Additive prognostic values of NT-proBNP and exercise stress echocardiography in asymptomatic patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 387-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Ji Park ◽  
Eun Jeong Cho ◽  
Joonghyun Ahn ◽  
Keumhee Carriere ◽  
Eun Kyoung Kim ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3013
Author(s):  
Juyoun Kim ◽  
Jae-Sik Nam ◽  
Youngdo Kim ◽  
Ji-Hyun Chin ◽  
In-Cheol Choi

Background: Left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) can occur immediately after mitral valve repair (MVr) for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) in some patients with normal preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study investigated whether forward LVEF, calculated as left ventricular outflow tract stroke volume divided by left ventricular end-diastolic volume, could predict LVD immediately after MVr in patients with DMR and normal LVEF. Methods: Echocardiographic and clinical data were retrospectively evaluated in 234 patients with DMR ≥ moderate and preoperative LVEF ≥ 60%. LVD and non-LVD were defined as LVEF < 50% and ≥50%, respectively, as measured by echocardiography after MVr and before discharge. Results: Of the 234 patients, 52 (22.2%) developed LVD at median three days (interquartile range: 3–4 days). Preoperative forward LVEF in the LVD and non-LVD groups were 24.0% (18.9–29.5%) and 33.2% (26.4–39.4%), respectively (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that forward LVEF was predictive of LVD, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.73–0.86), and an optimal cut-off was 31.8% (sensitivity: 88.5%, specificity: 58.2%, positive predictive value: 37.7%, and negative predictive value: 94.6%). Preoperative forward LVEF significantly correlated with preoperative mitral regurgitant volume (correlation coefficient [CC] = −0.86, p < 0.001) and regurgitant fraction (CC = −0.98, p < 0.001), but not with preoperative LVEF (CC = 0.112, p = 0.088). Conclusion: Preoperative forward LVEF could be useful in predicting postoperative LVD immediately after MVr in patients with DMR and normal LVEF, with an optimal cut-off of 31.8%.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Cetin Guvenc ◽  
E Arugaslan ◽  
T S Guvenc ◽  
F Ozpamuk Karadeniz ◽  
H Kasikcioglu ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None declared. Background and Aims It is difficult to determine left ventricular systolic performance in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) since left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) could be preserved until the end stages of the disease. Myocardial efficiency describes the amount of external work (EW) done by the left ventricle per unit of oxygen consumed (mVO2). In the present study, we aimed to investigate MEf in patients with asymptomatic severe MR using a novel echocardiographic method. Methods: A total of 27 patients with severe asymptomatic MR and 26 healthy volunteers were included in this cross-sectional study. EW was measured using stroke volume and blood pressure, while mVO2 was estimated using double product and LV mass. Results: There were no differences between the groups with regards to EF (66%±5% vs. 69%±7%), while MEf was significantly reduced in patients with severe MR (25%±11% vs. 44%±12%, p &lt; 0.001) (Table 1). This difference was maintained even after adjustment for age, gender and body surface area (adjusted :0.44, 95%CI: 0.39–0.49 for controls and adjusted :0.24, 95%CI: 0.19–0.29 for patients with severe MR). Further analysis showed that this reduction was due to an increase in total mVO2 in the severe MR group (Figure 1). Conclusions: Myocardial efficiency was significantly lower in patients with asymptomatic severe MR and preserved EF. Table 1 Parameter Control Group (n = 26) Severe Mitral Regurgitation (n = 27) P Value Age (y) 36.5 ± 8.9 41.3 ± 14.2 0.23 Gender (%Male) 9 (35%) 10 (37%) 1.0 BSA (m2) 1.82 ± 0.20 1.76 ± 0.18 0.64 LV End-Diastolic Volume (ml) 83.13 ± 18.88 121.91 ± 37.63 &lt;0.001 LV End-Systolic Volume (ml) 28.07 ± 9.57 45.30 ± 17.42 &lt;0.001 Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%) 0.69 ± 0.07 0.66 ± 0.05 0.29 Systolic Mitral Velocity (cm/s) 7.88 ± 1.14 8.07 ± 1.81 0.66 Stroke Work (j) 1.14 ± 0.21 1.15 ± 0.36 0.91 Minute External Work (j) 65.96 ± 14.71 70.17 ± 23.15 0.85 mVO2 (ml.min-1.100g-1) 6.79 ± 1.93 9.48 ± 4.71 0.02 Total mVO2 (j) 166.58 ± 77.14 346.46 ± 202.71 &lt;0.001 Myocardial Efficiency (%) 44 ± 12 25 ± 11 &lt;0.001 Table 1. Demographic, anthropometric, echocardiographic and mechanoenergetic data for study groups. BSA, body surface area; LV, left ventricle; mVO2, myocardial oxygen consumption. Abstract 559 Figure 1


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document