scholarly journals The subclinical hypothyroid state might predict 30-day readmission in patients admitted with acute heart failure syndrome and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175394472097774
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saad ◽  
Andrisael Garcia Lacoste ◽  
Pooja Balar ◽  
Aiyi Zhang ◽  
Timothy J. Vittorio
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: Thyroid hormone (TH) has an essential role on the functional capability of cardiac muscle with its gene modulation and induction of vasodilatory effects. There is considerable evidence to suggest the role of TH in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but less is known about its prognostic role in heart failure (HF) patients. We aim to evaluate the association between subclinical hypothyroid state (SCHS) and event rates including 30-day all-cause and HF readmission in patients with an index hospitalization for acute HF syndrome (AHFS). Methodology: A retrospective chart review analysis of 2335 patients admitted with the diagnosis of AHFS between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017 was conducted. SCHS was defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level >4.50 mIU/L with a normal thyroxine (T4) level. Patients with pre-existing thyroid disease or receiving thyroid replacement therapy were excluded. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was defined as having LVEF ⩽40%. Percentage of 30-day, 3-month and 6-month all-cause readmission and mortality rates were calculated in both cohorts of AHFS (HFpEF and HFrEF) with and without SCHS. Results: The mean age of the 2335 AHFS population was 65 (±14.8) years. Of the 2335 patients admitted with AHFS, 1228 (52.6%) patients were found to have HFrEF and 1107 (47.4%) with HFpEF. There were 170 (7.3%) patients with AHFS found to have SCHS. There were more males than females (54% versus 46%). The percentage of hospital readmission within 30 days was higher for patients with SCHS compared with those without SCHS in the HFrEF group (42% versus 30%, p = 0.001). Hospital readmission within 30 days for patients with SCHS compared with those without SCHS in the HFpEF group did not differ (36.5% versus 31%, p = 0.47). Additionally, all-cause mortality was higher among patients with SCHS compared with patients without SCHS in the HFrEF group (18.7% versus 7.0%, p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was found similar in both arms of the HFpEF group (9.5% versus 7.7%, p = 0.73). Conclusion: During an index hospital admission for AHFS, SCHS was an independent predictor of readmission in 30 days in patients with HFrEF but not in patients with HFpEF. Additionally, it was related to adverse outcome such as all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients but not in HFpEF patients. Further studies regarding the concept of tissue thyroid and the potential for a therapeutic target are warranted.

4181Prognosis of patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction treated with PCI: insight from the global leaders study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Chichareon ◽  
R Modolo ◽  
N Kogame ◽  
M Tomaniak ◽  
E Teiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Stent Thrombosis ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction between 40 to 49%) was introduced in the 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for heart failure. The prognosis of the mid-range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was less well assessed in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose We aimed to assess the 2-year outcomes of patients with mid-range ejection fraction (LVEF between 40 to 49%) after PCI compared with reduced LVEF (<40%) and preserved LVEF (≥50) in the GLOBAL LEADERS study. Methods The GLOBAL LEADERS study was a multicenter, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of two antiplatelet strategies in all-comers patients undergoing PCI with biolimus-A9 eluting stent. Patients with available information of LVEF were eligible in the present analysis. Patients were classified according to their LVEF into three groups; preserved (LVEF ≥50), mid-range (LVEF 40–49%) and reduced (LVEF <40%) left ventricular ejection fraction. Clinical outcomes at 2 years after PCI were compared among three groups in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. The primary outcome of present study was all-cause mortality at 2 years after PCI. The secondary outcomes were patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE). Individual components of the composite endpoint, definite or probable stent thrombosis and bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 were also reported. Results Out of 15968 patients included in the GLOBAL LEADERS study, information of LVEF was available in 15008 patients (93.99%); 12,128 patients (80.81%) were in the group of preserved LVEF, 1,737 patients (11.57%) were in the mid-range LVEF group and 1,143 patients (7.62%) were in the reduced LVEF group. The risk of all-cause mortality and POCE at 2 years were significantly different among the three groups. In an adjusted model, compared with the group of preserved LVEF, the hazard ratio for the all-cause mortality at 2 years rose from 1.89 (95% CI, 1.46–2.45) to 3.72 (95% CI, 2.95–4.70) in the group of mid-range and reduced LVEF respectively. Similar rises were observed for the POCE at 2 years from 1.27 (95% CI, 1.11–1.44) in the group of mid-range LVEF to 1.63 (95% CI, 1.42–1.87) in the group of reduced LVEF. The risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and definite or probable stent thrombosis in patients with mid-range LVEF was not different from patients with reduced LVEF (see figure). A similar risk of revascularization was observed among the three groups. Outcomes among three LVEF categories Conclusion Patients with mid-range LVEF undergoing PCI had a different prognosis from patients with reduced LVEF and preserved LVEF in term of survival and composite ischemic endpoints at 2 years.

scholarly journals Prognostic impacts of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e001112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiomi Yoshihisa ◽  
Yu Sato ◽  
Yuki Kanno ◽  
Mai Takiguchi ◽  
Tetsuro Yokokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Event ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

BackgroundIt has been reported that recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with better prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced EF (rEF). However, change of LVEF has not yet been investigated in cases of HF with preserved EF (HFpEF).Methods and resultsConsecutive 1082 HFpEF patients, who had been admitted to hospital due to decompensated HF (EF >50% at the first LVEF assessment at discharge), were enrolled, and LVEF was reassessed within 6 months in the outpatient setting (second LVEF assessment). Among the HFpEF patients, LVEF of 758 patients remained above 50% (pEF group), 138 patients had LVEF of 40%–49% (midrange EF, mrEF group) and 186 patients had LVEF of less than 40% (rEF group). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, younger age and presence of higher levels of troponin I were predictors of rEF (worsened HFpEF). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cardiac event rate of the groups progressively increased from pEF, mrEF to rEF (log-rank, p<0.001), whereas all-cause mortality did not significantly differ among the groups. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, rEF (vs pEF) was not a predictor of all-cause mortality, but an independent predictor of increased cardiac event rates (HR 1.424, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.861, p=0.039).ConclusionAn initial assessment of LVEF and LVEF changes are important for deciding treatment and predicting prognosis in HFpEF patients. In addition, several confounding factors are associated with LVEF changes in worsened HFpEF patients.

scholarly journals The Female Sex Confers Different Prognosis in Heart Failure: Same Mortality but More Readmissions

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel López-Vilella ◽  
Elena Marqués-Sulé ◽  
Rocío del Pilar Laymito Quispe ◽  
Ignacio Sánchez-Lázaro ◽  
Víctor Donoso Trenado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Blood Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Female Sex

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbimortality both in men and women. Differences between sex in etiopathogenesis, response to treatment, and quality of care have been found in patients with HF. Females are usually under-represented in clinical trials and there is no solid evidence demonstrating the influence of sex in the prognostic of chronic HF. The primary objective of this study was to analyse the differences in mortality and probability of hospital readmission between males and females with HF. The secondary objective was to compare mortality and probability of hospital readmission by ejection fraction (reduced vs. preserved).Methods: Patients with decompensated HF that were consecutively admitted to a Cardiology Service of a tertiary hospital for 4 years were recruited. De novo HF, death during hospitalization, programmed admissions and those patients with moderate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (40–50%) were discarded. Finally, 1,291 patients were included. Clinical profiles, clinical history, functional status, treatment at admission, first blood analysis performed, readmissions and mortality at follow-up were analyzed and compared. All patients underwent an echocardiographic study at admission. HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was considered when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was &lt;40%, whilst HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was considered when LVEF was ≥50%.Results: 716 participants were male (55%). Basal characteristics showed differences in some outcomes. No differences were found in probability of survival among patients with decompensated HF by sex and ejection fraction (p = 0.25), whereas there was a clear tend to a major survival in females with HFrEF (p &lt; 0.1). Females presented more readmissions when compared to males, independently from the LVEF (females = 33.5% vs. males = 26.8%; p = 0.009). Adjusted multivariate analysis showed no association between sex and mortality (HR = 0.97, IC 95% = 0.73–1.30, p = 0.86), although there was association between female sex and probability of readmission (OR = 1.37, IC 95% = 1.04–1.82, p = 0.02).Conclusions: Sex does not influence mid-term mortality in patients admitted for decompensated HF. Nevertheless, probability of readmission is higher in females independently from LVEF. Thus, it should be considered whether healthcare may be different depending on sex, and a more personalized and frequent care may be recommended in females.

Abstract 16085: Digoxin is Associated With Increased Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Without Concomitant Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Tysarowski ◽  
Nigri Rafael ◽  
Hyoeun Kim ◽  
Emad Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: There is conflicting data on the effect of digoxin on all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in patients with heart failure (HF). Hypothesis: We hypothesized that in patients with AF, mortality rates associated with digoxin treatment are different among patients with HF and without HF. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of hospitalized patients with AF assessing the effects of digoxin on all-cause mortality. We divided patients into two groups: with and without HF. We performed Cox regression analysis to assess hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality depending on digoxin treatment and used propensity score matching to adjust for differences in background characteristics between treatment groups. Results: Among 2179 consecutive patients, the median age was 73 ± 14 (table), 53% patient were male, 49% had HF, 19% were discharged on digoxin. Median left ventricular ejection fraction in the cohort was 60 (IQR 40-65). Among patients with HF, 35% had preserved, 18% had mid-range and 48% had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The mean follow-up time was 3 ± 2.1 years. After adjustment, in patients with HF, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the digoxin subgroups ( A , HR=1.01 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.35], p=0.92). In contrast, after adjustment, in patients without HF there was a statistically significant increased mortality in the digoxin subgroup ( B , HR=2.23, [95% CI 1.42 to 3.51], p<0.001). Conclusions: Digoxin use was associated with increased mortality in patients with AF and without concomitant HF. This suggests that clinicians should be careful in prescribing digoxin for rate control in AF, especially in patients without concomitant HF.

scholarly journals Heart Failure With Midrange Ejection Fraction: Prior Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Prognosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinxin Zhang ◽  
Yuxi Sun ◽  
Yanli Zhang ◽  
Feifei Chen ◽  
Shuyuan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Aims: Evidence-based guidelines for heart failure management depend mainly on current left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, fewer studies have examined the impact of prior LVEF. Patients may enter the heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) category when heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) deteriorates or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) improves. In this study, we examined the association between change in LVEF and adverse outcomes.Methods: HFmrEF patients with at least two or more echocardiograms 3 months apart at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University between September 1, 2015 and November 30, 2019 were identified. According to the prior LVEF, the subjects were divided into improved group (prior LVEF &lt; 40%), stable group (prior LVEF between 40 and 50%), and deteriorated group (prior LVEF ≥ 50%). The primary outcomes were cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and composite event of all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization.Results: A total of 1,168 HFmrEF patients (67.04% male, mean age 63.60 ± 12.18 years) were included. The percentages of improved, stable, and deteriorated group were 310 (26.54%), 334 (28.60%), and 524 (44.86%), respectively. After a period of follow-up, 208 patients (17.81%) died and 500 patients met the composite endpoint. The rates of all-cause mortality were 35 (11.29%), 55 (16.47%), and 118 (22.52%), and the composite outcome was 102 (32.90%), 145 (43.41%), and 253 (48.28%) for the improved, stable, and deteriorated groups, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that the deterioration group had higher risk of cardiovascular death (HR: 1.707, 95% CI: 1.064–2.739, P = 0.027), all-cause death (HR 1.948, 95% CI 1.335–2.840, P = 0.001), and composite outcome (HR 1.379, 95% CI 1.096–1.736, P = 0.006) compared to the improvement group. The association still remained significant after fully adjusted for both all-cause mortality (HR = 1.899, 95% CI 1.247–2.893, P = 0.003) and composite outcome (HR: 1.324, 95% CI: 1.020–1.718, P = 0.035).Conclusion: HFmrEF patients are heterogeneous with three different subsets identified, each with different outcomes. Strategies for managing HFmrEF should include previously measured LVEF to allow stratification based on direction changes in LVEF to better optimize treatment.

P4510Impact of secondary tricuspid regurgitation on survival in heart failure - insights from COMMIT-HF registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Nowak ◽  
L Pyka ◽  
M Kurdziel ◽  
L Siedlecki ◽  
J Niedziela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Tricuspid Regurgitation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Valvular Diseases

Abstract Background Functional tricuspid regurgitation (fTR) is common in left sided heart disease, especially in patients with concomitant left-sided valvular diseases and can lead to functional impairment and reduced survival. However, the impact of fTR on survival in chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) without severe left valvular diseases (LVD) is not fully established. The aim of the present study was to observe if moderate to severe fTR may influence the survival in patients with HFrEF without severe LVD. Methods We have analyzed a large single-center registry (n=2731) of HFrEF patients treated in a large-volume cardiovascular center between 2009–2015. After exclusion of patients with severe aortic and mitral valve disease we have included 2435 patients with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%). Functional moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation without severe left valvular diseases was present in 465 patients. Twelve -month vital status was available for the whole patient population. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed to evaluate the relationship between moderate to severe fTR and mortality in the study group. Results Comparison of clinical data of fTR and non-fTR in HFrEF patients revealed some significant differences (age 63.3±12.9 vs 61.3±12.4, p=0.002; female sex 25.8% vs 17,9%, p<0.001; chronic kidney disease stage III-V 45.3 vs 26.6%, p=0.001; atrial fibrillation 52.4% vs 28.5%, p<0.001). Twelve-month all-cause mortality was over 2-fold higher in the fTR group (21.2% vs 8.1%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences with regard to the medical treatment, implantable defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy. The presence of fTR was identified as an independent echocardiographic factor impaired 12-month all-cause survival (HR 1.59, CI 1.2- 2.09, p<0.001, figure 1) Conclusion Apart from the LVEF, the presence of moderate to severe fTR may predict 12-month all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Acknowledgement/Funding None

P3545Association between diastolic dysfunction and two-year survival in heart failure patients with mid-range or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Nordbeck ◽  
D Liu ◽  
K Hu ◽  
K Lau ◽  
T Kiwitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Extensive studies have demonstrated prognostic impact of echocardiographic defined diastolic dysfunction (DD) in patients with preserved as well as reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nevertheless, it remains controversial whether evaluation of DD could provide additional prognostic information in heart failure (HF) patients with impaired systolic function. The purpose of present study, therefore, is to investigate the prognostic impact of echocardiography-defined DD on survival in HF patients hospitalized in our centre from 2009 to 2017 with mid-range LVEF (HFmrEF, LVEF 41–49%) and reduced LVEF (HFrEF, LVEF<40%). Methods A total of 2018 patients with echocardiography-evidenced LVEF<50% and hospitalized in our centre between July 2009 to December 2017 were included. Baseline demographic and clinical data were obtained by reviewing the medical records. All patients subsequently completed a median clinical follow-up of 24 (IQR 13–36) months by medical record review or telephone interview. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality or heart transplantation (HTx). Patients were divided into mild, moderate and severe DD according to recent guidelines. Results The mean age was 69±13 years in the HFmrEF group and 68±13 years in the HFrEF group. All-cause mortality/HTx rate was significantly higher in the HFrEF (all-cause death n=318 and HTx n=11, 30.9%) group than in patients with HFmrEF (all-cause death n=235 and HTx n=2, 24.9%, P=0.003). All-cause mortality/HTx rate increased in proportion to DD severity in HFmrEF patients: 17.1% (54/315) in the mild DD group, 25.4% (115/452) in the moderate DD group, and 37.0% (68/184) in the severe DD group (P<0.001) and in HFrEF patients: 18.9% (43/228) in the mild DD group, 30.3% (146/482) in the moderate DD group, and 39.2% (140/357) in the severe DD group (P<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that Doppler parameter early-diastolic mitral inflow velocity to septal mitral annular velocity ratio (E/E') >14 (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06–1.89, P=0.020) and peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRVmax) >2.8m/s (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.33–2.29, P<0.001) were independent determinants of all-cause mortality/HTx in patients with HFmrEF; while E/E'>14 (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.08–2.04, P=0.015) remained as an independent determinant of all-cause mortality/HTx in patients with HFrEF after adjustment for clinical and other echocardiographic confounders. Besides DD-related parameters, after adjustment with age and sex, lower tricuspid and mitral annular plane systolic excursions (TAPSE and MAPSE) were also closely related to higher mortality/HTx rate in both HFmrEF and HFrEF patients. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves Conclusion Our results indicate that all-cause mortality/HTx rate increases in proportion to DD severity in both HFmrEF and HFrEF patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document