improvement Project: Novel Electronic Operative Note Templates to Improve the Continuity of Post-Operative Patient Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Abdeen ◽  
M Alaaraj ◽  
Y Alkilani ◽  
S B Ahmad ◽  
U Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Surgical Practice ◽  
Operative Note ◽  
It Training ◽  
Operative Notes ◽  
User Friendly ◽  
Training Opportunities

Abstract Introduction Good Surgical Practice from RCS England encourages the use of e-health records and detailed typed operative notes. The Covid-19 pandemic has led to multi-site operating. ENT operations in our trust were split over three sites including the private sector leading to potential disruption in continuity of patient care. Physical operation notes are difficult to access in emergencies, telephonic clinics or for audit purposes. We aim to have operative notes available on patients’ e-records which adhere to RCSEng guidelines. Method In this QIP, we reviewed all ENT operations over a retrospective one-month period recording percentage of notes uploaded to patient e-record and the number of surgeons in theatre. We created two novel RCSEng compliant e-operative notes with a user guide, generic and tonsillectomy-specific, and prospectively collected data to complete the cycle. Results 261 patients were included in both study periods. Only 36/134(27%) had e-operative pre-intervention improving to 71/127(56%) post-intervention. In the latter period, 76% of operations included a registrar and were more likely to have e-operative notes(72%) compared to when a consultant was operating alone(6%). There was low uptake of our tonsillectomy e-proforma(33%). Conclusions Our QIP has already proved effective with our templates increasing operative documentation on e-records. Increased use of e-template was more likely with the presence of a registrar in theatre. Room for improvement remains and we will re-audit after the introduction of further user-friendly operative templates and IT training. This QIP has also revealed additional operative training opportunities of which registrars can take advantage.

Improvement in the quality of patient notes: A report of a closed loop audit quality improvement project at a neurosurgical department in Pakistan.

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ashraf ◽  
Syed Shahzad Hussain ◽  
Usman Ahmad Kamboh ◽  
Mehreen Mehboob ◽  
Saman Shahid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Neurosurgical Department ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Audit Cycle ◽  
Patient Note ◽  
Operative Notes

Abstract Objective: To identify the deficiencies in patient note record-taking with the aim of improving the quality to meet international standards. Methods: The prospective clinical quality improvement audit study was conducted at the department of Neurosurgery, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Jinnah Hospital Lahore from January 219 to February 2020. The first audit cycle was carried out in July 2019, after data anonymisation, the notes from 1st January to 31st June were analysed in the first audit cycle against a hybrid proforma containing entries deemed essential in operative notes according to the guidelines of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. The guidelines were subsequently disseminated among postgraduate trainees using various methods. Post-intervention, randomly selected patient-notes from 1st August to 31st December 2019 were analysed in the second audit which was done in February 2020. The result of the two audits were compared to assess significance of association between the cycles for each categorical variable. Results: Of the 100 patient-notes audited, 50(50%) were part of each of the two cycles. Significant improvements (p<0.05) were seen between the two cycles in time of operation, pre-op status, post-op care: monitoring instruction, mobilisation, feeding instructions, wound care and position. There was 100% improvement in entries including name, age and sex, date of operation, elective/emergency, name of the procedure and name of operating surgeon and assistant, and the name of anaesthetist. Overall, marked improvement was observed in all parameters except in ‘use of antibiotic prophylaxes’. Conclusion: Regular audits are needed to monitor and improve, Continuous..

scholarly journals 988 A Quality Improvement Project; Improving the Quality and Safety of Handover During COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Chawla ◽  
M Said Noor
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
World Health ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Handover Process

Abstract Aim The World Health Organisation (WHO) positions effective handover, in its top five patient safety solutions. During our District Hospital Trust’s COVID-19 response, an unprecedented reorganisation of all teams occurred. All surgical and medical speciality junior doctors were re-deployed and split into 4 zones to cover the hospital. In this quality improvement project (QIP), we sought to understand our trainees’ thoughts on this new multi-zonal handover process and aimed to identify risk-reduction measures to aid better patient care. Method The opinions of trainees on the new handover system were obtained using an online Likert scale survey. Following the responses, a new morning and night handover proforma was developed. This was used trust-wide and a post-intervention repeat survey was conducted to assess the new changes. Results The primary survey received 31 responses with feedback illustrating mixed effectiveness of the existing handover process. Free text comments highlighted issues surrounding “safety”, “poor organisation”, “poor continuity of care” with one serious incident reported. Post-intervention of a new handover proforma, a repeat online survey received 25 responses. Results were significantly more positive with &gt;84% of responses being in the “strongly agree to agree” category, including for “continuity of care”, “organisation”, and “safety”. Conclusions This QIP illustrates a good example of a low-cost intervention to create a better handover system and aid hospitals during time of crises. For us, it managed to reform the handover process and ultimately improved our patient care. Forthcoming, we would like to create a national best practice guide for effective handover.

System intervention in community pharmacy setting: Leading to better patient care through reducing harm associated with coprescribing benzodiazepines and opioids

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 445-453
Author(s):  
Angelina Vascimini, PharmD ◽  
Kevin Duane, PharmD ◽  
Stacey Curtis, PharmD
Keyword(s):  
Chart Review ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
System Intervention ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Pharmacy Setting

Objective: The opioid epidemic is frequently discussed including the staggering numbers involved with coprescribing opioids and benzodiazepines associated with death. Community pharmacists, with the help of a system intervention, have a unique opportunity to help reduce the coprescribing of benzodiazepines and opioids and reduce the associated risk of death.Design: A single center retrospective chart review was conducted after a system intervention was placed, as a quality improvement project, from November 2019 to May 2020.Setting: Independent community pharmacy.Patients/participants: Data included demographics, dosing of each medication pre- and post-intervention, and naloxone status.Main outcome(s) measures: The primary outcome evaluated was reduction in dose/discontinuation of these prescriptions. The secondary outcome evaluated was the number of naloxone prescriptions ordered per protocol and picked up.Results: The primary outcome did not show statistical difference; however, the secondary outcomes showed statistical significance.Conclusion: In conclusion, community pharmacists, with the help of evolving technologies, can reduce harm associated with the coprescribing of benzodiazepines and opioids.

261 Using Technology to Improve Inpatient Surgical Lists

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Gowda ◽  
Z Chia ◽  
T Fonseka ◽  
K Smith ◽  
S Williams
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Point Scale ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Team Meetings ◽  
And Training ◽  
Multi Disciplinary Team

Abstract Introduction Every day in our surgical department; prior to our quality improvement project, Junior Doctors spent on average 3.26 clinical hours maintaining 5 surgical inpatient lists of different specialities with accessibility of lists rated as “neutral” based on a 5-point scale from difficult to easy. Our hospital previously had lists stored locally on designated computers causing recurrent difficulties in accessing and editing these lists. Method We used surveys sent to clinicians to collect data. Cycle 1: Surgical Assessment Units list on Microsoft Teams Cycle 2: Addition of surgical specialities and wards lists onto Microsoft Teams. Cycle 3 (current): expand the use of Microsoft Teams to other specialities. Results Utilising technology led to a 25% reduction in time spent on maintaining inpatient lists, to 2.46 hours a day, and an improvement in the accessibility of lists to “easy”. Across a year, this saves over 220 hours clinician hours which can be used towards patient care and training. Furthermore, use of Microsoft Teams has improved communication and patient care, in the form of virtual regional Multi-Disciplinary Team meetings and research projects. Conclusions Microsoft Teams is currently free to all NHS organisations in England so there is potential for these efficiency savings to be replicated nationwide.

The process of sourcing and preparing electronic health records data to implement a machine-learning algorithm for early identification of maternal cardiovascular risk (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nawar Shara ◽  
Kelley M. Anderson ◽  
Noor Falah ◽  
Maryam F. Ahmad ◽  
Darya Tavazoei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Patient Records ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

BACKGROUND Healthcare data are fragmenting as patients seek care from diverse sources. Consequently, patient care is negatively impacted by disparate health records. Machine learning (ML) offers a disruptive force in its ability to inform and improve patient care and outcomes [6]. However, the differences that exist in each individual’s health records, combined with the lack of health-data standards, in addition to systemic issues that render the data unreliable and that fail to create a single view of each patient, create challenges for ML. While these problems exist throughout healthcare, they are especially prevalent within maternal health, and exacerbate the maternal morbidity and mortality (MMM) crisis in the United States. OBJECTIVE Maternal patient records were extracted from the electronic health records (EHRs) of a large tertiary healthcare system and made into patient-specific, complete datasets through a systematic method so that a machine-learning-based (ML-based) risk-assessment algorithm could effectively identify maternal cardiovascular risk prior to evidence of diagnosis or intervention within the patient’s record. METHODS We outline the effort that was required to define the specifications of the computational systems, the dataset, and access to relevant systems, while ensuring data security, privacy laws, and policies were met. Data acquisition included the concatenation, anonymization, and normalization of health data across multiple EHRs in preparation for its use by a proprietary risk-stratification algorithm designed to establish patient-specific baselines to identify and establish cardiovascular risk based on deviations from the patient’s baselines to inform early interventions. RESULTS Patient records can be made actionable for the goal of effectively employing machine learning (ML), specifically to identify cardiovascular risk in pregnant patients. CONCLUSIONS Upon acquiring data, including the concatenation, anonymization, and normalization of said data across multiple EHRs, the use of a machine-learning-based (ML-based) tool can provide early identification of cardiovascular risk in pregnant patients. CLINICALTRIAL N/A

scholarly journals Neonatal Intra-Ventricular-Hemorrhage Prevention in Premature at < 30 Weeks Gestational Age

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Hoyos ◽  
Pablo Vasquez-Hoyos
Keyword(s):  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Antenatal Steroid ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Prevention Project ◽  
Ventricular Hemorrhage

Introduction: Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH) is a devastating condition mostly in preterm infants at &lt; 30 weeks GA with large morbidities and mortality usually in the first 72 hours after birth. Prevention seems to be the only way to completely deal with this problem. The IVH prevention in this age group has been studied and includes some strategies such as prenatal corticosteroids, cesarean delivery, careful extraction among others, but still, it has an unacceptably high incidence in this population.Objective: To measure the application of a quality improvement project develop from the "Drive to Zero IVH Prevention Project" presented in a Epiclatino lecture in our unit.Material and method: We design a before and after observational study and measured the incidence of IVH before and after October 2017 when a minimum manipulation protocol was implemented at the Cl&iacute;nica del Country (CDC) unit. We also compare these findings to those of other units in the EpicLatino network. All patients born &lt;30 weeks GA with less than 2 days of age, who survived at least 3 days, and had a neuroimaging taken were included. We compared demographics, diagnosis, and frequency of IVH cases, before Nov 2017 and after from CDC and the from 2018-2019 EpicLatino registry using a bivariate analysis. Results: We collected data from 46 cases before, 40 after implementation, and 203 cases from the EpicLatino registry. Demographic characteristics were very similar in the post-intervention with few statistically significant differences in antenatal steroid use (97.5% post, 96% before and 79.3% Epilatino, p=0.016), prolonged rupture of membranes (15% post, 4% before and 15% EpicLatino, p &lt;0.001), vaginal deliveries (7.5% post, 10.9% before and 24.1% Epilatino, p=0.01), suspended chorioamnionitis (12.5% post, 6% before and 20.2% Epiclatino). We found a significant reduction in IVH after the protocol was implemented with only 5 (7.5%) cases post-intervention compared to 19 (29.4%) case before, and when compared to the 81 (39.1%) cases in the registry, p&lt; 0.001. Most of the cases that occurred in the post-intervention occurred before admission to the unit due to obstetric trauma.Discussion: If a well-controlled delivery minimizing obstetric trauma is achieved, a minimal manipulation protocol appears to significantly decrease the incidence of HIV. Controlled, multicenter studies are still required to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Improving quality and assessment of referrals to the Enfield Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team (ECRHTT)

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S202-S202
Author(s):  
Margarita Kousteni ◽  
John Cousins ◽  
Ajay Mansingh ◽  
Maja Elia ◽  
Yumnah Ras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Home Treatment ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
List Type ◽  
Treatment Team ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Consultant Psychiatrist ◽  
The Impact

AimsTriaging referrals to crisis resolution and home treatment teams is a significant undertaking requiring experienced and dedicated staff. We observed that the volume of inappropriate referrals to ECRHTT was high, and that staff processing these often felt inexperienced or lacking in confidence to discharge them back to the referrers and signpost them to appropriate services.The aims of this quality improvement project (QIP) were: a)to reduce the number of inappropriate referrals received by the teamb)to reduce the number of inappropriate referrals accepted by the teamThis would significantly improve access and flow to the service and facilitate better patient care.MethodA pilot study was first completed of the quality (appropriateness/ inappropriateness) and source of all referrals to ECRHTT in January 2019 (n = 177).Subsequently, the consultant psychiatrist for ECRHTT based himself within the assessment team. He was able to closely monitor the referrals, at the same time as providing medical input to patients at their first point of contact. To evaluate the impact of this intervention, the percentage of inappropriate referrals accepted pre- and post-change was compared by re-auditing all referrals received in February 2019 (n = 175).Further interventions were instigated to improve referral quality. These included continuation of psychiatric medical input to the assessment team, teaching sessions for GPs and the crisis telephone service, and weekly meetings with psychiatric liaison and community mental health teams (CMHTs). Change was measured by reassessing the quality of all referrals made to ECRHTT in February 2020 (n = 215).Result46.9% of inappropriate referrals to ECRHTT were accepted in January 2019 compared to 16.9% in February 2019 following the addition of medical input to the assessment team. The absolute difference was 30% (95% CI: 14%–44%, p < 0.001).71% of referrals from GPs were inappropriate in January 2019 compared to 36% in February 2020 post-intervention (difference 35%, 95% CI: 8.84%–55.4%, p < 0.05). Inappropriate referrals from CMHTs decreased from 55.5% to 12% (difference 43.5%, 95% CI: 9.5%–70.3%, p < 0.05). Overall, the percentage of inappropriate referrals fell from 38% to 27.4%, a difference of 10.6% (95% CI: 1.3%–19.8%, p < 0.05). The percentage of inappropriate referrals from liaison teams did not change significantly.ConclusionThis piece of work shows that better engagement with referral sources significantly improved the quality of referrals made to ECRHTT. Interventions included medical input at the point of referral, teaching sessions for general practitioners as well as ongoing liaison with referring teams.

524 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: INCORPORATING COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT INTO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CLERKING

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii8-ii13
Author(s):  
A Oates
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Medical Team ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Efficient Detection ◽  
User Friendly

Abstract Elderly patients transferred to community hospitals often have complex medical, social, psychological, functional and pharmacological backgrounds that require careful assessment in order to create and deliver a high quality, patient-centred care plan. Unfortunately, time pressures experienced by staff in acute hospitals can make Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) unfeasible for every patient. Moreover, junior members of the medical team may be unsure as to which aspects of a patient’s background and presentation constitute important elements of a CGA. Failure to recognise and document pertinent issues can lead to prolonged admissions, disjointed care and failed discharges. Admission to a community hospital presents a convenient ‘checkpoint’ in the patient’s hospital journey at which to undertake a CGA. Recording the relevant information in an effective clerking proforma when the patient is admitted ensures that this information is displayed clearly and in a way that is accessible to all members of the multidisciplinary team. The pre-existing clerking proforma at Amersham Community Hospital omitted several important elements of CGA (such as examination of feet and gait, assessment of mood, FRAX-UK score, creation of a problem list etc.) The aim of this quality improvement project was to create a thorough, yet user-friendly and time-efficient clerking proforma which incorporated the important components of CGA. Using BGS guidance and NICE quality standards, alongside suggestions from the medical team, the existing clerking proforma was adapted and reformed. After one month, feedback from the team was used to further improve the clerking proforma, ensuring that it was user-friendly, whilst meeting the standards set out by NICE and BGS. This was repeated as part of a second PDSA cycle. The improved clerking proforma enables junior doctors to undertake a thorough and holistic assessment, promoting efficient detection of issues and the delivery of a higher quality of care.

Timely Family Feedback to Guide Family Engagement in the Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 42-51
Author(s):  
Natalie S. McAndrew ◽  
Laura Mark ◽  
Mary Butler
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Family Engagement ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
Family Experience ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
The Family

Background Organizations motivated to provide high-quality care in the intensive care unit are exploring strategies to engage families in patient care. Such initiatives are based on emerging evidence that family engagement improves quality and safety of care. Objective To gather family feedback to guide future nurse-led quality improvement efforts to engage families in the intensive care unit setting. Methods The Critical Care Family Satisfaction Survey, which consists of 20 items rated from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), was paired with open-ended questions and administered to families during the intensive care unit stay from March through December 2017. Content analysis was used to identify themes regarding the family experience. Results Responses were collected from 178 family members. The mean (SD) score on the survey was 4.65 (0.33). Five themes emerged regarding the delivery of family care in the intensive care unit: family interactions with the interdisciplinary team, information sharing and effective communication, family navigation of the intensive care unit environment, family engagement in the intensive care unit, and quality of patient care. Conclusions This quality improvement project provided foundational information to guide family engagement efforts in the intensive care unit. Real-time solicitation of feedback is essential to improving the family experience and guiding family-centered care delivery in this practice environment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document