scholarly journals Favourable long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer treated with extended transhiatal esophagectomy combined with en bloc lymphadenectomy: results from a retrospective observational cohort study

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dino Kröll ◽  
Yves Michael Borbély ◽  
Bastian Dislich ◽  
Tobias Haltmeier ◽  
Thomas Malinka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Abstract Background Although considered complex and challenging, esophagectomy remains the best potentially curable treatment option for resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction (AEG) carcinomas. The optimal surgical approach and technique as well as the extent of lymphadenectomy, particularly regarding quality of life and short- and long-term outcomes, are still a matter of debate. To lower perioperative morbidity, we combined the advantages of a one-cavity approach with extended lymph node dissection (usually achieved by only a two-cavity approach) and developed a modified single-cavity transhiatal approach for esophagectomy. Methods The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of an extended transhiatal esophageal resection with radical bilateral mediastinal en bloc lymphadenectomy (eTHE). A prospective database of 166 patients with resectable cancers of the esophagus (including adenocarcinomas of the AEG types I and II) were analyzed. Patients were treated between 2001 and 2017 with eTHE at a tertiary care university center. Relevant patient characteristics and outcome parameters were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes included short-term morbidity, mortality, radicalness of en bloc resection and oncologic efficacy. Results The overall survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 84, 70, and 61.0%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate after eTHE was 1.2%. Complications with a Clavien-Dindo score of III/IV occurred in 31 cases (18.6%). A total of 25 patients (15.1%) had a major pulmonary complication. The median hospital stay was 17 days (interquartile range (IQR) 12). Most patients (n = 144; 86.7%) received neoadjuvant treatment. The median number of lymph nodes resected was 25 (IQR 17). The R0 resection rate was 97%. Conclusion In patients with esophageal cancer, eTHE without thoracotomy resulted in excellent long-term survival, an above average number of resected lymph nodes and an acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality.

scholarly journals The Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Gastric Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482199743
Author(s):  
Ke Chen ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Zheling Chen
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
And Control

Background: Treatment options for advanced gastric esophageal cancer are quite limited. Chemotherapy is unavoidable at certain stages, and research on targeted therapies has mostly failed. The advent of immunotherapy has brought hope for the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze the safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and the long-term survival of patients who were diagnosed as gastric esophageal cancer and received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Method: Studies on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy of advanced gastric esophageal cancer published before February 1, 2020 were searched online. The survival (e.g. 6-month overall survival, 12-month overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR)) and adverse effects of immunotherapy were compared to that of control therapy (physician’s choice of therapy). Results: After screening 185 studies, 4 comparative cohort studies which reported the long-term survival of patients receiving immunotherapy were included. Compared to control group, the 12-month survival (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.12, P < 0.0001) and 18-month survival (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.39 to 2.81, P = 0.0001) were significantly longer in immunotherapy group. The 3-month survival rate (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.36 to 3.06, P = 0.92) and 18-month survival rate (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.98 to 2.12, P = 0.07) were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group. The ORR were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.65 to 3.66, P = 0.01). Meta-analysis pointed out that in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 sub group population, the immunotherapy could obviously benefit the patients in tumor response rates (OR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.89 to 7.61, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: For the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy was superior to that of chemotherapy or palliative care.

scholarly journals Mid- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for submucosal esophageal cancer types pT1b-SM1 and pT1b-SM2

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (06) ◽  
pp. E733-E742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Mora ◽  
Kenro Kawada ◽  
Yasuaki Nakajima ◽  
Takuya Okada ◽  
Yutaka Tokairin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Early Esophageal Cancer ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Submucosal Tumors ◽  
Submucosal Cancer

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are promising therapeutic options for early esophageal cancer (EC). The factors that can affect mid- and long-term survival in patients with submucosal EC (SM1 and SM2) have not been described in the literature. We aim to describe clinicopathological outcomes and factors that can affect the mid- and long-term survival in patients with resected submucosal tumors. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) for submucosal tumors over a 20-year period. The final study population included 119 cases with 137 lesions. Information was collected according to the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer 11-edition and factors affecting survival for 2 and 5 years after ER were analyzed. Results EMR was performed in 99 cases (72.3 %), ESD in 38 cases (27.7 %). There were no significant complications. Two- and 5-year survival rates were 91 % and 82 %, respectively. Mean age was 67.22 years (± 9.49 years), mortality caused by EC occurred in 13 cases (11 %). Factors that had a significant impact on long-term survival were age > 65 years (P = 0.0026), number of resected specimens (P = 0.0031), presence of another progressive disease (not EC) (P ≤ 0.001), recurrence (P = 0.0002), and relation between histopathological positive vertical margin and recurrence (P = 0.0112). Conclusions ER is viable treatment for esophageal submucosal cancer, selection between ESD/EMR can depend on tumor size and patient condition, and en bloc ER is the recommended technique for submucosal tumors. Long-term survival factors were identified.

scholarly journals Impact on long-term survival of the number of lymph nodes resected in patients with pT1N0 gastric cancer after R0 resection

Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (31) ◽  
pp. e4420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiuda Zhao ◽  
Feng Du ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Jie Kan ◽  
Li Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

PS02.167: IMPACT OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER RESECTION OF ESOPHAGUS FOR CARCINOMA ON LONG-TERM SURVIVAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 169-169
Author(s):  
Martin Snajdauf ◽  
Tomas Harustiak ◽  
Alexandr Pazdro ◽  
Robert Lischke
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Chyle Leak ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Esophagectomy with 2–3 field lymph node dissection is one of the most invasive surgical treatment for malignancy and is still associated with a high mortality and morbidity despite improvements in surgical techniques and postoperative management. The impact of postoperative complications on perioperative morbidity is widely accepted. But the impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival remains controversial. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patient who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer between January 2005 and December 2012 in our department (415 patients). We excluded non-radical resections (R1, R2 – 27 patients, 6.5%) and patients who died within 90 day after operation (20 patients, 4.8%). Data on gender, BMI, histologic diagnosis, tumor staging, neoadjuvant treatment, comorbidities, technical complications and postoperative medical complications were reviewed. Considered postoperative complications were anastomotic leak, empyema, chyle leak, pneumonia, ARDS, cardiac arrhythmia, wound infection and urinary tract infection. We analysed separately extrapolated serious complications Clavien Dindo 3–4 and their possible impact on overall survival. Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results Total number of analysed patients was 363. The median follow up was 8.5 years. From the baseline characteristics, the presence of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.0157, HR 2.376) and hypertension (P = 0.0093, HR 1.488), higher staging pT3–4 (0.0146, HR 1.437) and presence of lymph node metastasis pN + (P < 0.001, HR 2.263) had a negative impact on overall survival. Among the postoperative complications, only chyle leak (P = 0.0327, HR 4.023) had a negative prognostic factor on overall survival. Conclusion In this single institution series, among the postoperative complications only chylothorax affect negatively the overall survival. Accurate ligation of resected thoracic duct stumps to minimize chyle leak is important to improve outcomes. The influence of others postoperative complications wasn’t significant. We assume important to exclude postoperative mortality from analysis to prevent bias. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

scholarly journals Multimodal management of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Which type of neoadjuvant treatment?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Zandirad ◽  
H Teixeira-Farinha ◽  
N Demartines ◽  
M Schäfer ◽  
S Mantziari
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Objective The current treatment for locally advanced gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma consists of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) followed by surgery. Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and radio-chemotherapy (RCT) are both valid options, but comparative data for their efficacy remain scarce. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of RCT and CT to achieve a complete pathologic response (CPR) for locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma. Secondary endpoints were R0 resection rates, postoperative complications, long-term survival and recurrence. Methods All consecutive patients with locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with CT or RCT and oncologic resection from 2009 to 2018 were included. A CPR was defined with the Mandard tumor regression score. Standard statistical tests were used as appropriate. Overall and disease-free survival were compared with the Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to define independent predictors of CPR, and long-term survival. Results Among the 94 patients (84%male, median age 62 years [IQR 9.7]), 67 (71.3%) received preoperative RCT and 27 (28.7%) CT. Patient’s characteristics and pretreatment tumor stages were comparable. Surgical approach was thoracoabdominal Lewis resection in 95.5% RCT and 81.5% CT patients (P = 0.085). CPR was more frequent in the RCT than the CT group (13.4% vs 7.4%, P = 0.009), but R0 resection rates were similar (72.1% vs 66.7%, P = 0.628). There was a trend to higher ypN0 stage in the RCT group (55.2% vs 33.3%; P = 0.057). Postoperatively, RCT patients presented more cardiovascular complications (35.8% vs 11.1%; P = 0.017), although overall morbidity was similar (68.6% vs 62.9%, P = 0.988). 5-year overall survival was comparable (61.1% RCT vs 75.7% CT, P = 0.259), as was 5-year disease-free survival (33.5% RCT vs 22.8% CT, P = 0.763). Isolated loco-regional recurrence occurred in 2.9% RCT vs 3.7% CT patients (P = 0.976). NAT type was not an independent predictor for complete pathologic response nor long-term survival in the multivariate analysis. Median follow-up was 30 months [95%CI 21.3-38.8] for all patients. Conclusion Patients with locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma demonstrated higher rates of CPR after RCT than CT, and a trend to a better lymph node sterilization, although this did not translate in a significant survival benefit or decreased recurrence rate.

O45 THE ASSOCIATION OF PERIOPERATIVE QUALITY-OF-CARE PARAMETERS (TEXTBOOK OUTCOME) WITH LONG TERM OUTCOME AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M C Kalff ◽  
I Vesseur ◽  
W Eshuis ◽  
D Heineman ◽  
F Daams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Asa Score

Abstract Aim The objectives of this study were to confirm the association of textbook outcome (TO) and overall long-term survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, to investigate the relationship of TO and recurrence rates and to identify clinicopathological predictors for not achieving TO. Background & Methods Despite current improvements in the multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer, surgery remains the key component. Therefore, it is essential to optimize the surgical procedure and to pursue the highest surgical quality. TO is a composite measure of ten perioperative parameters reflecting the quality of surgical care concerning esophagectomy. All patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy with curative intent in two tertiary referral centers in The Netherlands between 2007-2016 were included. Patients with a carcinoma in situ, patients undergoing salvage or emergency procedure and patients that applied for opt-out were excluded. Clinicopathological predictors for not achieving TO were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier life-table estimates and cox regression. Results In total, 1057 patients were included. Over time, the percentage of patients who achieved TO increased from 28.9% in 2007 to 37.5% in 2016. BMI under 18.5, ASA score above one and age above 65 years were associated with a worse TO rate (OR 2.72 [1.02-7.24], ASA 2 OR 1.57 [1.13-2.17] and ASA 3+4 OR 2.33 [1.56-3.48], OR 1.387 [1.06-1.81], respectively), whereas neoadjuvant treatment predicted a better TO rate (OR 0.58 [0.41-0.81]). The median overall survival was 53 months (95% CI 42 – 63) for patients with TO and 35 months (95% CI 29 – 41) for patients without TO; resulting in an overall survival benefit of 18 months (HR 0.759, 95% CI 0.636 – 0.906, P = 0.002). The recurrence rates between TO and no-TO differed, but was not statistically significant (47.1% vs 42.8%, P = 0.177). Conclusion BMI less than 18.5, ASA-score higher than one and age older than 65 were characteristics associated with not achieving TO. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with a better TO rate. Achieved TO resulted in a better overall five-year survival indicating the importance of pursuing TO.

P80 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL-STAGED T3N3 ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S K Kamarajah ◽  
N Newton ◽  
M Navidi ◽  
S Wahed ◽  
A Immanuel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
Pathological Stage ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients with T3N3 esophageal cancers and determine differences between the clinical stage and pathological stage. Background Locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with poor long-term survival. Pre-treatment and post-treatment stage may differ due to the effect of neoadjuvant therapy and inaccuracies in staging. Multimodality staging followed by discussion at an MDT is considered the gold standard. Despite this, patients can be under-staged or over-staged leading to inadequate or unnecessary treatment associated with high levels of morbidity. Methods Consecutive patients from a single unit between 2010 - 2018 were included with either clinical (cT3N3) or pathological (pT3N3) esophageal cancer. Outcomes were compared between patients that underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and radical two field lymphadenectomy with or without neoadjuvant treatment and those patients staged cT3N3 treated non-surgically (NSR). Demographics, clinical and pathological stage, histological information and outcomes were recorded. Patients were staged using the TNM 8. Results This study included 156 patients, of which 63 had non-surgical treatment, only 3 of these had radical treatment. Of the remaining 93 patients who underwent esophagectomy, 34 were cT3N3, 54 were pT3N3 and five were unchanged before and after treatment. Median overall survival (OS) for surgical cT3N3 patients was significantly longer than pT3N3 and NSR (median: NR vs 19 vs 8 months, p<0.001). Twenty-seven patients with cT3N3 had lower staging following treatment whilst 3 had a higher stage. Conclusion T3N3 disease carries a poor prognosis. Within this cohort cT3N3 disease treated surgically has a high 5-year overall survival suggesting possible over-staging and stage migration due to neoadjuvant therapy. To contrast this those not having surgery have a dismal prognosis. The impact of neoadjuvant treatment cannot be predicted and, current staging modalities may be inaccurate. Clinical stage should be used with caution when counselling patients regarding management and prognosis.

The impact of age on patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anantha Madhavan ◽  
Sivesh K Kamarajah ◽  
Maziar Navidi ◽  
S Wahed ◽  
Arul Immanuel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Transthoracic Esophagectomy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Summary To compare long-term and short-term outcomes in patients &lt;70 years old with those ≥ 70 years old, who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy for carcinoma. With an ageing population more patients, with increasing co-morbidities are being diagnosed with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Concerns exist regarding offering older patients esophagectomy, conversely undue prejudice may exists that may prevent surgery being offered. Consecutive patients from a single unit between January 2000 and July 2016 that underwent trans-thoracic esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant treatment for carcinoma were included. Short-term outcomes including morbidity, mortality, length of stay and long-term survival were compared between those &lt;70 and those ≥ 70. This study identified 992 patients who underwent esophagectomy during the study period, of which 302 (30%) ≥ 70 years old. Greater proportion ≥ 70 years old had SCC (squamous cell carcinoma) (23%) than &lt;70 (18%) (p = 0.07). Patients ≥ 70 years old were noted to have higher ASA Grade 3 (34% vs 25%, p = 0.004) and were less likely to receive neoadjuvant treatment (64% vs 45% p&lt;0.001). Length of stay was longer in ≥ 70 (14 vs 17 days p&lt;0.001), and there were more complications (63% vs 75% p&lt;0.001). In hospital mortality was higher in ≥ 70 (2% vs 5% p = 0.026). Overall survival was 50 months in &lt;70 vs 36 months in ≥ 70 (p = &lt;0.001). In &lt;70s with adenocarcinoma, overall survival was 52 months vs 35 months in the ≥ 70 (p&lt;0.001). No significant difference in survival in patients with SCC, 49 months in &lt;70 vs 54 months in ≥ 70 (p = 0.711). Increased peri-operative morbidity and mortality combined with the reduction in the long term survival in the over 70s cohort should be addressed when counselling patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document