scholarly journals EP.WE.608Hospital within the Hospital – Renaissance of Elective Surgery Amidst the Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quratul Ain ◽  
Tanzeela Gala ◽  
Hajr Rashid ◽  
Hajra Ashraf ◽  
Shaheen Vesamia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Activity Data ◽  
Informatics System ◽  
Surgical Trainees ◽  
Business Informatics ◽  
Subsequent Wave

Abstract Aim COVID had an unprecedented effect on the NHS elective surgical care. To overcome the deficit created due to the pandemic, the concept of a ‘COVID protected zone’ gave birth to the ‘hospital within the hospital’. This included 9 elective theatres, 28 ring fenced elective beds, a surgical enhanced care unit, a canteen and a separated entrance. Of the fundamentals of the model were enhanced infection control and PPE guidance for staff. The aim of our study was to evaluate the recovery of elective activity brought about by this elective centre. Methods Theatre activity data was collected weekly (7/20 to 1/21) through the business informatics system. This was used to compare the activity achieved during the recovery phase from COVID after the first and subsequent wave. Results Pre COVID-19, 11 theatres were operating. These managed an average of 263 cases were per week. In the first week of operation of elective centre, 31% of theatre capacity was achieved. By week 7, 106% of pre COVID was recorded and 130% by week 11. During the 2nd wave the capacity was reduced to 42% as opposed to 0% during the first wave. This was only possible due to our model elective centre. Conclusion This model elective centre has enabled elective care to return to above normal levels, with increased efficiencies. This has not only shortened patient waiting times and cleared the back-log but also delivered training to surgical trainees without compromising safety.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimuthu Rathnayake ◽  
Mike Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
High Income ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Timely Access ◽  
Referral Systems

Abstract Background Long waiting times for elective surgery are common to many publicly funded health systems. Inefficiencies in referral systems in high-income countries are more pronounced than lower and middle-income countries. Primary care practitioners play a major role in determining which patients are referred to surgeon and might represent an opportunity to improve this situation. With conventional methods of referrals, surgery clinics are often overcrowded with non-surgical referrals and surgical patients experience longer waiting times as a consequence. Improving the quality of referral communications should lead to more timely access and better cost-effectiveness for elective surgical care. This review summarises the research evidence for effective interventions within the scope of primary-care referral methods in the surgical care pathway that might shorten waiting time for elective surgeries. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases in December-2019 to January-2020, for articles published after 2013. Eligibility criteria included major elective surgery lists of adult patients, excluding cancer related surgeries. Both randomised and non-randomised controlled studies were eligible. The quality of evidence was assessed using ROBINS-I, AMSTAR 2 and CASP, as appropriate to the study method used. The review presentation was limited to a narrative synthesis because of heterogeneity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42019158455. Results The electronic search yielded 7543 records. Finally, nine articles were considered as eligible after deduplication and full article screening. The eligible research varied widely in design, scope, reported outcomes and overall quality, with one randomised trial, two quasi-experimental studies, two longitudinal follow up studies, three systematic reviews and one observational study. All the six original articles were based on referral methods in high-income countries. The included research showed that patient triage and prioritisation at the referral stage improved timely access and increased the number of consultations of surgical patients in clinics. Conclusions The available studies included a variety of interventions and were of medium to high quality researches. Managing patient referrals with proper triaging and prioritisation using structured referral formats is likely to be effective in health systems to shorten the waiting times for elective surgeries, specifically in high-income countries.

scholarly journals 1358 Does A COVID Protected Hospital Within A COVID Hospital Enable Elective Care and Training Opportunities?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Rashid ◽  
T Gala ◽  
Q Ain ◽  
H Ashraf ◽  
S Vesamia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Training Environment ◽  
Informatics System ◽  
Surgical Trainees ◽  
Business Informatics ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Second Wave ◽  
Training Opportunities ◽  
And Training

Abstract Introduction Elective care in the UK came to a standstill with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. A restart could only be enabled with ‘green site’ separation and a ‘covid protected’ zone. A ‘hospital within the hospital’ concept was developed including 9 elective theatres, 28 ring fenced elective beds, a surgical enhanced care unit, a canteen, and a separated entrance. This model was underpinned with PPE, enhanced infection control and guidance for staff. The study documented the ability to recover elective activity and therefore provide a training environment for surgical trainees. Method Data was collected weekly (7/20 to 1/21) through the business informatics system with regard to theatres cases completed compared to the activity achieved in the 11-theatre elective estate pre COVID-19. Results Pre COVID-19, an average of 263 cases were completed per week. In the first week of operation, 31% of theatre capacity was achieved. By week 7, 106% of pre COVID was recorded and 130% by week 11. This was maintained until the impact of the second wave where activity has reduced to 50% but is not anticipated to reduce further as local anaesthetic and blocks maybe utilised. Conclusions This ‘hospital within the hospital’ has enabled elective care to return to above normal levels, with increased efficiencies. This has enabled a rapid return to a training environment for trainees disheartened with deployment to critical care in the first wave.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Different Patient Referral Methods on Waiting Times for Adults Needing Elective Surgery - Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimuthu Rathnayake ◽  
Mike Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Timely Access

Abstract Background: Long waiting times and lengthy queues for elective surgery are common to many publicly funded health systems. Primary care practitioners play a major role in determining which patients are referred to the consultant surgeon and might represent an opportunity to improve this situation. With conventional methods of referrals, surgery clinics are often overcrowded with non-surgical referrals and surgical patients experience longer waiting times as a consequence. Improving the quality of referral communications should lead to more timely access and better cost-effectiveness for elective surgical care. This review summarises the research evidence for interventions within the scope of primary care referral methods in the surgical care pathway that might shorten waiting time for elective surgeries.Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases in December 2019 to January 2020, for articles published after 2013. Eligibility criteria included major elective surgery lists of adult patients, excluding cancer and cancer related surgeries. Randomised trials and non-randomised controlled studies were eligible. The main outcome variable of interest was waiting time for the elective surgery. The quality of evidence was assessed using ROBINS-I, AMSTAR 2 and CASP, as appropriate to the study method used. The review presentation was limited to a narrative synthesis because of heterogeneity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42019158455.Results: The electronic search yielded 7543 records. Finally, nine articles were considered as eligible after deduplication and full article screening. The eligible research varied widely in design, scope, reported outcomes and overall quality, with one randomised trial, two quasi-experimental studies, two longitudinal follow up studies, three systematic reviews and one observational study. The included research showed that patient triage and prioritisation at the referral stage improved timely access and increased the number of consultations of surgical patients in clinics.Conclusions: The available studies included a variety of interventions and were of medium to high quality, showing that methods to improve the management of primary care referrals of patients for elective surgery can reduce waiting times and shorten waiting lists for elective surgery for adults.

scholarly journals Pediatric Surgical Reentry Strategy Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Tiered and Balanced Approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110111
Author(s):  
Ryan C. Pickens ◽  
Angela M. Kao ◽  
Mark A. Williams ◽  
Andrew C. Herman ◽  
Jeffrey S. Kneisl
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Children's Hospital ◽  
Protocol Development ◽  
Balanced Approach ◽  
Projective Curves ◽  
Children’S Hospital ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Emergent Surgery

Background In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, children’s hospitals across the country postponed elective surgery beginning in March 2020. As projective curves flattened, administrators and surgeons sought to develop strategies to safely resume non-emergent surgery. This article reviews challenges and solutions specific to a children’s hospital related to the resumption of elective pediatric surgeries. We present our tiered reentry approach for pediatric surgery as well as report early data for surgical volume and tracking COVID-19 cases during reentry. Methods The experience of shutdown, protocol development, and early reentry of elective pediatric surgery are reported from Levine’s Children’s Hospital (LCH), a free-leaning children’s hospital in Charlotte, North Carolina. Data reported were obtained from de-identified hospital databases. Results Pediatric surgery experienced a dramatic decrease in case volumes at LCH during the shutdown, variable by specialty. A tiered and balanced reentry strategy was implemented with steady resumption of elective surgery following strict pre-procedural screening and testing. Early outcomes showed a steady thorough fluctuating increase in elective case volumes without evidence of a surgery-associated positive spread through periprocedural tracking. Conclusion Reentry of non-emergent pediatric surgical care requires unique considerations including the impact of COVID-19 on children, each children hospital structure and resources, and preventing undue delay in intervention for age- and disease-specific pediatric conditions. A carefully balanced strategy has been critical for safe reentry following the anticipated surge. Ongoing tracking of resource utilization, operative volumes, and testing results will remain vital as community spread continues to fluctuate across the country.

HOW TO REPORT AND MONITOR THE PERFORMANCE OF WAITING LIST MANAGEMENT

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-618
Author(s):  
Markus Torkki ◽  
Miika Linna ◽  
Seppo Seitsalo ◽  
Pekka Paavolainen
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Varicose Vein ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Waiting List ◽  
Mean Waiting Time ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Potential Problems ◽  
Queue Discipline

Objectives: Potential problems concerning waiting list management are often monitored using mean waiting times based on empirical samples. However, the appropriateness of mean waiting time as an indicator of access can be questioned if a waiting list is not managed well, e.g., if the queue discipline is violated. This study was performed to find out about the queue discipline in waiting lists for elective surgery to reveal potential discrepancies in waiting list management. Methods: There were 1,774 waiting list patients for hallux valgus or varicose vein surgery or sterilization. The waiting time distributions of patients receiving surgery and of patients still waiting for an operation are presented in column charts. The charts are compared with two model charts. One model chart presents a high queue discipline (first in—first out) and another a poor queue discipline (random) queue. Results: There were significant differences in waiting list management across hospitals and patient categories. Examples of a poor queue discipline were found in queues for hallux valgus and varicose vein operations. Conclusions: A routine waiting list reporting should be used to guarantee the quality of waiting list management and to pinpoint potential problems in access. It is important to monitor not only the number of patients in the waiting list but also the queue discipline and the balance between demand and supply of surgical services. The purpose for this type of reporting is to ensure that the priority setting made at health policy level also works in practise.

scholarly journals The Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Training: the Past, the Present and the Future

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Yiasemidou
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Surgical Training ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
The World ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic and infection control measures had an unavoidable impact on surgical services. During the first wave of the pandemic, elective surgery, endoscopy, and ‘face-to-face’ clinics were discontinued after recommendations from professional bodies. In addition, training courses, examinations, conferences, and training rotations were postponed or cancelled. Inadvertently, infection control and prevention measures, both within and outside hospitals, have caused a significant negative impact on training. At the same time, they have given space to new technologies, like telemedicine and platforms for webinars, to blossom. While the recovery phase is well underway in some parts of the world, most surgical services are not operating at full capacity. Unfortunately, some countries are still battling a second or third wave of the pandemic with severely negative consequences on surgical services. Several studies have looked into the impact of COVID-19 on surgical training. Here, an objective overview of studies from different parts of the world is presented. Also, evidence-based solutions are suggested for future surgical training interventions.

scholarly journals Ethical considerations and patient safety concerns for cancelling non-urgent surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nolan J. Brown ◽  
Bayard Wilson ◽  
Stephen Szabadi ◽  
Cameron Quon ◽  
Vera Ong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Ethics ◽  
Health Care Access ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Surgical Safety ◽  
Care Access ◽  
Urgent Surgery ◽  
Starting Point

AbstractAt the time of writing of this article, there have been over 110 million cases and 2.4 million deaths worldwide since the start of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, postponing millions of non-urgent surgeries. Existing literature explores the complexities of rationing medical care. However, implications of non-urgent surgery postponement during the COVID-19 pandemic have not yet been analyzed within the context of the four pillars of medical ethics. The objective of this review is to discuss the ethics of elective surgery cancellation during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy. This review hypothesizes that a more equitable decision-making algorithm can be formulated by analyzing the ethical dilemmas of elective surgical care during the pandemic through the lens of these four pillars. This paper’s analysis shows that non-urgent surgeries treat conditions that can become urgent if left untreated. Postponement of these surgeries can cause cumulative harm downstream. An improved algorithm can address these issues of beneficence by weighing local pandemic stressors within predictive algorithms to appropriately increase surgeries. Additionally, the potential harms of performing non-urgent surgeries extend beyond the patient. Non-maleficence is maintained through using enhanced screening protocols and modifying surgical techniques to reduce risks to patients and clinicians. This model proposes a system to transfer patients from areas of high to low burden, addressing the challenge of justice by considering facility burden rather than value judgments concerning the nature of a particular surgery, such as cosmetic surgeries. Autonomy can be respected by giving patients the option to cancel or postpone non-urgent surgeries. However, in the context of limited resources in a global pandemic, autonomy is not absolute. Non-urgent surgeries can ethically be postponed in opposition to the patient’s preference. The proposed algorithm attempts to uphold the four principles of medical ethics in rationing non-urgent surgical care by building upon existing decision models, using additional measures of resource burden and surgical safety to increase health care access and decrease long-term harm as much as possible. The next global health crisis will undoubtedly present its own unique challenges. This model may serve as a comprehensive starting point in determining future guidelines for non-urgent surgical care.

The 7th French Airborne Forward Surgical Team experience of surgical support to the population of a low-income country: a prospective study on 341 patients with short-term follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 164 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvain Goudard ◽  
C Butin ◽  
C Carfantan ◽  
G Pauleau ◽  
E Soucanye de Landevoisin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Host Population ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Low Income Country ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Teams ◽  
A Prospective Study

BackgroundThe 7th Airborne Forward Surgical Team (FST) has deployed to Chad in 2015 and 2016, in support of French military forces. Humanitarian surgical care is known to represent a significant part of the surgical activity in such missions, but to date limited data have been published on the subject.MethodsAll surgical patients from a civilian host population treated by the FST during these missions have been prospectively included. Indications, operative outcomes and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.ResultsDuring this period, the FST operated on 358 patients. Humanitarian surgical care represented 95% of the activity. Most patients (92.7%) were operated for elective surgery. Emergencies and infectious diseases represented, respectively, 7.3% and 9.1% of cases. The mean length of stay (LOS) was three days (2–4), and the median follow-up was 30 days (22–34). Mortality rate was 0.6% and morbidity was 5.6%. Parietal surgery had no significant complication and had shorter LOS (p<0.001). Emergent surgeries were more complicated (p<0.01) and required more reoperations (p<0.05). Surgical infectious cases had longer LOS (p<0.01).ConclusionsHumanitarian surgical care can be provided without compromising the primary mission of the medical forces. Close surveillance and follow-up allowed favourable outcomes with low morbidity and mortality rates. Humanitarian care is responsible for a considerable portion of the workload in such deployed surgical teams. Accounting for humanitarian care is essential in the planning and training for such future medical operations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document