scholarly journals P337 Edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation: impact of tethering pattern on clinical, echocardiographic and procedure-related characteristics

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Oneto Fernandez ◽  
M Ruiz Ortiz ◽  
M Delgado Ortega ◽  
A M Rodriguez Almodovar ◽  
R Gonzalez Manzanares ◽  
...  

Abstract Edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (E2E-MVR) has emerged as a therapeutical option in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). Two tethering patterns (TP) have been described in SMR: symmetric and asymmetric. However, information on the implications of these TP on E2E-MVR is limited. Our aim was to assess the impact of mitral valve TP on clinical, echocardiographic and procedure-related characteristics in patients undergoing E2E-MVR. We consecutively recruited 62 patients with at least moderate SMR who underwent E2E-MVR in our center between 2011 and 2019 and analysed clinical, echocardiographic and procedure-related characteristics according to TP, which we classified into symmetric and asymmetric considering jet direction and mitral valve leaflet position during systole by means of two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (Figure 1). In our series, 43 patients (69.3%) had symmetric TP and 19 (30.7%) had asymmetric TP. Asymmetric TP was associated with ischemic aetiology (52.6% vs 23.3%, p = 0.02) and a non-significant trend to higher frequency of male sex (89.5% vs 67.4%, p = 0.07), diabetes mellitus (52.6% vs 27.9%, p = 0.06), massive regurgitation (78.9% vs 58.1%, p = 0.11) and higher values of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (34 ± 9% vs 28 ± 11%, p = 0.06). There were no differences in procedure-related characteristic between groups, in particular in number of devices (1.63 [IQR 1-2] vs 1.52 [IQR 1-2], p = 0.27), number of graspings (3.21 [IQR 2-4] vs 2.78 [IQR 2-3], p = 0.16) and time of procedure (95 ± 38min vs 107 ± 43min, p = 0.29). Procedural success (defined as SMR severity reduction≥2) was high in both groups (89.5% vs 74.4%, p = 0.18). At discharge, there was a significant reduction in effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) in (0.36 ± 0.16cm² vs 0.15 ± 0.10cm², p < 0.001) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (46 ± 12mmHg vs 40 ± 12mmHg, p = 0.004). LVEF was impaired in patients with asymmetric TP but not in patients with symmetric TP (difference in LVEF after procedure: -5 ± 9% vs -0 ± 8%, p = 0.03). In our study, asymmetric TP was related to the ischemic aetiology of left ventricular dysfunction. Procedural characteristics, and EROA and PASP reductions at discharge were similar regardless of TP. However, patients with asymmetric TP had a significantly impairment in LVEF, probably because of afterload mismatch phenomenon. Abstract P337 Figure 1: example of tethering patterns

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Benito Gonzalez ◽  
X Freixa ◽  
C Godino ◽  
M Taramasso ◽  
R Estevez-Loureiro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Limited information has been reported regarding the impact of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) on ventricular arrhythmic (VA) burden. The aim of this study was to address the incidence of VA and appropriate antitachycardia implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies before and after PMVR. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with heart failure with reduce left ventricular ejection fraction, functional mitral regurgitation grade 3+ or 4+ and an active ICD or cardiac resynchronizer who underwent PMVR in any of the eleven recruiting centers. Only patients with complete available device VA monitoring from one-year before to one year after PMVR were included. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were collected before PMVR and at 12-months follow-up. Results 93 patients (68.2±10.9 years old, male 88.2%) were enrolled. PMVR was successfully performed in all patients and device success at discharge was 91.4%. At 12-months follow-up, we observed a significant reduction in mitral regurgitation severity, NT-proBNP and prevalence of severe pulmonary hypertension and severe kidney disease. Patients also referred a significant improvement in NYHA functional class and showed a non-significant trend to reserve left ventricular remodeling. After PMVR a significant decrease in the incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (5.0–17.8 vs 2.7–13.5, p=0.002), sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation (0.9–2.5 vs 0.5–2.9, p=0.012) and ICD antitachycardia therapies (2.5–12.0 vs 0.9–5.0, p=0.033) were observed. Conclusion PMVR was related to a reduction in arrhythmic burden and ICD therapies in our cohort. Proportion of patients who presented ven Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 427-430
Author(s):  
Xu Yu Jin ◽  
Rana Sayeed ◽  
John Pepper ◽  
Mario Petrou

Based on current guidelines, 15% to 20% of patients undergoing mitral valve repair for regurgitation develop left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 50%–55%) despite a normal baseline. Two schools of thought have been debated: preexisting myocardial disease or suboptimal intraoperative myocardial protection. In our view, they could be reconciled. It is well recognized that left ventricular ejection fraction with a standard cut off at 50%–55% has limited sensitivity in detecting early systolic impairment in mitral regurgitation patients. Mitral regurgitation also leads to mitochondrial oxidative stress, thus rendering the myocardium more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury and precipitating postoperative cardiac dysfunction. The fall in left ventricular ejection fraction early after mitral valve repair was shown to be caused by the reduction in both myocardial contractility and left ventricular stroke volume. To mitigate the risk to myocardial reperfusion injury, appropriate cardioplegia volume and distribution and well-defined surgical repair processes are equally important. We use transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioplegia delivery, imaging the intramyocardial flow and ensuring adequate protection of the subendocardium during mitral valve repair. Mild aortic regurgitation on a beating heart often leads to left ventricular dilatation with diminished cardioplegia flow in the myocardium, thus requiring direct ostia cardioplegia. Systematic transesophageal echocardiography assessment before surgery is essential for establishing the mitral regurgitation mechanisms and translating them into precise surgical repair strategies. The benefits of transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioplegia delivery warrant further clinical trials in order to evolve into part of a high surgical standard.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Cetinkaya ◽  
Maryam Waheed ◽  
Karin Bramlage ◽  
Oliver Johannes Liakopoulos ◽  
Mohamed Zeriouh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mitral regurgitation is a frequent valvular disease, with an increasing prevalence. We analysed the long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair procedures conducted over the last 10 years in our clinic using almost exclusively two different annuloplasty ring types. Methods A single-centre, retrospective analysis of mitral valve surgeries conducted between January 2005 and December 2015 for patients undergoing first-line mitral valve repair with either open (Cosgrove) or closed (CE Physio / Physio II) annuloplasty (OA or CA, respectively) rings. Results In total, 1120 patient documentations were available of which 528 underwent OA and 592 patients CA. The median age of patients was 64.0 years and 41.1% were female. The majority of these patients underwent the procedure because of degenerative valve disease. Rates of successful repair were about 90%, 72 h procedural mortality was 0.6% and the rate of re-intervention was 0.6% within the first 30 days. Functional (mitral regurgitation, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic diameter and New York Heart Association class) as well as hard outcomes were comparable. 77.7 and 74.4% of patients were alive at the 10-year follow-up in the OA and CA groups, respectively. Upon multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio was 0.926 (95% CI: 0.642–1.3135; p = 0.681). Conclusions The functional outcome and survival rates up to 10 years after mitral valve repair were comparable using open and closed annuloplasty rings. Whether this means these rings are interchangeable or a carefully selection of the best-for-the-patient devices will be subject of future investigations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenchen Wang ◽  
Wenbo Yang ◽  
Zhongwei Shi ◽  
Yuehua Fang

Abstract Purpose The relationship between surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) and renal function is not well described. We sought to evaluate renal function before and after surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) in degenerative significant MR. Methods Patients with primary severe ( 4+) MR and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who underwent surgical mitral valve repair, evaluated by a cutting-edge 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic probe were included in this study. Three CKD-EPI equations were used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before surgery and before patients discharge. Forty patients with baseline lower mean eGFR were studied. Results Measurements substantiated statistically remarkable improvements in eGFR (P<0.001), multivariable linear regression modeling demonstrated a strong association between increase of eGFR and reduction of MR (P=0.003), reduction of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP, P=0.018), as well as increase of forward stroke volume(FSV, P=0.02), regardless of the reduction of LVEF, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF). Conclusion Renal function improves after surgical mitral valve repair in patients with degenerative severe mitral regurgitation and preserved LVEF, despite of cardiac functional worsening.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Kavsur ◽  
C Iliadis ◽  
C Metze ◽  
M Spieker ◽  
V Tiyerili ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recent studies indicate that careful patient selection is key for the percutaneous edge-to-edge repair via MitraClip procedure. The MIDA Score represents a useful tool for patient selection and is validated in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). Aim We here assessed the potential benefit of the MIDA Score for patients with functional or degenerative MR undergoing edge-to-edge mitral valve repair via the MitraClip procedure. Methods In the present study, we retrospectively included 520 patients from three Heart Centers undergoing MitraClip implantation for MR. All parameters of the MIDA Score were available in these patients, consisting of the 7 variables age, symptoms, atrial fibrillation, left atrial diameter, right ventricular systolic pressure, left-ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction. According to the median MIDA-Score of 9 points, patients were stratified in to a high and a low MIDA Score group and association with all-cause mortality was evaluated. Moreover, MR was assessed in echocardiographic controls in 370 patients at discharge, 279 patients at 3-months and 222 patients at 12 months after MitraClip implantation. Results During 2-years follow-up after MitraClip implantation, 69 of 291 (24%) patients with a high MIDA Score and 25 of 229 (11%) patients with a low MIDA Score died. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test showed inferior rates of death in patients with a low score (p&lt;0.001) and multivariate cox regression revealed an odds ratio of 0.54 (0.31–0.95; p=0.032) regarding 2-year survival in this group. Moreover, one point increase in the MIDA Score was associated with a 1.18-fold increase in the risk for mortality (1.02–1.36; p=0.025). Comparing patients with a high MIDA Score and patients with a low score, post-procedural residual moderate/severe MR tended to be more frequent in patients with a high MIDA Score at discharge (53% vs 43%; p=0.061), 3-months (50% vs 40%; p=0.091) and significantly at 12-months follow-up (52% vs 37%; p=0.029). Conclusion The MIDA Mortality Risk Score remained its predictive ability in patients with degenerative or function MR undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. Moreover, a high MIDA score was associated with a higher frequency of post-procedural residual moderate/severe MR, indicating a lower effectiveness of this procedure in these patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Gasser ◽  
Maria von Stumm ◽  
Christoph Sinning ◽  
Ulrich Schaefer ◽  
Hermann Reichenspurner ◽  
...  

Objective: To identify echocardiographic and surgical risk factors for failure after mitral valve repair. Methods: We identified a total of 77 consecutive patients from our institutional mitral valve surgery database who required redo mitral valve surgery due to recurrence of mitral regurgitation after primary mitral valve repair. A control group of 138 patients who had a stable echocardiographic long-term result was included based on propensity score matching. Systematic analysis of echocardiographic parameters was performed before primary surgery; after mitral valve repair and prior to redo surgery. Risk factor analysis was performed using multivariate Cox regression model. Results: Redo surgery was associated with the presence of pulmonary hypertension ≥ 50 mmHg (p = 0.02), a mean transmitral gradient > 5 mmHg (p = 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% (p = 0.05) before surgery and mitral regurgitation ≥moderate at time of discharge (p = 0.002) in the whole cohort. Patients with functional mitral valve regurgitation had a higher tendency to undergo redo surgery if preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter exceeded 65 mm (p = 0.043) and if postoperative tenting height exceeded 6 mm (p = 0.018). Low ejection fraction was not significantly associated with the need for redo mitral valve surgery in the functional subgroup. Conclusions: Recurrent mitral regurgitation is still a valuable problem and is associated with relevant perioperative mortality. Patients with severe mitral regurgitation should undergo early mitral valve repair surgery as long as systolic pulmonary artery pressure is low, left ventricular ejection fraction is preserved, and LVEED is deceeds 65 mm.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Stolz ◽  
M Orban ◽  
D Braun ◽  
P Doldi ◽  
M Orban ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The impact of mitral valve (MV) tethering patterns on outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) for severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is unknown. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of asymmetric postero-anterior and medio-lateral MV leaflet tethering on procedural and survival outcomes after TEER for SMR. Methods Symmetry of postero-anterior leaflet tethering was defined as the ratio of the posterior to anterior MV leaflet angle (PLA/ALA) in the central MV segment 2. The ratio of the tenting area between MV segments 3 and 1 (S3/S1 ratio) was defined as medio-lateral tethering symmetry. We used receiver operating characteristics and a proportional Cox model to identify cut-off values of asymmetric postero-anterior and medio-lateral tethering for prediction of two-year survival after TEER. Results 178 patients receiving TEER for SMR were included. Asymmetric postero-anterior tethering was observed in 67 patients (37.6%, PLA/ALA ratio cut-off &gt;1.54). Medio-lateral tethering was asymmetric in 49 patients (27.5%, S3/S1 ratio cut-off &gt;1.49). MR was reduced to MR ≤2+ in 91.6% of patients, while postprocedural MR remained higher in the presence of asymmetric postero-anterior tethering (p=0.01). After adjustment for potential clinical and echocardiographic confounders, multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed asymmetric postero-anterior tethering (HR=2.77, CI=1.43–5.38, p&lt;0.01) and asymmetric medio-lateral tethering (HR=2.90, CI=1.54–5.45, p&lt;0.01) as independent predictors for two-year survival. Conclusions Asymmetric postero-anterior and medio-lateral MV leaflet tethering patterns independently increase two-year all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TEER for SMR. Detailed echocardiographic patient selection might improve outcomes after TEER. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Postero-anterior tethering Medio-lateral tethering


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (27) ◽  
pp. 2206-2214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annelieke H J Petrus ◽  
Olaf M Dekkers ◽  
Laurens F Tops ◽  
Eva Timmer ◽  
Robert J M Klautz ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) has been reported after mitral valve repair for functional MR. However, the impact of recurrent MR on long-term survival remains poorly defined. In the present study, mortality-adjusted recurrent MR rates, the clinical impact of recurrent MR and its determinants were studied in patients after mitral valve repair with revascularization for functional MR in the setting of ischaemic heart disease. Methods and results Long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcome was evaluated in 261 consecutive patients after restrictive mitral annuloplasty and revascularization for moderate to severe functional MR, between 2000 and 2014. The cumulative incidence of recurrent MR ≥ Grade 2, assessed by competing risk analysis, was 9.6 ± 1.8% at 1-year, 20.3 ± 2.5% at 5-year, and 27.6 ± 2.9% at 10-year follow-up. Cumulative survival was 85.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 81.0–90.0] at 1-year, 67.3% (95% CI 61.1–72.6%) at 5-year, and 46.1% (95% CI 39.4–52.6%) at 10-year follow-up. Age, preoperative New York Heart Association Class III or IV, a history of renal failure, and recurrence of MR expressed as a time-dependent variable [HR 3.28 (1.87–5.75), P < 0.001], were independently associated with an increased mortality risk. Female gender, a history of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, a preoperative QRS duration ≥120 ms, a higher preoperative MR grade, and a higher indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume were independently associated with an increased likelihood of recurrent MR. Conclusion Mitral valve repair for functional ischaemic MR resulted in a low incidence of recurrent MR with favourable clinical outcome up to 10 years after surgery. Presence of recurrent MR at any moment after surgery proved to be independently associated with an increased risk for mortality.


Author(s):  
Tetsu Tanaka ◽  
Refik Kavsur ◽  
Maximilian Spieker ◽  
Christos Iliadis ◽  
Clemens Metze ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hepatorenal dysfunction is a strong prognostic predictor in patients with heart failure. However, the prognostic impact of the hepatorenal dysfunction in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) has not been well studied. Methods In consecutive patients who underwent edge-to-edge TMVR at three German centers, the model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio (MELD-XI) score was calculated as 5.11 × ln [serum total bilirubin (mg/dl)] + 11.76 × ln [serum creatinine (mg/dl)] + 9.44. Patients were stratified into high (> 11) or low (≤ 11) MELD-XI score of which an incidence of the composite outcome, consisting of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization, within 2 years after TMVR was assessed. Results Of the 881 patients, the mean MELD-XI score was 11.0 ± 5.9, and 415 patients (47.1%) had high MELD-XI score. The MELD-XI score was correlated with male, effective regurgitant orifice area, and tricuspid regurgitation severity and inversely related to left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with high MELD-XI score had a higher incidence of the composite outcome than those with low MELD-XI score (47.7% vs. 29.8%; p < 0.0001), and in multivariable analysis, the high MELD-XI score was an independent predictor of the composite outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.77; p = 0.04). Additionally, the MELD-XI score as a continuous variable was also an independent predictor (adjusted HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.05; p = 0.048). Conclusions The MELD-XI score was associated with clinical outcomes within 2 years after TMVR and can be a useful risk-stratification tool in patients undergoing TMVR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document