scholarly journals Pulmonary congestion during exercise stress echocardiography in ischaemic, heart failure and valvular patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Merli ◽  
A Zagatina ◽  
P.M Merlo ◽  
R Arbucci ◽  
C Borguezan Daros ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lung ultrasound (LUS) detects pulmonary congestion as B-lines at rest and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE). Aim To assess the prevalence of B-lines during ESE in different cardiovascular diseases. Methods We performed ESE plus LUS (4-site simplified scan) in 4419 subjects referred for semi-supine bike ESE in 28 certified centers. B-lines score ranged from 0 (normal) to 40 (severely abnormal). Stress B-lines abnormal result was ≥2 units. Six different populations were evaluated: healthy controls (n=103); chronic coronary syndromes (CCS, n=3701); heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n=395); heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, n=70); valvular heart disease (VHD) for ischemic mitral regurgitation ≥moderate at rest (n=123); repaired tetralogy of Fallot (ToF, n=27). Results Feasibility of B-lines was 100% at rest and peak ESE in all subjects. Imaging and analysis time were <1 minute. B-lines (median) were not detectable in healthy subjects (rest=0.1 [0–1] vs 0.1 [0–1], p=ns) and TOF (rest=0.2 [0–2] vs 0.3 [0–4], p=ns), but were present in all other groups: see figure. During ESE, B-lines increased in CCS (rest=0.5 [0–24] vs ESE=1.3 [0–28], p<0.001); HFrEF (rest=1.4 [0–35] vs ESE=2.9 [0–40], p<0.001); HFpEF (rest=0.3 [0–2] vs ESE=3.4 [0–12], p<0.001), VHD (rest=1.7 [0–12] vs ESE=4.3 [0–23], p<0.001). Stress B-lines were correlated with stress-rest change in wall motion score index in CCS (r=0.325, p<0.001), contractile reserve in HFrEF (r=−0.266, p<0.001) and in VHD (r=−.0300, p=0.001), left atrial volume stress-rest change in HFpEF (r=0.287, p=0.043). Conclusion B-lines identify the pulmonary congestion phenotype at rest and more frequently during ESE in patients with different coronary, myocardial or valvular heart disease, all sharing the final common pathway of acute backward left heart failure through different disease-specific mechanisms. B-lines are absent in healthy subjects and in conditions inducing a mostly right-sided overload such as repaired ToF. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. B-lines at rest and during stress. Percentage (%) of rest (empty bar) and stress (full bar) B-lines abnormality (≥2 units) in six different study groups.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Sharma ◽  
David E Newby ◽  
Ralph A H Stewart ◽  
Mildred Lee ◽  
Ruvin Gabriel ◽  
...  

Stress echocardiography is recommended for the assessment of asymptomatic patients with severe valvular heart disease (VHD) when there is discrepancy between symptoms and resting markers of severity. The aim of this study is to determine the prognostic value of exercise stress echocardiography in patients with common valve lesions. One hundred and fifteen patients with VHD (aortic stenosis (n=28); aortic regurgitation (n=35); mitral regurgitation, (n=26); mitral stenosis (n=26)), and age- and sex-matched controls (n=39) with normal ejection fraction underwent exercise stress echocardiography. The primary endpoint was a composite of death or hospitalization for heart failure. Asymptomatic VHD patients had lower exercise capacity than controls and 37% of patients achieved <85% of their predicted metabolic equivalents (METS). There were three deaths and four hospital admissions, and 24 patients underwent surgery during follow-up. An abnormal stress echocardiogram (METS <5, blood pressure rise <20 mmHg, or pulmonary artery pressure post exercise >60 mmHg) was associated with an increased risk of death or hospital admission (14% vs 1%, P<0.0001). The assessment of contractile reserve did not offer additional predictive value. In conclusion, an abnormal stress echocardiogram is associated with death and hospitalization with heart failure at 2 years. Stress echocardiography should be considered as part of the routine follow-up of all asymptomatic patients with VHD.


Author(s):  
Vidhu Anand ◽  
Garvan C Kane ◽  
Christopher G Scott ◽  
Sorin V Pislaru ◽  
Rosalyn O Adigun ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims  Cardiac power is a measure of cardiac performance that incorporates both pressure and flow components. Prior studies have shown that cardiac power predicts outcomes in patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). We sought to evaluate the prognostic significance of peak exercise cardiac power and power reserve in patients with normal EF. Methods and results  We performed a retrospective analysis in 24 885 patients (age 59 ± 13 years, 45% females) with EF ≥50% and no significant valve disease or right ventricular dysfunction, undergoing exercise stress echocardiography between 2004 and 2018. Cardiac power and power reserve (developed power with stress) were normalized to LV mass and expressed in W/100 g of LV myocardium. Endpoints at follow-up were all-cause mortality and diagnosis of heart failure (HF). Patients in the higher quartiles of power/mass (rest, peak stress, and power reserve) were younger and had higher peak blood pressure and heart rate, lower LV mass, and lower prevalence of comorbidities. During follow-up [median 3.9 (0.6–8.3) years], 929 patients died. After adjusting for age, sex, metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved, ischaemia/infarction on stress test results, medication, and comorbidities, peak stress power/mass was independently associated with mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), highest vs. lowest quartile, 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4–0.6, P &lt; 0.001] and HF at follow-up [adjusted HR, highest vs. lowest quartile, 0.4, 95% CI (0.3, 0.5), P &lt; 0.001]. Power reserve showed similar results. Conclusion  The assessment of cardiac power during exercise stress echocardiography in patients with normal EF provides valuable prognostic information, in addition to stress test findings on inducible myocardial ischaemia and exercise capacity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Gargani ◽  
N Pugliese ◽  
F Frassi ◽  
S Masi ◽  
P Landi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lung-ultrasound B-lines are the sonographic sign of pulmonary congestion and are present in patients with heart failure (HF). Their role as a diagnostic marker is quite established since they can be used for the differential diagnosis of dyspnea to both rule in or rule out HF, whereas their prognostic value at admission is less known. Purpose To assess the prognostic value of B-lines at admission in patients admitted to a Cardiology Department with a diagnosis of HF with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. Methods We enrolled a total of 310 consecutive in-patients (aged 69 ± 12 years, 751 males) who underwent on admission a two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation coupled with lung ultrasound assessment of B-lines, according to standardised protocols. The total number of B-line was obtained by summing the number of B-lines from 28 scanning sites on the anterior and lateral right and left hemithorax, as previously described. Results All patients were followed-up for a median period of 15 (interquartile range: 5-28) months for death and HF readmission. During the follow-up, 79 events occurred. Among standard echocardiographic parameters, ejection fraction (EF) &lt;50%, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) &lt; 17 mm, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) ³35 mmHg, inferior vena cava diameter &gt;21 mm and total B-lines ³30 were predictors of events at univariate analysis, whereas only B-lines ³30 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-4.10) and TAPSE &lt;17 mm (HR 0.53; CI 0.29-0.97) were independent predictors at multivariate analysis. When analysing separately HFpEF patients (105 patients, 33.9%), B-lines ³30 was the only independent predictor of events (HR 6.11; CI 1.49-25.05) (Figure). Conclusions B-lines are a simple, user-friendly, bedside echographic sign of pulmonary congestion, that provides useful information not only for the diagnosis but also for the prognosis of HF patients. Their added value among standard echocardiographic parameters is stronger in patients with HFpEF compared to HFrEF. An integrated cardiopulmonary ultrasound assessment at HF admission provides excellent value for both diagnostic and prognostic stratification. Abstract P1479 Figure


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document