scholarly journals P298. Comparison of the familial and sporadic cases of inflammatory bowel diseases in long-term follow-up regarding step-up treatment, clinical, and biochemical parameters

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S242.3-S243
2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S995
Author(s):  
Francesca Padovese ◽  
Maria Grazia Vettorato ◽  
Greta Lorenzon ◽  
Francesco Cavallin ◽  
Ottavia Bartolo ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Yamile Zabana ◽  
Ignacio Marín-Jiménez ◽  
Iago Rodríguez-Lago ◽  
Isabel Vera ◽  
María Dolores Martín-Arranz ◽  
...  

We aim to describe the incidence and source of contagion of COVID-19 in patients with IBD, as well as the risk factors for a severe course and long-term sequelae. This is a prospective observational study of IBD and COVID-19 included in the ENEIDA registry (53,682 from 73 centres) between March–July 2020 followed-up for 12 months. Results were compared with data of the general population (National Centre of Epidemiology and Catalonia). A total of 482 patients with COVID-19 were identified. Twenty-eight percent were infected in the work environment, and 48% were infected by intrafamilial transmission, despite having good adherence to lockdown. Thirty-five percent required hospitalization, 7.9% had severe COVID-19 and 3.7% died. Similar data were reported in the general population (hospitalisation 19.5%, ICU 2.1% and mortality 4.6%). Factors related to death and severe COVID-19 were being aged ≥ 60 years (OR 7.1, 95% CI: 1.8–27 and 4.5, 95% CI: 1.3–15.9), while having ≥2 comorbidities increased mortality (OR 3.9, 95% CI: 1.3–11.6). None of the drugs for IBD were related to severe COVID-19. Immunosuppression was definitively stopped in 1% of patients at 12 months. The prognosis of COVID-19 in IBD, even in immunosuppressed patients, is similar to that in the general population. Thus, there is no need for more strict protection measures in IBD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S299-S301
Author(s):  
C Le Berre ◽  
A Bourreille ◽  
M Flamant ◽  
G Bouguen ◽  
L Siproudhis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are disabling disorders. The IBD-Disability Index (IBD-DI) was developed for quantifying disability in IBD patients but is difficult to use. The IBD-Disk is a shortened and visual adaptation of the IBD-DI. It has not been validated yet. The main objectives were to validate the IBD-Disk in a large cohort of IBD patients and to assess its variability over time. Methods From March 2018 to July 2019, IBD patients from three university-affiliated hospitals responded twice to both IBD-Disk and IBD-DI at 3–12 months intervals (NCT03590639). Validation included concurrent validity, reproducibility, internal consistency, and evaluation of IBD-Disk correlation with IBD activity. Variability was assessed by comparing scores between baseline and follow-up visits. Results A total of 559 patients (73% Crohn’s disease, 27% ulcerative colitis) were included and 389 were followed up (Table 1). There was a good correlation between IBD-Disk and IBD-DI scores (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) (Figure 1). The IBD-Disk was significantly higher in patients with active disease according to Physician/Patient Global Assessment (Figure 2), clinical scores (Figure 3), and biomarkers levels, compared with patients with inactive disease. Reproducibility was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.90), as well as internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.89). The IBD-Disk score significantly decreased in patients becoming inactive over time. Conclusion This is the first study to validate the IBD-Disk in a large cohort of IBD patients, demonstrating that it is a valid and reliable tool for quantifying disability in clinical practice. Further studies are warranted to assess its correlation with endoscopic activity, to explore its responsiveness to change, and to evaluate the factors associated with disability.


Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 3275-3283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Dupré ◽  
Michael Collins ◽  
Gaétane Nocturne ◽  
Franck Carbonnel ◽  
Xavier Mariette ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Vedolizumab (VDZ) has been incriminated in the occurrence of articular manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). The aim of this study was to describe musculoskeletal manifestations occurring in IBD patients treated by VDZ and to identify risk factors. Methods In this retrospective monocentric study, we included all consecutive patients treated by VDZ for IBD in our hospital. Incident musculoskeletal manifestations occurring during VDZ treatment were analysed and characteristics of patients with and without articular inflammatory manifestations were compared. Results Between 2013 and 2017, 112 patients were treated with VDZ for IBD: ulcerative colitis (n = 59), Crohn’s disease (n = 49) and undetermined colitis (n = 4). Four patients (3.6%) had a history of SpA, whereas 13 (11.6%) had a history of peripheral arthralgia. Some 102 (91.1%) patients had previously received anti-TNF. After a mean (S.d.) follow-up of 11.4 (8.6) months, 32 (28.6%) patients presented 35 musculoskeletal manifestations, of which 18 were mechanical and 17 inflammatory. Among the latter, 11 had axial or peripheral SpA, 5 had early reversible arthralgia and 1 had chondrocalcinosis (n = 1). Among the 11 SpA patients, only 3 (2.6%) had inactive IBD and may be considered as paradoxical SpA. The only factor associated with occurrence of inflammatory manifestations was history of inflammatory articular manifestation [7/16 (43.8%) vs 10/80 (12.5%), P = 0.007]. Conclusion Musculoskeletal manifestations occurred in almost 30% of IBD patients treated with VDZ, but only half of them were inflammatory. Since most of the patients previously received anti-TNF, occurrence of inflammatory articular manifestations might rather be linked to anti-TNF discontinuation than to VDZ itself.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S342-S342
Author(s):  
S Mazza ◽  
A Fascì ◽  
V Casini ◽  
C Ricci ◽  
F Munari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since infliximab (IFX) patent expiry in 2015, several IFX biosimilars have been licensed in EU for all indications, including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). IFX biosimilars currently available in Italy include CT-P13 and SB2, both of which demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety and immunogenicity with IFX originator in IBD patients. Safety and clinical efficacy of single switch from originator IFX to CT-P13 have also been confirmed in a prospective clinical trial. On the contrary, data regarding multiple therapeutic switching of IFX originator with CT-P13 and SB2 are currently lacking. Methods This study was aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of double switch from IFX originator to CT-P13 and subsequently to SB2 in patients with IBD. From November 2018 to May 2019, patients undergoing IFX double switch in 8 Centres in Lombardy were retrospectively analysed. The overall rate of IFX discontinuation, incidence and type of adverse events (AE) and proportion of patients on clinical remission over time were recorded. Data were compared with a control group of 66 IBD patients single switched from IFX originator to CT-P13. Results Fifty-two double-switched IBD patients were enrolled (63% M, mean age 41 years, 75% Crohn’s disease, 25% ulcerative colitis). Main indications for IFX therapy were moderate to severe disease (50%) and steroid-dependent disease (25%). The overall 24- and 48-week IFX discontinuation rates following second switch (CTP13->SB2) were 2% (95% CI 0–6%) and 14% (95% CI 3–25%), respectively. During a median follow-up of 40 weeks (18–48), 4 patients (12%) experienced a total of 6 AE (2 cutaneous, 2 infectious, 1 articular and 1 immunological), leading to IFX discontinuation in 3 cases (6%). No infusion reactions were observed. At week 24 following second switch, 49 (94%) patients were in clinical remission, the remaining 3 patients not being in remission already at the time of second switch. Only one patient lost response after week 24, 48 (92%) of patients being in clinical remission at the end of follow-up. No differences in IFX discontinuation, AE and clinical remission rates were found between double-switched and single-switched patients. No clinical parameters were found to predict safety and efficacy outcomes. Conclusion The study supports both safety and efficacy of the double switch from IFX originator to CT-P13 and SB2 in patients with IBD, and demonstrates its non-inferiority to a single switch strategy, with potential cost implications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document