P80 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL-STAGED T3N3 ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S K Kamarajah ◽  
N Newton ◽  
M Navidi ◽  
S Wahed ◽  
A Immanuel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
Pathological Stage ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients with T3N3 esophageal cancers and determine differences between the clinical stage and pathological stage. Background Locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with poor long-term survival. Pre-treatment and post-treatment stage may differ due to the effect of neoadjuvant therapy and inaccuracies in staging. Multimodality staging followed by discussion at an MDT is considered the gold standard. Despite this, patients can be under-staged or over-staged leading to inadequate or unnecessary treatment associated with high levels of morbidity. Methods Consecutive patients from a single unit between 2010 - 2018 were included with either clinical (cT3N3) or pathological (pT3N3) esophageal cancer. Outcomes were compared between patients that underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and radical two field lymphadenectomy with or without neoadjuvant treatment and those patients staged cT3N3 treated non-surgically (NSR). Demographics, clinical and pathological stage, histological information and outcomes were recorded. Patients were staged using the TNM 8. Results This study included 156 patients, of which 63 had non-surgical treatment, only 3 of these had radical treatment. Of the remaining 93 patients who underwent esophagectomy, 34 were cT3N3, 54 were pT3N3 and five were unchanged before and after treatment. Median overall survival (OS) for surgical cT3N3 patients was significantly longer than pT3N3 and NSR (median: NR vs 19 vs 8 months, p<0.001). Twenty-seven patients with cT3N3 had lower staging following treatment whilst 3 had a higher stage. Conclusion T3N3 disease carries a poor prognosis. Within this cohort cT3N3 disease treated surgically has a high 5-year overall survival suggesting possible over-staging and stage migration due to neoadjuvant therapy. To contrast this those not having surgery have a dismal prognosis. The impact of neoadjuvant treatment cannot be predicted and, current staging modalities may be inaccurate. Clinical stage should be used with caution when counselling patients regarding management and prognosis.

Long-term outcomes of clinical and pathological-staged T3 N3 esophageal cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
S K Kamarajah ◽  
N Newton ◽  
M Navidi ◽  
S Wahed ◽  
A Immanuel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Carcinoma Of The Esophagus ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
The Impact

Summary Locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with poor long-term survival. Pre- and post-treatment stages may differ because of neoadjuvant therapy and inaccuracies in staging. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients staged with clinical T3 N3 and pathological T3 N3 carcinoma of the esophagus and determine differences between the groups. Consecutive patients from a single unit between 2010 and 2018 were included with either clinical (cT3 N3) or pathological (pT3 N3) esophageal cancer. Outcomes were compared between patients that underwent esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant treatment and those patients staged cT3 N3 treated non-surgically (NSR). Patients were staged using the TNM 8. This study included 156 patients, 63 patients were staged cT3 N3 initially and had NSR treatment, only three of these had radical treatment. Of the remaining 93 patients who underwent esophagectomy, 34 were initially staged as cT3 N3, 54 were found to be pT3 N3 having been staged earlier initially, and five were unchanged before and after treatment. Median overall survival (OS) for surgical cT3 N3 patients was significantly longer than pT3 N3 and NSR (median: NR vs 19 vs 8 months, P &lt; 0.001). Twenty-seven patients with cT3 N3 had lower staging following treatment, while three had a higher stage. T3 N3 disease carries a poor prognosis. Within this cohort, cT3 N3 disease treated surgically has a high 5-year OS suggesting possible over-staging and stage migration due to neoadjuvant therapy. Those not having surgery, have a dismal prognosis. The impact of neoadjuvant treatment cannot be predicted and, current staging modalities may be inaccurate. Clinical stage should be used with caution when counseling patients regarding management and prognosis.

PS02.167: IMPACT OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER RESECTION OF ESOPHAGUS FOR CARCINOMA ON LONG-TERM SURVIVAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 169-169
Author(s):  
Martin Snajdauf ◽  
Tomas Harustiak ◽  
Alexandr Pazdro ◽  
Robert Lischke
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Chyle Leak ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Esophagectomy with 2–3 field lymph node dissection is one of the most invasive surgical treatment for malignancy and is still associated with a high mortality and morbidity despite improvements in surgical techniques and postoperative management. The impact of postoperative complications on perioperative morbidity is widely accepted. But the impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival remains controversial. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patient who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer between January 2005 and December 2012 in our department (415 patients). We excluded non-radical resections (R1, R2 – 27 patients, 6.5%) and patients who died within 90 day after operation (20 patients, 4.8%). Data on gender, BMI, histologic diagnosis, tumor staging, neoadjuvant treatment, comorbidities, technical complications and postoperative medical complications were reviewed. Considered postoperative complications were anastomotic leak, empyema, chyle leak, pneumonia, ARDS, cardiac arrhythmia, wound infection and urinary tract infection. We analysed separately extrapolated serious complications Clavien Dindo 3–4 and their possible impact on overall survival. Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results Total number of analysed patients was 363. The median follow up was 8.5 years. From the baseline characteristics, the presence of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.0157, HR 2.376) and hypertension (P = 0.0093, HR 1.488), higher staging pT3–4 (0.0146, HR 1.437) and presence of lymph node metastasis pN + (P < 0.001, HR 2.263) had a negative impact on overall survival. Among the postoperative complications, only chyle leak (P = 0.0327, HR 4.023) had a negative prognostic factor on overall survival. Conclusion In this single institution series, among the postoperative complications only chylothorax affect negatively the overall survival. Accurate ligation of resected thoracic duct stumps to minimize chyle leak is important to improve outcomes. The influence of others postoperative complications wasn’t significant. We assume important to exclude postoperative mortality from analysis to prevent bias. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

O45 THE ASSOCIATION OF PERIOPERATIVE QUALITY-OF-CARE PARAMETERS (TEXTBOOK OUTCOME) WITH LONG TERM OUTCOME AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M C Kalff ◽  
I Vesseur ◽  
W Eshuis ◽  
D Heineman ◽  
F Daams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Asa Score

Abstract Aim The objectives of this study were to confirm the association of textbook outcome (TO) and overall long-term survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, to investigate the relationship of TO and recurrence rates and to identify clinicopathological predictors for not achieving TO. Background & Methods Despite current improvements in the multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer, surgery remains the key component. Therefore, it is essential to optimize the surgical procedure and to pursue the highest surgical quality. TO is a composite measure of ten perioperative parameters reflecting the quality of surgical care concerning esophagectomy. All patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy with curative intent in two tertiary referral centers in The Netherlands between 2007-2016 were included. Patients with a carcinoma in situ, patients undergoing salvage or emergency procedure and patients that applied for opt-out were excluded. Clinicopathological predictors for not achieving TO were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier life-table estimates and cox regression. Results In total, 1057 patients were included. Over time, the percentage of patients who achieved TO increased from 28.9% in 2007 to 37.5% in 2016. BMI under 18.5, ASA score above one and age above 65 years were associated with a worse TO rate (OR 2.72 [1.02-7.24], ASA 2 OR 1.57 [1.13-2.17] and ASA 3+4 OR 2.33 [1.56-3.48], OR 1.387 [1.06-1.81], respectively), whereas neoadjuvant treatment predicted a better TO rate (OR 0.58 [0.41-0.81]). The median overall survival was 53 months (95% CI 42 – 63) for patients with TO and 35 months (95% CI 29 – 41) for patients without TO; resulting in an overall survival benefit of 18 months (HR 0.759, 95% CI 0.636 – 0.906, P = 0.002). The recurrence rates between TO and no-TO differed, but was not statistically significant (47.1% vs 42.8%, P = 0.177). Conclusion BMI less than 18.5, ASA-score higher than one and age older than 65 were characteristics associated with not achieving TO. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with a better TO rate. Achieved TO resulted in a better overall five-year survival indicating the importance of pursuing TO.

scholarly journals Favourable long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer treated with extended transhiatal esophagectomy combined with en bloc lymphadenectomy: results from a retrospective observational cohort study

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dino Kröll ◽  
Yves Michael Borbély ◽  
Bastian Dislich ◽  
Tobias Haltmeier ◽  
Thomas Malinka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Abstract Background Although considered complex and challenging, esophagectomy remains the best potentially curable treatment option for resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction (AEG) carcinomas. The optimal surgical approach and technique as well as the extent of lymphadenectomy, particularly regarding quality of life and short- and long-term outcomes, are still a matter of debate. To lower perioperative morbidity, we combined the advantages of a one-cavity approach with extended lymph node dissection (usually achieved by only a two-cavity approach) and developed a modified single-cavity transhiatal approach for esophagectomy. Methods The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of an extended transhiatal esophageal resection with radical bilateral mediastinal en bloc lymphadenectomy (eTHE). A prospective database of 166 patients with resectable cancers of the esophagus (including adenocarcinomas of the AEG types I and II) were analyzed. Patients were treated between 2001 and 2017 with eTHE at a tertiary care university center. Relevant patient characteristics and outcome parameters were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes included short-term morbidity, mortality, radicalness of en bloc resection and oncologic efficacy. Results The overall survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 84, 70, and 61.0%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate after eTHE was 1.2%. Complications with a Clavien-Dindo score of III/IV occurred in 31 cases (18.6%). A total of 25 patients (15.1%) had a major pulmonary complication. The median hospital stay was 17 days (interquartile range (IQR) 12). Most patients (n = 144; 86.7%) received neoadjuvant treatment. The median number of lymph nodes resected was 25 (IQR 17). The R0 resection rate was 97%. Conclusion In patients with esophageal cancer, eTHE without thoracotomy resulted in excellent long-term survival, an above average number of resected lymph nodes and an acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality.

The impact of age on patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anantha Madhavan ◽  
Sivesh K Kamarajah ◽  
Maziar Navidi ◽  
S Wahed ◽  
Arul Immanuel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Transthoracic Esophagectomy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Summary To compare long-term and short-term outcomes in patients &lt;70 years old with those ≥ 70 years old, who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy for carcinoma. With an ageing population more patients, with increasing co-morbidities are being diagnosed with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Concerns exist regarding offering older patients esophagectomy, conversely undue prejudice may exists that may prevent surgery being offered. Consecutive patients from a single unit between January 2000 and July 2016 that underwent trans-thoracic esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant treatment for carcinoma were included. Short-term outcomes including morbidity, mortality, length of stay and long-term survival were compared between those &lt;70 and those ≥ 70. This study identified 992 patients who underwent esophagectomy during the study period, of which 302 (30%) ≥ 70 years old. Greater proportion ≥ 70 years old had SCC (squamous cell carcinoma) (23%) than &lt;70 (18%) (p = 0.07). Patients ≥ 70 years old were noted to have higher ASA Grade 3 (34% vs 25%, p = 0.004) and were less likely to receive neoadjuvant treatment (64% vs 45% p&lt;0.001). Length of stay was longer in ≥ 70 (14 vs 17 days p&lt;0.001), and there were more complications (63% vs 75% p&lt;0.001). In hospital mortality was higher in ≥ 70 (2% vs 5% p = 0.026). Overall survival was 50 months in &lt;70 vs 36 months in ≥ 70 (p = &lt;0.001). In &lt;70s with adenocarcinoma, overall survival was 52 months vs 35 months in the ≥ 70 (p&lt;0.001). No significant difference in survival in patients with SCC, 49 months in &lt;70 vs 54 months in ≥ 70 (p = 0.711). Increased peri-operative morbidity and mortality combined with the reduction in the long term survival in the over 70s cohort should be addressed when counselling patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer.

scholarly journals Prognostic relevance of lymph node regression on survival in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliza Hagens ◽  
Karina Tukanova ◽  
Sara Jamel ◽  
Mark van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
George B Hanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Average Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

Summary Introduction The prognostic value of histomorphologic regression in primary esophageal cancer has been previously established, however the impact of lymph node (LN) response on survival still remains unclear. The aim of this review was to assess the prognostic significance of LN regression or downstaging following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. Methods An electronic search was performed to identify articles evaluating LN regression or downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the influence of regression in the LNs and nodal downstaging on overall survival. Histomorphologic tumor regression in LNs was defined by the absence of viable cells or degree of fibrosis on histopathologic examination. Downstaged LNs were defined as pN0 nodes by the tumor, node, and metastasis classification, which were positive prior to treatment neoadjuvant. Results Eight articles were included, three of which assessed tumor regression (number of patients = 292) and five assessed downstaging (number of patients = 1368). Complete tumor regression (average rate of 29.1%) in the LNs was associated with improved survival, although not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26–1.06; P = 0.17). LNs downstaging (average rate of 32.2%) was associated with improved survival compared to node positivity after neoadjuvant treatment (HR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.22–0.77; P = 0.005). Discussion The findings of this meta-analysis have shown a survival benefit in patients with LN downstaging and are suggestive for considering LN downstaging to ypN0 as an additional prognostic marker in staging and in the comparative evaluation of differing neoadjuvant regimens in clinical trials. No statistically significant effect of histopathologic regression in the LNs on long-term survival was seen.

Is neoadjuvant therapy beneficial in clinically staged T2N0 esophageal cancer?

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 135-135
Author(s):  
Taranjeet Kaur ◽  
James P. Dolan ◽  
Brian S. Diggs ◽  
Renato Luna ◽  
Brett C. Sheppard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Support Design ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Impact

135 Background: The optimal treatment strategy for clinical stage T2N0 (cT2N0) esophageal cancer is poorly defined. The specific aims of this analysis were to determine the impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in cT2N0 esophageal cancer patients on overall survival, nodal metastasis, staging, and pathological complete responders (pCR) NAT. Methods: We reviewed a retrospective cohort of 27 patients with cT2N0 esophageal cancer at Oregon Health & Science University, an NCI-Designated Cancer Center from 1999 to 2011. All patients were staged pre-operatively using Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS), CT +/- FDG-PET. Patients were identified into two cohorts: NAT followed by surgery and surgery alone. We compared overall survival between the cohorts using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Eleven patients (41%) received NAT followed by surgery and sixteen patients (59%) underwent surgery alone. Minimal invasive esophagectomy and decreased length of stay (p < 0.05) were associated with the presence of neoadjuvant therapy. The difference in overall survival rate was not statistically significant between NAT and surgery alone groups (p = 0.96). Three of 11 patients (27%) had a pCR and 8 (73%) were partial or non responders after NAT. In the surgery only group, nine of 16 patients (56%) were understaged, 6 (38%) were overstaged and 1 (6%) was correctly staged. Despite being clinically node negative, 14/27 (52%) had node positive disease in both groups with 5/11 (45%) in NAT group and 9/16 (56%) in surgery group. Conclusions: The benefit of NAT in cT2N0 esophageal cancer patients remains unclear. However, our finding of significant clinical understaging and frequent positive nodes in clinically node negative patients suggests a clinical benefit to NAT for some cT2N0 patients before surgery. These observations support design of a prospective clinical trial to define the role of NAT in patients with cT2N0 esophageal cancer.

scholarly journals The Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Gastric Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482199743
Author(s):  
Ke Chen ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Zheling Chen
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
And Control

Background: Treatment options for advanced gastric esophageal cancer are quite limited. Chemotherapy is unavoidable at certain stages, and research on targeted therapies has mostly failed. The advent of immunotherapy has brought hope for the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze the safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and the long-term survival of patients who were diagnosed as gastric esophageal cancer and received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Method: Studies on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy of advanced gastric esophageal cancer published before February 1, 2020 were searched online. The survival (e.g. 6-month overall survival, 12-month overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR)) and adverse effects of immunotherapy were compared to that of control therapy (physician’s choice of therapy). Results: After screening 185 studies, 4 comparative cohort studies which reported the long-term survival of patients receiving immunotherapy were included. Compared to control group, the 12-month survival (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.12, P < 0.0001) and 18-month survival (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.39 to 2.81, P = 0.0001) were significantly longer in immunotherapy group. The 3-month survival rate (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.36 to 3.06, P = 0.92) and 18-month survival rate (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.98 to 2.12, P = 0.07) were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group. The ORR were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.65 to 3.66, P = 0.01). Meta-analysis pointed out that in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 sub group population, the immunotherapy could obviously benefit the patients in tumor response rates (OR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.89 to 7.61, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: For the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy was superior to that of chemotherapy or palliative care.

P82 A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED COHORT STUDY TO EVALUATE THE ASSOCIATION OF LYMPH NODE RETRIEVAL WITH LONG-TERM OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R van der Werf, Leonie ◽  
Marra, PhD Elske ◽  
S Gisbertz, PhD Suzanne ◽  
P L Wijnhoven, PhD Bas ◽  
I van Berge Henegouwen, PhD Mark
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Pathological Staging ◽  
Lymph Node Retrieval

Abstract Introduction Previous studies evaluating the association of LN yield and survival presented conflicting results and many may be influenced by confounding and stage migration. This study aimed to evaluate whether the quality indicator ‘retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes (LNs)’ is associated with better long-term survival and more accurate pathological staging in patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and resection. Methods Data of esophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery between 2011-2016 was retrieved from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. Patients with <15 LNs and ≥15 LNs were compared after propensity score matching based on patient and tumor characteristics. The primary endpoint was 3-year survival. To evaluate the effect of LN yield on the accuracy of pathological staging, pathological N-stage was evaluated and 3-year survival was analyzed in a subgroup of patients node-negative disease. Results In 2260 of 3281 patients (67%) ≥15 LNs were retrieved. In total, 992 patients with ≥15 LNs were matched to 992 patients with <15 LNs. The 3-year survival did not differ between the two groups (57% versus 54%, p=0.28). pN+ was scored in 41% of patients with ≥15 LNs versus 35% of patients with <15 LNs. For node-negative patients, the 3-year survival was significantly better for patients with ≥15 LNs (69% versus 61%, p=0.01). Conclusions In this propensity score matched cohort, 3-year survival was comparable for patients with ≥15 LNs, although increasing nodal yield was associated with more accurate staging. In node-negative patients, 3-year survival was higher for patients with ≥15 LNs.

Postoperative Morbidity in Curative Resection of Gastroesophageal Carcinoma Does Not Impact Long-term Survival

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 1228-1231
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Samples ◽  
Anna C. Snavely ◽  
Michael O. Meyers
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Nodal Dissection

Significant morbidity and mortality have historically been reported for surgical resection of gastric and gastroesophageal junction tumors. We evaluated our experience to determine morbidity and mortality and evaluated demographic and pathologic risk factors associated with postoperative outcome and long-term survival. A retrospective, Institutional Review Board-approved, single-institution database identified 102 patients who underwent resection with curative intent for gastroesophageal junction or gastric carcinoma from 2004 to 2012. The method of Kaplan and Meier was used to describe overall survival and estimate median survival. Of 102 patients, 74 were male and 28 were female. Of these, 24 patients were > 70 years of age at surgery (median = 62.9). Forty esophagectomies, 25 total gastrectomies, and 37 subtotal gastrectomies were performed. Two patients died (one esophagectomy and one gastrectomy). Forty-one developed a complication: 17 minor and 35 major, including six anastomotic leaks. Patients with low preoperative albumin ( P = 0.01) and increased age ( P = 0.05) were associated with having a postoperative complication; extent of nodal dissection ( P = 0.48), jejunostomy (0.24), performance status ( P = 0.77), type of surgery ( P = 0.74), and neoadjuvant therapy ( P = 0.24) were not associated. More extensive nodal dissection was associated with a decreased risk of death ( P = 0.007). Having any complication ( P = 0.20), an anastomotic leak ( P = 0.17), worse grade of complication ( P = 0.15), presence of feeding jejunostomy tube ( P = 0.17), and neoadjuvant therapy ( P = 0.30) were not associated with changes in overall survival. Thorough lymph node dissection improves survival without increasing postoperative morbidity. The data advocate for increased lymph node yield and close attention to nutritional support in gastroesophageal carcinoma patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document