scholarly journals Can We Say No to the ‘Nocebo Effect’ in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases?

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1095-1096
Author(s):  
Lorant Gonczi ◽  
Peter L Lakatos
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdinando D’Amico ◽  
Virginia Solitano ◽  
Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet ◽  
Silvio Danese

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-301
Author(s):  
Richard H. Parrish

This commentary summarizes a collection of key references published within the last ten years, and identifies pharmacologic research directions to improve treatment access and success through greater biosimilar or “follow-on” biologic utilization combined with other targeted small molecule agents that possess unique pathophysiologic mechanisms for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in adult and pediatric patients. Since they are not identical to the originator or reference biologic agent, all biosimilars are not generically equivalent. However, in the US and other countries, they are considered therapeutically interchangeable if the manufacturer has demonstrated no clinically meaningful differences from the reference product. Comparisons of different clinical initiation and switching scenarios are discussed with reference to interchangeability, immunogenicity, nocebo effect, cost effectiveness, and time courses for discontinuation rates.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Enck ◽  
Sibylle Klosterhalfen

Placebo and nocebo responses are mostly discussed in clinical trials with functional bowel disorders. Much less has been investigated and is known in gastrointestinal diseases beyond irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), especially in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). For the purpose of this review, we screened the Journal of Interdisciplinary Placebo Studies (JIPS) database with approximately 4,500 genuine placebo research articles and identified nine meta-analyses covering more than 135 randomized and placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) with more than 10,000 patients with Crohn´s disease (CD) and another five meta-analyses with 150 RCTs and more than 10,000 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Only three discussed nocebo effects, especially in the context of clinical use of biosimilars to treat inflammation. The articles were critically analyzed with respect to the size of the placebo response in CD and UC, its effects on clinical improvement versus maintenance of remission, and mediators and moderators of the response identified. Finally, we discussed and compared the differences and similarities of the placebo responses in IBD and IBS and the nocebo effect in switching from biologics to biosimilars in IBD management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document