scholarly journals Convergent evolution of brain morphology and communication modalities in lizards

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Robinson ◽  
Michael S. Patton ◽  
Brittney M. Andre ◽  
Michele A. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Chemical Signals ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Brain Morphology ◽  
Lizard Species ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Hemidactylus Turcicus ◽  
Soma Size ◽  
Communication Modalities

Abstract Animals communicate information within their environments via visual, chemical, auditory, and/or tactile modalities. The use of each modalityis generally linked to particular brain regions, but it is not yet known whether the cellular morphology of neurons in these regions has evolved in association with the relative use of a modality.We investigated relationships between the behavioral use of communication modalities and neural morphologies in six lizard species. Two of these species (Anolis carolinensis and Leiocephalus carinatus) primarily use visual signals to communicate with conspecifics and detect potential prey, and two (Aspidoscelis gularis and Scincella lateralis) communicate and forage primarily using chemical signals. Two other species (Hemidactylus turcicus and Sceloporus olivaceus) use both visual and chemical signals. For each species, we performed behavioral observations and quantified rates of visual and chemical behaviors. We then cryosectioned brain tissues from 9–10 males of each species and measured the soma size and density of neurons in two brain regions associated with visual behaviors (the lateral geniculate nucleus and the nucleus rotundus) and one region associated with chemical behaviors (the nucleus sphericus). With analyses conducted in a phylogenetic context, we found that species that performed higher rates of visual displays had a denser lateral geniculate nucleus, and species that used a higher proportion of chemical displays had larger somas in the nucleus sphericus. These relationships suggest that neural morphologies in the brain have evolved convergently in species with similar communication behaviors.

NMDAR-1 staining in the lateral geniculate nucleus of normal and visually deprived cats

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOKUBAS ZIBURKUS ◽  
MARTHA E. BICKFORD ◽  
WILLIAM GUIDO
Keyword(s):  
Nmda Receptors ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Cell Labeling ◽  
Acid Decarboxylase ◽  
Thalamic Nuclei ◽  
Neurofilament Protein ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Soma Size ◽  
Adult Cats

In normal adult cats, a monoclonal antibody directed toward the NR-1 subunit of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (Pharmingen, clone 54.1) produced dense cellular and neuropil labeling throughout all layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and adjacent thalamic nuclei, including the thalamic reticular, perigeniculate, medial intralaminar, and ventral lateral geniculate nuclei. Cellular staining revealed well-defined somata, and in some cases proximal dendrites. NMDAR-1 cell labeling was also evident in the LGN of early postnatal kittens, suggesting that developing LGN cells possess this receptor subunit at or before eye opening. Within the A-layers of the adult LGN, staining encompassed a wide range of soma sizes. Soma size comparisons of NMDAR-1 stained cells with those stained with an antibody directed toward a nonphosphorylated neurofilament protein (SMI-32), which selectively stains Y-relay cells (Bickford et al., 1998), or an antibody to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), which stains for GABAergic interneurons, suggested that NMDA receptors are utilized by relay cells and interneurons. NMDAR-1 staining was also observed in the LGN of cats with early monocular lid suture. Although labeling was apparent in both deprived and nondeprived A-layers of LGN, the distribution of soma sizes was significantly different. In the deprived A-layers of LGN, staining was limited to small- and medium-sized cells. Cells with relatively large soma were lacking. However, cell density measurements as well as soma size comparisons with cells stained for Nissl substance suggested these differences were due to deprivation-induced cell shrinkage and not to a loss of NMDAR-1 staining in Y-cells. Taken together, these results suggest that NMDA receptors are utilized by both relay cells and interneurons in LGN and that alterations in early visual experience do not necessarily affect the expression of NMDA receptors in the LGN.

Temporal response properties of koniocellular (blue-on and blue-off) cells in marmoset lateral geniculate nucleus

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1421-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. J. Pietersen ◽  
S. K. Cheong ◽  
S. G. Solomon ◽  
C. Tailby ◽  
P. R. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Color Vision ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Cortical Circuits ◽  
Temporal Response ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Visual Latency ◽  
Cell Groups ◽  
Bon Cells

Visual perception requires integrating signals arriving at different times from parallel visual streams. For example, signals carried on the phasic-magnocellular (MC) pathway reach the cerebral cortex pathways some tens of milliseconds before signals traveling on the tonic-parvocellular (PC) pathway. Visual latencies of cells in the koniocellular (KC) pathway have not been specifically studied in simian primates. Here we compared MC and PC cells to “blue-on” (BON) and “blue-off” (BOF) KC cells; these cells carry visual signals originating in short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cones. We made extracellular recordings in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of anesthetized marmosets. We found that BON visual latencies are 10–20 ms longer than those of PC or MC cells. A small number of recorded BOF cells ( n = 7) had latencies 10–20 ms longer than those of BON cells. Within all cell groups, latencies of foveal receptive fields (<10° eccentricity) were longer (by 3–8 ms) than latencies of peripheral receptive fields (>10°). Latencies of yellow-off inputs to BON cells lagged the blue-on inputs by up to 30 ms, but no differences in visual latency were seen on comparing marmosets expressing dichromatic (“red-green color-blind”) or trichromatic color vision phenotype. We conclude that S-cone signals leaving the LGN on KC pathways are delayed with respect to signals traveling on PC and MC pathways. Cortical circuits serving color vision must therefore integrate across delays in (red-green) chromatic signals carried by PC cells and (blue-yellow) signals carried by KC cells.

Prenatal disruption of binocular interactions creates novel lamination in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus

1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preston E. Garraghty ◽  
Carla J. Shatz ◽  
Mriganka Sur
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cell ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Monocular Enucleation ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Binocular Interactions ◽  
Soma Size ◽  
Cell Layers ◽  
Normal Nucleus

AbstractThe elimination of retinogeniculate afferents from one eye on embryonic day 44 (E44) has pronounced effects on the formation of the cellular laminae in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Only two laminae form: a dorsal, “magnocellular” layer, and a ventral, “parvocellular” layer. Soma size measurements and previously reported patterns of termination of retinogeniculate axons suggest that the dorsal lamina is a coalescence of the normal A-laminae and the dorsal, magnocellular division of layer C, while the ventral layer is a composite of the parvocellular sublamina of layer C and the remaining C-laminae. This is a novel pattern of lamination in the LGN that differs from that found in the normal nucleus, not only in that there are now only two cell layers rather than the normal five, but also in that the interlaminar zone occurs in an abnormal location. This result is markedly different from that observed in other species where interlaminar zones present after early monocular enucleation are a subset of the ones which would normally be present. We suggest that, in the absence of ongoing binocular interactions, interactions between functionally distinct retinal ganglion cell classes from the remaining eye may direct the formation of cell laminae in the LGN, even when such interactions are not normally operative.

Reduced soma size of the M-neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus following foetal alcohol exposure in non-human primates

2010 ◽  
Vol 205 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Papia ◽  
M. W. Burke ◽  
S. Zangenehpour ◽  
R. M. Palmour ◽  
F. R. Ervin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Alcohol Exposure ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Soma Size

Laminar organization and ultrastructure of GABA-immunoreactive neurons and processes in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri)

1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert N. Holdefer ◽  
Thomas T. Norton ◽  
Ranney Mize R.
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Functional Organization ◽  
Tree Shrew ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Gamma Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Tupaia Belangeri ◽  
Lateral Geniculate

AbstractThe distribution and ultrastructure of neurons and neuropil labeled by an antiserum to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) were examined in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). The LGN of this species segregates center type and cell class into three distinct pairs of laminae: a medial pair (laminae 1 and 2) containing ON-center cells, a more lateral pair (4, 5) containing OFF-center cells, and 2 laminae (3, 6) containing W-like cells. The relationship between this laminar segregation and the distribution of GABA immunoreactivity was investigated in the present study. GABA-immunoreactive neurons and neuropil were present in all six of the laminae. However, both the density of labeled cells (adjusted for neuronal density across laminae) and the density of labeled neuropil showed a medial-to-lateral gradient. The adjusted density of labeled cells was higher laterally than medially, and the density of labeled neuropil was significantly greater in the more lateral OFF-center laminae and W-like laminae than in the medial two ON-center laminae. Thus, inhibitory, GABAergic influences may modulate to different degrees the visual signals in the ON, OFF, and W pathways. Labeled cells had a mean cross-sectional area (107 μm2) approximately one-half that of unlabeled cells (216 μm2). They constitute 16–34% of the neurons in the LGN. At the electron microscope level, three different kinds of labeled profile were observed. Vesicle containing profiles like the F2 profiles of cat were postsynaptic to retinal terminals and presynaptic to conventional dendrites. Fl axon terminals with dense clusters of vesicles were also labeled as were some myelinated axons. Another labeled profile, which we suggest should be called an F3 process, was a large dendrite of irregular caliber with punctate groups of vesicles near the synapse. Our results suggest that GABAergic circuitry is an important part of the functional organization in the LGN of the tree shrew.

scholarly journals The augmentation of retinogeniculate communication during thalamic burst mode

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Alitto ◽  
Daniel L. Rathbun ◽  
Jessica J. Vandeleest ◽  
Prescott C. Alexander ◽  
W. Martin Usrey
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Response Mode ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Thalamic Nuclei ◽  
Burst Mode ◽  
Tonic Response ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Response Modes

AbstractRetinal signals are transmitted to cortex via neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), where they are processed in burst or tonic response mode. Burst mode occurs when LGN neurons are sufficiently hyperpolarized for T-Type Ca2+ channels to de-inactivate, allowing them to open in response to a depolarization which can trigger a high-frequency sequence of Na+-based spikes (i.e. burst). In contrast, T-type channels are inactivated during tonic mode and do not contribute to spiking. Although burst mode is commonly associated with sleep and the disruption of retinogeniculate communication, bursts can also be triggered by visual stimulation, thereby transforming the retinal signals relayed to the cortex.To determine how burst mode affects retinogeniculate communication, we made recordings from monosynaptically connected retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurons in the cat during visual stimulation. Our results reveal a robust augmentation of retinal signals within the LGN during burst mode. Specifically, retinal spikes were more effective and often triggered multiple LGN spikes during periods likely to have increased T-Type Ca2+ activity. Consistent with the biophysical properties of T-Type Ca2+ channels, analysis revealed that effect magnitude was correlated with the duration of the preceding thalamic interspike interval and occurred even in the absence of classically defined bursts. Importantly, the augmentation of geniculate responses to retinal input was not associated with a degradation of visual signals. Together, these results indicate a graded nature of response mode and suggest that, under certain conditions, bursts facilitate the transmission of visual information to the cortex by amplifying retinal signals.SignificanceThe thalamus is the gateway for retinal information traveling to the cortex. The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), like all thalamic nuclei, has two classically defined categories of spikes—tonic and burst—that differ in their underlying cellular mechanisms. Here we compare retinogeniculate communication during burst and tonic response modes. Our results show that retinogeniculate communication is enhanced during burst mode and visually evoked thalamic bursts, thereby augmenting retinal signals transmitted to cortex. Further, our results demonstrate that the influence of burst mode on retinogeniculate communication is graded and can be measured even in the absence of classically defined thalamic bursts.

scholarly journals Diverse GABAergic neurons organize into subtype-specific sublaminae in the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ubadah Sabbagh ◽  
Gubbi Govindaiah ◽  
Rachana D. Somaiya ◽  
Ryan V. Ha ◽  
Jessica C. Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Gabaergic Neurons ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Retinal Axons ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Retinal Input

AbstractIn the visual system, retinal axons convey visual information from the outside world to dozens of distinct retinorecipient brain regions and organize that information at several levels, including either at the level of retinal afferents, cytoarchitecture of intrinsic retinorecipient neurons, or a combination of the two. Two major retinorecipient nuclei which are densely innervated by retinal axons are the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN), which is important for classical image-forming vision, and ventral LGN (vLGN), which is associated with non-image-forming vision. The neurochemistry, cytoarchitecture, and retinothalamic connectivity in vLGN remain unresolved, raising fundamental questions of how it receives and processes visual information. To shed light on these important questions, we labeled neurons in vLGN with canonical and novel cell type-specific markers and studied their spatial distribution and morphoelectric properties. Not only did we find a high percentage of cells in vLGN to be GABAergic, we discovered transcriptomically distinct GABAergic cell types reside in the two major laminae of vLGN, the retinorecipient, external vLGN (vLGNe) and the non-retinorecipient, internal vLGN (vLGNi). Within vLGNe, we identified transcriptionally distinct subtypes of GABAergic cells that are distributed into four adjacent sublaminae. Using trans-synaptic viral tracing and in vitro electrophysiology, we found cells in each these vLGNe sublaminae receive monosynaptic inputs from the retina. These results not only identify novel subtypes of GABAergic cells in vLGN, they suggest the subtype-specific laminar distribution of retinorecipient cells in vLGNe may be important for receiving, processing, and transmitting light-derived signals in parallel channels of the subcortical visual system.Graphical abstract.The vLGN is organized into subtype-specific sublaminae which receive visual inputThe ventral lateral geniculate nucleus (vLGN) is part of the visual thalamus. It can broadly be separated into two structural domains or laminae, the external vLGNe (which receives retinal input) and the internal vLGNi (receives no retinal input). In this study, we describe subtypes of transcriptomically distinct GABAergic neurons that populate the vLGN and organize into discrete, adjacent sublaminae in the vLGNe. Taken together, our results show four subtype-specific sublaminae of retinorecipient neurons in vLGNe.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document