scholarly journals Long-Term Clinical Effectiveness of Ustekinumab in Patients With Crohn’s Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Ito ◽  
Atsuo Maemoto ◽  
Takehiko Katsurada ◽  
Hiroki Tanaka ◽  
Satoshi Motoya ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study clarifies the long-term effectiveness of ustekinumab based on real-life data from Japanese Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. Methods A total of 137 patients were included, and 124 patients (90.5%) were exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents. Results The clinical remission rate at week 52 was 32.4% in moderate to severely active CD patients. The achievement of clinical remission for 8 weeks after ustekinumab therapy induction was associated with clinical remission at week 52. Ustekinumab persistence rate at week 104 was 81.4%. Conclusion Ustekinumab is effective and persistent in CD patients with the previous treatment history of several biologics.

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S118-S120 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Alric ◽  
A Amiot ◽  
J Kirchgesner ◽  
X Tréton ◽  
M Allez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is no head-to-head trial comparing ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) refractory to anti-TNF. In France between May 2014 and November 2016, vedolizumab (and not ustekinumab) was reimbursed for patients who had failed anti-TNF. Then, between December 2016 and August 2018, ustekinumab (and not vedolizumab) was reimbursed for this category of patients. Since September 2018, both ustekinumab and vedolizumab are reimbursed in patients who are refractory to anti-TNF. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with CD refractory to anti-TNF. Methods We studied all consecutive patients with active CD who were refractory to at least one anti-TNF, and were treated either with vedolizumab or ustekinumab, in five university hospitals of the Paris area, between May 2014 and August 2018. The primary endpoint was clinical remission rate at week 48. Adjustment according to propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed. Results 239 patients were included, 107 received ustekinumab and 132 received vedolizumab. After propensity scoring with IPTW, there was no difference between the two groups (Figure 1). At week 48, the clinical remission rate was higher with ustekinumab than with vedolizumab (54.4% vs. 38.3%; OR =1.92, 95% CI [1.09–3.39]). At week 48, corticosteroid-free remission rate tended to be numerically higher with ustekinumab than with vedolizumab (44.7% vs. 34.0%; OR = 1.57, 95% CI [0.88–2.79]). Treatment persistence was significantly more frequent in the ustekinumab group (71.5% vs. 49.7%; OR = 2.54, 95% CI [1.40–4.62]). The dose optimisation rate at week 48 was higher with vedolizumab than with ustekinumab (53.5% vs. 30.1%; OR = 0.37, 95% Cl [0.21–0.67]). Subgroup analyses showed that ustekinumab was associated with higher clinical remission rates at week 48 in patients with ileal CD (OR = 3.49; 95% CI [1.33–9.17]), a penetrating phenotype (OR = 6.58; 95% CI [1.91–22.68]) and a history of perianal disease (OR = 2.48; 95% CI [1.04–5.93]). Regardless of treatment group, combotherapy was associated with a higher clinical remission rate at week 48 (OR = 1.93; 95% CI [1.09–3.43]). Conclusion This study suggests that, after 1 year of follow-up, ustekinumab is associated with a higher rate of clinical remission than vedolizumab in CD patients refractory to anti-TNF, particularly in those with ileal and penetrating disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S379-S379
Author(s):  
A Gubbiotti ◽  
B Barberio ◽  
F Zingone ◽  
R D’Incà ◽  
L Bertani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There are limited real-life studies in medical literature evaluating the efficacy and safety of Ustekinumab, an Anti-IL-23/Anti IL-12 agent, in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who required treatment because of refractoriness or intolerance to previous biological treatments. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of Ustekinumab in anti-TNF refractory or intolerant CD patients. Methods All CD patients who completed induction with Ustekinumab in three Italian IBD Units (Padua, Santorso, and Pisa) were enrolled. Patients were evaluated after induction (first intravenous dose followed by a subcutaneous dose at 8 weeks) and clinical (Harvey- Bradshaw-Index) and biochemical data, including faecal calprotectin (FC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were collected. Information on the need of optimisation (every 12 or 8 weeks) and adverse events were also collected. Continuous and categorical variables were expressed as mean with standard deviation (sd) and frequency with percentages, respectively. Comparisons between variables were conducted using paired t-test and chi-square test. Data were analysed using STATA11.1 software. Results Sixty-three patients were included (41 males, mean age 43 ± sd 13.2 years). All of them had previously been treated with at least one biologic agent and 95.2% with oral steroids. The main indications for starting therapy were: previous treatment failure (77.2%) and pharmacological intolerance (17.5%). At the time of the induction, 28.6% patients were under steroid treatment. Post induction, clinical remission was obtained in 63.5% patients, while steroid-free clinical remission in 52.4%. Moreover, a statistically significant reduction of FC (from 916 μg/l to 444 μ/l, p < 0.001) and normalisation of CRP (n = 14, 33.3%; p < 0.001) were observed. After induction, 3 adverse effects were reported, and in two treatment discontinuations was necessary (i.e. 1 case of pyelonephritis and 1 case of a re-activation of entero-cutaneous fistula). Finally, among 63 patients enrolled, 51 (80.9%) were optimised with a maintenance regimen of 8 weeks sub-cutaneous doses. Conclusion Our study shows that Ustekinumab seemed is effective in achieving clinical remission and steroid-free clinical remission after induction in the majority of CD patient despite the refractoriness to anti-TNF treatment. Moreover, the drug appeared safe and well tolerated. On the other hand, treatment optimisation to 8 weeks was adopted in most of the patients, in order to guarantee a better outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S536-S537
Author(s):  
G Mocci ◽  
A Cuomo ◽  
L Allegretta ◽  
G Aragona ◽  
R Colucci ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is an anti-IL12/23 antibody for the treatment of Crohn’s Disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of UST in a large population-based cohort of CD patients who failed previous treatment with other biologics Methods 194 CD patients (108 males and 86 females, mean age 48 years (range 38–58 years) were retrospectively reviewed. 147 patients were already treated with anti-TNFα (75.8%), and 47 (24.2%) patients were already treated with anti-TNFα and vedolizumab. Concomitant treatment with steroids was present in 177 (91.2%) patients Results At week 12, clinical remission was achieved in 146 (75.2%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 6 months, clinical remission was maintained in 135 (69.6%) patients; at that time, mucosal healing was assessed in 62 (31.9%) patients, and it was achieved in 33 (53.2) patients. Three (1.5%) patients were submitted to surgery. Steroid-free remission was achieved in 115 (59.3%) patients. Both serum C-Reactive Protein and Fecal Calprotectin (FC) levels were significantly reduced with respect to baseline levels during follow-up. A logistic regression, UST therapy as thirdline therapy (after both anti-TNFα and vedolizumab), FC >200 μg/g, and HBI ≥8 were significantly associated with lack of remission. Adverse events occurred in 5 (2.6%) patients, and four of them required suspension of treatment Conclusion Ustekinumab seemed to be really effective and safe in CD patients unresponsive to other biologic treatments, especially when used as second-line treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S381-S382
Author(s):  
B Bressler ◽  
A Yarur ◽  
U Kopylov ◽  
M Bassel ◽  
N Brett ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is little long-term research (≥12 months) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) patients investigating the impact on clinical effectiveness of combined (combo) therapy of vedolizumab (VDZ) plus immunomodulators/immunosuppressants (IMMs) compared with VDZ monotherapy. Research suggests the use of concomitant aminosalicylates [5-ASAs] in UC may not bolster effectiveness. Finally, it is unclear if the safety profile differs between VDZ monotherapy and combo therapy. This study described clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes in patients with UC or CD treated with first-line biologic VDZ as monotherapy or combo therapy with IMMs or 5-ASAs (UC only). Methods This was a real-world, multi-country (Canada, Greece and the USA), retrospective chart review study of biologic-naïve UC and CD patients (≥18 years old) treated with VDZ (initiated Tx May 2014–March 2018). Data were collected from Tx initiation to the earliest of death and chart abstraction date. Cumulative rates of clinical effectiveness outcomes over 24 months (Tx persistence, clinical response and clinical remission) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with unadjusted comparisons conducted using the log-rank test. Clinical response and remission were assessed from standard disease measures reported in medical records. Analyses of unadjusted incidence rates (per 100 person-years [PYs]) of disease exacerbations, disease-related surgeries, serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) were performed. For these analyses in monotherapy vs. VDZ+IMMs, UC and CD patients were combined due to restrictions of sample size and a number of events. Results This analysis included 318 patients treated with VDZ (monotherapy: UC = 53, CD = 108; VDZ+IMMs: UC = 22, CD = 24; VDZ+5-ASAs: UC = 111). There were no observed differences in age, sex or disease duration between patients on monotherapy vs. VDZ+IMMs or vs. VDZ+5-ASAs. Data trends in effectiveness outcomes were similar in monotherapy vs. VDZ+IMMs over 24 months (Figure 1). Tx persistence (monotherapy: 71.6%; VDZ+5-ASAs: 82.7%; p = 0.40), clinical remission (monotherapy: 54.3%; VDZ+5-ASAs: 87.7%; p = 0.37) and clinical response (monotherapy: 81.7%; VDZ+5-ASAs: 92.2%; p = 0.54) were also similar between monotherapy and VDZ+5-ASAs over 24 months. Safety outcomes were similar between groups (Figure 2). Conclusion Though sample sizes were small, the unadjusted trends in the results of this long-term real-world study suggest that biologic-naïve UC or CD patients treated with VDZ alone may have similar clinical effectiveness outcomes to patients receiving VDZ+IMMs. Trends in data also suggest that in patients with UC, VDZ+5-ASAs may not be more effective than VDZ alone.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S351-S352
Author(s):  
M L Scribano ◽  
A Aratari ◽  
B Neri ◽  
C Bezzio ◽  
P Balestrieri ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is increasingly used in Italy for the treatment of refractory Crohn’s disease (CD), however very few data concerning real-life experience has been reported. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness of UST in refractory CD patients treated in a large Italian cohort. Methods A retrospective study was conducted in 5 Italian tertiary centers. All adult CD patients who started UST because of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) failure were included. The co-primary outcomes were steroid-free clinical remission (defined as Harvey Bradshaw Index, HBI ≤4) at weeks 26 and 52. Secondary outcomes were changes in HBI score, changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) values, normalization of CRP (≤0.5 mg/dl) at weeks 8, 26, and 52, and adverse events. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage. Unpaired t-test was used to compare variables. A p-value <0.05 indicated statistical significance. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD), and median with interquartile range (IQR). Results Between Nov 2018 and Feb 2020,140 patients (51.4% male; median age 45.0 years, IQR 36.3-54.0; median disease duration 16.0 years, IQR 8.0-22.0) were included. The majority of patients had ileocolonic disease (L1, 38.6%; L2, 11.4%; L3, 50.0%) and an inflammatory phenotype (B1, 50.7%; B2, 31.0%; B3, 18.3%). All patients had previously been exposed to at least one anti-TNF agent, 27.1% to 2 anti-TNF agents, and 20.0% to vedolizumab . At inclusion 15.7% of patients received corticosteroids and 8.6% immunomodulators. All patients received an intravenous dose of 6 mg/kg, followed by subcutaneous administration of 90 mg every 8 (90%) or 12 weeks (10%) according to clinical judgment. The proportion of patients achieving steroid-free clinical remission was 61.0% and 64.2% at weeks 26 and 52 respectively. A significant decrease in the mean HBI was reported from baseline to week 8 (6.8 ± 3.6 vs 4.5 ± 3.1; p <0.001), week 26 (3.5 ± 2.9; p <0.001), and week 52 (3.1 ± 2.4; p <0.001). The mean CRP values was also significantly decreased from baseline to week 8 (4.6 ± 7.3 vs 2.8 ± 7.1; p <0.001), week 26 (1.7 ± 3.8; p <0.001), and week 52 (1.1 ± 2.2; p<0.001). At baseline 93 of 119 patients had high CRP value: a normal CRP value was observed in 34.9%, 37.8%, and 49.3% of patients at weeks 8, 26, and 52 respectively. Overall, 11 patients (7.9%) discontinued UST within 1 year: primary failure (n=2), secondary failure (n=6), adverse events (n=3: 2 allergic reactions, and 1 arthralgia). Conclusion To our knowledge this is one of the largest Italian cohort followed up to 1 year, and the results confirm that UST is an effective and safe treatment in refractory CD patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S347-S348
Author(s):  
L Calandrini ◽  
M Salice ◽  
H Privitera Hrustemovic ◽  
G Peruzzi ◽  
F Rizzello ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Long-term effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) in real-life clinical practice is unknown. We aimed to evaluate clinical efficacy and treatment persistence of VDZ in a real-world cohort of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods CD patients from a single tertiary IBD referral centre receiving VDZ treatment outside clinical trials between September 2016 and August 2019 were included. Data were collected prospectively at baseline, weeks 22, 54, and 108. Disease activity was assessed using the Harvey Bradshaw index (HBI). The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission, defined as HBI of 4 or lower without the need of corticosteroids. Secondary endpoints were treatment persistence and durability of VDZ response. Results Up to August 2019 114 patients had received at least one VDZ infusion, 79% had prior anti-TNFα drug exposure. Of the 90 patients who reached 54 weeks of follow-up, 68 patients (75,5%) were still under VDZ therapy. 38 of them (55,9%) were in steroid-free clinical remission. We compared the initial response to VDZ at week 22 and at week 54. Among the 29 patients in steroid-free clinical remission at week 22, 25 (86.2%) were still in steroid-free clinical remission at week 54. Three out of 29 patients discontinued VDZ therapy before week 54, for insufficient response and adverse events in two cases and for pregnancy in one. Of the 34 patients who reached 108 weeks of follow-up, 17 (50%) were still under VDZ therapy. 11 of them (64.7%) were in steroid-free clinical remission. We compared the initial response to VDZ at week 22 and at week 108. Among the 11 patients in steroid-free clinical remission at week 22, 6 (54.5%) were still in steroid-free clinical remission at week 108. Two out of 11 patients discontinued VDZ therapy before week 108 for worsening of perianal disease. Conclusion After 1 year, 75.5% of patients were still on treatment, of whom more than 55% achieved remission. 86% of patients maintained a response after the first year of treatment. After 2 years the rate of patients who presented with steroid-free clinical remission and who maintained response tended to decrease, consistent with previously published data. However, half of the patients persisted with VDZ treatment. These data support the long-term effectiveness and favourable safety profile of VDZ.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S400-S401
Author(s):  
R M Saiz Chumillas ◽  
L Alba Hernández ◽  
I Chivato Martín-Falquina ◽  
E Badia Aranda ◽  
M L Arias García ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) refractory to anti-TNF is worse than in anti-TNF naïve patients. Methods Retrospective study of patients with CD refractory or intolerant to TNF initiating ustekinumab between January 2013 and March 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, and without corticosteroid treatment. Our aim was evaluated clinical response (reduction of CDAI >100), clinical remission (CDAI <150) and biochemical remission (CDAI <100 and CRP <1 mg/L and faecal calprotectin <100 µg/g) in short and long term. Results A total of 49 patients with a medium follow-up of 28 months (IQR:13-37) were included. Patients baseline characteristics are reflected in Table 1. In 20% patients the induction was made subcutaneous (90 mg/week for 4 weeks). At week 52, clinical response, clinical remission and biochemical remission was 93%, 82% and 54% respectively (Figure 1). In the long term (3 years), 62% had clinical response, 52% remained in clinical remission, and 48% showed biochemical remission. 1/3 of patients needed intensification every year. Ustekinumab treatment discontinuation was observed in 13 patients (27%) mainly due to lack of response (6[12%]: primary, 7[14%]: secondary). No serious adverse effects have been reported. Conclusion About 50% of the patients are in clinical and biochemical remission at week 152 in a real-life cohort of anti-TNF-exposed CD patients. With a harder remission definition including biochemical parameters, our results in real life are similar to pivotal studies at week 152. Nevertheless, at week 52 our remission rates were higher.


2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-468-S-469
Author(s):  
Remo Panaccione ◽  
Jean-Frederic Colombel ◽  
William J. Sandborn ◽  
Anne Robinson ◽  
Jingdong Chao ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S781-S782
Author(s):  
Rabilloud Marie-Laure ◽  
Charlène Brochard ◽  
Emma Bajeux ◽  
Siproudhis Laurent ◽  
Jean-François Viel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S329-S330
Author(s):  
F Akyüz ◽  
A Ormeci ◽  
N Namazova ◽  
M Guzel ◽  
A Abbasgoulizadeh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Adalimumab (ADA) is one of the most preferred anti-TNF agents because of its ease of use in real life. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ADA in the long-term period of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Methods Patients treated with adalimumab (ADA) as the first- and second-line biological treatment for mild to moderate active IBD between January 2009 and March 2019 were included. The clinical and endoscopic response rate of ADA were evaluated, retrospectively. Remission was defined in ulcerative colitis patients (UC), if stool frequency ≤ 3/day with no bleeding and no mucosal lesions at the colonoscopy. Remission was defined in Crohn’s disease patients (CD) if CDAI < 150 and mucosal healing at the colonoscopy. Results Fifty-eight patients (81% Crohn’s disease, 58.6% biologic naive) were included in this study. Mean age was 41.4 ± 12.3 years old (19–67 years) and 46.6% of them were female. Median follow-up time was 57 months in UC and 65 months in Crohn’s disease (CD). Infliximab experience rate before ADA in UC and CD was 36.4%, 42.6%, respectively. CD’s related surgery rate was 43.5%; surgery rate 87.5% before ADA therapy and 12.5% after ADA treatment. Clinical and endoscopic remission rates were 81.8% / 63.6% and 89.4%/ 63.4 in UC and CD, respectively at the end of follow-up period. Loss of response rate was 20% in UC and 28.3% in CD (table). Mean months for loss of response were 42 ± 25.4 months and 29.7 ± 12 months in UC and CD, respectively. Clinical remission was obtained by dose escalation in 66% of CD patients who had response loss. Loss of response rate was not significantly different between IFX naive and IFX experienced patients (p > 0.05). There was no significant adverse event during the follow-up period. Conclusion In real life, the efficacy of ADA treatment is high in mild-to-moderate active IBD. Endoscopic remission was also acceptable for this group of patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document