scholarly journals P540 Real-world evidence on treatment switching in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review of literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S511-S512
Author(s):  
H Singh ◽  
L Wilson ◽  
A Pandey ◽  
T Tencer ◽  
J Kumar

Abstract Background Current approved therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) have well-established efficacy; however, some patients may fail to respond or may lose their response over time, resulting in dose escalation or treatment switching. The objective of this systematic literature review was to summarize the real-world evidence on treatment switching in UC and the associated clinical, safety and economic outcomes. Methods A literature search of Embase and MEDLINE (from database inception to August 2020) and conference proceedings (2017 to 2020) was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The population of interest included adult patients (≥18 years) with UC who experienced treatment switching on anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha agents (anti- TNFα) - (adalimumab [ADA], infliximab [IFX], golimumab [GOL]), vedolizumab (VDZ), tofacitinib (TOFA), and ustekinumab (USTE). Outcomes of interest included all available clinical, safety and economic outcomes. Results Of a total 1593 studies screened, 29 met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 22 (76%) reported switching rates of 4–63% (sample size: 4-1274). A total of 7 studies reported outcomes in populations comprised entirely of switched patients (sample size: 5–76). Figure 1 includes the directed connectivity graph showing the number of studies reporting different switches. IFX to ADA was the most frequently reported switch (n=11 studies;35%). Figure 2 and Table 1 include the number of studies and proportion of patients reporting outcomes following a treatment switch, respectively. Heterogeneity was observed in patient populations, follow-up, and definitions of response/remission. In the short term (4–12 weeks), remission rates of 10–38% have been reported that increased to 49–100% in the long-term (24–57 weeks). In contrast, the clinical response rates decreased over time (30–58% over 4–12 weeks versus 15–56% over 24–57 weeks). Colectomy and corticosteroid-free remission were reported in 0–35% and 18–79% of patients, respectively. Rate of adverse events varied from 13–38%, with a switch to IFX from other anti-TNFs associated with the highest rate. One study reported higher mean quarterly total healthcare costs in patients who switched within anti-TNFs (IFX>ADA, ADA>IFX) compared to those who did not ($15,004 vs $9632). Conclusion Treatment switching in the management of moderate-to-severe UC is common in routine clinical practice and is associated with suboptimal outcomes and potentially increased costs. There remains a need for additional treatment options that provide long-term durable disease control.

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199553
Author(s):  
Joshua Richter ◽  
Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi ◽  
Jason Yeaw ◽  
Suneel Kudaravalli ◽  
Stojan Zavisic ◽  
...  

Introduction Real-world evidence on later line treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is sparse. We evaluated clinical outcomes among RRMM patients in the 1-year following treatment with pomalidomide or daratumumab and compared economic outcomes between RRMM patients and non-MM patients. Patient and Methods Adult patients with ≥1 claim of pomalidomide or daratumumab were identified between January 2012 and February 2018 using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus US claims database. Patients were required to have a diagnosis or treatment for MM and a claim of any immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors before the index date. Mean time to new therapy, overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier curve and adverse events (AEs) were reported over the 1-year post-index period. RRMM patients were also matched to a non-MM comparator cohort and economic outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Results 289 RRMM patients were matched to 1,445 patients without MM. Most prevalent hematological AE was anemia (72.0%) and non-hematological AE was infections (75.4%). Mean (SD) time to a new treatment was 4.7 (5.3) months and median OS was 14.6 months. RRMM patients had significantly higher hospitalizations and physician office visits (Both P < .0001) compared to non-MM patients. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with RRMM had 4.9 times (95% CI 3.8-6.4, P < .0001) the total healthcare costs compared with patients without MM. The major driver of total costs among RRMM patients was pharmacy costs (67.3%). Conclusion RRMM patients showed a high frequency of AEs, low OS, and a substantial economic burden suggesting need for effective treatment options.


Author(s):  
Sara Santos ◽  
Verónica Gamelas ◽  
Rita Saraiva ◽  
Guilherme Simões ◽  
Joana Saiote ◽  
...  

Tofacitinib has emerged as a new option for ulcerative colitis. Its rapid absorption, metabolism, and clinical improvement make it an interesting option for rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), a situation with limited therapeutic options in patients with a long-term disease course and multiple drug failure. The management of ASUC in this setting becomes challenging, underlying the need for new drugs and data on their efficacy and safety. We describe 2 cases of acute episodes in which tofacitinib was used as a rescue therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Olivera ◽  
Silvio Danese ◽  
Lieven Pouillon ◽  
Stefanos Bonovas ◽  
Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet

Author(s):  
Benedikt Fritzsching ◽  
Marco Contoli ◽  
Celeste Porsbjerg ◽  
Sarah Buchs ◽  
Julie Rask Larsen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document