scholarly journals Tamoxifen does not form detectable DNA adducts in white blood cells of breast cancer patients

1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1149-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Phillips ◽  
Alan Hewer ◽  
Philip L. Grover ◽  
Grace K. Poon ◽  
Paul L. Carmichael
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wings TY Loo ◽  
Michael CW Yip ◽  
Louis WC Chow ◽  
Qing Liu ◽  
Elizabeth LY Ng ◽  
...  

Background Short-term memory (STM) decline in breast cancer patients resulting from chemotherapy was evaluated by means of blood biomarkers, a questionnaire, and a computerized STM test. Methods This study was conducted from January 2013 to June 2013, recruiting 90 subjects: 30 breast cancer patients beginning the 3rd of 4th cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, 30 recovered patients (who completed 4 cycles of docetaxel for a minimum of 6 months), and 30 healthy subjects (disease-free females). The levels of hemoglobin, red and white blood cells, and cortisol in serum, and a computerized STM test were analyzed to estimate the effects of chemotherapy on STM. A questionnaire was given to all subjects to assess quality of life. Results Statistically significant differences were observed for the blood parameters (hemoglobin, red and white blood cells, and cortisol levels) between healthy and on-treatment subjects (respectively 13.47±0.96 g/dL vs 5.37±0.38 g/dL, 4.58±0.41 1012/L vs 2.07±0.13 1012/L, and 6.15±1.03 109/L vs 0.86±0.41 109/L). Scores of the STM test were significantly lower for patients compared to healthy subjects. As indicated by the results of the questionnaire, breast cancer patients had a higher tendency to forget than healthy controls (X2=3.15; p<0.0001) and recovered subjects (X2=3.15; p<0.0001). Conclusion We found depleted levels of hemoglobin, red and white blood cells as a result of chemotherapy, and elevated levels of stress correlated with poor performances in the computerized STM test. A higher cortisol level might be an important precursor of STM deterioration. Monitoring cortisol would be beneficial for evaluating the quality of life of breast cancer patients on chemotherapy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marija Gamulin ◽  
Verica Garaj-Vrhovac ◽  
Nevenka Kopjar ◽  
Snježana Ramić ◽  
Tomislav Viculin ◽  
...  

Tumor Biology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 101042831769504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Golnaz Khakpour ◽  
Mehrdad Noruzinia ◽  
Pantea Izadi ◽  
Fatemeh Karami ◽  
Mohammad Ahmadvand ◽  
...  

Critical roles of epigenomic alterations in the pathogenesis of breast cancer have recently seized great attentions toward finding epimarkers in either non-invasive or semi-non-invasive samples as well as peripheral blood. In this way, methylated DNA immunoprecipitation microarray (MeDIP-chip) was performed on DNA samples isolated from white blood cells of 30 breast cancer patients compared to 30 healthy controls. A total of 1799 differentially methylated regions were identified including SLC6A3, Rab40C, ZNF584, and FOXD3 whose significant methylation differences were confirmed in breast cancer patients through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Hypermethylation of APC, HDAC1, and GSK1 genes has been previously reported in more than one study on tissue samples of breast cancer. Methylation of those aforementioned genes in white blood cells of our young patients not only relies on their importance in breast cancer pathogenesis but also may highlight their potential as early epimarkers that makes further assessments necessary in large cohort studies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. S214
Author(s):  
I. Matic ◽  
M. Grujic ◽  
B. Kolundzija ◽  
A. Damjanovic Velickovic ◽  
Z. Tomasevic ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A Comen ◽  
Maria Kleppe ◽  
Hannah Wen ◽  
Britta Weigelt ◽  
Lennart Bastian ◽  
...  

Redox Report ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miroslav Adžić ◽  
Ana Nićiforović ◽  
Vesna Vučić ◽  
Zora Nešković-Konstantinović ◽  
Snežana D. Spasić ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rebecca Peniel Storph ◽  
Frank N. Ghartey ◽  
Richard K. D. Ephraim ◽  
Enoch Mensah ◽  
Martin Mornah ◽  
...  

Background: People with primary invasive breast cancer receive both local (surgery and radiation therapy) and systemic treatment (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy). However, there are substantial short-and long-term side effects from chemotherapy as documented in several studies. This study assessed the effects of chemotherapy on clinical, haematological and biochemical profile of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital. Methods: This longitudinal study was conducted in the female surgical ward of the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH). We randomly sampled 51 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and scheduled to start chemotherapy and recorded their demographic, clinical and therapeutic data. Blood was collected for haematological profiles [haemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC) count, platelets (PLT) and biochemical analysis (lipid profile, uric acid and creatinine) for day 1, day 21 and day 42 of their chemotherapy cycles. Results: Majority of the participants were within 46-60 years, married, overweight and had informal employment. Throughout chemotherapy cycles, systolic blood pressure (SBP) significantly decreased till after the third cycle (P=0.026), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) significantly decreased after second cycle but increased slightly after the third cycle (P=0.029). Hemoglobin though insignificant, decreased after the second cycle but increased sharply after the third cycle (P=0.281). White blood cells (WBC) significantly decreased throughout cycles (P=0.008) whereas high density lipoprotein (P=0.014) increased throughout cycles- Uric acid (P=0.852) and creatinine (P=1.000). were maintained throughout cycles Conclusion: Throughout cycles, chemotherapy had significant adverse effect on the clinical profile (systolic and diastolic blood pressure), white blood cells (WBC) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) in patients undergoing treatment.


1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.J. van Schooten ◽  
M.J.X. Hillebrand ◽  
F.E. van Leeuwen ◽  
N. van Zandwijk ◽  
H.M. Jansen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document