scholarly journals Prognostic impact of free-fat mass index on elderly patients with acute decompensated heart failure: from CURE-HF registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kanai ◽  
H Motoki ◽  
T Okano ◽  
K Kimura ◽  
M Minamisawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Fat Mass ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Fat Mass Index ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Free-Fat Mass Index (FFMI) is an indicator of malnutrition and sarcopenia. We hypothesized that low FFMI would be associated with worse prognosis in elderly patients with heart failure. Methods In 800 patients who discharged after treatment for HF were prospectively enrolled from 13 medical centers. Free-Fat Mass Index was calculated dividing the square of the patients heights in meters into lean body mass. All-cause mortality (cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular) was followed-up by telephone interview and chart review. Results In our study cohort (median age, 78 [range 72–87]), FFMI was 16.7 [15.2, 18.0]. All-cause mortality was observed in 211 patients during 631 [266, 983] days follow-up. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, lower FFMI was associated with all-cause mortality. Furthermore, FFMI was an independent predictor of mortality after adjustment for age, gender, albumin, hemoglobin, creatinine, brain natriuretic peptide, and left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 95% CI: 0.841 (0.745–0.944), p=0.004). In subgroup analysis, low FFMI was associated with both cardiac and non-cardiac mortality in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (Log-rank p=0.002, p=0.013, respectively) (Figure). Furthermore, low FFMI was significantly associated non-cardiac death in patients with preserved EF (Log-rank p=0.033) (Figure). Conclusions Free-Fat Mass Index was significantly associated with mortality in elderly patients with HF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

P3545Association between diastolic dysfunction and two-year survival in heart failure patients with mid-range or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Nordbeck ◽  
D Liu ◽  
K Hu ◽  
K Lau ◽  
T Kiwitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Extensive studies have demonstrated prognostic impact of echocardiographic defined diastolic dysfunction (DD) in patients with preserved as well as reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nevertheless, it remains controversial whether evaluation of DD could provide additional prognostic information in heart failure (HF) patients with impaired systolic function. The purpose of present study, therefore, is to investigate the prognostic impact of echocardiography-defined DD on survival in HF patients hospitalized in our centre from 2009 to 2017 with mid-range LVEF (HFmrEF, LVEF 41–49%) and reduced LVEF (HFrEF, LVEF<40%). Methods A total of 2018 patients with echocardiography-evidenced LVEF<50% and hospitalized in our centre between July 2009 to December 2017 were included. Baseline demographic and clinical data were obtained by reviewing the medical records. All patients subsequently completed a median clinical follow-up of 24 (IQR 13–36) months by medical record review or telephone interview. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality or heart transplantation (HTx). Patients were divided into mild, moderate and severe DD according to recent guidelines. Results The mean age was 69±13 years in the HFmrEF group and 68±13 years in the HFrEF group. All-cause mortality/HTx rate was significantly higher in the HFrEF (all-cause death n=318 and HTx n=11, 30.9%) group than in patients with HFmrEF (all-cause death n=235 and HTx n=2, 24.9%, P=0.003). All-cause mortality/HTx rate increased in proportion to DD severity in HFmrEF patients: 17.1% (54/315) in the mild DD group, 25.4% (115/452) in the moderate DD group, and 37.0% (68/184) in the severe DD group (P<0.001) and in HFrEF patients: 18.9% (43/228) in the mild DD group, 30.3% (146/482) in the moderate DD group, and 39.2% (140/357) in the severe DD group (P<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that Doppler parameter early-diastolic mitral inflow velocity to septal mitral annular velocity ratio (E/E') >14 (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06–1.89, P=0.020) and peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRVmax) >2.8m/s (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.33–2.29, P<0.001) were independent determinants of all-cause mortality/HTx in patients with HFmrEF; while E/E'>14 (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.08–2.04, P=0.015) remained as an independent determinant of all-cause mortality/HTx in patients with HFrEF after adjustment for clinical and other echocardiographic confounders. Besides DD-related parameters, after adjustment with age and sex, lower tricuspid and mitral annular plane systolic excursions (TAPSE and MAPSE) were also closely related to higher mortality/HTx rate in both HFmrEF and HFrEF patients. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves Conclusion Our results indicate that all-cause mortality/HTx rate increases in proportion to DD severity in both HFmrEF and HFrEF patients.

4181Prognosis of patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction treated with PCI: insight from the global leaders study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Chichareon ◽  
R Modolo ◽  
N Kogame ◽  
M Tomaniak ◽  
E Teiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Stent Thrombosis ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction between 40 to 49%) was introduced in the 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for heart failure. The prognosis of the mid-range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was less well assessed in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose We aimed to assess the 2-year outcomes of patients with mid-range ejection fraction (LVEF between 40 to 49%) after PCI compared with reduced LVEF (<40%) and preserved LVEF (≥50) in the GLOBAL LEADERS study. Methods The GLOBAL LEADERS study was a multicenter, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of two antiplatelet strategies in all-comers patients undergoing PCI with biolimus-A9 eluting stent. Patients with available information of LVEF were eligible in the present analysis. Patients were classified according to their LVEF into three groups; preserved (LVEF ≥50), mid-range (LVEF 40–49%) and reduced (LVEF <40%) left ventricular ejection fraction. Clinical outcomes at 2 years after PCI were compared among three groups in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. The primary outcome of present study was all-cause mortality at 2 years after PCI. The secondary outcomes were patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE). Individual components of the composite endpoint, definite or probable stent thrombosis and bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 were also reported. Results Out of 15968 patients included in the GLOBAL LEADERS study, information of LVEF was available in 15008 patients (93.99%); 12,128 patients (80.81%) were in the group of preserved LVEF, 1,737 patients (11.57%) were in the mid-range LVEF group and 1,143 patients (7.62%) were in the reduced LVEF group. The risk of all-cause mortality and POCE at 2 years were significantly different among the three groups. In an adjusted model, compared with the group of preserved LVEF, the hazard ratio for the all-cause mortality at 2 years rose from 1.89 (95% CI, 1.46–2.45) to 3.72 (95% CI, 2.95–4.70) in the group of mid-range and reduced LVEF respectively. Similar rises were observed for the POCE at 2 years from 1.27 (95% CI, 1.11–1.44) in the group of mid-range LVEF to 1.63 (95% CI, 1.42–1.87) in the group of reduced LVEF. The risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and definite or probable stent thrombosis in patients with mid-range LVEF was not different from patients with reduced LVEF (see figure). A similar risk of revascularization was observed among the three groups. Outcomes among three LVEF categories Conclusion Patients with mid-range LVEF undergoing PCI had a different prognosis from patients with reduced LVEF and preserved LVEF in term of survival and composite ischemic endpoints at 2 years.

Abstract 14471: Prognostic Impact of Sarcopenia in Men versus Women With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanari Kimura ◽  
Shungo Hikoso ◽  
Nakatani Daisaku ◽  
Shunsuke Tamaki ◽  
Masamichi Yano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study

Background: Sarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis in chronic heart failure. Fat-free mass index (FFMI) is an indicator of resting energy expenditure and has been used for the clinical diagnosis of sarcopenia. However, the prognostic impact of sarcopenia diagnosed by FFMI remains to be elucidated in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and preserved LVEF (HFpEF), relating to gender. Methods: Patients' data were extracted from The Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT-HFpEF) study, which is a prospective multicenter observational registry for ADHF patients with LVEF ≥50% in Osaka. We studied 621 patients who survived to discharge (men, n=281 and women, n=340). Fat-free mass (FFM) was estimated by the formula [FFM (kg) = 7.38 + 0.02908 х urinary creatinine (mg/day)] and normalized by the square of the patient’s height in meters to calculate FFMI at discharge. Sarcopenia was defined as FFMI <17 kg/m2 in men and <15 kg/m2 in women. The endpoint was all-cause death. Results: During a follow-up period of 1.5±0.8 yrs, 102 patients died (men, n=46 and women, n=56). At multivariate Cox analysis, FFMI was significantly associated with the mortality independently of age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, NT-proBNP and LVEF in both men (p=0.0155) and women (p=0.0223). Patients with sarcopenia had a significantly higher risk of all-cause death than those without sarcopenia in both genders (Figure). Conclusions: In this multicenter study, sarcopenia diagnosed by FFMI was shown to be associated with poor clinical outcome in HFpEF patients admitted with ADHF in both genders.

scholarly journals Prognostic impacts of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e001112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiomi Yoshihisa ◽  
Yu Sato ◽  
Yuki Kanno ◽  
Mai Takiguchi ◽  
Tetsuro Yokokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Event ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

BackgroundIt has been reported that recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with better prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced EF (rEF). However, change of LVEF has not yet been investigated in cases of HF with preserved EF (HFpEF).Methods and resultsConsecutive 1082 HFpEF patients, who had been admitted to hospital due to decompensated HF (EF >50% at the first LVEF assessment at discharge), were enrolled, and LVEF was reassessed within 6 months in the outpatient setting (second LVEF assessment). Among the HFpEF patients, LVEF of 758 patients remained above 50% (pEF group), 138 patients had LVEF of 40%–49% (midrange EF, mrEF group) and 186 patients had LVEF of less than 40% (rEF group). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, younger age and presence of higher levels of troponin I were predictors of rEF (worsened HFpEF). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cardiac event rate of the groups progressively increased from pEF, mrEF to rEF (log-rank, p<0.001), whereas all-cause mortality did not significantly differ among the groups. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, rEF (vs pEF) was not a predictor of all-cause mortality, but an independent predictor of increased cardiac event rates (HR 1.424, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.861, p=0.039).ConclusionAn initial assessment of LVEF and LVEF changes are important for deciding treatment and predicting prognosis in HFpEF patients. In addition, several confounding factors are associated with LVEF changes in worsened HFpEF patients.

The prognostic impact of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation after heart failure hospitalization on long-term mortality – Propensity-score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Iwanami ◽  
K Jujo ◽  
S Higuchi ◽  
T Abe ◽  
M Shoda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background In the last two decades, catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been developed as a standard and effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFrEF), PVI CA for AF dramatically improves LVEF, resulting in better clinical prognoses. On the contrary, there still has been no data that PVI CA for AF improves the prognosis in heart failure patients with preserved LVEF (HFpEF). Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of PVI CA for AF after the hospitalization due to decompensation of heart failureHF, focusing on LVEF. Methods From the database including 1,793 consecutive patients who were hospitalized due to congestive HF, we ultimately analyzed 624 AF patients who were discharged alive. They were assigned into two groups due that PVI CA for AF procedure done after the index hospitalization for HF; the PVI CA group (n=62) and Non-PVI CA group (n=562). For the two groups, we performed propensity-score (PS) matching using variables as follows: age, sex, LVEF, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at discharge. Further analysis was performed separately in HFrEF (LVEF &lt;50%) and HFpEF (LVEF &gt;50%). The primary endpoint of this study was death from any cause. Results In unmatched patients, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the PVI CA group had a significantly lower all-cause mortality than those in the Non-PVI CA group during 678 median follow-up period (Log-rank test: P=0.003, Figure A). In 96 PS-matched patients, patients in the PVI CA group still had lower mortality rate than those in the Non-PVI CA group (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.09–0.86, p=0.018, Figure B). When the whole study population was classified into HFrEF and HFpEF, HFrEF patients who received PVI showed a significantly lower mortality than those who did not (p=0.007); whereas, in HFpEF patients, PVI CA for AF did not make statistical difference in all-cause mortality (p=0.061). Conclusions In this observational study, PVI CA for AF may improve the mortality in HF patients with reduced LVEF. However, the prognostic impact of PVI CA for AF was not observed in HF patients with preserved LVEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals The subclinical hypothyroid state might predict 30-day readmission in patients admitted with acute heart failure syndrome and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175394472097774
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saad ◽  
Andrisael Garcia Lacoste ◽  
Pooja Balar ◽  
Aiyi Zhang ◽  
Timothy J. Vittorio
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: Thyroid hormone (TH) has an essential role on the functional capability of cardiac muscle with its gene modulation and induction of vasodilatory effects. There is considerable evidence to suggest the role of TH in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but less is known about its prognostic role in heart failure (HF) patients. We aim to evaluate the association between subclinical hypothyroid state (SCHS) and event rates including 30-day all-cause and HF readmission in patients with an index hospitalization for acute HF syndrome (AHFS). Methodology: A retrospective chart review analysis of 2335 patients admitted with the diagnosis of AHFS between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017 was conducted. SCHS was defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level >4.50 mIU/L with a normal thyroxine (T4) level. Patients with pre-existing thyroid disease or receiving thyroid replacement therapy were excluded. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was defined as having LVEF ⩽40%. Percentage of 30-day, 3-month and 6-month all-cause readmission and mortality rates were calculated in both cohorts of AHFS (HFpEF and HFrEF) with and without SCHS. Results: The mean age of the 2335 AHFS population was 65 (±14.8) years. Of the 2335 patients admitted with AHFS, 1228 (52.6%) patients were found to have HFrEF and 1107 (47.4%) with HFpEF. There were 170 (7.3%) patients with AHFS found to have SCHS. There were more males than females (54% versus 46%). The percentage of hospital readmission within 30 days was higher for patients with SCHS compared with those without SCHS in the HFrEF group (42% versus 30%, p = 0.001). Hospital readmission within 30 days for patients with SCHS compared with those without SCHS in the HFpEF group did not differ (36.5% versus 31%, p = 0.47). Additionally, all-cause mortality was higher among patients with SCHS compared with patients without SCHS in the HFrEF group (18.7% versus 7.0%, p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was found similar in both arms of the HFpEF group (9.5% versus 7.7%, p = 0.73). Conclusion: During an index hospital admission for AHFS, SCHS was an independent predictor of readmission in 30 days in patients with HFrEF but not in patients with HFpEF. Additionally, it was related to adverse outcome such as all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients but not in HFpEF patients. Further studies regarding the concept of tissue thyroid and the potential for a therapeutic target are warranted.

Leg flow-mediated arterial dilation in elderly patients with heart failure and normal left ventricular ejection fraction

2007 ◽  
Vol 292 (3) ◽  
pp. H1427-H1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Gregory Hundley ◽  
Ersin Bayram ◽  
Craig A. Hamilton ◽  
Eric A. Hamilton ◽  
Timothy M. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Normal Left Ventricular ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Background: flow-mediated arterial dilation (FMAD), an indicator of endothelial function, is reduced in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFREF). Many elderly patients with heart failure exhibit a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (HFNEF). It is unknown whether FMAD is severely reduced in the elderly with HFNEF. Methods and Results: 30 participants >60 yr of age, 11 healthy, 9 with HFNEF, and 10 with HFREF, underwent a cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of FMAD in the superficial femoral artery followed within 48 h by symptom-limited exercise with expired gas analysis. Elderly patients with HFREF and HFNEF had severely reduced peak oxygen consumption (V̇o2 peak; 12 ± 2 and 13 ± 1 ml·kg−1·min−1, respectively) vs. their healthy age-matched contemporaries (20 ± 3 ml·kg−1·min−1). FMAD was 3.8 ± 1.3% (0.85 ± 0.22 mm2) in patients with HFREF; it was 12.1 ± 3.6% (3.1 ± 1.2 mm2) and 13.7 ± 5.9% (3.9 ± 1.7 mm2), respectively, in patients with HFNEF and age-matched healthy older individuals. After adjustment for age and gender, the association of FMAD with V̇o2 was high in healthy and HFREF subjects ( P = 0.05 and 0.02, respectively) but less so in HFNEF participants ( P = 0.58). Conclusions: elderly patients with HFNEF do not exhibit marked reduction in leg FMAD. These data suggest that mechanisms other than impaired femoral arterial endothelial function contribute to the severe exercise intolerance experienced by these individuals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document