Tofacitinib in Ulcerative Colitis: Real-world Evidence From the ENEIDA Registry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Chaparro ◽  
Ana Garre ◽  
Francisco Mesonero ◽  
Cristina Rodríguez ◽  
Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Real Practice ◽  
Term Response ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Aim To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis [UC] in real life. Methods Patients from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry and treated with tofacitinib due to active UC were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Partial Mayo Score [PMS]. Short-term response/remission was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, and 16. Results A total of 113 patients were included. They were exposed to tofacitinib for a median time of 44 weeks. Response and remission at Week 8 were 60% and 31%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher PMS at Week 4 (odds ratio [OR] = 0].2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0].1–0.4) was the only variable associated with lower likelihood of achieving remission at Week 8. Higher PMS at Week 4 [OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3–0.7] and higher PMS at Week 8 [OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1–0.5] were associated with lower probability of achieving remission at Week 16. A total of 45 patients [40%] discontinued tofacitinib over time. Higher PMS at Week 8 was the only factor associated with higher tofacitinib discontinuation [hazard ratio = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.3–1.6]. A total of 34 patients had remission at Week 8; of these, 65% had relapsed 52 weeks after achieving remission; the dose was increased to 10 mg/12 h in nine patients, and five of them reached remission again. Seventeen patients had adverse events. Conclusions Tofacitinib is effective and safe in UC patients in real practice, even in a highly refractory cohort. A relevant proportion of patients discontinue the drug over time, mainly due to primary failure.

scholarly journals P434 Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis: real-world evidence from Eneida Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S394-S395
Author(s):  
M Chaparro ◽  
A Garre ◽  
M Iborra ◽  
M Barreiro-de Acosta ◽  
M J Casanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Patient Status ◽  
Probability Of Response

Abstract Background Ustekinumab has shown promising results in ulcerative colitis (UC) in the development program (UNIFI) that should be confirmed in clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in UC in real life. Methods Patients included in the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry that received at least 1 dose of ustekinumab intravenously due to active UC were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Partial Mayo Score (PMS). The short-term response was assessed at week 8 and 16. The last-observation-carried-forward method was used in patients that stopped ustekinumab treatment before week 8 or 16. Variables associated with short-term remission were identified by logistic regression analysis. Data quality was assessed by remote monitoring. Results Forty-seven patients were included (Table 1); all of them had been previously exposed to biologic agents (70% to >2): 100% to anti-TNF and 83% to vedolizumab. A total of 26% had been exposed to tofacitinib. Seventeen patients (36%) had response at week 8 [3 of them (6%) had remission]; 16 patients (34%) had response at week 16 [5 of them (11%) had remission] (Figure 1). There was a statistically significant decrease in C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration during the induction only in patients with a response at week 16 (Figure 2). The proportion of patients with CRP elevated at baseline and at week 8 was higher among non-responders at week 16 (Table 2). In the multivariate analysis, higher PMS at week 8 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.3–0.9)] and CRP over the upper normal limit at week 8 (OR = 0.1; 95% CI = 0.01–0.8) were associated with lower probability of response at week 16; steroids during induction increased the probability of response at week 16 (OR = 8; 95% CI = 1–71). Of patients without response at week 8, only 7% achieved response at week 16. Seventeen out of 31 patients continued ustekinumab beyond week 16, despite being non-responders. Of these 17 patients, 4 reached remission after the third dose, 1 after the fifth and 1 after the seventh one. There were 2 infections, one of them with fatal consequences (in a patient under steroids and tacrolimus due to renal transplant). Conclusion Ustekinumab shows benefit in some UC patients in real practice, even in a very refractory cohort in which the drug was prescribed as last resort. Patient status at week 8 seems to be a good predictor of response after the induction. Safety was consistent with the known profile of ustekinumab.

scholarly journals OP29 Tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis: Real-world evidence from Eneida Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S026-S028 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Chaparro ◽  
A Garre ◽  
F Mesonero ◽  
C Rodríguez ◽  
M Barreiro-de Acosta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis (UC) in real life. Methods Patients from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with tofacitinib due to active UC were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Partial Mayo Score (PMS). The short-term response was assessed at week 4, 8 and 16. The last-observation-carried-forward method was used in patients that stopped tofacitinib before the time-points for clinical assessment. Variables associated with short-term remission at week 8 were identified by logistic regression analysis. The cumulative retention rate and the cumulative incidence of relapse over time were assessed by survival curves. Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of tofacitinib discontinuation or relapse over time. Data quality was assessed by remote monitoring. Results 113 patients were included (Table 1 and Figure 1) and exposed to tofacitinib a median of 44 (interquartile range = 30–66) weeks. Response and remission at week 8 were 60% and 31%, respectively (Figure 2). In multivariate analysis, higher PMS at week 4 [odds ratio (OR)=0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1–0.4] was the only variable associated with the likeliness of achieving remission at week 8. Higher PMS at week 4 (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3–0.7) and higher PMS at week 8 (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1–0.5) were associated with lower probability of achieving remission at week 16. Twenty per cent of those without remission at week 4, and 12% of those without remission at week 8, achieved remission at week 16. A total of 45 patients (40%) discontinued tofacitinib over time (Figure 3); the discontinuation rate was 34% and 46% at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively. PMS at week 8 was the only factor associated with tofacitinib discontinuation [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.3–1.6)]. A total of 33 patients had remission at week 8; from them, 65% relapsed 52 weeks after achieving remission; 9 patients increased the dose to 10 mg /12 h and 5 reached remission again. No factors associated with relapse over time were identified. Eighteen patients had adverse events (4 hypercholesterolaemia, 2 herpes zoster, 3 infections, 2 dyspnoea, 1 neoplasia, 1 lymphopenia, 1 headache, 1 hypertriglyceridaemia and 4 others). No thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusion Tofacitinib is relatively effective in UC patients in real practice even in a highly refractory cohort. Only 10% of the patients without remission at week 8 reached remission at week 16. A relevant proportion of patients discontinue the drug over time, mainly due to primary failure. Over 60% of patients that achieve remission, relapse over time. Safety was consistent with the known profile of tofacitinib

scholarly journals P476 Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis: Real-world evidence from the ENEIDA registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S465-S466
Author(s):  
M Chaparro ◽  
A Garre ◽  
M Iborra ◽  
M Sierra ◽  
M Barreiro-de Acosta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background The development program (UNIFI) has shown promising results of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment that should be confirmed in clinical practice. Aims Primary: to evaluate the durability of ustekinumab treatment in UC patients in clinical practice. Secondary: to assess the short-term response (at week 16) and the long-term effectiveness (at maximum follow-up) and to assess the safety of ustekinumab in clinical practice. Methods Patients included in the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry who received at least one intravenous dose of ustekinumab due to active UC [Partial Mayo Score (PMS) >2] were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on PMS. Results 95 patients were included (table 1). At week 16, 53% of patients had clinical response (including 35% of patients in remission) (figure 1). In the multivariate analysis, elevated serum C-reactive protein was the only variable significantly associated with clinical remission. Long-term remission is represented in figure 2. 36% of patients discontinued the treatment with ustekinumab during a median follow-up of 31 weeks. The probability of maintaining ustekinumab treatment was 87% at week 16, 63% at week 56, and 59% at week 72 (figure 3); primary failure was the main reason for ustekinumab discontinuation. No variable was associated with risk of discontinuation. Three patients reported adverse events; one of them had a fatal severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion Ustekinumab is effective both in the short and the long-term in real-life, even in a highly refractory cohort. Higher inflammatory burden at baseline correlated with lower probability of achieving remission. Safety was consistent with the known profile of ustekinumab.

scholarly journals Fecal calprotectin is a useful biomarker for predicting the clinical outcome of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in ulcerative colitis patients: a prospective observation study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Ueno ◽  
Yuya Sugiyama ◽  
Yu Kobayashi ◽  
Yuki Murakami ◽  
Takuya Iwama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Reduction Rate ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Observation Study ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Adsorptive Apheresis

Abstract Background Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) is widely used as a remission induction therapy for active ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. However, there are no available biomarkers for predicting the clinical outcome of GMA. We investigated the utility of Fecal calprotectin (FC) as a biomarker for predicting the clinical outcome during GMA therapy in active UC patients. Methods In this multicenter prospective observation study, all patients received 10 sessions of GMA, twice a week, for 5 consecutive weeks. FC was measured at entry, one week, two weeks, and at the end of GMA. Colonoscopy was performed at entry and after GMA. The clinical activity was assessed based on the partial Mayo score when FC was measured. Clinical remission (CR) was defined as a partial Mayo score of ≤ 2 and endoscopic remission (ER) was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore of either 0 or 1. We analyzed the relationships between the clinical outcome (CR and ER) and the change in FC concentration. Result Twenty-six patients were included in this study. The overall CR and ER rates were 50.0% and 19.2%, respectively. After GMA, the median FC concentration in patients with ER was significantly lower than that in patients without ER (469 mg/kg vs. 3107 mg/kg, p = 0.03). When the cut-off value of FC concentration was set at 1150 mg/kg for assessing ER after GMA, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.8 and 0.81, respectively. The FC concentration had significantly decreased by one week. An ROC analysis demonstrated that the reduction rate of FC (ΔFC) at 1 week was the most accurate predictor of CR at the end of GMA (AUC = 0.852, P = 0.002). When the cut-off value of ΔFC was set at ≤ 40% at 1 week for predicting CR at the end of GMA, the sensitivity and specificity were 76.9% and 84.6%, respectively. Conclusion We evaluated the utility of FC as a biomarker for assessing ER after GMA and predicting CR in the early phase during GMA in patients with active UC. Our findings will benefit patients with active UC by allowing them to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures and will help establish new strategies for GMA.

scholarly journals P663 Efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis after previous ineffective biological therapies

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S545-S546
Author(s):  
M Rutka ◽  
K Farkas ◽  
D Pigniczki ◽  
K Szántó ◽  
B Anita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background Tofacitinib (TFC) is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor, which was recently approved for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of the current real-life study was to determine efficacy of TFC induction therapy regarding the clinical response and remission in patients with active UC. We evaluated short-term efficacy data in a Hungarian cohort with prior exposure to other biological agents such as anti-TNF drugs and vedolizumab. Methods In this single-centre retrospective study, patients with TFC introduction were included. Since January 2019, a total of 16 patients received an oral TFC induction therapy in a dose of 10 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Endoscopic activity was evaluated by endoscopic Mayo (eMayo) score before the introduction of TFC and in case of an inadequate therapeutic response to the 5-mg-therapy to confirm therapeutic decision-making. Based on the evaluation of clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters, we either kept the dosage or reduced the dose to 5 mg according to local regulations. We also collected data from the 16. and 24. weeks of the therapy. Primary endpoints were a clinical response (as a reduction in partial Mayo Score [pMayo] by minimum 3 points) or remission (as a Mayo score of the maximum of 2 points and without blood in stool) at week 8. Results Sixteen patients had received the induction therapy (mean age: 36 years, 7 males and 9 females) in our centre. After 8 weeks, 12 (75%) patients responded to the TFC induction therapy and 6 (37.5%) of them were in remission. Four patients were primary non-responders (25%). Corticosteroid therapy (18 ± 7 mg) was required during the induction in 4 responder cases, which could be stepped down by week 8. As a continuous maintenance therapy, 4 patients have already reached the 16th week and 8 have completed the 24th week. By the end of the follow-up, 12 patients responded and 10 was in remission. During the observation period, 3 patients had to remain on 10 mg TFC dose, 6 patients required dose escalation from 5 mg to 10 mg and 5 mg was sufficient in case of only 3 patients after the introduction. Endoscopic activity showed a moderate decrease from 2.5 ± 0.5 eMayo score to 2 ± 1 (n = 7) until week 16. In respect the responder patients, CRP levels decreased from the mean of 7.23 to 5.02. No serious side-effects were observed during the follow-up. Conclusion After the 8-week TFC induction therapy, the response rate was high and only every fourth patients were non-responder. A low number of patients had adequate reactions to the 5 mg-therapy after the introduction, but TFC is effective with dose-escalation in respect of clinical response and remission in patients with UC, who have had an inadequate response to previous biological therapy.

scholarly journals Long-term, Real-life, Observational Study in Treating Outpatient Ulcerative Colitis with Golimumab

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Tursi ◽  
Giammarco Mocci ◽  
Walter Elisei ◽  
Leonardo Allegretta ◽  
Raffaele Colucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Mayo Score

Background and Aims: Several studies have found Golimumab (GOL) effective and safe in the short-term treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), but few long-term data are currently available from real world. Our aim was to assess the long-term real-life efficacy and safety of GOL in managing UC outpatients in Italy. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study assessing consecutive UC outpatients treated with GOL for at least 3-month of follow-up was made. Primary endpoints were the induction and maintenance of remission in UC, defined as Mayo score ≤2. Several secondary endpoints, including clinical response, colectomy rate, steroid free remission and mucosal healing, were also assessed during the follow-up. Results: One hundred and seventy-eight patients were enrolled and followed up for a median (IQR) time of 9 (3-18) months (mean time follow-up: 33.1±13 months). Clinical remission was achieved in 57 (32.1%) patients: these patients continued with GOL, but only 6 patients (3.4%) were still under clinical remission with GOL at the 42nd month of follow-up. Clinical response occurred in 64 (36.4%) patients; colectomy was performed in 8 (7.8%) patients, all of them having primary failure. Steroid-free remission occurred in 23 (12.9%) patients, and mucosal healing was achieved in 29/89 (32.6%) patients. Adverse events occurred in 14 (7.9%) patients. Conclusions: Golimumab does not seem able to maintain long-term remission in UC in real life. The safety profile was good.

scholarly journals A232 EFFICACY OF TOFACITINIB FOR THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE-TO-SEVERE ULCERATIVE COLITIS: REAL-WORLD DATA

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 108-109
Author(s):  
Y Xiao ◽  
P L Lakatos ◽  
R Bourdages ◽  
A Bitton ◽  
W Afif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Preliminary Analysis ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Severe Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background A significant proportion of patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) do not respond to therapy, which includes thiopurines, glucocorticoids, and antagonists to tumour necrosis factor-α and integrin. Tofacitinib, a Janus Kinase inhibitor, has emerged as an efficacious and safe treatment for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. However, it is not known if this efficacy translates into real-life effectiveness in a regular clinical practice. Aims We aimed to assess the rate of clinical response and clinical remission at 3 and 6 months after tofacitinib initiation. Secondary endpoints included rate of biomarker normalization, corticosteroids-free clinical remission and severe infections. Methods We conducted a multi-center retrospective observational study of adult patients with active UC started on tofacitinib from January 1, 2015 to October 1, 2019 at the McGill University Health Center and Hotel-Dieu de Lévis. A positive clinical response was defined as a decrease of ≥3 in the partial Mayo score. Clinical remission was defined as partial Mayo score of ≤2. Biomarker normalization was defined as fecal calprotectin ≤250ug/g. Severe infection was defined as an infection requiring hospitalization. Results During the study period, 40 patients with UC were started on tofacitinib. Amongst the patients, 85% (n=34) had failed ≥1 biologic and 50% (n=20) had failed ≥3 biologics. At the time of this preliminary analysis, 38 patients had undergone 3 months of treatment and 30 patients had undergone 6 months of treatment. At 3 months, a clinical response was seen in 89.5% of patients (n=34) and clinical remission occurred in 63.2% (n=24). At 6 months, clinical response occurred in 73.3% of patients (n=22) and clinical remission was sustained in 53.33% (n=16). Biochemical normalization occurred in 29.0% (n=11) and 30.0% (n=9) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Additionally, 63.2% (n=24) and 43.3% of patients (n=13) achieved steroid-free clinical remission at 3 and 6 months, respectively. In the interim, one patient developed a serious infection requiring discontinuation of drug. Conclusions Our preliminary analysis demonstrates that in a real-life setting, tofacitinib is an effective treatment for inducing clinical remission in refractory UC patients. Further data will be complied to better assess the efficacy over a longer follow up. Funding Agencies None

scholarly journals P690 A propensity score weighted comparison of vedolizumab, adalimumab, and golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis: Real-life data from the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD)

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S561-S562
Author(s):  
F S Macaluso ◽  
M Ventimiglia ◽  
W Fries ◽  
A Viola ◽  
M Cappello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Treatment Persistence ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background No real-life study aiming at comparing at the same time the effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ), adalimumab (ADA), and golimumab (GOL) in Ulcerative colitis (UC) is currently available. Methods Data of consecutive patients with UC treated with VDZ, ADA, and GOL from June 2015 to December 2018 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD). A three-arms propensity score-adjusted analysis was performed to reduce bias caused by imbalanced covariates at baseline, including the proportion of TNF-α inhibitor naïve and non-naïve patients, using the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) method. The effectiveness was evaluated at 8 weeks, 52 weeks, and as treatment persistence at the end of follow-up. The clinical endpoints were steroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo score <2 without steroid use) and clinical response (reduction of the partial Mayo score ≥2 points with a concomitant decrease of steroid dosage compared with baseline). The sum of the two outcomes was defined as a clinical benefit. The achievement of mucosal healing (endoscopic Mayo score 0–1) was assessed after at least 6 months of biological treatment. Results A total of 463 treatments (VDZ: n = 187; ADA: n = 168; GOL: n = 108) were included, with a median follow-up of 47.6 weeks (IQR 20.0–85.9). At 8 weeks, a clinical benefit was achieved in 70.6% patients treated with VDZ, in 68.5% patients treated with ADA, and in 67.6% patients treated with GOL (p = n.s. for all comparisons). After 52 weeks, VDZ showed better rates of clinical benefit compared with both ADA (71.6% vs. 47.5; OR: 2.79, 95% CI 1.63–4.79, p < 0.001) and GOL (71.6% vs. 40.2%; OR: 3.77, 95% CI 2.08–6.80, p < 0.001), while the difference between ADA and GOL was not significant. Cox survival analysis demonstrated that patients treated with VDZ had a reduced probability of treatment discontinuation compared with those treated with ADA (HR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.28–0.64, p < 0.001) and GOL (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.19–0.46, p < 0.001), while patients treated with ADA had a reduced risk of treatment discontinuation compared with those treated with GOL (HR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.50–1.00, p = 0.048). Post-treatment mucosal healing rates showed a numerical but non-significant difference in favour of VDZ (48.1%) compared with ADA and GOL (38.0% and 34.6%, respectively). Conclusion In the first study comparing at the same time the clinical effectiveness of VDZ, ADA, and GOL in UC patients via propensity score-adjusted analysis, VDZ was superior to both subcutaneous agents at 52 weeks and as treatment persistence, while ADA showed a superior treatment persistence compared with GOL.

scholarly journals Soluble human Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 is associated with endoscopic activity in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis treated with golimumab

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175628481986914
Author(s):  
Fernando Magro ◽  
Susana Lopes ◽  
Marco Silva ◽  
Rosa Coelho ◽  
Francisco Portela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Therapeutic Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Histological Activity ◽  
Median Change ◽  
Multicentre Prospective Study

Background: Suppressor of Tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) is an IL33 receptor detected in the mucosa and serum of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. We evaluated soluble ST2 (sST2) as a surrogate biomarker of disease outcome and therapeutic response, in moderate-to-severe UC patients treated with golimumab. Methods: We conducted an open-label single-arm multicentre prospective study. At screening/baseline, week 6 (W6) and week 16 (W16), clinical and endoscopic activity (total Mayo score), histologic activity (Geboes index) and biomarkers were evaluated. Results: From 38 patients, 34 (89.5%) completed W6 and 29 (76.3%) completed W16. Mean age (±SD) was 34.6 ± 12.6 years; 55.9% were female. At W16, 62.1% achieved clinical response. Patients with endoscopic activity at W6 ( n = 20) had higher baseline sST2 (median, 24.5 versus 18.7 ng/ml, p = 0.026) and no decrease from baseline (median change, 0.8 versus −2.7, p = 0.029). At W6, sST2 levels correlated with endoscopic activity ( rs = 0.45, p = 0.007) but not with histological activity ( rs = 0.25, p = 0.151). The best cut-offs for endoscopic activity were sST2 = 16.9 ng/ml (sensitivity = 85%; specificity = 71%) and faecal calprotectin (FC) = 353 μg/g (sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 67%). Patients with histological activity at W6 ( n = 27) had higher baseline ST2 levels (median, 23.0 versus 13.7 ng/ml, p = 0.035). sST2 did not correlate with FC or serum C-reactive protein. FC levels correlated with histological activity and baseline FC were higher when Geboes ⩾3.1 at W6. Conclusions: sST2 may be a surrogate biomarker of UC activity and therapeutic response as it correlates with endoscopic and clinical activity at W6 of golimumab treatment, and subjects with endoscopic and histological activity at W6 had higher baseline ST2 levels.

scholarly journals Correlation between Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin and Endoscopic, Histopathologic and Clinical Activities of Ulcerative Colitis

2020 ◽  
pp. 136-144
Author(s):  
Mohammed G. Flefel ◽  
Heba A. Mourad ◽  
Eiman A. Hasby ◽  
Sherif E. Ezzat ◽  
Waleed S. Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Liver And Kidney ◽  
Noninvasive Biomarkers ◽  
Neutrophil Gelatinase

Introduction: Detection of activity of ulcerative colitis (UC) is vital for predicting treatment outcome. The assessment depends on clinical, serologic, and endoscopic findings. One of the noninvasive biomarkers for disease activity detection is serum Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL). Aim: To assess the relationship between NGAL and endoscopic, histopathologic and clinical activity of UC. Methods: This study was conducted on 50 cases with definitive diagnosis of UC and 15 cases with normal colonoscopy examination as controls. UC cases were considered active if Geobes score was ≥3.1. Complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and liver and kidney function tests were done. Serum NGAL was estimated using ELISA technique. Results: UC cases were classified into active group (n = 36) and inactive group (n = 14). In active UC cases, median value (IQR) of serum NGAL was significantly increased (101.15 (67.53 – 156.40) ng/mL) compared to inactive cases (63.35 (60.98–65.20) ng/mL) and control group (24.80 (15.50 – 31.50) ng/mL). Serum NGAL was well correlated with Geobes score, Mayo score, CRP and ESR. Serum NGAL at cut-off ≥ 63 can predict activity with sensitivity 88.89%, specificity 85.71%, PPV 94.12% and NPV 75%. Conclusion: Serum NGAL is valuable noninvasive marker for assessment of UC disease activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document