scholarly journals Anticoagulation and outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Angleitner ◽  
M Zinggl ◽  
P Werner ◽  
I Coti ◽  
M Mach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Logistic Euroscore ◽  
Biological Prosthesis ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Abstract Background No strong recommendation exists regarding the use of short-term anticoagulation after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a biological prosthesis. Purpose Our aim was to analyze outcomes of patients receiving warfarin versus low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) after isolated SAVR. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all adult patients who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2017 at our department (n=598). Exclusion criteria included pre-operative anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, dialysis, previous aortic valve replacement, or active endocarditis. Patients who were discharged alive were stratified according to the type of anticoagulation (warfarin, n=332, 55.5%; LMWH, n=266, 44.5%). Long-term survival during the follow-up period was analyzed (median follow-up, 5.6 years). Results Patients who received warfarin had significantly lower logistic EuroSCORE and were younger (Table 1). Warfarin was more frequently utilized between 2009 and 2014, whereas LMWH was more commonly used between 2015 and 2017. Kaplan-Meier curves in Figure 1 show that patients who received warfarin had significantly superior long-term survival (log-rank test: p=0.002). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed that the use of warfarin was associated with significantly lower risk of long-term mortality when compared with LMWH (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.74, p=0.001). Covariables in this model included logistic EuroSCORE, era, and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass. Conclusions The present analysis suggests that the use of warfarin is associated with significantly superior survival after SAVR with a biological prosthesis. Our findings require validation in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Predictive factors of long-term survival in the octogenarian undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement: 12-year single-centre follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1798-1805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giangiuseppe Cappabianca ◽  
Sandro Ferrarese ◽  
Andrea Musazzi ◽  
Francesco Terrieri ◽  
Claudio Corazzari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Abstract 15741: Long Term Survival Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Single US High Volume Center

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo O Escarcega ◽  
Rebecca Torguson ◽  
Marco A Magalhaes ◽  
Nevin C Baker ◽  
Sa’ar Minha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Introduction: Mortality following Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been reported up to 5 years. However, mortality after 5 years remains unclear. Hypothesis: We aim to determine the mortality in patients undergoing TAVR >5 years follow up. Methods: From our institution’s prospectively collected TAVR database we analyzed all patients undergoing TAVR to a maximum follow up of 8 years. We divided our population into transapical TAVR (TA-TAVR) and transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) groups. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 511 patients who underwent TAVR were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing TA-TAVR had higher rates of peripheral vascular disease compared with TF-TAVR (56% vs 29%, p<0.001) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score (10.9 ± 4 vs 9.2 ± 4, p<0.001). TA-TAVR was associated with higher mortality at 1 year (32% vs 21%, p=0.01). However, there was no significant difference in very-long term mortality of patients undergoing TA-TAVR vs TF-TAVR (Figure). Conclusions: Long-term mortality following TAVR surpasses 50%. While in the first 2 years TA-TAVR is associated with higher mortality rates after three years the survival rates are similar in both approaches.

scholarly journals Indications and predictors for pacemaker implantation after isolated aortic valve replacement with bioprostheses: the CAREAVR study

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-404
Author(s):  
Samuli J Salmi ◽  
Tuomo Nieminen ◽  
Juha Hartikainen ◽  
Fausto Biancari ◽  
Joonas Lehto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Atrioventricular Block ◽  
Sick Sinus Syndrome ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Abstract OBJECTIVES We sought to study the indications, long-term occurrence, and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement with bioprostheses. METHODS The CAREAVR study included 704 patients (385 females, 54.7%) without a preoperative PPI (mean ± standard deviation age 75 ± 7 years) undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement at 4 Finnish hospitals between 2002 and 2014. Data were extracted from electronic patient records. RESULTS The follow-up was median 4.7 years (range 1 day to 12.3 years). Altogether 56 patients received PPI postoperatively, with the median 507 days from the operation (range 6 days to 10.0 years). The PPI indications were atrioventricular block (31 patients, 55%) and sick sinus syndrome (21 patients, 37.5%). For 4 patients, the PPI indication remained unknown. A competing risks regression analysis (Fine–Gray method), adjusted with age, sex, diabetes, coronary artery disease, preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, AF at discharge and urgency of operation, was used to assess risk factors for PPI. Only AF at discharge (subdistribution hazard ratio 4.34, 95% confidence interval 2.34–8.03) was a predictor for a PPI. CONCLUSIONS Though atrioventricular block is the major indication for PPI after surgical aortic valve replacement, &gt;30% of PPIs are implanted due to sick sinus syndrome during both short-term follow-up and long-term follow-up. Postoperative AF versus sinus rhythm conveys &gt;4-fold risk of PPI. Clinical trial registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02626871

scholarly journals Long-term survival after surgical aortic valve replacement among patients over 65 years of age

Open Heart ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e000338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansour T A Sharabiani ◽  
Francesca Fiorentino ◽  
Gianni D Angelini ◽  
Nishith N Patel
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

scholarly journals Preoperative Atrial Fibrillation is associated with long-term morTality in patients undergoing suRgical AortiC valvE Replacement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Farag ◽  
Yusuf Kiberu ◽  
Ashwin Reddy ◽  
Ahmad Shoaib ◽  
Mohaned Egred ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent after any cardiac surgery, but evidence suggests it may have no significant impact on survival if sinus rhythm (SR) is effectively restored early after the onset of the arrhythmia. In contrast, management of preoperative AF is often overlooked during or after cardiac surgery despite several proposed protocols. This study sought to evaluate the impact of preoperative AF on mortality in patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods We performed a retrospective, single-centre study involving 2,628 consecutive patients undergoing elective, primary isolated surgical AVR from 2008 to 2018. A total of 268/ 2,628 patients (10.1%) exhibited AF before surgery. The effect of preoperative AF on mortality was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Short-term mortality was 0.8% and was not different between preoperative AF and SR cohorts. Preoperative AF was highly predictive of long-term mortality (median follow-up of 4 years [Q1-Q3 2-7]; HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.79-2.79, P<0.001), and remained strongly and independently predictive after adjustment for other risk factors (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.21-1.96, P<0.001) compared with preoperative SR. In propensity score-matched analysis, the adjusted mortality risk was higher in the AF cohort (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-1.99, P=0.03) compared with the SR cohort. Conclusions Preoperative AF was independently predictive of long-term mortality in patients undergoing isolated surgical AVR. It remains to be seen whether concomitant surgery or other preoperative measures to correct AF may impact long-term survival.

scholarly journals Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis for Degenerative Aortic Valve Stenosis: Initial Experience With 67 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. E1065-E1069
Author(s):  
Dejan Lazovic ◽  
Mladen Kocica ◽  
Filip Vucicevic ◽  
Milica Kocica ◽  
Milos Grujic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Biological Prosthesis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Postoperative Time ◽  
The Right

Objective: The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the characteristics (positive and negative) of Perceval S valve in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis. The study included 67 patients operated on at our institution and a mean follow-up period of 18 months. Methods: From June 2016 to November 2019, 209 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis. Of these, 67 patients were included in the study based on the exclusion and inclusion criteria set before the study began. Their data were recorded during their hospital stay (preoperative, intraoperative, and early and late postoperative time). Results: Fifty-four patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (group I) with a Perceval S prosthesis, and 13 patients had combined aortic valve replacement procedures and CABG procedures (group II). Patients were implanted with the following prosthesis sizes: S (N = 12), M (N = 18), L (N = 28), or XL (N = 9). The Perceval S valve successfully was implanted in 67 (91.8%) patients (in 6 patients, the preoperative transthoracic echocardiographic data did not coincide with intraoperative TEE and surgical measurement of the size of the annulus in the suture). Surgical approaches in patients were medial sternotomy (N = 48), mini sternotomy (N = 15), and thoracotomy through the second intercostal space to the right (N = 4). The mean clamping time of the aorta and CPB length for isolated cases was 54 and 82 minutes, respectively, and 96 and 120 minutes for combined procedures. Four (5.9%) patients died within 30 days. Conclusion: Early postoperative results showed that the Perceval S valve was safe. Further follow up is required to evaluate the long-term duration of patients with this bioprosthesis.

scholarly journals Structural valve deterioration after aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta valve

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46
Author(s):  
Paul Werner ◽  
Jasmin Gritsch ◽  
Sabine Scherzer ◽  
Christoph Gross ◽  
Marco Russo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Single Centre Experience ◽  
Structural Valve Deterioration ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Valve In Valve

Abstract OBJECTIVES Despite promising short- and mid-term results for durability of the Trifecta valve, contradictory reports of early structural valve deterioration (SVD) do exist. We investigated the incidence of SVD after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with the Trifecta in our single-centre experience. METHODS Data of 347 consecutive patients (mean age 71.6 ± 9.5 years, 63.4% male) undergoing SAVR with the Trifecta between 2011 and 2017 were analysed. Clinical and echocardiographic reports were obtained with a median follow-up of 41 months (1114 patient years). RESULTS Isolated SAVR was performed in 122 patients (35.2%), whereas 225 patients (64.8%) underwent concomitant procedures. The median EuroSCORE II was 4.0 (0.9; 7.1) and 30-day mortality was 3.7% (n = 13). Kaplan–Meier estimates for the freedom of overall mortality at 1, 5 and 7 years were 88.7 ± 1.7%, 73.7 ± 2.6% and 64.7 ± 4.2%, respectively. SVD was observed in 25 patients (7.2%) with a median time to first diagnosis of 73 months. Freedom of SVD was 92.5 ± 0.9% at 5 years and 65.5 ± 7.1% at 7 years. Thirteen patients underwent reintervention for SVD (6 re-SAVR, 7 valve-in-valve), resulting in a freedom of reintervention for the SVD of 98.5 ± 1.1% at 5 years and 76.9 ± 6.9% at 7 years. CONCLUSIONS We herein report one of the highest rates of SVD after SAVR with the Trifecta. These data indicate that the durability of the prosthesis decreases at intermediate to long-term follow-up, leading to considerable rates of reintervention due to SVD.

scholarly journals The Aortic Annulus Stabilization Technique Prevents Paravalvular Leaks after Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Implantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5776
Author(s):  
Elena Caporali ◽  
Roberto Lorusso ◽  
Tiziano Torre ◽  
Francesca Toto ◽  
Alberto Pozzoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Stabilization Technique ◽  
Valve Implantation ◽  
Rapid Deployment

Background: Surgical aortic valve replacement with rapid deployment bioprosthesis guarantees good hemodynamic results but carries the risk of paravalvular leaks. To address this issue, an annulus stabilization technique has been recently developed. Methods: Clinical and hemodynamic parameters from patients treated for aortic valve replacement with the rapid deployment bioprosthesis and a concomitant annulus stabilization technique were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Echocardiographic data at discharge and at 1-year follow-up were collected and analysed. Results: A total of 57 patients (mean age 74.3 ± 6.1 years) with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement with the rapid deployment bioprosthesis and concomitant annulus stabilization technique (mean valve size: 23.8 ± 1.9 mm). Combined procedures accounted for 56.1%. Hospital mortality was 1.8% and a new pacemaker for conduction abnormalities was implanted in 10 patients. The pre-discharge echocardiographic control showed absence of paravalvular leaks of any degree in all patients with mean valve gradient of 9.6 ± 4.0 mmHg. The 1-year echocardiographic control confirmed the good valve hemodynamic (mean gradient of 8.0 ± 2.8 mmHg) and absence of leaks. Conclusion: In this preliminary clinical experience, the annulus stabilization technique prevents postoperative paravalvular leaks after rapid deployment aortic valve implantation, up to 1-year postoperatively. Studies on larger series are of paramount importance to confirm the long-term efficacy of this new surgical technique.

scholarly journals Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement—Age-Dependent Choice of Prosthesis Type

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 5554
Author(s):  
Keti Vitanova ◽  
Felix Wirth ◽  
Johannes Boehm ◽  
Melchior Burri ◽  
Rüdiger Lange ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Mechanical Prosthesis ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Recently, the use of surgically implanted aortic bioprostheses has been favoured in younger patients. We aimed to analyse the long-term survival and postoperative MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebral Event) rates in patients after isolated aortic valve replacement. Methods: We conducted a single-centre observational retrospective study, including all consecutive patients with isolated aortic valve replacement. 1:1 propensity score matching of the preoperative baseline characteristics was performed. Results: A total of 2172 patients were enrolled in the study. After propensity score matching the study included 428 patients: 214 biological vs. 214 mechanical prostheses, divided into two subgroups: group A < 60 years and group B > 60 years. The mean follow-up time was 7.6 ± 3.9 years. Estimated survival was 97 ± 1.9% and 89 ± 3.4% at 10 years for biological and mechanical prosthesis, respectively in group A (p = 0.06). In group B the survival at 10 years was 79.1 ± 5.8% and 69.8 ± 4.4% for biological and mechanical prosthesis, respectively (p = 0.83). In group A, patients with a bioprosthesis exhibited a tendency for higher cumulative incidence MACCE rates compared to patients with a mechanical prosthesis, p = 0.83 (bio 7.3 ± 5.3% vs. mech 4.6 ± 2.2% at 10 years). In group B, patients with a mechanical prosthesis showed a tendency for higher cumulative incidence MACCE rates compared to patients with bioprosthesis, p = 0.86 (bio 4.3 ± 3.1% vs. mech 9.1 ± 3.1% at 10 years). Conclusions: Long-term survival after surgical aortic valve replacement is similar in patients with a biological and mechanical prosthesis, independent of the patients’ age. Moreover, younger patients (<60 years) with bioprosthesis showed a survival benefit, compared to patients with mechanical prosthesis in this age group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document