516 THE CHARACTERIZATION OF DYSPLASIA IN BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS—A PROSPECTIVE NATIONWIDE REGISTRY FROM THE RIBBON NETWORK

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L O Byrne ◽  
M O' Brien ◽  
C Muldoon ◽  
C Ryan ◽  
M Buckley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Barrett’S Esophagus ◽  
Barrett's Esophagus ◽  
Initial Diagnosis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Repeat Endoscopy ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Indefinite For Dysplasia ◽  
The Republic

Abstract   Barrett’s Esophagus is the main pathological precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), dysplasia is known to be one of the principal predictors of progression to malignancy. The RIBBON Registry was established with six academic medical centers in the Republic of Ireland to identify and manage high risk Barrett’s Esophagus (BE) patients. From our database of over 4,000 patients our aim was to establish characteristics of those patients who progressed to dysplasia and furthermore to malignancy. Methods Data was gathered prospectively from December 2007—December 2019. Ethical approval was sought for the database at the time of establishment. Detailed endoscopic, pathological and clinical data was collected via a web-based data capture system at time of initial diagnosis and at each subsequent encounter. A data manager was appointed at each site and a national lead coordinating the project. The Vienna Grading system was used to grade histology. Patients were included if they had an initial or subsequent diagnosis of Specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM), Indefinite for dysplasia (IND) or Low-Grade Dysplasia (LGD). Results 860 patients were included with a total of 3792 patient years, a male to female ratio of 2.9:1 and a median age at diagnosis of 63. 50 patients had an initial diagnosis of SIM with subsequent episodes of dysplasia while 510 patients had IND or LGD at diagnosis. 158 (18.37%) progressed to High grade dysplasia (HGD) and EAC. The overall incidence of EAC was 1.7% per year, HGD 2.4% per year and a combined rate of 4.2% per year. Median time to progression in SIM was 4.7 years, 1.1 years for IND and 9 months for LGD. Conclusion The overall progression of the group was much higher compared to looking at those who had SIM alone without dysplasia from the same registry (0.9% per year). Time to progression was significantly faster in the groups with initial dysplasia be that IND or LGD. In our centers those patients were followed up with repeat endoscopy as per international guidelines, the above results highlight the importance of this practice given the potential for malignancy.

scholarly journals Yield of Repeat Endoscopy in Barrett’s Esophagus with No Dysplasia and Low-Grade Dysplasia: A Population-Based Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavel Visrodia ◽  
Prasad G. Iyer ◽  
Cathy D. Schleck ◽  
Alan R. Zinsmeister ◽  
David A. Katzka
Keyword(s):  
Barrett’S Esophagus ◽  
Barrett's Esophagus ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Repeat Endoscopy ◽  
Low Grade Dysplasia

Barrett’s Registry Collaboration of academic centers in Ireland reveals high progression rate of low-grade dysplasia and low risk from nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus: report of the RIBBON network

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M O’Byrne ◽  
Jolene Witherspoon ◽  
Roy J J Verhage ◽  
Marie O’Brien ◽  
Cian Muldoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Barrett’S Esophagus ◽  
Barrett's Esophagus ◽  
Population Based ◽  
First Year ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Ablative Therapies ◽  
Low Grade Dysplasia

Summary Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the main pathological precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or EAC from nondysplastic BE (NDBE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and indefinite for dysplasia (IND) varies widely between population-based studies and specialized centers for many reasons, principally the rigor of the biopsy protocol and the accuracy of pathologic definition. In the Republic of Ireland, a multicenter prospective registry and bioresource (RIBBON) was established in 2011 involving six academic medical centers, and this paper represents the first report from this network. A detailed clinical, endoscopic and pathologic database registered 3,557 patients. BE was defined strictly by both endoscopic evidence of Barrett’s epithelium and the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM). A prospective web-based database was used to gather information with initial and follow-up data abstracted by a data manager at each site. A total of 2,244 patients, 1,925 with no dysplasia, were included with complete follow-up. The median age at diagnosis was 60.5 with a 2.1:1 male to female ratio and a median follow-up time of 2.7 years (IQR 1.19–4.04), and 6609.25 person years. In this time period, 125 (5.57%) progressed to HGD/EAC, with 74 (3.3%) after 1 year of follow-up and 38 (1.69%) developed EAC, with 20 (0.89%) beyond 1 year. The overall incidence of HGD/EAC was 1.89% per year; 1.16% if the first year is excluded. The risk of progression to EAC alone overall was 0.57% per year, 0.31% excluding the first year, and 0.21% in the 1,925 patients who had SIM alone at diagnosis. Low-grade dysplasia (LGD) progressed to HGD/EAC in 31% of patients, a progression rate of 12.96% per year, 6.71% with the first year excluded. In a national collaboration of academic centers in Ireland, the progression rate for NDBE was similar to recent population studies. Almost one in two who progressed was evident within 1 year. Crucially, LGD diagnosed and confirmed by specialist gastrointestinal pathologists represents truly high-risk disease, highlighting the importance of expertise in diagnosis and management, and providing indirect support for ablative therapies in this context.

scholarly journals Persistent indefinite for dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus is a risk factor for dysplastic progression to low-grade dysplasia

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J Henn ◽  
Kevin Y Song ◽  
Amy A Gravely ◽  
Hector Mesa ◽  
Shahnaz Sultan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Barrett’S Esophagus ◽  
Barrett's Esophagus ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Indefinite For Dysplasia ◽  
Low Grade Dysplasia

Summary Patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are at increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The risk is largely based on the degree of dysplasia. Dysplasia cannot always be differentiated from inflammatory changes, and therefore may be classified as indefinite for dysplasia (IND). The risk of progressive dysplasia in patients with IND is unclear. Our aim is to characterize the risk of progression in US veterans with BE-IND. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with BE-IND between 2006 and 2016. All IND was diagnosed by consensus conference with an expert gastrointestinal (GI) pathologist or review by an expert GI pathologist and persistence was defined as IND present on subsequent endoscopic biopsy. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/EAC. Secondary outcomes included any progression including incident low-grade dysplasia (LGD), any prevalent dysplasia and risk factors for dysplastic progression, namely persistent IND. Risk factors for progression were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Among 107 patients with BE-IND, there were no incident cases of HGD/EAC. Twenty patients (18.7%) developed incident LGD during a median follow-up of 2.39 years (interquartile range, 1.13–5.17). The annual rate of progression to LGD was 5.95 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 3.73–9.02). Prevalent dysplasia was common (9.3%). Eight patients had prevalent LGD, one patient had prevalent HGD and one patient had prevalent EAC. Twenty-eight patients (30.1%) were found to have persistent IND. Among those with persistent IND, 10 (36%) patients progressed to LGD (none to HGD/EAC). The progression rate to LGD for patients with persistent IND was 7.86 (95% CI, 3.99–14.02) cases per 100 patient-years versus 4.78 (95% CI, 2.48–8.52) for nonpersistent IND (P = 0.036). The odds ratio for progression to LGD in persistent IND was 3.06 (95% CI, 1.08–8.64). In multivariate analysis adjusting for age, smoking history, presence of hiatal hernia and BMI > 30, persistent IND remained significant (OR 3.23; 95% CI, 1.04–9.98). Regression to nondysplastic BE was very common. Seventy-one (61%) patients developed complete and sustained regression of all dysplastic changes at last follow-up. Persistent IND, present in one-third of patients with IND, is an independent risk factor for progression to LGD. Although no patients in this cohort developed HGD/EAC, prevalent dysplasia was common (9.3%). Taken together, patients with IND should receive close surveillance for both prevalent and incident dysplasia especially if IND is persistent.

Risk Stratification of Patients With Barrett’s Esophagus and Low-grade Dysplasia or Indefinite for Dysplasia

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-465.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashanthi N. Thota ◽  
Hyun-Ju Lee ◽  
John R. Goldblum ◽  
Xiuli Liu ◽  
Madhusudhan R. Sanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Barrett’S Esophagus ◽  
Barrett's Esophagus ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Indefinite For Dysplasia ◽  
Low Grade Dysplasia

scholarly journals TissueCypher Barrett’s esophagus assay impacts clinical decisions in the management of patients with Barrett’s esophagus

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. E348-E355
Author(s):  
David L. Diehl ◽  
Harshit S. Khara ◽  
Nasir Akhtar ◽  
Rebecca J. Critchley-Thorne
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Barrett’S Esophagus ◽  
Barrett's Esophagus ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Eradication Therapy ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Management Decisions ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and study aims The TissueCypher Barrett’s Esophagus Assay is a novel tissue biomarker test, and has been validated to predict progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of TissueCypher on clinical decision-making in the management of BE. Patients and methods TissueCypher was ordered for 60 patients with non-dysplastic (ND, n = 18) BE, indefinite for dysplasia (IND, n = 25), and low-grade dysplasia (LGD, n = 17). TissueCypher reports a risk class (low, intermediate or high) for progression to HGD or EAC within 5 years. The impact of the test results on BE management decisions was assessed. Results Fifty-two of 60 patients were male, mean age 65.2 ± 11.8, and 43 of 60 had long segment BE. TissueCypher results impacted 55.0 % of management decisions. In 21.7 % of patients, the test upstaged the management approach, resulting in endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) or shorter surveillance interval. The test downstaged the management approach in 33.4 % of patients, leading to surveillance rather than EET. In the subset of patients whose management plan was changed, upstaging was associated with a high-risk TissueCypher result, and downstaging was associated with a low-risk result (P < 0.0001). Conclusions TissueCypher was used as an adjunct to support a surveillance-only approach in 33.4 % of patients. Upstaging occurred in 21.7 % of patients, leading to therapeutic intervention or increased surveillance. These results indicate that the TissueCypher test may enable physicians to target EET for TissueCypher high-risk BE patients, while reducing unnecessary procedures in TissueCypher low-risk patients.

Endoscopic Expert Revision of Previous Histological Confirmed Flat Low-Grade Dysplasia In Barrett’s Esophagus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
EA Nieuwenhuis ◽  
SN van Munster ◽  
BLAM Weusten ◽  
L Alvarez Herrero ◽  
A Bogte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Barrett’S Esophagus ◽  
Barrett's Esophagus ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Low Grade Dysplasia
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document